IP Library Granted Patent US 12,458,442
Granted Patent B2
US 12,458,442 · App. 18/217,224 · Granted Nov 4, 2025

Apparatus, system, and method for bone loss compensation of a patient's knee joint during an orthopaedic surgical procedure

Inventors: Michael J. Rock (Leeds, GB); Robert Freeman (Leeds, GB); Martin Preutenborbeck (Leeds, GB)
Assignee: DePuy Ireland Unlimited Company
A61B34/10A61F2/461A61B2017/564A61B2034/104A61B2034/105A61B2034/107A61B2034/2068A61F2002/4633
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,458,442
App. No.
18/217,224
Granted
Nov 4, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

An apparatus, system, and method for compensating for bone loss of a patient's knee joint during the performance of an orthopaedic surgical procedure includes determining an estimated amount of bone loss of a bone of a patient's knee joint, determining an anatomical distance between a femoral anatomical feature of a patient's femur and a tibial anatomical feature of a patient's tibia, and adjusting the determined anatomical distance based on the estimated amount of bone loss. The determined anatomical distance is indicative of a ligament length of a collateral ligament of the patient's knee joint. The bone loss may be estimated based on, for example, a surface curve fitting algorithm applied to a three-dimensional model of the bone, a defined bone loss amount provided by a user, or a comparison of the three-dimensional model of the bone to a statistical shape model that approximates the bone in a healthy state.

Claims (28)

1 . A method for compensating for bone loss of a patient's knee joint during the performance of an orthopaedic surgical procedure, the method comprising:

determining, by a computer system, an estimated amount of bone loss of a bone of a patient's knee joint based on a three-dimensional model of the bone, wherein the bone comprises at least one of a femur and a tibia of the patient's knee joint;

determining, by the computer system, an anatomical distance between a femoral anatomical feature located on the patient's femur and a tibial anatomical feature located on the patient's tibia at a plurality of degrees of flexion of the patient's knee joint while the femur of the patient's knee joint is in contact with the tibia of the patient's knee joint, wherein the anatomical distance is indicative of a ligament length of a collateral ligament of the patient's knee joint; and

adjusting, by the computer system, the determined anatomical distance at each degree of flexion based on the estimated amount of bone loss of the bone of the patient's knee joint.

2 . The method of claim 1 , wherein determining the estimated amount of bone loss of the bone of the patient's knee joint comprises:

applying, by the computer system, a surface curve fitting algorithm to the three-dimensional model of the bone; and

determining, by the computer system, the estimated amount of bone loss based on a difference between a damaged surface of the bone of the patient's knee joint as indicated in the three-dimensional model and a corresponding surface defined by the surface curve fitting algorithm.

3 . The method of claim 1 , wherein determining the estimated amount of bone loss of the bone of the patient's knee joint comprises:

receiving, by the computer system, a defined bone loss amount provided by a user of the computer system; and

determining, by the computer system, the estimated amount of bone loss based on the defined bone loss amount.

4 . The method of claim 3 , wherein receiving the defined bone loss amount comprises receiving, by the computer system, a defined bone loss amount for a plurality of locations of a damaged surface of the bone of the patient's knee joint from the user of the computer system, wherein each location of the plurality of locations of the damaged surface contacts the other one of the femur or the tibia of the patient's knee joint at a corresponding degree of flexion of the patient's knee.

5 . The method of claim 1 , wherein determining the estimated amount of bone loss of the bone of the patient's knee joint comprises:

updating the three-dimensional model of the bone of the patient's knee joint to include indicia of a damaged surface of the bone;

obtaining a three-dimensional statistical shape model of a reference bone corresponding to the bone of the patient's knee joint, wherein the reference bone does not include the damaged surface;

adjusting a set of parameters of the three-dimensional statistical shape model to approximate the bone of the patient's knee joint in a healthy state that does not include the damaged surface; and

comparing the three-dimensional model of the bone of the patient's knee joint including the indicia of the damaged surface to the three-dimensional statistical shape model to determine the estimated amount of bone loss of the bone of the patient's knee joint.

6 . The method of claim 1 , wherein determining the anatomical distance between the femoral anatomical feature and the tibial anatomical feature comprises determining an anatomical distance between an attachment point of the collateral ligament on the patient's femur and an attachment point of the collateral ligament on the patient's tibia.

7 . The method of claim 6 , wherein determining the anatomical distance between the attachment point of the collateral ligament on the patient's femur and the attachment point of the collateral ligament on the patient's tibia comprises determining an anatomical distance that is indicative of a length of a medial collateral ligament or a lateral collateral ligament of the patient's knee joint while the patient's knee joint is moved through a range of flexion with the femur of the patient's knee joint in contact with the tibia of the patient's knee joint.

8 . The method of claim 1 , wherein determining the anatomical distance between the tibial anatomical feature and the femoral anatomical feature comprises determining an anatomical distance between an attachment point of the collateral ligament on the patient's femur and a planned cutting plane of the patient's tibia in each degree of flexion of the plurality of degrees of flexion of the patient's knee.

9 . The method of claim 8 , wherein adjusting the determined anatomical distance of the collateral ligament comprises increasing the determined anatomical distance between the attachment point of the collateral ligament on the patient's femur and the planned cutting plane of the patient's tibia at each degree of flexion of the plurality of degrees of flexion of the patient's knee.

10 . The method of claim 1 , wherein adjusting the determined anatomical distance comprises adjusting an estimated length of a medial collateral ligament or a lateral collateral ligament of the patient's knee joint at each degree of flexion based on the estimated amount of bone loss of the bone of the patient's knee joint.

11 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

determining, by the computer system, a cutting plane of the bone of the patient's knee joint based on the adjusted determined anatomical distance; and

performing an orthopaedic bone resection on the bone of the patient's knee joint using the determined cutting plane as a reference for the orthopaedic bone resection.

12 . The method of claim 11 , wherein adjusting the determined anatomical distance comprises adjusting the determined anatomical distance by an adjustment amount that is based on the estimated amount of bone loss of the bone of the patient's knee joint; and

further comprising determining, by the computer system, an initial cutting plane of the bone of the patient's knee joint,

wherein determining the cutting plane of the bone of the patient's knee joint based on the adjusted determined anatomical distance comprises moving the initial cutting plane by the adjustment amount to define a final cutting plane, and

wherein performing the orthopaedic bone resection comprises performing the orthopaedic bone resection on the bone of the patient's knee joint using the final cutting plane as a reference for the orthopaedic bone resection.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 19, 2024
From: ROCK, MICHAEL J.; FREEMAN, ROBERT; PREUTENBORBECK, MARTIN
To: DEPUY IRELAND UNLIMITED COMPANY
Reel/Frame 066178/0696 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20250000582A1 · Jan 2, 2025
References Cited (33)
US 7842092B2 · Otto et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 8172775B2 · Warkentine et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8983813B2 · Miles et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9248001B2 · Colombet et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 10064686B2 · McKinnon et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20050251148A1 · Friedrich et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20060161051A1 · Terrill-Grisoni et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20060241405A1 · Leitner et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20070179626A1 · De La Barrera et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20080208081A1 · Murphy et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080281329A1 · Fitz et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20100010506A1 · Murphy · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100152741A1 · Park et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20150148653A1 · Fleig et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20160228193A1 · Moctezuma De La Barrera et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20180140232A1 · Fleig et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20200383729A1 · Amanatullah · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20220008219A1 · Logan · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20230005232A1 · Harris, Jr. · 2023 [cited by examiner]
EP 2861140A1 · 2015 [cited by applicant]
JP 2007523696A · 2007 [cited by applicant]
WO 2005072629A1 · 2005 [cited by applicant]
WO 2006078236A1 · 2006 [cited by applicant]
WO 2013185811A1 · 2013 [cited by applicant]
Clouthier, et al; The Effect of Articular Geometry Features IDentified Using Statistical Shape Modelling on Knee Biomechanics; Medical Engineering and Physics 66 (2019) 47-55. [cited by applicant]
Depuy Synthes; VELYS Robotic-Assisted Solution for Total Knee, User Guide—Software v1.6; IFU-0902-60-0222 Rev. L. [cited by applicant]
Chao, et al; Virtual Interactive Musculoskeletal System (VIMS) in Orthopaedic Research, Education and Clinical Patient Care; Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research; Mar. 8, 2007; 19 pages. [cited by applicant]
Van Der Esch, et al; Knee Varus—Valgus Motion During Gait—A Measure of Joint Stability in Patients with Osteoarthritis; Osteoarthritis and Cartilage (2008) 16, 522-525. [cited by applicant]
Heesterbeek, et al; Posterior Cruciate Ligament Recruitment Affects Antero-Posterior Translation During Flexion Gap Distraction in Total Knee Replacement; Acta Orthopaedica 2010; 81 (4): 471-477. [cited by applicant]
Tranberg, et al.; Simultaneous Measurements of Knee Motion Using an Optical Tracking System and Radiostereometric Analysis (RSA); Acta Orthopaedica 2011; 82 (2): 171-176. [cited by applicant]
Amiri, et al; A Computational Modeling Approach for Investigating Soft Tissue Balancing in Bicruciate Retaining Knee Arthroplasty; Hindawi Publishing Corporation Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine vol. 2… [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion in PCT/EP2024/068007, mailed Oct. 2, 2024, 22 pages. [cited by applicant]
Fucentese, Sandro F., et al, “A novel augmented reality-based surgical guidance system for total knee arthroplasty”, Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Springer Verlag, DE, vol. 141, No. 12, Oct. 26, 2021, 7 pa… [cited by applicant]