IP Library Granted Patent US 12,454,007
Granted Patent B2
US 12,454,007 · App. 17/932,959 · Granted Oct 28, 2025

Powder flow measurement in additive manufacturing systems

Inventors: Scott Nelson (Indianapolis, IN); John Grubbs (Indianapolis, IN); Quinlan Yee Shuck (Indianapolis, IN)
Assignee: Rolls-Royce Corporation
B22F10/85B33Y50/02G05B19/4099G06T7/0004G05B2219/49023G06T2207/30108
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,454,007
App. No.
17/932,959
Granted
Oct 28, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

A system may include one or more computing devices configured to receive image data representing illuminated powder of a powder stream between a powder delivery device of an additive manufacturing system and a build surface of a component; determine at least one metric associated with the powder stream based on the received image data; determine whether the at least one metric indicates an abnormal state of the at least one metric; and cause the additive manufacturing system to perform at least one action in response to determining that the at least one metric indicates the abnormal state.

Claims (35)

1 . A system comprising:

one or more computing devices configured to:

receive image data representing illuminated powder of a powder stream between a powder delivery device of an additive manufacturing system and a build surface of a component, wherein the additive manufacturing system is configured to simultaneously deliver energy to form a melt pool in the build surface and deliver the powder stream to the melt pool, and wherein the image data represents illuminated powder of the powder stream while the powder stream is delivered to the melt pool;

determine at least one metric associated with the powder stream based on the received image data;

determine whether the at least one metric indicates an abnormal state of the at least one metric; and

cause the additive manufacturing system to perform at least one action in response to the at least one metric indicating the abnormal state.

2 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the one or more computing devices is configured to determine the at least one metric by at least:

determining a mass flow rate or powder distribution within the powder stream.

3 . The system of claim 2 , wherein the one or more computing devices is configured to determine the at least one metric by at least:

determining a mass flow rate or powder distribution for each region of interest of at least one region of interest of the powder stream.

4 . The system of claim 3 , wherein the one or more computing devices is configured to determine whether the at least one metric indicates an abnormal state by at least:

comparing the at least one metric associated with each region of interest to the at least one metric associated with each other region of interest and determining that the at least one metric indicates the abnormal state in response to the comparison showing differences between the metrics above a threshold difference value.

5 . The system of claim 2 , wherein the one or more computing devices is configured to determine the at least one metric by at least:

determining a radial powder distribution for each region of interest of at least one region of interest of the powder stream.

6 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the one or more computing devices is configured to determine whether the at least one metric indicates the abnormal state of the at least one metric by at least:

comparing the at least one metric to a baseline range of values and determining that the at least one metric indicates the abnormal state in response to the at least one metric being outside of the baseline range of values.

7 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the one or more computing devices is configured to cause the additive manufacturing system to perform at least one action by at least:

controlling at least one operating parameter of the additive manufacturing system.

8 . The system of claim 7 , wherein the at least one parameter comprises at least one of a powder feed rate or a carrier gas flow rate.

9 . The system of claim 8 , wherein the at least one parameter comprises at least one of a powder feed rate to a selected nozzle of the powder delivery device or a carrier gas flow rate to a selected nozzle of the powder delivery device.

10 . The system of claim 7 , wherein the at least one parameter comprises a position of the powder delivery device.

11 . The system of claim 10 , wherein the one or more computing devices is configured to cause the powder delivery device to move against a scrubbing surface.

12 . The system of claim 7 , wherein the at least one parameter comprises a purge gas flow rate, and wherein the one or more computing devices is configured to cause a relatively high purge gas flow rate through the powder delivery device.

13 . The system of claim 7 , wherein the one or more computing devices is configured to cause the additive manufacturing system to perform the at least one action by at least placing the powder delivery device in a recovery state while controlling the at least one operating parameter of the additive manufacturing system.

14 . A method comprising:

receiving, by one or more computing devices, image data representing illuminated powder of a powder stream between a powder delivery device of an additive manufacturing system and a build surface of a component, wherein the additive manufacturing system is configured to simultaneously deliver energy to form a melt pool in the build surface and deliver the powder stream to the melt pool, and wherein the image data represents illuminated powder of the powder stream while the powder stream is delivered to the melt pool;

determining, by the one or more computing devices, at least one metric associated with the powder stream based on the received image data;

determining, by the one or more computing devices, whether the at least one metric indicates an abnormal state of the at least one metric; and

causing, by the one or more computing devices, the additive manufacturing system to perform at least one action in response to determining that the at least one metric indicates the abnormal state.

15 . The method of claim 14 , wherein determining the at least one metric comprises determining, by the one or more computing devices, a mass flow rate or powder distribution within the powder stream.

16 . The method of claim 15 , wherein determining the at least one metric comprises determining, by the one or more computing devices, a mass flow rate or powder distribution for each region of interest of at least one region of interest of the powder stream.

17 . The method of claim 16 , wherein determining whether the at least one metric indicates an abnormal state comprises comparing, by the one or more computing devices, the at least one metric associated with each region of interest to the at least one metric associated with each other region of interest and determining that the at least one metric indicates the abnormal state in response to the comparison showing differences between the metrics above a threshold difference value.

18 . The method of claim 15 , wherein determining the at least one metric comprises determining, by the one or more computing devices, a radial powder distribution for each region of interest of at least one region of interest of the powder stream.

19 . The method of claim 14 , wherein determining whether the at least one metric indicates the abnormal state of the at least one metric comprises comparing, by the one or more computing devices, the at least one metric to a baseline range of values and determining that the at least one metric indicates the abnormal state in response to the at least one metric being outside of the baseline range of values.

20 . The method of claim 14 , wherein causing the additive manufacturing system to perform at least one action comprises controlling, by the one or more computing devices, at least one operating parameter of the additive manufacturing system.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 4, 2023
From: NELSON, SCOTT; GRUBBS, JOHN; SHUCK, QUINLAN YEE
To: ROLLS-ROYCE CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 062270/0289 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 63247571 · Sep 23, 2021
Related Publication 20230090298A1 · Mar 23, 2023
References Cited (43)
US 5396333A · Aleshin · 1995 [cited by examiner]
US 6922599B2 · Richey · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 7725206B2 · Richey · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 10456984B2 · Matusik et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 11079745B2 · Giera · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11150633B2 · de Souza Borges Ferreira et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11198640B2 · Kelley · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11465240B2 · Liu · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11890675B2 · Riede et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 20120243797A1 · Di Venuto Dayer et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20150283610A1 · Ljungblad · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20170059529A1 · Kamel et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20180099333A1 · DehghanNiri et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180297115A1 · Diwinsky et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20190268507A1 · Nakamura et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20210046708A1 · Riede et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20230089809A1 · Nelson et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230090298A1 · Nelson et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230091046A1 · Nelson et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230092671A1 · Nelson et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230278108A1 · Fleury et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20240416589A1 · Ruiz-Vargas et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
CN 108956609A · 2018 [cited by applicant]
CN 106475558B · 2019 [cited by applicant]
DE 102011009345B3 · 2012 [cited by applicant]
JP 2021521008A · 2021 [cited by applicant]
Brown et al., “Insights into Powder Flow Characterization Methods for Directed Energy Distribution Additive Manufacturing Systems,” Solid Freeform Fabrication 2018: Proceedings of the 29th Annual International Solid Fre… [cited by applicant]
Melo, “Powder jet particle density distribution analysis and qualification for the laser metal deposition process,” Dissertation Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, retrieved from https://repositorio.ufsc.br/xmlui/h… [cited by applicant]
Sdvizhenskii et al., “Online laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy for metal-particle powder flow analysis during additive manufacturing,” Journal of Analytical Atompic Spectrometry, Issue 2, No. 25, Royal Society of Che… [cited by applicant]
Balu et al., “Parametric study on a coaxial multi-material powder flow in laser-based powder deposition process”, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, vol. 212, No. 7, Feb. 2012, pp. 1598-1610. [cited by applicant]
Garcia-Moreno et al., “A new PIV method to measure powder flow velocity in laser metal deposition: an Eulerian-based approach”, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, vol. 117, No. 5-6, Aug. 202… [cited by applicant]
Mann et al., “New sensor and system technology for higher process stability in LMD”, Proceedings vol. 10911, High-Power Laser Materials Proceeding: Applications, Diagnostics, and Systems VIII, vol. 10911, Feb. 2019, 8 p… [cited by applicant]
Riede, “Formnext 2019: Fraunhofer IWS presents COAXshield and LIsec AM systems”, Optics.org, Nov. 2019, 3 pp., Retrieved from the Internet on Jan. 18, 2023 from URL: https://optics.org/news/10/11/29. [cited by applicant]
Riede, “LIsec: Systems Integrated Powder Nozzle Measuring System for Additive Manufacturing Applications”, Fraunhofer, Nov. 2019, 2 pp., Retrieved from the Internet on Jan. 18, 2023 from URL: https://www.iws.fraunhofer.… [cited by applicant]
Tan et al., “Dynamic evolution of powder stream convergence with powder feeding durations in direct energy deposition”, International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, vol. 157, Oct. 2020, 16 pp. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 17/932,945, filed Sep. 16, 2022, naming inventors Nelson et al. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 17/932,962, filed Sep. 16, 2022, naming inventors Nelson et al. [cited by applicant]
Montero et al., “Inspection of Powder Flow During LMD Deposition by High Speed Imaging”, Physics Procedia, vol. 83, Elsevier, Sep. 16, 2016, pp. 1319-1328. [cited by applicant]
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 17/932,962 dated Feb. 26, 2025, 11 pp. [cited by applicant]
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 17/932,962 dated Sep. 30, 2024, 30 pp. [cited by applicant]
Response to Office Action dated Sep. 30, 2024 from U.S. Appl. No. 17/932,962, filed Dec. 27, 2024, 14 pp. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 18/593,538, filed Mar. 1, 2024, naming inventors Nelson et al. [cited by applicant]
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 17/932,945 dated Jul. 30, 2025, 14 pp. [cited by applicant]