IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,471,832
Granted Patent B2
US 12,471,832 · App. 17/649,860 · Granted Nov 18, 2025

System and methods for improving diagnostic evoked potential studies for functional assessments of nerves and nerve pathways

Inventors: Jonathan D. Block (Walnut Creek, CA); Hieu T. Ball (Walnut Creek, CA)
Assignee: SidewayStrategies LLC
A61B5/388A61B5/383A61B5/4047A61B5/6814A61B5/6828A61B5/6829A61N1/36017A61B5/4052A61B2562/0209A61B2562/046A61N1/0456A61N1/0476A61N1/0502
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,471,832
App. No.
17/649,860
Granted
Nov 18, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

Systems and methods for enhancing diagnostic evoked potential recordings of a nerve or nerve pathway of interest. A grid array of stimulating electrodes are placed on, over, or through skin in a location beneath which a nerve or nerve pathway is suspected to lie. A stimulator controls the grid array, where each electrode is independently controllable as active or inactive, as a cathode or anode, etc. A plurality of recording electrodes may record Somato-Sensory Evoked Potentials (SSEPs) and/or Transcranial Electrical Motor Evoked Potentials (TCeMEP) in response to activation of the stimulating electrodes. A processor controls stimulating the stimulating electrodes, and receives responses from the recording electrodes, in a general search mode and a focused search mode in order to use a minimum stimulation intensity at which a maximum response amplitude is detected to continually stimulate the nerve or the nerve pathway.

Claims (56)

1 . A system comprising:

a plurality of stimulating electrodes arranged in a grid array configured to be placed on, over, or through skin over an area of a nerve or nerve pathway;

a stimulator configured to control the grid array;

a plurality of recording electrodes; and

one or more processors configured to:

execute a general search mode comprising:

instructing the stimulator to systematically test a plurality of stimulation schemes until a first evoked potential response is detected by the plurality of recording electrodes having a maximum response amplitude, wherein:

each of the plurality of stimulation schemes includes activating and assigning positions and polarity of one or more of the plurality of stimulating electrodes, and

instructing the stimulator to systematically test the plurality of stimulation schemes in the general search mode comprises instructing the stimulator to ramp stimulation intensity during testing each of the plurality of stimulation schemes until at least one of: a maximum stimulation intensity value is reached, or the maximum response amplitude is detected;

execute a focused search mode after executing the general search mode, the focused search mode comprising:

utilizing information from the general search mode, instructing the stimulator to systematically test the plurality of stimulation schemes until a second evoked potential response is detected by the plurality of recording electrodes having the maximum response amplitude and a minimum stimulation intensity, wherein:

instructing the stimulator to systematically test the plurality of stimulation schemes in the focused search mode comprises instructing the stimulator to ramp stimulation intensity during testing each of the plurality of stimulation schemes until the maximum response amplitude is detected;

for each stimulation scheme of the plurality of stimulation schemes, recording a respective stimulation intensity for the stimulation scheme at which the maximum response amplitude is detected;

comparing the respective stimulation intensities of the plurality of stimulation schemes at which the maximum response amplitudes was detected; and

selecting the minimum stimulation intensity at which the maximum response amplitude was detected; and

use the minimum stimulation intensity at which the maximum response amplitude was detected to further stimulate the nerve or nerve pathway.

2 . The system of claim 1 , wherein:

each of the plurality of stimulating electrodes is independently assignable to be active or inactive,

each of the plurality of stimulating electrodes is independently assignable to be active as an anode or a cathode, and

the stimulator is configured to independently assign stimulation parameters to each of the plurality of stimulating electrodes.

3 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the maximum response amplitude of the first evoked potential response does not increase in amplitude upon an increase in stimulation intensity.

4 . The system of claim 1 , wherein, during the general search mode, a stimulation scheme of the plurality of stimulation schemes at which the maximum response amplitude is detected comprises a positive stimulation scheme, and wherein information from the positive stimulation scheme is used to instruct the stimulator to systematically test the plurality of stimulation schemes during the focused search mode.

5 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the general search mode further comprises, after the first evoked potential response is detected, executing another stimulation scheme from among the plurality of stimulation schemes.

6 . The system of claim 1 , wherein each stimulating electrode of the plurality of stimulating electrodes is at least one of: percutaneous or transcutaneous.

7 . The system of claim 1 , wherein at least one of the plurality of stimulating electrodes of the grid array comprises an atraumatic tip.

8 . The system of claim 1 , wherein both the grid array and the plurality of recording electrodes are configured to be placed on a first appendage.

9 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the grid array comprises a plurality of smaller grid arrays each configured to stimulate multiple points along a course of the nerve or nerve pathway.

10 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the one or more processors are further configured to:

in response to receiving an input from a safety button capable of being pressed by an awake subject, immediately stopping all stimulation.

11 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the one or more processors are further configured to:

in response to receiving an input from a user control, modifying at least one of the general search mode or the focused search mode by limiting a total number of the plurality of stimulation schemes used during the at least one of the general search mode or the focused search mode.

12 . The system of claim 1 , further comprising semi-automatically executing the general search mode and the focused search mode, wherein at least one of the general search mode or the focused search mode is interruptible by a user.

13 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the plurality of recording electrodes is configured to record at least one of: Somato-Sensory Evoked Potentials (SSEPs), Transcranial Electrical Motor Evoked Potentials (TCeMEP), Compound Muscle Action Potentials (CMAPs), Sensory Nerve Action Potentials (SNAPs), or Mixed Nerve Action Potentials (MNAPs), providing a user with a functional assessment of peripheral mixed nerve function, peripheral motor nerve function, peripheral sensory nerve function, and/or the nerve or nerve pathway during a procedure in which the nerve or nerve pathway is known to be at risk of damage.

14 . A computer-implemented method comprising:

by one or more processors executing program instructions:

communicating with a stimulator configured to control a grid array of a plurality of stimulating electrodes;

executing a general search mode comprising:

instructing the stimulator to systematically test a plurality of stimulation schemes until a first evoked potential response is detected by a plurality of recording electrodes having a maximum response amplitude, wherein:

each of the plurality of stimulation schemes includes activating and assigning positions and polarity of the plurality of stimulating electrodes, and

instructing the stimulator to systematically test the plurality of stimulation schemes in the general search mode comprises instructing the stimulator to ramp stimulation intensity during testing each of the plurality of stimulation schemes until at least one of: a maximum stimulation intensity value is reached or the maximum response amplitude is detected;

executing a focused search mode after executing the general search mode, the focused search mode comprising:

utilizing information from the general search mode, instructing the stimulator to systematically test the plurality of stimulation schemes until a second evoked potential response is detected by the plurality of recording electrodes having the maximum response amplitude and a minimum stimulation intensity, wherein:

instructing the stimulator to systematically test the plurality of stimulation schemes in the focused search mode comprises instructing the stimulator to ramp stimulation intensity during testing each of the plurality of stimulation schemes until the maximum response amplitude is detected;

for each stimulation scheme of the plurality of stimulation schemes, recording a respective stimulation intensity for the stimulation scheme at which the maximum response amplitude is detected;

comparing the respective stimulation intensities of the plurality of stimulation schemes at which the maximum response amplitude was detected; and

selecting the minimum stimulation intensity at which the maximum response amplitude was detected; and

using the minimum stimulation intensity at which the maximum response amplitude was detected to further stimulate a nerve or nerve pathway.

15 . The computer-implemented method of claim 14 , wherein:

each of the plurality of stimulating electrodes is independently assignable to be active or inactive,

each of the plurality of stimulating electrodes is independently assignable to be active as an anode or a cathode, and

the stimulator is configured to independently assign stimulation parameters to each of the plurality of stimulating electrodes.

16 . The computer-implemented method of claim 14 , wherein the maximum response amplitude of the first evoked potential response does not increase in amplitude upon an increase in stimulation intensity.

17 . The computer-implemented method of claim 14 , wherein, during the general search mode, a stimulation scheme of the plurality of stimulation schemes at which the maximum response amplitude is detected comprises a positive stimulation scheme, and wherein information from the positive stimulation scheme is used to instruct the stimulator to systematically test the plurality of stimulation schemes during the focused search mode.

18 . The computer-implemented method of claim 14 , wherein the general search mode further comprises, after the first evoked potential response is detected, executing another stimulation scheme from among the plurality of stimulation schemes.

19 . The computer-implemented method of claim 14 , wherein both the grid array and the plurality of recording electrodes are configured to be placed on a first appendage.

20 . The computer-implemented method of claim 14 , further comprising semi-automatically executing the general search mode and the focused search mode, wherein at least one of the general search mode or the focused search mode is interruptible by a user.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 22, 2022
From: BLOCK, JONATHAN D.; BALL, HIEU T.
To: SIDEWAYSTRATEGIES LLC
Reel/Frame 061189/0084 →
Continuity (3)
Continuation 16317221
Provisional Application 62362523 · Jul 14, 2016
Related Publication 20220400999A1 · Dec 22, 2022
References Cited (55)
US 7231256B2 · Wahlstrand et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 7522953B2 · Kaula et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 7959577B2 · Schmitz et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 7962191B2 · Marino et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8005535B2 · Gharib et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8137284B2 · Miles et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8165653B2 · Marino et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8172750B2 · Miles et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8206312B2 · Farquhar · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8224453B2 · De Ridder · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8644903B1 · Osa et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8660657B2 · Saoji · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8914121B2 · Moffitt et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8942801B2 · Miles et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9248279B2 · Chen et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 10016142B2 · Block et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10973451B2 · Block et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11272871B2 · Block et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 12029565B2 · Block et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 20050182456A1 · Ziobro et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20060161235A1 · King · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20060276853A1 · Tass et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20080167574A1 · Farquhar · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20090177112A1 · Gharib et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20100268298A1 · Moffitt et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20110082383A1 · Cory et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110230785A1 · Higgins et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110269172A1 · Eberle et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20120095360A1 · Runney et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20130035741A1 · Kolen et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130131743A1 · Yamasaki et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20140057232A1 · Wetmore et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140378941A1 · Su et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20150005680A1 · Lipani · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150012067A1 · Bradley et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150012068A1 · Bradley et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150032022A1 · Stone et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150057722A1 · Faltys et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150066104A1 · Wingeler et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150157626A1 · Cohen et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20160022992A1 · Franke et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20250127447A1 · Block et al. · 2025 [cited by applicant]
EP 2289448 · 2011 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2014063163 · 2014 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2018014007 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
Bernard et al., “Electrical Performances of a New Multipolar Micro-Stimulator”; 10th Annual Conference of the International FES Society, Montreal Canada, Jul. 2005; 3 pages. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report in PCT/US2013/065968, dated Jan. 30, 2014, in 2 pages. [cited by applicant]
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority in PCT/US2013/065968, dated Jan. 30, 2014, in 10 pages. [cited by applicant]
Ahmadian A et al., “Analysis of lumbar plexopathies and nerve injury after lateral retroperitoneal transpsoas approach: Diagnostic standardization,” J Neurosurg Spine 2013; 18(3); pp. 289-297. [cited by applicant]
Silverstein J et al., “Saphenous nerve somatosensory evoked potentials: A novel technique to monitor the femoral nerve during transpsoas lateral lumbar interbody fusion,” Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2014; 39(15); pp. 1254-126… [cited by applicant]
Robinson LR et al., “The efficacy of femoral nerve intraoperative somatosensory evoked potentials during surgical treatment of thoracolumbar fractures,” Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Oct. 1, 1993; 18(13); pp. 1793-1797. [cited by applicant]
Block J et al., “Motor evoked potentials for femoral nerve protection in transpsoas lateral access surgery of the spine,” Neurodiagnostic Journal, Mar. 2015; 55(1); pp. 36-45. [cited by applicant]
Chaudhary K et al., “Trans-cranial motor evoked potential detection of femoral nerve injury in trans-psoas lateral lumbar interbody fusion,” Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing, Jun. 17, 2015, pp. 549-554. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority in PCT/US2017/042271, dated Sep. 26, 2017, in 16 pages. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority in PCT/US2017/041995, dated Sep. 28, 2017, in 8 pages. [cited by applicant]