IP Library Granted Patent US 12,457,578
Granted Patent B2
US 12,457,578 · App. 18/249,402 · Granted Oct 28, 2025

Method and apparatus for task management in next generation networks

Inventors: Xin Guo (Beijing, CN); Tingfang Tang (Beijing, CN); Lianhai Wu (Beijing, CN); Haiming Wang (Beijing, CN)
Assignee: Lenovo (Beijing) Limited
H04W64/006H04W36/00835H04W72/543
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,457,578
App. No.
18/249,402
Granted
Oct 28, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

Embodiments of the present application relate to a method and an apparatus for task management in next generation networks (NGNs). According to an embodiment of the present application, a method can include: receiving a request message for requesting candidate configuration of a task result feedback (TRF) on a task associated with a UE; transmitting a task status report configuration to a first edge data network (EDN), wherein the first EDN includes a server to perform the task; and receiving a task status report associated with the task from the first EDN. Embodiments of the present application can efficiently satisfy the quality of service (QoS) or quality of experience (QoE) requirements (such as latency, energy, computational capability and so on) of a UE during a handover procedure.

Claims (60)

1. A method, comprising:

receiving a request message for requesting a candidate configuration of a task result feedback (TRF) of a task associated with a user equipment (UE);

transmitting a task status measurement and a reporting configuration to a first edge data network (EDN), the first EDN including a server to perform the task; and

receiving a task status report associated with the task from the first EDN.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the method is performed by a standalone predicted session management function (PSMF) or by a session management function (SMF).

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the request message includes at least one of:

an identity (ID) of the UE;

an ID of a session associated with the task;

a cell ID of at least one candidate handover (HO) cell for the UE;

a type field indicating a type of handover; or

a maximum number of candidate configurations.

4. The method of claim 3 , wherein the type of the handover indicates a target HO cell is determined by at least one of a predicted session management function (PSMF), a session management function (SMF), a source cell, the UE, or the source cell based on an HO request acknowledge considering the candidate configuration for the TRF of each candidate HO cell.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the task status measurement and the reporting configuration indicates the task on the server to be measured, content included in the task status report, and a reporting criterion of the task status report.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the task status report includes at least one of:

a timestamp for the task status report;

a time duration between the timestamp for the task status report and an end of the task; or

one or more quality of service (QOS) requirements for the TRF, wherein the one or more QoS requirements include at least one of:

a maximum requested time associated with reception of the TRF by the UE;

a requested time duration associated with the reception of the TRF by the UE; or

reliability for the TRF.

7. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

transmitting a performance data request message for requesting a performance data, the performance data request message indicating at least one of a criterion for the TRF, requested information in the performance data, or a maximum number of information elements included in the requested information; and

receiving the performance data including the requested information.

8. The method of claim 7 , further comprising:

determining a first set of candidate configurations of the TRF based on the performance data, wherein each of the first set of candidate configurations indicates how to provide the TRF on the task to the UE via a corresponding candidate handover (HO) cell.

9. The method of claim 8 , further comprising:

in response to the first set of candidate configurations not associated with a second EDN, determining a second set of candidate configurations based on the performance data, the task status report, and a type of handover indicated in the request message.

10. The method of claim 8 , further comprising:

in response to the first set of candidate configurations associated with at least a second EDN, and for each candidate configuration of the TRF in the first set of candidate configurations of the TRF which is associated with a corresponding second EDN:

transmitting a task transfer request message including information of the task to the corresponding second EDN associated with the candidate configuration;

receiving a task transfer response message from the corresponding second EDN; and

determining a second set of candidate configurations of the TRF based on the performance data, the task status report, a type of handover indicated in the request message, and the task transfer response message from each second EDN.

11. An apparatus, comprising:

a processor; and

a memory coupled with the processor, the processor configured to cause the apparatus to:

receive a request message to request a candidate configuration of a task result feedback (TRF) of a task associated with a user equipment (UE);

transmit a task status measurement and a reporting configuration to an edge data network (EDN) that includes a server to perform the task; and

receive a task status report associated with the task from the EDN.

12. The apparatus of claim 11 , wherein the apparatus implements a standalone predicted session management function (PSMF) or by a session management function (SMF).

13. The apparatus of claim 11 , wherein the request message includes at least one of:

an identity (ID) of the UE;

an ID of a session associated with the task;

a cell ID of at least one candidate handover (HO) cell for the UE;

a type field indicating a type of handover; or

a maximum number of candidate configurations.

14. The apparatus of claim 13 , wherein the type of the handover indicates a target HO cell is determined by at least one of a predicted session management function (PSMF), a session management function (SMF), a source cell, the UE, or the source cell based on an HO request acknowledge considering the candidate configuration for the TRF of each candidate HO cell.

15. The apparatus of claim 11 , wherein the task status measurement and the reporting configuration indicates the task on the server to be measured, content included in the task status report, and a reporting criterion of the task status report.

16. The apparatus of claim 11 , wherein the task status report includes at least one of:

a timestamp for the task status report;

a time duration between the timestamp for the task status report and an end of the task; or

one or more quality of service (QOS) requirements for the TRF, wherein the one or more QoS requirements include at least one of a maximum requested time associated with reception of the TRF by the UE, a requested time duration associated with the reception of the TRF by the UE, or reliability for the TRF.

17. The apparatus of claim 11 , wherein the processor is configured to cause the apparatus to:

transmit a performance data request message for requesting a performance data, the performance data request message indicating at least one of a criterion for the TRF, requested information in the performance data, or a maximum number of information elements included in the requested information; and

receive the performance data including the requested information.

18. The apparatus of claim 17 , wherein the processor is configured to cause the apparatus to determine a first set of candidate configurations of the TRF based on the performance data, wherein each of the first set of candidate configurations indicates how to provide the TRF on the task to the UE via a corresponding candidate handover (HO) cell.

19. The apparatus of claim 18 , wherein the processor is configured to cause the apparatus to, in response to the first set of candidate configurations not associated with a second EDN, determine a second set of candidate configurations based on the performance data, the task status report, and a type of handover indicated in the request message.

20. The apparatus of claim 18 , wherein, in response to the first set of candidate configurations associated with at least an additional EDN, and for each candidate configuration of the TRF in the first set of candidate configurations of the TRF which is associated with a corresponding additional EDN, the processor is configured to cause the apparatus to:

transmit a task transfer request message including information of the task to a corresponding second EDN associated with the candidate configuration;

receive a task transfer response message from the corresponding second EDN; and

determine a second set of candidate configurations of the TRF based on the performance data, the task status report, a type of handover indicated in the request message, and the task transfer response message from each additional EDN.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 18, 2023
From: GUO, XIN; TANG, TINGFANG; WU, LIANHAI; WANG, HAIMING
To: LENOVO (BEIJING) LTD.
Reel/Frame 063354/0806 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20230388964A1 · Nov 30, 2023
References Cited (33)
US 10499304B1 · Stauffer · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 11197209B2 · Guo · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 11762743B2 · Wang · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20070217619A1 · Hall et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20190191341A1 · Trang · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190342797A1 · Fu · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20200154459A1 · Mukherjee · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200267084A1 · Hande · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200336940A1 · Salkintzis · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200351724A1 · Guo · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20210014734A1 · Liu · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210136620A1 · Laitila · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210351997A1 · Luft · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20220053602A1 · Kim · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220361038A1 · Kim · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20230008647A1 · Yao · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20230014613A1 · Je · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20230074288A1 · Filippou · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20230396954A1 · Zhang · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20240314592A1 · Wang · 2024 [cited by examiner]
CN 101025623A · 2007 [cited by applicant]
CN 107924336A · 2018 [cited by applicant]
CN 111314464A · 2020 [cited by applicant]
WO 2020180217A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
WO 2020197288A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
3GPP TS 23.502v16.5.0. “3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Services and System Aspects; Procedures for the 5G System (5GS); Stage 2 (Release 16)” Jul. 2020. (Year: 2020). [cited by examiner]
R3-213471. 3GPP TSG-RAN WG3 Meeting #113-e. “AI/ML based mobility optimization” Intel Corporation. Electronic Meeting. Aug. 16-26, 2021. (Year: 2021). [cited by examiner]
R3-230626. 3GPP TSG-RAN WG3 Meeting#119. “Discussion on mobility optimization” Intel Corporation. Athens, Greece. Feb. 27-Mar. 2023. (Year: 2023). [cited by examiner]
“Technical Specification Group Services and System Aspects; Study on enhancement of support for Edge Computing”, 3GPP TR 23.748 V0.5.0 [retrieved May 22, 2023]. Retrieved from the Internet <https://portal.3gpp.org/deskt… [cited by applicant]
PCT/CN2020/122253 , “International Preliminary Report on Patentability”, PCT Application No. PCT/CN2020/122253, May 4, 2023, 5 pages. [cited by applicant]
PCT/CN2020/122253 , “International Search Report and Written Opinion”, PCT Application No. PCT/CN2020/122253, Jul. 27, 2021, 6 pages. [cited by applicant]
20958030.7 , “European Search Report”, Application No. 20958030.7, Jun. 27, 2024, 34 pages. [cited by applicant]
Multiaccess Edge Computing (MEC) , “European Search Report”, Draft ETSI GR MEC 031 V2.0.21 MEC 5G Integration 650, Route Des Lucioles ; F-06921 Sophia-Antipolis; France ; URL:docbox.etsi.org/ISG/MEC/70-Draft/0031/MEC003… [cited by applicant]