IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,452,197
Granted Patent B2
US 12,452,197 · App. 18/466,377 · Granted Oct 21, 2025

System and method for proactive intervention to reduce high cost channel usage

Inventors: Scott Karp (Washington, DC); Erik Mueller (Chevy Chase, MD)
Assignee: Capital One Services, LLC
H04L51/02
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,452,197
App. No.
18/466,377
Filed
Sep 13, 2023
Granted
Oct 21, 2025
Kind
B2
Art Unit
2443
USPC
709/206
Abstract

Embodiments disclosed herein generally relate to a system and method for proactively generating an intervening message for a remote client device in response to an anticipated user action. A computing system receives one or more streams of user activity. The one or more streams of user activity include interaction with a server of an organization via an application executing on the remote client device. The computing system inputs the one or more streams of user activity into a prediction model. The computing system identifies an anticipated user action based on a prediction output from the prediction model. The computing system determines, based on a solution model, a proposed solution to the anticipated user action. The computing system generates an anticipated message to be transmitted to the remote client device of the user. The computing system transmits the anticipated message to the remote client device of the user.

Claims (81)

1. A method, comprising:

identifying, by a computing system, a user action originating from a mobile application operating on a user device authorized to access an account of a user managed by the computing system by detecting a trigger event from one or more user interactions with the mobile application;

inputting, by the computing system, the user action into a prediction model configured to predict a future action to be taken by the user;

determining, by the computing system, that a bandwidth of a primary communication channel can be reduced by identifying an alternate communication channel capable of processing the future action to be made by the user; and

based on determining that the bandwidth of the primary communication channel can be reduced, generating, by the computing system, a message to be transmitted to the user via the alternate communication channel before the user accesses the primary communication channel for performing the future action and transmitting the message to the user via the alternate communication channel, wherein the prediction preempts utilization of the primary communication channel for the future action.

2. The method of claim 1 wherein identifying the alternate communication channel capable of processing the future action comprises:

determining a complexity of addressing the future action to be taken by the user; and

determining that the alternate communication channel can handle the complexity of the future action.

3. The method of claim 1 wherein identifying the alternate communication channel capable of processing the future action comprises:

identifying at least two alternate communication channels comprising a first alternate communication channel and a second alternate communication channel;

determining that the first alternate communication channel is capable of processing the future action;

determining that the second alternate communication channel is not capable of processing the future action; and

selecting the first alternate communication channel as the alternate communication channel capable of processing the future action.

4. The method of claim 1 wherein identifying the alternate communication channel capable of processing the future action comprises:

identifying at least two alternate communication channels comprising a first alternate communication channel and a second alternate communication channel;

determining that the first alternate communication channel and the second alternate communication channel are both capable of processing the future action;

determining that there is more bandwidth available on the first alternate communication channel than the second alternate communication channel; and

selecting the first alternate communication channel as the alternate communication channel capable of processing the future action.

5. The method of claim 1 wherein identifying, by the computing system, the user action further comprises:

detecting a trigger event by monitoring online interactions with a webpage associated with the account,

detecting a trigger event by monitoring online activity of the user device, and

detecting a trigger event by monitoring user interactions with an SMS message, a chat program, an IVR system, or combinations thereof.

6. The method of claim 1 further comprising:

determining a solution to preempt the future action to be performed by the user; and

performing the solution on behalf of the user, wherein the message comprises an indication that the solution was performed, and wherein the trigger event is associated with navigating to a customer service chatbot.

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein identifying, by the computing system, the user action originating from the user device comprises:

detecting a trigger event by monitoring the one or more user interactions with the mobile application, the one or more user interactions comprising payment of an account, transferring funds, navigating to a customer service chatbot, searching for previous transactions, changing personal identification information, a loan application, a credit application, or combinations thereof.

8. A non-transitory computer readable medium comprising one or more sequences of instructions, which, when executed by one or more processors, causes a computing system to perform operations comprising:

identifying, by the computing system, a user action related to an account of a user managed by the computing system, the user action comprising a trigger event associated with a loan application or credit application;

inputting, by the computing system, the user action into a prediction model configured to predict a future action to be taken by the user;

determining, by the computing system, that a bandwidth of a primary communication channel can be reduced by identifying an alternate communication channel capable of processing the future action to be made by the user; and

based on determining that the bandwidth of a primary communication channel can be reduced, generating, by the computing system, a message to be transmitted to the user via the alternate communication channel before the user accesses the primary communication channel for performing the future action and transmitting the message to the user via the alternate communication channel, wherein the prediction preempts utilization of the primary communication channel for the future action.

9. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 8 , wherein identifying the alternate communication channel capable of processing the future action comprises:

determining a complexity of addressing the future action to be taken by the user; and

determining that the alternate communication channel can handle the complexity of the future action.

10. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 8 , wherein identifying the alternate communication channel capable of processing the future action comprises:

identifying at least two alternate communication channels comprising a first alternate communication channel and a second alternate communication channel;

determining that the first alternate communication channel is capable of processing the future action;

determining that the second alternate communication channel is not capable of processing the future action; and

selecting the first alternate communication channel as the alternate communication channel capable of processing the future action.

11. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 8 , wherein identifying the alternate communication channel capable of processing the future action comprises:

identifying at least two alternate communication channels comprising a first alternate communication channel and a second alternate communication channel;

determining that the first alternate communication channel and the second alternate communication channel are both capable of processing the future action;

determining that there is more bandwidth available on the first alternate communication channel than the second alternate communication channel; and

selecting the first alternate communication channel as the alternate communication channel capable of processing the future action.

12. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 8 , wherein identifying, by the computing system, the user action related to the account of the user further comprises:

detecting a trigger event by monitoring online interactions with a webpage associated with the account,

detecting a trigger event by monitoring online activity of the user,

detecting a trigger event by monitoring user interactions with a mobile application, and

detecting a trigger event by monitoring user interactions with an SMS message, a chat program, an IVR system, or combinations thereof.

13. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 12 , wherein the trigger event is further associated with account payment, transferring funds, navigating to a customer service chatbot, searching for previous transactions, changing personal identification information, or combinations thereof.

14. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 12 , wherein the trigger event is further associated with payment of an account, transferring funds, navigating to a customer service chatbot, searching for previous transactions, changing personal identification information, or combinations thereof.

15. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 8 , further comprising:

determining a solution to preempt the future action to be performed by the user; and

performing the solution on behalf of the user, wherein the message comprises an indication that the solution was performed.

16. A system comprising:

a processor; and

a memory having programming instructions stored thereon, which, when executed by the processor, causes the system to perform operations comprising:

identifying a user action related to an account of a user managed by the system, the user action comprising a trigger event associated with a payment or funds transfer;

inputting the user action into a prediction model configured to predict a future action to be taken by the user;

determining that a bandwidth of a primary communication channel can be reduced by identifying an alternate communication channel capable of processing the future action to be made by the user; and

based on determining that the bandwidth of a primary communication channel can be reduced, generating a message to be transmitted to the user via the alternate communication channel before the user accesses the primary communication channel for performing the future action and transmitting the message to the user via the alternate communication channel, wherein the prediction preempts utilization of the primary communication channel for the future action.

17. The system of claim 16 , wherein identifying the alternate communication channel capable of processing the future action comprises:

determining a complexity of addressing the future action to be taken by the user; and

determining that the alternate communication channel can handle the complexity of the future action.

18. The system of claim 16 , wherein identifying the alternate communication channel capable of processing the future action comprises:

identifying at least two alternate communication channels comprising a first alternate communication channel and a second alternate communication channel;

determining that the first alternate communication channel is capable of processing the future action;

determining that the second alternate communication channel is not capable of processing the future action; and

selecting the first alternate communication channel as the alternate communication channel capable of processing the future action.

19. The system of claim 16 , wherein identifying the alternate communication channel capable of processing the future action comprises:

identifying at least two alternate communication channels comprising a first alternate communication channel and a second alternate communication channel;

determining that the first alternate communication channel and the second alternate communication channel are both capable of processing the future action;

determining that there is more bandwidth available on the first alternate communication channel than the second alternate communication channel; and

selecting the first alternate communication channel as the alternate communication channel capable of processing the future action.

20. The system of claim 16 , wherein identifying the user action related to the account of the user comprises:

detecting a trigger event by monitoring online interactions with a webpage associated with the account,

detecting a trigger event by monitoring online activity of the user,

detecting a trigger event by monitoring user interactions with a mobile application, and

detecting a trigger event by monitoring user interactions with an SMS message, a chat program, an IVR system, or combinations thereof.

21. The system of claim 20 , the trigger event is further associated with navigating to a customer service chatbot, searching for previous transactions, changing personal identification information, a loan application, a credit application, or combinations thereof.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 13, 2023
From: KARP, SCOTT; MUELLER, ERIK
To: CAPITAL ONE SERVICES, LLC
Reel/Frame 064892/0684 →
Continuity (4)
Continuation 17934761 · Sep 23, 2022
Continuation 16868717 · May 7, 2020
Continuation 16003668 · Jun 8, 2018
Related Publication 20240048510A1 · Feb 8, 2024
References Cited (58)
US 6295294B1 · Odlyzko · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 6721780B1 · Kasriel et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 6850252B1 · Hoffberg · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 6990087B2 · Rao · 2006 [cited by examiner]
US 8019834B2 · Horvitz et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8254393B2 · Horvitz · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 8417715B1 · Bruckhaus et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 9015099B2 · Nitz et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9065915B1 · Lillard et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9536248B2 · Kannan et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 10540223B1 · Johansson et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10554817B1 · Sullivan et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 11556808B1 · Kim · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20030105589A1 · Liu et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20030153338A1 · Herz · 2003 [cited by examiner]
US 20030161451A1 · Fitzpatrick et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20040061718A1 · Fitzpatrick et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20050055433A1 · Mathew et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20050202827A1 · DeMarco · 2005 [cited by examiner]
US 20060031340A1 · Mathew et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20080154625A1 · Serbanescu · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20090003201A1 · Horvitz · 2009 [cited by examiner]
US 20090228566A1 · Sharp et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20100094791A1 · Miltonberger · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100262467A1 · Barnhill, Jr. et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20110167110A1 · Hoffberg et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20120122463A1 · Chen · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 20130268468A1 · Vijayaraghavan et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130283168A1 · Brown et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20150019637A1 · Backholm · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150074215A1 · Arquette et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150163121A1 · Mahaffey et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150185995A1 · Shoemaker et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20160140567A1 · Hanna et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160173428A1 · Balasubramanian et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160173616A1 · Bank et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160294956A1 · Fix et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160357232A1 · Kalyanasundaram · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20170180276A1 · Gershony · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20170180499A1 · Gelfenbeyn et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170323211A1 · Bencke et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170339178A1 · Mahaffey et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20180025010A1 · Ramer et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180121808A1 · Ramakrishna et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180337871A1 · Matta et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180359179A1 · Zhang · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20190028588A1 · Shinseki et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190287171A1 · Parmar · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190289025A1 · Kursun et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190379615A1 · Karp et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20200143288A1 · Eisenzopf · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200349614A1 · Batcha et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200349932A1 · Ogawa et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200356999A1 · Pandey et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20210029246A1 · Erhart et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20220138279A1 · Lepeska · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20230123592A1 · Karp · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20230308199A1 · Svennebring · 2023 [cited by examiner]