IP Library Granted Patent US 12,462,170
Granted Patent B2
US 12,462,170 · App. 17/269,425 · Granted Nov 4, 2025

Prediction interpretation apparatus and prediction interpretation method

Inventors: Taku Itou (Tokyo, JP); Keiichi Ochiai (Tokyo, JP); Yusuke Fukazawa (Tokyo, JP)
Assignee: NTT DOCOMO, INC.
G06N5/04G06F16/24575G06F17/18G06N20/00G16H50/20
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,462,170
App. No.
17/269,425
Granted
Nov 4, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

A prediction interpretation apparatus, comprising: a data storage unit configured to store data of a plurality of users; a model storage unit configured to store a prediction model learned from data of the whole of the plurality of users; a vicinity user search unit configured to extract vicinity users for the target user from the data storage unit; a linear regression model learning unit configured to learn a linear regression model approximated to the prediction model for the vicinity users; and an interpretation result output unit configured to output an interpretation result of prediction for the target user based on a partial regression coefficient of the linear regression model, wherein the vicinity user search unit extracts the vicinity user by narrowing vicinity user candidates extracted based on distance between users based on a prediction direction of the target user by the prediction model.

Claims (26)

1 . A prediction interpretation apparatus, comprising:

a memory configured to store data of a plurality of users,

wherein the memory is configured to store a prediction model learned from data of the plurality of users; and

a processor configured to extract final vicinity users for a target user from the memory,

wherein the processor is configured to learn a linear regression model approximated to the prediction model for the final vicinity users;

wherein the processor is configured to output interpretation results of prediction for the target user based on one or more partial regression coefficients of the linear regression model;

wherein the interpretation results comprise one or more life habits presented to the target user in descending order based upon an impact between a life habit of the one or more life habits and one or more health risks of the target user;

wherein the processor extracts the final vicinity users by narrowing vicinity user candidates extracted based on a distance between users based on a prediction direction of the target user by the prediction model, and

wherein the processor is configured to narrow the vicinity user candidates by excluding at least one vicinity user candidate from the final vicinity users based upon a deviation between a prediction value associated with the at least one vicinity user candidate and the prediction direction of the target user.

2 . The prediction interpretation apparatus as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the processor:

calculates a differential coefficient of the prediction model as the prediction direction,

calculates a slope of a line connecting a point corresponding to a state for one of the vicinity user candidates and a prediction result according to the prediction model, and a point corresponding to a state for the target user and a prediction result according to the prediction model, and

extracts a vicinity user candidate whose product of the differential coefficient and the slope of the line is not negative as a vicinity user.

3 . The prediction interpretation apparatus as claimed in claim 2 ,

wherein the processor outputs one or more items corresponding to each of the one or more partial regression coefficients based on an order of magnitude of the one or more partial regression coefficients of the linear regression model.

4 . The prediction interpretation apparatus as claimed in claim 1 ,

wherein the processor outputs one or more items corresponding to each of the one or more partial regression coefficients based on an order of magnitude of the one or more partial regression coefficients of the linear regression model.

5 . The prediction interpretation apparatus as claimed in claim 4 ,

wherein, when a value of a certain item is changed, the processor outputs a changed prediction result based on the one or more partial regression coefficients.

6 . A prediction interpretation method executed by a prediction interpretation apparatus including a memory configured to store data of a plurality of users; wherein the memory is configured to store a prediction model learned from data of the plurality of users, the prediction interpretation method comprising:

extracting final vicinity users for a target user from the memory;

learning a linear regression model approximated to the prediction model for the final vicinity users; and

outputting interpretation results of prediction for the target user based on one or more partial regression coefficients of the linear regression model,

wherein the interpretation results comprise one or more life habits presented to the target user in descending order based upon an impact between a life habit of the one or more life habits and one or more health risks of the target user, and

wherein the prediction interpretation apparatus extracts the final vicinity users by narrowing vicinity user candidates extracted based on a distance between users based on a prediction direction of the target user by the prediction model, and

wherein narrowing the vicinity user candidates comprises excluding at least one vicinity user candidate from the final vicinity users based upon a deviation between a prediction value associated with the at least one vicinity user candidate and the prediction direction of the target user.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 5, 2021
From: ITOU, TAKU; OCHIAI, KEIICHI; FUKAZAWA, YUSUKE
To: NTT DOCOMO, INC.
Reel/Frame 055823/0695 →
Priority Claims (1)
JP 2018-157718 · Aug 24, 2018 · national
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20210182712A1 · Jun 17, 2021
References Cited (25)
US 10877444B1 · Roach · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 11594311B1 · Bradley · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20050108753A1 · Saidi · 2005 [cited by examiner]
US 20080064118A1 · Porwancher · 2008 [cited by examiner]
US 20090089023A1 · Watanabe · 2009 [cited by examiner]
US 20170220937A1 · Wada · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20170293919A1 · Li · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20180046942A1 · Conroy · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20180096739A1 · Sano · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20190088159A1 · Minturn · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190096529A1 · Arffa · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20210012244A1 · Taniguchi · 2021 [cited by examiner]
JP 2009057337A · 2009 [cited by applicant]
Wang, Fei, Jimeng Sun, and Shahram Ebadollahi. “Composite distance metric integration by leveraging multiple experts' inputs and its application in patient similarity assessment.” Statistical Analysis and Data Mining: T… [cited by examiner]
Stojanovic, Jelena, Djordje Gligorijevic, and Zoran Obradovic. “Modeling customer engagement from partial observations.” Proceedings of the 25th ACM International on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. 2… [cited by examiner]
Cheng, Yu, et al. “Risk prediction with electronic health records: A deep learning approach.” Proceedings of the 2016 SIAM international conference on data mining. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 2016. (… [cited by examiner]
Ribeiro, Marco Tulio, Sameer Singh, and Carlos Guestrin. ““Why should i trust you?” Explaining the predictions of any classifier.” Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and d… [cited by examiner]
Hsieh, Cheng-Kang, et al. “Collaborative metric learning.” Proceedings of the 26th international conference on world wide web. 2017. (Year: 2017). [cited by examiner]
Saritha, K., and Sajimon Abraham. “Prediction with partitioning: Big data analytics using regression techniques.” 2017 International Conference on Networks & Advances in Computational Technologies (NetACT). IEEE, 2017. … [cited by examiner]
Shishvan, Omid Rajabi, Daphney-Stavroula Zois, and Tolga Soyata. “Machine intelligence in healthcare and medical cyber physical systems: A survey.” IEEE Access 6 (2018): 46419-46494. (Year: 2018). [cited by examiner]
Wu, W., Chen, L. & Zhao, Y. Personalizing recommendation diversity based on user personality. User Model User-Adap Inter 28, 237-276 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11257-018-9205-x (Year: 2018). [cited by examiner]
Of Kulev, Igor, et al. “Evaluating an ordered list of recommended physical activities within health care system.” International Conference on ICT Innovations. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2014 (Year: 2014). [cited by examiner]
R. Eto et al. “Fully-Automatic Bayesian Piecewise Sparse Linear Models” Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, PMLR 33: 238-246, 2014 (9 pages). [cited by applicant]
International Search Report issued in International Application No. PCT/JP2019/032843, mailed Nov. 19, 2019 (3 pages). [cited by applicant]
Written Opinion issued in International Application No. PCT/JP2019/032843; Dated Nov. 19, 2019 (3 pages). [cited by applicant]