IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,446,793
Granted Patent B2
US 12,446,793 · App. 17/016,497 · Granted Oct 21, 2025

System and process of utilizing image data to place a member

Inventor: David E. Macht (Littleton, CO)
Assignee: Medtronic Navigation, Inc.
A61B5/061A61B5/4851A61B6/12A61B6/486A61B6/505A61B34/10G06T3/403G06T7/0012A61B6/485A61B17/56A61B2034/105A61B2034/2055A61B2034/2068A61B2090/3762A61F2/00A61F7/02
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,446,793
App. No.
17/016,497
Filed
Sep 10, 2020
Granted
Oct 21, 2025
Kind
B2
Art Unit
3798
USPC
600/424
Abstract

Disclosed is a system for acquiring and using image data and generating a three-dimensional reconstruction of a subject. The three-dimensional reconstruction can be used to assist in determining various features, including axis and planes of a subject or members placed relative to the subject. The system can be implemented to plan and perform a procedure relative to the subject.

Claims (56)

1. A method for using an x-ray imaging system with a procedure, the method comprising:

executing instructions with a processor to automatically:

access at least a three-dimensional image reconstruction of a subject representing an actual post-procedure condition of the subject based upon projections from a post-procedure x-ray image data set;

determine at least one anatomical landmark of the subject in the three-dimensional image reconstruction of the subject;

determine a geometric configuration representative of a portion of the subject based on the three-dimensional image reconstruction of the subject and the at least one anatomical landmark;

display an icon of the at least one anatomical landmark and the geometric configuration superimposed on the three-dimensional image reconstruction of the subject, where the geometric configuration is at least one of an anatomical plane icon or an anatomical angle icon; and

determine a similarity between the actual post-procedure condition of the subject based on the determined geometric configuration and at least one pre-determined desired post-procedure configuration of the subject.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the at least one anatomical landmark comprises determining an ipsilateral anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS), a contralateral ASIS, at least one pubic tubercle, or combinations thereof.

3. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

determining the at least one pre-determined desired post-procedure configuration of the subject based at least on the three-dimensional image reconstruction of the subject representing the actual post-procedure condition of the subject.

4. The method of claim 3 , wherein the three-dimensional image reconstruction includes both the subject and a prosthetic device.

5. The method of claim 4 , further comprising:

executing instructions with a processor to automatically:

access the post-procedure x-ray image data after positioning the prosthetic device relative to the subject that represents the actual post-procedure condition of the subject and of the prosthetic device.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the geometric configuration superimposed on the three-dimensional image reconstruction further comprises at least one of a length, a plane, an axis, and an angle.

7. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

executing instructions with a processor to automatically:

acquire from an imaging system a pre-procedure x-ray image data set comprising a pre-procedure condition of the subject; and

generate a pre-procedure three-dimensional image reconstruction of at least the portion of the subject based on the pre-procedure x-ray image data set.

8. The method of claim 7 , further comprising:

executing further instructions with the processor to:

determine the at least one anatomical landmark in the pre-procedure three-dimensional image reconstruction, and

determine a pre-procedure geometric configuration representative of at least the portion of the subject.

9. The method of claim 7 , further comprising:

executing instructions with a processor to automatically:

recall the at least one desired pre-determined post-procedure configuration of the subject based on the pre-procedure x-ray image data set.

10. A system for use with an x-ray imaging system for a procedure, the system comprising:

a processor configured to recall instructions from a memory and execute instructions to:

access projections from a post-procedure x-ray image data set representing an actual post-procedure condition of a subject;

determine at least one anatomical landmark in a three-dimensional image reconstruction of the subject representing the actual post-procedure condition based upon the accessed projections from the post-procedure x-ray image data set,

determine a geometric configuration representative of a portion of the subject, where the geometric configuration is at least one of an anatomical plane or an anatomical angle,

display an icon of the at least one anatomical landmark and the geometric configuration superimposed on the three-dimensional image reconstruction of the subject, where the geometric configuration is at least one of an anatomical plane icon or an anatomical angle icon, and

determine a similarity between the actual post-procedure condition of the subject to at least one predetermined desired post-procedure configuration of the subject; and

an output device configured to display for viewing the determined similarity.

11. The system of claim 10 , wherein the processor is configured to execute further instructions to:

access a pre-procedure x-ray image data of the subject,

determine the at least one anatomical landmark in a first three-dimensional image reconstruction based on the accessed pre-procedure x-ray image data of the subject, and

determine a pre-procedure geometric configuration representative of at least the portion of the subject.

12. The system of claim 10 , wherein the processor is configured to execute further instructions to recall the predetermined desired post-procedure configuration of the subject based on the three-dimensional image reconstruction of the subject representing an actual post-procedure condition of the subject.

13. A method for using an x-ray imaging system with a procedure, the method comprising:

operating a processor to execute instructions to automatically (i) generate a first three-dimensional image reconstruction of a subject based on projections from a first x-ray image data set, (ii) determine at least one anatomical landmark in the first three-dimensional image reconstruction, and (iii) determine a first geometric configuration of a portion of the subject based on the at least one anatomical landmark;

acquiring projections from a second x-ray image data set after at least a portion of the procedure;

operating the processor or a second processor to execute further instructions to automatically (i) generate a second three-dimensional image reconstruction of the subject based at least on the projections of the second x-ray image data set, (ii) determine the at least one anatomical landmark in the second three-dimensional image reconstruction, and (iii) determine a second geometric configuration of the portion of the subject based on the at least one anatomical landmark;

evaluating the determined second geometric configuration to compare the determined second geometric configuration to a predetermined desired post-procedure configuration;

determining to complete the procedure based at least on outputting the evaluation and comparison;

wherein each of the first and second geometric configurations is at least one of an anatomical plane or an anatomical angle; and

displaying the second three-dimensional image reconstruction for the evaluation, including displaying an icon of the at least one anatomical landmark and the second geometric configuration superimposed on the second three-dimensional image reconstruction, where the second geometric configuration is at least one of anatomical plane icon or an anatomical angle icon.

14. The method of claim 13 , further comprising:

acquiring the projections from the first x-ray image data set of the subject; and

predetermining the desired post-procedure configuration based on the acquired projections from the first x-ray image data set of the subject and the first three-dimensional image reconstruction and the at least one anatomical landmark.

15. The method of claim 14 , further comprising:

determining the desired post procedure configuration of the subject prior to acquiring the projections from the second x-ray image data set.

16. The method of claim 15 , wherein the desired post procedure configuration of the subject includes at least one of a length, a plane, an axis, or an angle based on the at least one anatomical landmark.

17. The method of claim 16 , wherein the determined second geometric configuration and the predetermined desired post-procedure configuration are both related to a configuration relative to a pelvis of the subject.

18. The method of claim 17 , wherein the at least one anatomical landmark includes an ipsilateral anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS), a contralateral ASIS, at least one pubic tubercle, or combinations thereof.

19. The method of claim 17 , wherein the at least one anatomical landmark comprises a femur landmark including at least one of an ipsilateral lesser trochanter, a contralateral lesser trochanter, or combinations thereof.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 10, 2020
From: MACHT, DAVID E.
To: MEDTRONIC NAVIGATION, INC.
Reel/Frame 053730/0545 →
Continuity (2)
Continuation 13750550 · Jan 25, 2013
Related Publication 20200405180A1 · Dec 31, 2020
References Cited (59)
US 6322565B1 · Garner et al. · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 6674883B1 · Wei et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 7764985B2 · McCombs et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 8233963B2 · Hartmann et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8239001B2 · Verard et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8271069B2 · Jascob et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8308361B2 · Gregerson et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8320991B2 · Jascob et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8325873B2 · Helm et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8861818B2 · Ito et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 10779751B2 · Macht · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20030153829A1 · Sarin et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20030176860A1 · Shimura · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20030194057A1 · Dewaele · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20040133276A1 · Lang et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20050065617A1 · Moctezuma de la Barrera et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20060293614A1 · Radinsky et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20080287781A1 · Revie et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20090198276A1 · Lee · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20100030231A1 · Revie et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20110313424A1 · Bono et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20120230573A1 · Ito et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20130072821A1 · Odermatt · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20130172731A1 · Gole · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20140005522A1 · Zurovcik · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20140031664A1 · Kang · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20140081659A1 · Nawana · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20140093154A1 · Penenberg · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140188240A1 · Lang · 2014 [cited by examiner]
CN 102647962A · 2012 [cited by applicant]
EP 2505165A1 · 2012 [cited by applicant]
JP 2002159478A · 2002 [cited by applicant]
JP 2003271749A · 2003 [cited by applicant]
JP 2008534208A · 2008 [cited by applicant]
JP 2008531163A · 2008 [cited by applicant]
JP 2009136426A · 2009 [cited by applicant]
WO 2006079211A1 · 2006 [cited by applicant]
WO 2006109022A2 · 2006 [cited by applicant]
WO 2011065378A1 · 2011 [cited by applicant]
Japanese Office Action regarding Application No. 2020016087, mailed Jan. 17, 2022. [cited by applicant]
Australian Office Action mailed Aug. 25, 2017 for Australian Application No. 2014209244 corresponding to PCT/2014/012958 which claims benefit of U.S. Appl. No. 13/750,550, filed Jan. 25, 2013. [cited by applicant]
Babisch, et al. “The rationale for tilt-adjusted acetabular cup navigation.” J Bone Joint Surg AM, Feb. 2008, 357-365. [cited by applicant]
Chinese Office Action for CN Application No. 201480005976.6 dated Mar. 17, 2017 corresponding to PCT/2014/012958 which claims benefit of U.S. Appl. No. 13/750,550, filed Jan. 25, 2013. [cited by applicant]
Chinese Office Action mailed Jul. 10, 2018 in corresponding Chinese Application No. 2014800005976.6. [cited by applicant]
Dikmen, et al., “Joint Detection And Localization Of Multiple Anatomical Landmarks Through Learning”, Medical Imaging 2008, Computer Aided Diagnosis, vol. 6915, 691538, (2008). [cited by applicant]
European Office Action for EP Application No. 14708127.7 dated Mar. 20, 2017 corresponding to PCT/2014/012958 which claims benefit of U.S. Appl. No. 13/750,550, filed Jan. 25, 2013. [cited by applicant]
European Office Action mailed Jan. 18, 2018 in corresponding European Application No. 14708127.7. [cited by applicant]
International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion mailed Aug. 6, 2015 for PCT/US2014/012958 claiming benefit of U.S. Appl. No. 13/750,550, filed Jan. 25, 2013. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed Jun. 6, 2014 for PCT/US2014/012958 claiming benefit of U.S. Appl. No. 13/750,550, filed Jan. 25, 2013. [cited by applicant]
Japanese Office Action for JP Application No. 2015-555344 dated Oct. 21, 2016 corresponding to PCT/2014/012958 which claims benefit of U.S. Appl. No. 13/750,550, filed Jan. 25, 2013. [cited by applicant]
Japanese Office Action for JP Application No. 2015-555344 mailed May 26, 2017 corresponding to PCT/2014/012958 which claims benefit of U.S. Appl. No. 13/750,550, filed Jan. 25, 2013. [cited by applicant]
Japanese Office Action for JP Application No. 2017-184401, dated Oct. 2, 2019. [cited by applicant]
Japanese Office Action mailed Jun. 14, 2018 in corresponding Japanese Application No. 14752477.1. [cited by applicant]
Murray, D.W. “The Definition and Measurement of Acetabular Orientation,” J Bone Joint Surg AM, 1993, 228-232. [cited by applicant]
Office Action mailed Jan. 11, 2019 in corresponding Chinese Application No. 201480005976.6. [cited by applicant]
Office Action mailed Mar. 14, 2019 in corresponding Japanese Application No. 2017-184401. [cited by applicant]
Office Action regarding Canadian Patent Application No. 2,898,634, dated Jan. 7, 2020. [cited by applicant]
Office Action regarding Japanese Patent Application No. 2020-016087 (with English Translation), dated Mar. 31, 2021. [cited by applicant]
Canadian Office Action regarding Application No. 2,898,634, dated May 6, 2022. [cited by applicant]