IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,452,305
Granted Patent B2
US 12,452,305 · App. 17/672,262 · Granted Oct 21, 2025

Adaptive enforcement of security within a network

Inventors: Gopal Gupta (Bangalore, IN); Abhinesh Mishra (Bangalore, IN)
Assignee: Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP
H04L63/20G06N20/00H04L63/0245H04L63/1425H04L63/1433H04L63/1441
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,452,305
App. No.
17/672,262
Filed
Feb 15, 2022
Granted
Oct 21, 2025
Kind
B2
Art Unit
2495
USPC
726/1
Abstract

A system receives one or more ingress data packets from a client device or a user in a network. The system obtains attributes, via packet inspection, from the one or more ingress data packets, and determines one or more embedding vectors from the attributes. The one or more embedding vectors represent a status of a session during which the ingress data packets are obtained. The system transmits the one or more embedding vectors as inputs to a trained machine learning model. The system infers, using the trained machine learning mode, one or more security policies based on the embedding vectors. The system provides or implementing the one or more security policies.

Claims (59)

1. A computer-implemented method, comprising:

receiving one or more ingress data packets from a client device or a user in a network;

obtaining attributes, via packet inspection, from the one or more ingress data packets;

determining one or more embedding vectors from the attributes, wherein the one or more embedding vectors represent a status of a session during which the ingress data packets are obtained;

transmitting the one or more embedding vectors as inputs to a trained machine learning model, wherein the machine learning model is trained using a first training dataset that indicates respective mappings of embedding vectors to security policies and a second training dataset generated based on incorrectly determined or incorrectly mapped security policies by the machine learning model; and

inferring, using the trained machine learning model, one or more security policies based on the embedding vectors; and

providing or implementing the one or more security policies.

2. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the security policies comprise an operating system aspect, a networking aspect, a cryptographic aspect, and an application aspect.

3. The computer-implemented method of claim 2 , wherein the networking aspect is associated with intrusion detection, anti-malware, anti-virus protection, data loss prevention and a firewall.

4. The computer-implemented method of claim 2 , wherein the cryptographic aspects comprise tunneling parameters or attributes.

5. The computer-implemented method of claim 2 , wherein the application aspects comprise access control or log auditing attributes or parameters.

6. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the determination of the one or more vectors comprises generating:

a first embedding vector corresponding to attributes associated with the client device or the user;

a second embedding vector corresponding to attributes associated with destination from which data is sought;

a third embedding vector corresponding to attributes associated with the network; and

a fourth embedding vector corresponding to attributes associated with the contextual parameters.

7. The computer-implemented method of claim 6 , wherein the attributes associated with the client device or the user comprise at least two of:

a location of the client device or the user;

bandwidth consumptions of different categories of content or applications by the client device or the user;

a reputation based on content accessed by the client device or the user; and

a frequency or number of security events triggered by the client device or the user.

8. The computer-implemented method of claim 6 , wherein the attributes associated with the destination comprise at least two of:

a deployment of the destination;

a transmission medium or protocol of the destination;

a reputation of the destination based on historical security attributes, parameters, or events;

an abnormality metric of the destination; and

a software stack or software embedding of the destination.

9. The computer-implemented method of claim 6 , wherein the attributes associated with the network comprise at least two of:

a network type;

health parameters of the network;

a distribution of priority traffic flows throughout the network;

a geolocation over which the network is distributed; and

one or more tags within the network.

10. A non-transitory storage medium storing instructions that, when executed by at least one processor of a computing system, cause the computing system to:

receive one or more ingress data packets from a client device or a user in a network;

obtain attributes, via packet inspection, from the one or more ingress data packets;

determine one or more embedding vectors from the attributes, wherein the one or more embedding vectors represent a status of a session during which the ingress data packets are obtained;

transmit the one or more embedding vectors as inputs to a trained machine learning model, wherein the machine learning model is trained using a first training dataset that indicates respective mappings of embedding vectors to security policies and a second training dataset generated based on incorrectly determined or incorrectly mapped security policies by the machine learning model; and

infer, using the trained machine learning model, one or more security policies based on the embedding vectors, wherein the security policies comprise an operating system aspect, a networking aspect, a cryptographic aspect, and an application aspect; and

providing or implementing the one or more security policies.

11. The non-transitory storage medium of claim 10 , wherein the security policies comprise an operating system aspect, a networking aspect, a cryptographic aspect, and an application aspect.

12. The non-transitory storage medium of claim 11 , wherein the networking aspect comprises attributes or parameters associated with intrusion detection, anti-malware, anti-virus protection, data loss prevention and a firewall.

13. The non-transitory storage medium of claim 10 , wherein the determination of the one or more vectors comprises generating:

a first embedding vector corresponding to attributes associated with the client device or the user;

a second embedding vector corresponding to attributes associated with destination from which data is sought;

a third embedding vector corresponding to attributes associated with the network; and

a fourth embedding vector corresponding to attributes associated with the contextual parameters.

14. A computer-implemented method, comprising:

receiving one or more ingress data packets from a client device or a user in a network;

obtaining attributes, via packet inspection, from the one or more ingress data packets;

determining one or more embedding vectors from the attributes, wherein the determination of the one or more vectors comprises generating

a first embedding vector corresponding to attributes associated with the client device or the user,

a second embedding vector corresponding to attributes associated with destination from which data is sought,

a third embedding vector corresponding to attributes associated with the network, and

a fourth embedding vector corresponding to attributes associated with the contextual parameters,

and wherein the one or more embedding vectors represent a status of a session during which the ingress data packets are obtained;

transmitting the one or more embedding vectors as inputs to a trained machine learning model; and

inferring, using the trained machine learning model, one or more security policies based on the embedding vectors; and

providing or implementing the one or more security policies.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 15, 2022
From: GUPTA, GOPAL; MISHRA, ABHINESH
To: HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE DEVELOPMENT LP
Reel/Frame 059017/0837 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20230262093A1 · Aug 17, 2023
References Cited (55)
US 5764765A · Phoenix · 1998 [cited by examiner]
US 6748083B2 · Hughes · 2004 [cited by examiner]
US 7178277B2 · Takeuchi · 2007 [cited by examiner]
US 7437081B2 · Mitchell · 2008 [cited by examiner]
US 8434129B2 · Kannappan · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 8855316B2 · Wiseman · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 9350601B2 · Jain · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 9960465B2 · Dudley · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 10057058B2 · Murakami · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 10581604B2 · Mustafa · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 10771489B1 · Bisht · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 10931588B1 · Matthews · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 10931602B1 · Matthews · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 11057318B1 · Matthews · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 11099902B1 · Matthews · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 11121878B2 · McCarty · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 11328222B1 · Matthews · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 11892746B1 · Mazed · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 12113675B1 · Gupta · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 20040255167A1 · Knight · 2004 [cited by examiner]
US 20050138352A1 · Gauvreau · 2005 [cited by examiner]
US 20070065154A1 · Luo · 2007 [cited by examiner]
US 20070076884A1 · Wellbrock · 2007 [cited by examiner]
US 20070195774A1 · Sherman · 2007 [cited by examiner]
US 20110206204A1 · Sychev · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 20110213979A1 · Wiseman · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 20140010234A1 · Patel · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20140068765A1 · Choi · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20140133652A1 · Oshida · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20150047032A1 · Hannis · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20160241396A1 · Fu · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20160359626A1 · Fu · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20160366094A1 · Mason · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20170006082A1 · Shishodia · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20170214525A1 · Zhao · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20170230173A1 · Choi · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20180115523A1 · Subbarayan · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20180176091A1 · Yoon · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20190036821A1 · Levy · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190319796A1 · Ghosh · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190319804A1 · Mathew · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190349392A1 · Wetterwald · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190379682A1 · Overby · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20200084222A1 · William · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200259792A1 · Devarajan · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200259793A1 · Pangeni · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20210112034A1 · Sundararajan · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210374585A1 · Ramanathan · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210374761A1 · Ramanathan · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210374862A1 · Ramanathan · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20220070223A1 · Deng · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220247786A1 · Vavilala · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220400123A1 · Ayoub · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20230023529A1 · Jenkins · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20250106150A1 · Shah · 2025 [cited by examiner]