IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,473,811
Granted Patent B2
US 12,473,811 · App. 17/967,362 · Granted Nov 18, 2025

Validation and optimization of industrial carbon footprint emissions reduction

Inventors: Abdulrahman M. Hazazi (Dammam, SA); Zyad Abood Bamigdad (Dammam, SA); Mana M. Alowaidh (Dhahran, SA); Ali H. Al-Qahtani (Dammam, SA)
Assignee: Saudi Arabian Oil Company
E21B44/00E21B41/0064G06Q10/0637G06Q50/26Y02E20/32
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,473,811
App. No.
17/967,362
Granted
Nov 18, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

Systems and methods include a method for generating optimum de-carbonization investment plans. An optimization objective is determined for reducing carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) emissions of an organization. A CO 2 emissions baseline for the organization is determined. An optimum de-carbonization investment plan is generated for the organization using the optimization objective and the CO 2 emissions baseline for the organization. The optimum de-carbonization investment plan is configured to minimize life cycle costs of the organization while meeting emission reduction targets of the organization.

Claims (60)

1 . A computer-implemented method, comprising:

receiving, from a sensor, measurements indicative of carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) emissions of drilling equipment comprising a drill bit drilling a wellbore;

determining an optimization objective for reducing CO 2 emissions of an organization comprising the drilling equipment;

determining a CO 2 emissions baseline for the organization;

generating, using the optimization objective of the organization, the measurements indicative of the CO 2 emissions of the drilling equipment operating the drill bit, and the CO 2 emissions baseline for the organization, an optimum de-carbonization plan for the organization that is configured to minimize life cycle costs of the organization while meeting emission reduction targets of the organization;

generating, based on the optimum de-carbonization plan, changes to settings of the drill bit, the settings comprising one or more of a speed and a direction of the drill bit; and

transmitting the changes to at least one of the speed and the direction of the drill bit to the drilling equipment.

2 . The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein determining the optimization objective for reducing CO 2 emissions of the organization comprises:

determining the emission reduction targets based on an objective function of the organization;

determining operational constraints for meeting the emission reduction targets; and

determining a plan by which to meet the optimization objective while operating under the operational constraints.

3 . The computer-implemented method of claim 2 , wherein the emission reduction targets of the organization comprise a direct emissions reduction target, an indirect emissions reduction target, and a supply chain emissions reduction target.

4 . The computer-implemented method of claim 2 , wherein determining the CO 2 emissions baseline for the organization comprises:

monitoring and verifying direct emissions, indirect emissions, and emissions resulting from supply chains; and

classifying the CO 2 emissions based on combustion, venting, flaring, and fugitives for direct and indirect emissions.

5 . The computer-implemented method of claim 2 , wherein determining the optimization objective for reducing CO 2 emissions of the organization comprises using a library of information regarding energy efficiency (EE) de-carbonization initiatives that defines, for each type of source used by organizations, costs, and impacts associated with each type of emission reduction.

6 . The computer-implemented method of claim 2 , wherein the emission reduction targets of the organization comprise a reduction of CO 2 contributors by a predefined threshold.

7 . The computer-implemented method of claim 6 , wherein the predefined threshold is a percentage of CO 2 emissions.

8 . The computer-implemented method of claim 2 , wherein the objective function comprises an optimization goal of maximizing net present value (NPV).

9 . The computer-implemented method of claim 2 , wherein the objective function comprises an optimization goal of minimizing capital expenditures (CAPEX).

10 . The computer-implemented method of claim 2 , wherein the objective function comprises an optimization goal of maximizing CO 2 emissions reduction.

11 . The computer-implemented method of claim 2 , wherein the operational constraints comprise quantitative values of a CO 2 emissions reduction target and constraints per one or both of year and given period.

12 . The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein generating the optimum de-carbonization plan for the organization comprises prioritizing actions according to an annual plan to meet the emission reduction targets of the organization.

13 . The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , further comprising:

optimizing, by an optimizer using the optimization objective and the CO 2 emissions baseline for the organization, priorities that are prioritized by the optimizer; and

presenting, in a user interface as part of the optimum de-carbonization plan, the priorities, comprising information regarding emissions reduction targets.

14 . The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , further comprising:

generating, based on the optimum de-carbonization plan, changes to settings of de-carbonization equipment of a conventional gas turbine power plant by activating an air compressor, controlling air to a chamber, changing a setting of a turbine, and activating a heat recovery steam generator and a steam turbine generator; and

transmitting signals representing controlling activating the air compressor, controlling air to the chamber, changing the setting of a turbine, and activating the heat recovery steam generator and the steam turbine generator from a user interface to the air compressor, the chamber, the turbine, the heat recovery steam generator, or the steam turbine generator.

15 . A system, comprising:

drilling equipment comprising a drill bit configured to drill a wellbore;

a sensor configured to detect carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from the drilling equipment operating the drill bit; and

a computer separate from the drilling equipment comprising:

a dashboard configured to present CO 2 emissions related factors and settings of the drilling equipment to a user, at least one of the settings selectable by the user and comprising at least one of a speed or direction of the drill bit;

one or more processors; and

a non-transitory computer-readable storage medium coupled to the one or more processors and storing programming instructions for execution by the one or more processors, the programming instructions instructing the one or more processors to perform operations comprising:

receiving, from the sensor, measurements indicative of carbon dioxide CO 2 emissions of the drilling equipment;

determining an optimization objective for reducing CO 2 emissions of an organization comprising the drilling equipment;

determining a CO 2 emissions baseline for the organization;

generating, using the optimization objective of the organization, the measurements indicative of the CO 2 emissions of the drilling equipment, and the CO 2 emissions baseline for the organization, an optimum de-carbonization plan for the organization that is configured to minimize life cycle costs of the organization while meeting emission reduction targets of the organization;

generating, based on the optimum de-carbonization plan, changes to the settings of the drilling equipment; and

transmitting, based on user input to the dashboard, the changes of at least one of the speed or the direction of the drill bit from the dashboard to the drilling equipment.

16 . The system of claim 15 , the operations further comprising:

determining the emission reduction targets based on an objective function of the organization; and

determining operational constraints for meeting the emission reduction targets; and

determining a plan by which to meet the optimization objective while operating under the operational constraints.

17 . The system of claim 16 , further comprising a conventional gas turbine power plant comprising:

one or more of an air compressor, a turbine, a chamber between the air compressor and the turbine, a heat recovery steam generator, and a steam turbine generator; and

a de-carbonization equipment,

the programming instructions instructing the one or more processors to perform additional operations comprising:

generating, based on the optimum de-carbonization plan, changes to the settings of a de-carbonization equipment by activating the air compressor, controlling air to the chamber, setting the turbine, and activating the heat recovery steam generator and the steam turbine generator; and

transmitting, based on user input to the dashboard, the changes of at least one of the settings from the dashboard to the air compressor, the chamber, the turbine, the heat recovery steam generator, and the steam turbine generator.

18 . The system of claim 17 , wherein determining the optimization objective for reducing CO 2 emissions of the organization comprises:

determining the emission reduction targets for the conventional gas turbine power plant based on the objective function of the organization;

determining operational constraints of the conventional gas turbine power plant for meeting the emission reduction targets; and

determining a plan by which to meet the optimization objective while operating under the operational constraints of the conventional gas turbine power plant.

19 . The system of claim 15 , wherein generating the optimum de-carbonization plan for the organization comprises prioritizing actions according to an annual plan to meet the emission reduction targets of the organization.

20 . The system of claim 15 , further comprising:

optimizing, by an optimizer using the optimization objective and the CO 2 emissions baseline for the organization, priorities that are prioritized by the optimizer; and

presenting, in a user interface as part of the optimum de-carbonization plan, the priorities, comprising information regarding emissions reduction targets.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 18, 2022
From: HAZAZI, ABDULRAHMAN M.; BAMIGDAD, ZYAD ABOOD; ALOWAIDH, MANA M.; AL-QAHTANI, ALI H.
To: SAUDI ARABIAN OIL COMPANY
Reel/Frame 061450/0438 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20240127155A1 · Apr 18, 2024
References Cited (29)
US 7877235B2 · McConnell · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 10125641B2 · Sundaram · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20090287520A1 · Zimmerman · 2009 [cited by examiner]
US 20100257124A1 · Srinivasan · 2010 [cited by examiner]
US 20120084193A1 · Marino · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 20130035973A1 · Desai · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20140039709A1 · Steven · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20140039965A1 · Steven · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20170138222A1 · Sundaram · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20180134593A1 · Remer · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20200256181A1 · Jamieson · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200370446A1 · Mook · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20210388717A1 · Srinivasan · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20220109175A1 · Allinson · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220413166A1 · Saccomanno · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20230020417A1 · Elbsat · 2023 [cited by examiner]
CN 114282736 · 2022 [cited by applicant]
EP 1521152 · 2005 [cited by applicant]
EP 3731159 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
Vogt-Schilb, Adrien, Guy Meunier, and Stéephane Hallegatte. “When starting with the most expensive option makes sense: Optimal timing, cost and sectoral allocation of abatement investment.” Journal of Environmental Econ… [cited by examiner]
Ioannou, Ioannis, Shelley Xin Li, and George Serafeim. “The effect of target difficulty on target completion: The case of reducing carbon emissions.” The Accounting Review 91.5 (2016): 1467-1492. (Year: 2016). [cited by examiner]
Dahlmann, Frederik, Layla Branicki, and Stephen Brammer. “Managing Carbon Aspirations: The Influence of Corporate Climate Change Targets on Environmental Performance.” Journal of Business Ethics (2019): 1-24. (Year: 201… [cited by examiner]
Vogt-Schilb, Adrien, Guy Meunier, and Stéphane Hallegatte. “When starting with the most expensive option makes sense: Optimal timing, cost and sectoral allocation of abatement investment.” Journal of Environmental Econo… [cited by examiner]
Wang, Yongli, et al. “Capacity planning and optimization of business park-level integrated energy system based on investment constraints.” Energy 189 (2019): 116345. (Year: 2019). [cited by examiner]
Josifović, Aleksandar. “Reducing the environmental impact of hydraulic fracturing pumps.” (2016). (Year: 2016). [cited by examiner]
“A Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard,” The Greenhouse Gas Protocol, World Resources Institute and World Business Council for Sustainable Development, Mar. 2004, 116 pages. [cited by applicant]
Malins et al., “Reduction of Upstream Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Flaring and Venting,” International Council on Clean Transportation (ICCT), 2014, 246 pages. [cited by applicant]
Epa.gov [online] “Scope 3 Inventory Guidance,” EPA Center for Corporate Climate Leadership, available on or before Nov. 27, 2006, via Internet Archive: Wayback Machine URL <http://web.archive.org/web/20161127162705/http… [cited by applicant]
“Technical Guidance for Calculating Scope 3 Emissions,” Greenhouse Gas Protocol, World Resources Institute & World Business Council for Sustainable Development, 2013, 182 pages. [cited by applicant]