IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,466,412
Granted Patent B2
US 12,466,412 · App. 18/363,498 · Granted Nov 11, 2025

Yaw rate sensor bias estimation

Inventors: William Jay Young (Rochester, MI); Amol Rajendra Birhade (Jersey City, NJ); Jason Gregory Pickel (Farmington Hills, MI); Jose Carlos Zavala-Jurado (Brighton, MI); Yimeng Dong (Northville, MI)
Assignee: QUALCOMM Incorporated
B60W40/114B60W60/0015B60W2420/403B60W2520/14
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,466,412
App. No.
18/363,498
Granted
Nov 11, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

An example yaw rate related method includes: obtaining a plurality of measurements of yaw rate of a vehicle from a yaw rate sensor; and determining a yaw rate sensor bias estimate for the yaw rate sensor based on at least one of the plurality of measurements of yaw rate in response to: a plurality of indications of location of the vehicle over time based on global navigation satellite system signals being indicative of straight-line movement of the vehicle; or a determination that the vehicle is stationary.

Claims (38)

1 . A yaw rate related method comprising:

obtaining a plurality of measurements of yaw rate of a vehicle from a yaw rate sensor; and

determining a yaw rate sensor bias estimate for the yaw rate sensor based on at least a first one of the plurality of measurements of yaw rate in response to:

a plurality of indications of location of the vehicle over time based on global navigation satellite system signals being indicative of straight-line movement of the vehicle and at least a second one of the plurality of measurements of yaw rate being indicative of straight-line movement of the vehicle.

2 . The yaw rate related method of claim 1 , wherein determining the yaw rate sensor bias estimate for the yaw rate sensor comprises determining that yaw rate measurement residuals are below one or more respective residual thresholds.

3 . The yaw rate related method of claim 1 , further comprising providing a yaw rate indication that comprises at least one of the at least a first one of the plurality of measurements of yaw rate with the yaw rate sensor bias estimate removed.

4 . The yaw rate related method of claim 1 , wherein the vehicle is an autonomous vehicle and the yaw rate related method further comprises disabling a blind stop function of the autonomous vehicle based on a yaw rate sensor bias estimate covariance exceeding an accuracy threshold.

5 . The yaw rate related method of claim 4 , further comprising determining the accuracy threshold based on a speed of the autonomous vehicle.

6 . The yaw rate related method of claim 1 , further comprising determining that the plurality of indications of location of the vehicle are indicative of straight-line movement of the vehicle by determining that a ratio of orthogonal standard deviations of the plurality of indications of location of the vehicle is less than a straight-line threshold.

7 . A device comprising:

one or more memories; and

one or more processors communicatively coupled to the one or more memories and configured to:

obtain a plurality of measurements of yaw rate of a vehicle from a yaw rate sensor; and

determine a yaw rate sensor bias estimate for the yaw rate sensor based on at least a first one of the plurality of measurements of yaw rate in response to:

a plurality of indications of location of the vehicle over time based on global navigation satellite system signals being indicative of straight-line movement of the vehicle and at least a second one of the plurality of measurements of yaw rate being indicative of straight-line movement of the vehicle.

8 . The device of claim 7 , wherein to determine the yaw rate sensor bias estimate for the yaw rate sensor the one or more processors are configured to determine that yaw rate measurement residuals are below a residual threshold.

9 . The device of claim 7 , wherein the one or more processors are configured to provide a yaw rate indication that comprises at least one of the at least a first one of the plurality of measurements of yaw rate with the yaw rate sensor bias estimate removed.

10 . The device of claim 7 , wherein the vehicle is an autonomous vehicle and the one or more processors are further configured to disable a blind stop function of the autonomous vehicle based on a yaw rate sensor bias estimate covariance exceeding an accuracy threshold.

11 . The device of claim 10 , wherein the one or more processors are configured to determine the accuracy threshold based on a speed of the autonomous vehicle.

12 . The device of claim 7 , wherein the one or more processors are configured to determine that the plurality of indications of location of the vehicle are indicative of straight-line movement of the vehicle by determining that a ratio of orthogonal standard deviations of the plurality of indications of location of the vehicle is less than a straight-line threshold.

13 . A device comprising:

a yaw rate sensor configured to provide a plurality of measurements of yaw rate of a vehicle; and

means for determining a yaw rate sensor bias estimate for the yaw rate sensor based on at least a first one of the plurality of measurements of yaw rate in response to:

a plurality of indications of location of the vehicle over time based on global navigation satellite system signals being indicative of straight-line movement of the vehicle and at least a second one of the plurality of measurements of yaw rate being indicative of straight-line movement of the vehicle.

14 . The device of claim 12 , wherein the means for determining the yaw rate sensor bias estimate for the yaw rate sensor comprise means for determining that yaw rate measurement residuals are below a residual threshold.

15 . The device of claim 13 , further comprising means for providing a yaw rate indication that comprises at least one of the at least a first one of the plurality of measurements of yaw rate with the yaw rate sensor bias estimate removed.

16 . The device of claim 13 , wherein the vehicle is an autonomous vehicle and the device further comprises means for disabling a blind stop function of the autonomous vehicle based on a yaw rate sensor bias estimate covariance exceeding an accuracy threshold.

17 . The device of claim 16 , further comprising means for determining the accuracy threshold based on a speed of the autonomous vehicle.

18 . The device of claim 13 , further comprising means for determining that the plurality of indications of location of the vehicle are indicative of straight-line movement of the vehicle by determining that a ratio of orthogonal standard deviations of the plurality of indications of location of the vehicle is less than a straight-line threshold.

19 . A non-transitory, processor-readable storage medium comprising processor-readable instructions to cause one or more processors to:

obtain a plurality of measurements of yaw rate of a vehicle from a yaw rate sensor; and

determine a yaw rate sensor bias estimate for the yaw rate sensor based on at least a first one of the plurality of measurements of yaw rate in response to:

a plurality of indications of location of the vehicle over time based on global navigation satellite system signals being indicative of straight-line movement of the vehicle and at least a second one of the plurality of measurements of yaw rate being indicative of straight-line movement of the vehicle.

20 . The non-transitory, processor-readable storage medium of claim 19 , wherein the processor-readable instructions to cause the one or more processors to determine the yaw rate sensor bias estimate for the yaw rate sensor comprise processor-readable instructions to cause the one or more processors to determine that yaw rate measurement residuals are below a residual threshold.

21 . The non-transitory, processor-readable storage medium of claim 19 , further comprising processor-readable instructions to cause the one or more processors to provide a yaw rate indication that comprises at least one of the at least a first one of the plurality of measurements of yaw rate with the yaw rate sensor bias estimate removed.

22 . The non-transitory, processor-readable storage medium of claim 19 , wherein the vehicle is an autonomous vehicle and the non-transitory, processor-readable storage medium further comprises processor-readable instructions to cause the one or more processors to disable a blind stop function of the autonomous vehicle based on a yaw rate sensor bias estimate covariance exceeding an accuracy threshold.

23 . The non-transitory, processor-readable storage medium of claim 22 , further comprising processor-readable instructions to cause the one or more processors to determine the accuracy threshold based on a speed of the autonomous vehicle.

24 . The non-transitory, processor-readable storage medium of claim 19 , further comprising processor-readable instructions to cause the one or more processors to determine that the plurality of indications of location of the vehicle are indicative of straight-line movement of the vehicle by determining that a ratio of orthogonal standard deviations of the plurality of indications of location of the vehicle is less than a straight-line threshold.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 23, 2023
From: YOUNG, WILLIAM JAY; BIRHADE, AMOL RAJENDRA; PICKEL, JASON GREGORY; ZAVALA-JURADO, JOSE CARLOS; DONG, YIMENG
To: ARRIVER SOFTWARE, LLC
Reel/Frame 064680/0214 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 63395495 · Aug 5, 2022
Related Publication 20240043017A1 · Feb 8, 2024
References Cited (13)
US 6198988B1 · Tseng · 2001 [cited by examiner]
US 20030042790A1 · Amberkar · 2003 [cited by examiner]
US 20090265054A1 · Basnayake · 2009 [cited by examiner]
US 20130231825A1 · Chundrlik, Jr. · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20140163808A1 · Seo et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20160244069A1 · Bajpai · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20170297562A1 · Chen et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20200339134A1 · Pennala et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20220089165A1 · Lee · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220194469A1 · Atmeh et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20240175716A1 · Ghadieh · 2024 [cited by examiner]
JP 2020083236A · 2020 [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion—PCT/US2023/029300—ISA/EPO—Oct. 13, 2023. [cited by applicant]