IP Library Granted Patent US 12,461,519
Granted Patent B2
US 12,461,519 · App. 18/125,513 · Granted Nov 4, 2025

System and method for retroactive and automated validation or corrective action with respect to online sensors

Inventors: Narasimha M. Rao (Collierville, TN); Ryan Carli (Cordova, TN)
Assignee: Buckman Laboratories International, Inc.
G05B23/0283G05B23/0232G05B23/0243G05B23/0267
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,461,519
App. No.
18/125,513
Granted
Nov 4, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

A system and method is provided for correction of sensors in an industrial process. A first sensor provides first data corresponding to measured variables for at least one respective process component, which are further aggregated in data storage with corresponding contextual tags comprising time series identifiers. For a given sample from the industrial process, at least the first data having a corresponding time series identifier are obtained for comparison with second data collected via a second sensor and which comprises measured variables corresponding to the at least one respective process component from the given sample. A feedback signal is selectively generated based on a determined error between the collected first data and the collected second data corresponding to the given sample, and may in an embodiment be used for automatically calibrating the first sensor. The feedback signal may further or alternatively be used to prompt interventions in the first sensor.

Claims (35)

1 . A method for correction of sensors in an industrial process, the method comprising:

collecting first data via one or more online first sensors with respect to the industrial process, the first data corresponding to measured variables for at least one respective process component;

aggregating the first data in data storage as respective input data points with corresponding contextual tags comprising time series identifiers;

for a given sample collected from a production stage of the industrial process and having a respective time series identifier, obtaining at least one respective input data point of the first data having a corresponding time series identifier;

collecting second data via one or more second sensors, the second data comprising measured variables corresponding to the at least one respective process component from the given sample;

determining a difference between at least one measured variable from the first data and the corresponding at least one measured variable from the second data;

selectively generating a feedback signal to at least one of the one or more first sensors as an error value based on the determined difference; and

automatically calibrating the at least one of the one or more first sensors to correct further first data collected from the at least one of the one or more first sensors based on the generated feedback signal.

2 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

automatically determining an intervention state for at least one of the one or more first sensors based at least in part on the feedback signal and generating a message corresponding to the determined intervention state via a user interface.

3 . The method of claim 2 , wherein at least one type of determined intervention state corresponds to a message prompting maintenance of the at least one of the one or more first sensors.

4 . The method of claim 2 , wherein at least one type of determined intervention state corresponds to a message prompting replacement of the at least one of the one or more first sensors.

5 . The method of claim 2 , wherein the intervention state is determined based on predictive analysis with respect to an error condition.

6 . The method of claim 5 , wherein the intervention state is further determined in view of a margin for error and utilizing observed trends corresponding to the aggregated first data.

7 . The method of claim 6 , wherein the margin for error is dynamically determined based on the observed trends corresponding to the aggregated first data.

8 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

adjusting the aggregated first data based on the feedback signal to retroactively account for the determined error value, further in view of the corresponding time series identifier.

9 . The method of claim 1 , wherein at least the determined error value is implemented for development and/or training of a model to reflect learned relationships between the first data and one or more process conditions and/or quality metrics.

10 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the one or more second sensors are offline with respect to the industrial process.

11 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the one or more first sensors are mounted at a first online location to generate first data for the given sample with a first time series identifier, and the one or more second sensors are mounted at a second online location to generate second data for the given sample with a second time series identifier.

12 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the one or more first sensors are mounted at a first online location to generate first data for the given sample with a first time series identifier, the one or more second sensors are mounted at a second online location to generate data for the given sample with a second time series identifier, and the data generated by the one or more second sensors are processed to indirectly determine the second data corresponding to the at least one respective process component.

13 . A system comprising:

one or more first sensors mounted online with respect to an industrial process, and configured to generate first data corresponding to measured variables in real time for at least one respective process component;

data storage aggregating the first data as respective input data points with corresponding contextual tags comprising time series identifiers; and

a data processor configured, for a given sample collected from a production stage of the industrial process and having a respective time series identifier, to

obtain at least the respective input data point of the first data having a corresponding time series identifier,

collect second data via one or more second sensors, the second data comprising measured variables corresponding to the at least one respective process component from the given sample,

determine a difference between at least one measured variable from the first data and the corresponding at least one measured variable from the second data, and

selectively generate a feedback signal to at least one of the one or more first sensors as an error value based on the determined difference;

wherein a controller is functionally linked to the at least one of the one or more first sensors and configured to automatically correct further first data generated from the at least one of the one or more first sensors based on the generated feedback signal.

14 . The system of claim 13 , wherein the processor is further configured to adjust the aggregated first data based on the feedback signal to retroactively account for the determined error value, further in view of the corresponding time series identifier.

15 . The system of claim 13 , wherein the processor is further configured to implement at least the determined error value for development and/or training of a model to reflect learned relationships between the first data and one or more process conditions and/or quality metrics.

16 . The system of claim 13 , wherein the one or more second sensors are offline with respect to the industrial process.

17 . The system of claim 13 , wherein the one or more first sensors are mounted at a first online location to generate first data for the given sample with a first time series identifier, and the one or more second sensors are mounted at a second online location to generate second data for the given sample with a second time series identifier.

18 . The system of claim 13 , wherein the one or more first sensors are mounted at a first online location to generate first data for the given sample with a first time series identifier, the one or more second sensors are mounted at a second online location to generate data for the given sample with a second time series identifier, and the data generated by the one or more second sensors are processed to indirectly determine the second data corresponding to the at least one respective process component.

Assignments (2)
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jul 1, 2025
From: BUCKMAN LABORATORIES INTERNATIONAL, INC.
To: ANTARES CAPITAL LP, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 071574/0986 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 2, 2025
From: CARLI, RYAN; RAO, NARASIMHA M.
To: BUCKMAN LABORATORIES INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Reel/Frame 069813/0857 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 63323138 · Mar 24, 2022
Related Publication 20230305552A1 · Sep 28, 2023
References Cited (79)
US 4978861A · Sabater et al. · 1990 [cited by applicant]
US 5269883A · Beuther · 1993 [cited by applicant]
US 5512139A · Worcester · 1996 [cited by applicant]
US 5571382A · Berglund · 1996 [cited by applicant]
US 5635028A · Vinson et al. · 1997 [cited by applicant]
US 5649448A · Koskimies et al. · 1997 [cited by applicant]
US 5654799A · Chase et al. · 1997 [cited by applicant]
US 6485571B1 · Graf · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 6523401B2 · Oechsle et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 6701637B2 · Lindsay et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 6749723B2 · Linden · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 6881583B2 · Kahle · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 7101461B2 · Allen et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 7545971B2 · Shakespeare · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 7803899B2 · Zollinger et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7959763B2 · Machattie et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8308900B2 · Covarrubias et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8568562B2 · Sullivan et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8691323B2 · Von Drasek et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8958898B2 · Von Drasek et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9109330B2 · Shakespeare et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9121136B2 · Aengeneyndt et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9182271B2 · Grigoriev et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9238889B2 · Paavola et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9266301B2 · Furman et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9303977B2 · Kellomki et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9388530B2 · Von Drasek et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9404895B2 · Von Drasek et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9675905B2 · Mudaly · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9721377B2 · Raunio et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9801384B2 · Barak · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9851199B2 · Von Drasek et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 10043256B2 · Toskala et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10155662B2 · Gatti et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10329715B2 · Buist et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10496061B2 · Strohmenger et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10501274B2 · Ramakrishnan et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10604896B2 · Von Drasek et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10643323B2 · Toskala et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10697119B2 · Kallerdahl et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10844547B2 · Silva et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10914037B2 · Gorden · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 10941522B1 · Buist et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11015293B2 · Patterson · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11041271B2 · Luneau et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 12228588B2 · Weiss · 2025 [cited by examiner]
US 20020054449A1 · Despain · 2002 [cited by examiner]
US 20020060017A1 · Kuusisto et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20050145357A1 · Muench · 2005 [cited by examiner]
US 20060143671A1 · Ens et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20070204966A1 · Chou et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20100086672A1 · Von Drasek et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100269996A1 · Grattan et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20110297341A1 · Dilkus · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20120211190A1 · Goto et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20130048238A1 · Glover et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130180677A1 · Thomas et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130245158A1 · Grigoriev et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20140096925A1 · Gorden · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140110071A1 · Furman et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140254885A1 · Sze · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20150053358A1 · Ban et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150159329A1 · Tan et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150299952A1 · Kalaniemi · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20160032527A1 · Gorden · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160239755A1 · Aggour et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170016181A1 · Edbauer et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170357240A1 · Stewart et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20180144271A1 · Schlitt et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180284741A1 · Cella · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20190033850A1 · B R et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20200277734A1 · Kallerdahl et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
EP 3293595A1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
KR 101992747B1 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
KR 102222734B1 · 2021 [cited by applicant]
WO 2013037926A1 · 2013 [cited by applicant]
WO 2018122857A1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
WO 2021137133A1 · 2021 [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion for corresponding patent application No. PCT/US2023/015772, dated Jul. 4, 2023, 10 pages. [cited by applicant]