IP Library Granted Patent US 12,461,273
Granted Patent B2
US 12,461,273 · App. 17/552,175 · Granted Nov 4, 2025

Vehicle-based anomaly detection using artificial intelligence and combined environmental and geophysical sensor data

Inventors: Daniel P. Lathrop (University Park, MD); Heidi Myers (Greenbelt, MD); Vedran Lekic (Washington, DC)
Assignee: University of Maryland, College Park
G01V11/00G06N3/04
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,461,273
App. No.
17/552,175
Granted
Nov 4, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

Geophysical anomalies in an area or region can be detected, characterized, or otherwise mapped using a combination of environmental and geophysical sensor data acquired using a vehicle, which may be a remotely operated or autonomously controlled unmanned vehicle. Anomalies are detected by processing the environmental sensor data and geophysical sensor data using artificial intelligence algorithms, programs, or models. As an example, the artificial intelligence algorithms, programs, or models can include machine learning algorithms, programs, or models. The environmental sensor data are processed to generate control parameters for controlling the acquisition and/or processing of the geophysical sensor data optimized for environmental conditions in the area.

Claims (65)

1 . A method for producing a map depicting geophysical anomalies in an area based on geophysical sensor data, the method comprising:

(a) accessing environmental sensor data with a computer system, the environmental sensor data being indicative of environmental conditions in an area;

(b) accessing a first machine learning algorithm with the computer system, wherein the first machine learning algorithm has been trained on first training data to determine confidence weights from environmental conditions;

(c) generating confidence weight values by applying the environmental sensor data to the first machine learning algorithm, generating a first output as the confidence weight values;

(d) accessing geophysical sensor data with a computer system, the geophysical sensor data being indicative of data acquired from the area using a plurality of different geophysical sensors;

(e) accessing a second machine learning algorithm with the computer system, wherein the second machine learning algorithm has been trained on second training data to identify anomalies in the area from the geophysical sensor data acquired from the area;

(f) generating anomaly map data by applying the geophysical sensor data to the second machine learning algorithm and using the confidence weight values as an input to the second machine learning algorithm to control contributions of different ones of the geophysical sensors when generating the anomaly map data, generating a second output as the anomaly map data; and

(g) providing the anomaly map data to a user, wherein the anomaly map data comprise an anomaly map depicting at least one anomaly in the area.

2 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the accessing the environmental sensor data comprises acquiring the environmental sensor data using environmental sensors coupled to a vehicle.

3 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the accessing the geophysical sensor data comprises acquiring the geophysical sensor data using the plurality of different geophysical sensors.

4 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the first machine learning algorithm is a neural network.

5 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the second machine learning algorithm is a neural network and the using the confidence weight values as an input to the second machine learning algorithm comprises applying the confidence weight values to hidden layers of the neural network.

6 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the environmental sensor data comprise at least one of soil moisture data, soil temperature data, air moisture data, air temperature data, or albedo.

7 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the geophysical sensor data comprise at least one of ground penetrating radar data, magnetometer data, optical instrumentation data, X-ray spectral data, optical spectral data, hyperspectral data, nuclear magnetic resonance data, acoustic data, or accelerometer data.

8 . The method of claim 7 , wherein the optical instrumentation data comprise at least one of visible spectrum camera data, infrared camera data, or ultraviolet camera data.

9 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the anomaly map depicts a location of the at least one anomaly.

10 . The method of claim 9 , wherein the anomaly map depicts a probability of the location of the at least one anomaly.

11 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the at least one anomaly comprises an unexploded ordnance.

12 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the at least one anomaly comprises a mineral deposit.

13 . The method of claim 12 , wherein the anomaly map further comprises a mineral deposit layer indicating a type of a mineral in the mineral deposit.

14 . The method of claim 13 , wherein the type of the mineral is determined based on the geophysical sensor data that comprise at least one of X-ray spectral data, optical spectral data, hyperspectral data, or nuclear magnetic resonance data.

15 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the at least one anomaly comprises a civil engineering survey object.

16 . The method of claim 15 , wherein the civil engineering survey object includes at least one of an electrical utility, a gas utility, a water utility, a waste tank, a sewer, or a tunnel.

17 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the at least one anomaly comprises a geophysical feature.

18 . The method of claim 17 , wherein the geophysical feature includes at least one of a lava tube, a cave, or a hydrologic resource.

19 . A method for generating an anomaly map depicting geophysical anomalies in an area, the method comprising:

(a) acquiring environmental sensor data using environmental sensors coupled to a vehicle;

(b) processing the environmental sensor data using an electronic processor housed on the vehicle to generate geophysical sensing control parameter data for controlling a geophysical sensing mode of the vehicle;

(c) acquiring geophysical sensor data using geophysical sensors coupled to the vehicle while in the geophysical sensing mode; and

(d) processing the geophysical sensor data using the electronic processor to generate an anomaly map that depicts at least one anomaly within the area.

20 . The method of claim 19 , wherein the environmental sensor data are processed by the electronic processor by inputting the environmental sensor data to a machine learning algorithm, generating an output as the geophysical sensing control parameter data.

21 . The method of claim 20 , wherein the machine learning algorithm comprises a neural network.

22 . The method of claim 19 , wherein the geophysical sensor data are processed by the electronic processor by inputting the geophysical sensor data to a machine learning algorithm, generating an output as the anomaly map.

23 . The method of claim 22 , wherein the machine learning algorithm comprises a neural network.

24 . The method of claim 23 , wherein the geophysical sensing control parameter data comprise confidence weight values that are input to hidden layers of the neural network by the electronic processor to weigh different geophysical sensor data types based on environmental conditions in the area as measured by the environmental sensors.

25 . The method of claim 19 , wherein the geophysical sensing control parameter data are processed by the electronic processor to control an operation of the vehicle when the vehicle is in the geophysical sensing mode.

26 . The method of claim 25 , wherein the vehicle is an aerial vehicle and processing the geophysical sensing control parameter data by the electronic processor controls the operation of the aerial vehicle based on the environmental conditions in the area and on which the geophysical sensors are being used to acquire the geophysical sensor data.

27 . The method of claim 25 , wherein processing the geophysical sensing control parameter data by the electronic processor controls the operation of the geophysical sensors such that different ones of the geophysical sensors are operated to acquire the geophysical sensor data based on the environmental conditions in the area.

28 . The method of claim 19 , wherein the anomaly map depicts a location of the at least one anomaly.

29 . The method of claim 28 , wherein the anomaly map depicts a probability of the location of the at least one anomaly.

30 . A vehicle-based system for mapping geophysical anomalies within an area, the vehicle-based system comprising:

a vehicle;

a plurality of environmental sensors coupled to the vehicle;

a plurality of geophysical sensors coupled to the vehicle; and

an electronic processor housed within the vehicle and in communication with the plurality of environmental sensors and the plurality of geophysical sensors, the electronic processor being configured to:

acquire environmental sensor data with the plurality of environmental sensors;

acquire geophysical sensor data with the plurality of geophysical sensors; and

generate an anomaly map that depicts at least one anomaly within an area using the environmental sensor data and the geophysical sensor data.

31 . The vehicle-based system of claim 30 , wherein the electronic processor is configured to generate the anomaly map by:

accessing a first neural network;

inputting the environmental sensor data to the first neural network, generating output as confidence weight values for hidden layers in a second neural network;

accessing the second neural network; and

inputting the confidence weight values and the geophysical sensor data to the second neural network, generating output as the anomaly map.

32 . The vehicle-based system of claim 30 , wherein the vehicle is an aerial vehicle.

33 . The vehicle-based system of claim 32 , wherein the aerial vehicle is an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV).

34 . The vehicle-based system of claim 33 , wherein the UAV is an autonomously controlled UAV.

35 . The vehicle-based system of claim 30 , wherein the vehicle is a ground-based vehicle.

36 . The vehicle-based system of claim 35 , wherein the ground-based vehicle is an unmanned ground vehicle (UGV).

37 . The vehicle-based system of claim 36 , wherein the UGV is an autonomously controlled UGV.

38 . The vehicle-based system of claim 30 , wherein the vehicle comprises a trailer that is coupled to another vehicle.

39 . The vehicle-based system of claim 38 , wherein the trailer is fabricated from at least one of non-ferromagnetic materials or non-metallic materials.

40 . The vehicle-based system of claim 30 , wherein the environmental sensors comprise at least one of a soil moisture sensor, a soil temperature sensor, an air moisture sensor, an air temperature sensor, or an albedometer; and further wherein the environmental sensor data comprises information regarding environmental conditions in the area which is utilized by the electronic processor to control operation of the geophysical sensors such that different ones of the geophysical sensors are operated to acquire the geophysical sensor data based on the environmental conditions in the area.

41 . The vehicle-based system of claim 40 , wherein the geophysical sensors comprise at least one of a ground penetrating radar sensor, a magnetometer, a metal detecting excitation coil, a metal detecting sensing coil, an optical instrumentation sensor, an X-ray spectral sensor, an optical spectral sensor, a hyperspectral sensor, an acoustic sensor, a nuclear magnetic resonance sensor, or an inertial sensor.

42 . The vehicle-based system of claim 41 , wherein the magnetometer comprises at least one of a 3-component fluxgate magnetometer or a magnetometer array.

43 . The vehicle-based system of claim 41 , wherein the optical instrumentation sensor comprises at least one of a visible spectrum camera, an infrared camera, or an ultraviolet camera.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 17, 2021
From: LATHROP, DANIEL P.; MYERS, HEIDI; LEKIC, VEDRAN
To: UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK
Reel/Frame 058412/0117 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 63126485 · Dec 16, 2020
Related Publication 20240134085A1 · Apr 25, 2024
References Cited (58)
US 20190056231A1 · Bai · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20200175691A1 · Zhang · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200353832A1 · Xiao · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20210056778A1 · Wylie · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210295144A1 · Restelli et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20220057806A1 · Guo · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220179703A1 · Vincent · 2022 [cited by examiner]
WO 2018213399A1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
Acheroy, Marc. “Mine action: status of sensor technology for close-in and remote detection of anti-personnel mines.” Near Surface Geophysics 5.1 (2007): 43-55. [cited by applicant]
Baur et al., “Applying deep learning to automate UAV-based detection of scatterable landmines.” Remote Sensing 12.5 (2020): 859. 1-16. [cited by applicant]
Bechtel et al., “Characterization of electromagnetic properties of in situ soils for the design of landmine detection sensors: Application in Donbass, Ukraine.” Remote Sensing 11.10 (2019): 1232. 1-16. [cited by applicant]
Benedetto et al., “Remote sensing of soil moisture content by GPR signal processing in the frequency domain.” IEEE Sensors Journal 11.10 (2011): 2432-2441. [cited by applicant]
Bruschini et al., “Ground penetrating radar and imaging metal detector for antipersonnel mine detection.” Journal of Applied Geophysics 40.1-3 (1998): 59-71. [cited by applicant]
Bruschini, “A survey of research on sensor technology for landmine detection.” Journal of Conventional Weapons Destruction 2.1 (1998). 1-25. [cited by applicant]
Carey et al., “Software defined radio for stepped-frequency, ground-penetrating radar.” IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS). IEEE, 2017. Software defined radio for stepped-frequency, grou… [cited by applicant]
Cerquera et al. “UAV for landmine detection using SDR-based GPR technology.” Robots Operating in Hazardous Environments (2017): 26-55. [cited by applicant]
Colorado et al., “An integrated aerial system for landmine detection: SDR-based Ground Penetrating Radar onboard an autonomous drone.” Advanced Robotics 31.15 (2017): 791-808. [cited by applicant]
Cremer et al., “Infrared polarization measurements and modeling applied to surface-laid antipersonnel landmines.” Optical Engineering 41.5 (2002): 1021-1032. [cited by applicant]
De Jong et al., “Using Polarization features of visible light for automatic landmine detection.” Physics of Automatic Target Recognition. New York, NY: Springer New York, 2007. 73-90. 18 pages. [cited by applicant]
Debatty “Software defined Radar a state of the art.” 2010 2nd International Workshop on Cognitive Information Processing. IEEE, 2010. 253-257. [cited by applicant]
Ganesh et al., “Surveillance drone for landmine detection.” 2015 International Conference on Advanced Computing and Communications (ADCOM). IEEE, 2015. 33-38. [cited by applicant]
Garcia-Fernandez et al. “Portable and easily-deployable air-launched GPR scanner.” Remote Sensing 12.11 (2020): 1833. 1-20. [cited by applicant]
Gasperikova et al., “Berkeley Uxo Discriminator (Bud).” 20th EEGS Symposium on the Application of Geophysics to Engineering and Environmental Problems. European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers, 2007. 1-9. [cited by applicant]
Gavazzi et al., “Fluxgate three-component magnetometers for cost-effective ground, UAV and airborne magnetic surveys for industrial and academic geoscience applications and comparison with current industrial standards t… [cited by applicant]
Geometrics, “MetalMapper 2x2 Advanced Time Domain EM UXO Sensor” (2018), 1-2. [cited by applicant]
“Giannakies et al., “A realistic FDTD numerical modeling framework of ground penetrating radar for landmine detection.”” IEEE journal of selected topics in applied earth observations and remote sensing 9.1 (2015): 37-51. [cited by applicant]
Gooneratne et al., “A review of sensing technologies for landmine detection: Unmanned vehicle based approach.” 2nd International Conference on Autonomous Robots and Agents. 2004. 401-407. [cited by applicant]
Groenenboom et al., “Data processing and imaging in GPR system dedicated for landmine detection.” Subsurface Sensing Technologies and Applications 3 (2002): 387-402. [cited by applicant]
Grote et al., “Field-scale estimation of volumetric water content using ground-penetrating radar ground wave techniques.” Water resources research 39.11 (2003). 1-14. [cited by applicant]
Jenks et al., “The use of a Software Defined Radio as an OFDM GPR.” 2017 9th International Workshop on Advanced Ground Penetrating Radar (IWAGPR). IEEE, 2017. 1-4. [cited by applicant]
Kappler et al., “A hybrid method for UXO vs. non-UXO discrimination.” Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics 16.4 (2011): 177-189. [cited by applicant]
Kasban et al., “A comparative study of landmine detection techniques.” Sensing and Imaging: An International Journal 11 (2010): 89-112. [cited by applicant]
Kaya et al., “Buried and surface mine detection from thermal image time series.” IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing 10.10 (2017): 4544-4552. [cited by applicant]
Klotzsche et al., “Measuring soil water content with ground penetrating radar: A decade of progress.” Vadose Zone Journal 17.1 (2018): 1-9. [cited by applicant]
Komkov et al., “Reservoir Computing for Prediction of Beam Evolution in Particle Accelerators.” NeurIPS Machine Learning for the Physical Sciences Workshop. 2019. 1-5. [cited by applicant]
Komkov et al., “Reservoir computing using networks of cmos logic gates.” International Conference on Neuromorphic Systems 2021. 2021. 1-7. [cited by applicant]
Komkov et al., “RF signal classification using Boolean reservoir computing on an FPGA.” 2021 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN). IEEE, 2021. 1-9. [cited by applicant]
Komkov et al., “The recurrent processing unit: Hardware for high speed machine learning.” arXiv preprint arXiv:1912.07363 (2019). 1-5. [cited by applicant]
Lameri et al., “Landmine detection from GPR data using convolutional neural networks.” 2017 25th European signal processing conference (EUSIPCO). IEEE, 2017. 538-542. [cited by applicant]
Malof, “Exploiting Multi-Look Information for Landmine Detection in Forward Looking Infrared Video” MS thesis. Duke University, 2013. 1-24. [cited by applicant]
Martinez et al., “Assessing the performance of three type of UWB antennas for FMCW GPR imaging.” 2018 International Conference on Electromagnetics in Advanced Applications (ICEAA). IEEE, 2018. 620-622. [cited by applicant]
Messelink et al., “Feature-based detection of land mines in infrared images.” Detection and Remediation Technologies for Mines and Minelike Targets VII. vol. 4742. SPIE, 2002.108-119. [cited by applicant]
Myers et al., “Multi-sensor integration using machine learning for UAV-based landmine detection.” AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts. vol. 2019. ABSTRACT only, 1 page. [cited by applicant]
Nelson et al., “Magnetic modeling of UXO and UXO-like targets and comparison with signatures measured by MTADS.” Proc. UXO Forum. 1998. 282-291. [cited by applicant]
Nelson et al., “Multisensor towed array detection system for UXO detection.” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 39.6 (2001): 1139-1145. [cited by applicant]
Ngan et al., “Development of automatic target recognition for infrared sensor-based close-range land mine detector.” Detection Technologies for Mines and Minelike Targets. vol. 2496. SPIE, 1995. 881-889. [cited by applicant]
Nikulin et al., “Automated UAS aeromagnetic surveys to detect MBRL unexploded ordnance.” The Journal of Conventional Weapons Destruction 24.1 (2020): 13. pp. 56-62. [cited by applicant]
Nuzzo et al., “A new densely-sampled ground penetrating radar array for landmine detection.” Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar. IEEE, 2014. 969-974. [cited by applicant]
Ralston et al., “Software defined radar: An open source platform for prototype GPR development.” 2012 14th International Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR). IEEE, 2012.172-177. [cited by applicant]
Robledo et al., “A survey of land mine detection technology.” International Journal of Remote Sensing 30.9 (2009): 2399-2410. [cited by applicant]
Schavemaker et al., “Infrared processing and sensor fusion for anti-personnel land-mine detection.” Eindhoven: IEEE Student Branch, 2000. 61-71. [cited by applicant]
Shani et al., “Dynamics of analog logic-gate networks for machine learning.” Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science 29.12 (2019). 1-18. [cited by applicant]
Travassos et al., “A review of ground penetrating radar antenna design and optimization.” Journal of microwaves, optoelectronics and electromagnetic applications 17 (2018): 385-402. [cited by applicant]
Ultra TEM-IV “Advanced Geophysical Classification Technology” GapEOD. (2020). UltraTEM. Retrieve on Mar. 12, 2024, from https://www.gapeod.com/ultratem/. 4 pages. [cited by applicant]
VMR3G “Minehound”—Dual-Sensor Detector. Vallon GmbH. (2023). 1-5. [cited by applicant]
Yoo et al., “Application of a drone magnetometer system to military mine detection in the demilitarized zone.” Sensors 21.9 (2021): 3175. 1-15. [cited by applicant]
Zhang et al., “Compressive sensing based software defined GPR for subsurface imaging.” 2021 IEEE Radar Conference (RadarConf21). IEEE, 2021.1-6. [cited by applicant]
Zhang et al., “Sensing of unexploded ordnance with magnetometer and induction data: Theory and signal processing.” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 41.5 (2003): 1005-1015. [cited by applicant]
Cited By (1)
US 12,619,001