IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,481,306
Granted Patent B2
US 12,481,306 · App. 18/309,559 · Granted Nov 25, 2025

Adaptive and optimal imaging of quantum optical systems for quantum computing

Inventors: Christopher Monroe (Ellicott City, MD); Jiehang Zhang (College Park, MD); David Wong-Campos (Hyattsville, MD); Antonios Kyprianidis (Takoma, MD); Patrick Michael Becker (College Park, MD)
Assignee: UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK
G06E3/005B82Y10/00B82Y40/00G01J1/42G06N10/40H10D48/383G01J2001/4247G01N21/6458
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,481,306
App. No.
18/309,559
Granted
Nov 25, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

The disclosure describes an adaptive and optimal imaging of individual quantum emitters within a lattice or optical field of view for quantum computing. Advanced image processing techniques are described to identify individual optically active quantum bits (qubits) with an imager. Images of individual and optically-resolved quantum emitters fluorescing as a lattice are decomposed and recognized based on fluorescence. Expected spatial distributions of the quantum emitters guides the processing, which uses adaptive fitting of peak distribution functions to determine the number of quantum emitters in real time. These techniques can be used for the loading process, where atoms or ions enter the trap one-by-one, for the identification of solid-state emitters, and for internal state-detection of the quantum emitters, where each emitter can be fluorescent or dark depending on its internal state. This latter application is relevant to efficient and fast detection of optically active qubits in quantum simulations and quantum computing.

Claims (34)

1 . A method for determining qubit values for a plurality of atomic ions in an ion trap, the method identification comprising:

preparing, by an optical source, at least one atomic ion of the plurality of atomic ions in a bright state while maintaining all other atomic ions of the plurality of atomic ions in a different state than the bright state;

collecting a fluorescing image of the at least one atomic ion of the plurality of atomic ions in the bright state;

determining a respective centroid and a respective width of the at least one atomic ion based on an individual atomic ion intensity detected in the fluorescing image; and

determining a qubit value of the at least one atomic ion based on the determined centroid and width of the at least one atomic ion.

2 . The method according to claim 1 , further comprising:

performing a maximum likelihood method to decompose a distribution of a peak intensity in the fluorescing image into a best fit linear combination of all of a plurality of individual basis intensity distributions; and

determining the qubit value of the at least one atomic ion based on the best fit linear combination.

3 . The method according to claim 2 , wherein the distribution of the peak intensity in the fluorescing image is based on the determined centroid and width of the at least one atomic ion.

4 . The method according to claim 1 , further comprising establishing individual basis intensity distributions for each of the plurality of atomic ions.

5 . The method according to claim 1 , wherein the bright state is a bright quantum state and the different state is a dark state or a dark quantum state.

6 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the optical source is a red-detuned near-resonant laser that Doppler cools the plurality of atomic ions and fluoresces the at least one atomic ion.

7 . The method of claim 2 , wherein determining the qubit value comprises adaptively correcting the plurality of atomic ions in response to the best fit linear combination indicating that there is a slow movement of at least a subset of the plurality of atomic ions, there are dropouts from losing trapped atomic ions, or drifts affecting crosstalk.

8 . The method of claim 2 , wherein determining the peak intensity in the fluorescing image comprises identifying a region-of-interest (ROI) for the at least one atomic ion based on one or more of the centroid and the width of the respective individual peak intensity.

9 . The method of claim 8 , further comprising labeling the ROI with one or more of a text identifier or a geometric shape encircling the respective individual peak intensity.

10 . The method of claim 9 , further comprising indicating, by the text identifier, a number assigned to the at least one atomic ion.

11 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising periodically identifying the qubit value for the at least one atomic ion as part of a calibration procedure.

12 . A quantum information processing (QIP) system, comprising:

an ion trap configured to trap a plurality of atomic ions;

an optical controller configured to control an optical source to configure at least one atomic ion of the plurality of atomic ions in a bright state while maintaining all other atomic ions of the plurality of atomic ions in a different state than the bright state; and

an imaging system configured to:

collect a fluorescing image of the at least one atomic ion of the plurality of atomic ions in the bright state,

determine a respective centroid and a respective width of the at least one atomic ion based on an individual atomic ion intensity detected in the fluorescing image, and

determine a qubit value of the at least one atomic ion based on the determined centroid and width of the at least one atomic ion.

13 . The QIP system according to claim 12 , wherein the imaging system configured to:

perform a maximum likelihood method to decompose a distribution of a peak intensity in the fluorescing image into a best fit linear combination of all of a plurality of individual basis intensity distributions, and

determine the qubit value of the at least one atomic ion based on the best fit linear combination.

14 . The QIP system according to claim 13 , wherein the distribution of the peak intensity in the fluorescing image is based on the determined centroid and width of the at least one atomic ion.

15 . The QIP system according to claim 12 , wherein the imaging system includes a CCD camera or a CMOS camera that is configured to collect the fluorescing image.

16 . The QIP system according to claim 12 , wherein the bright state is a bright quantum state and the different state is a dark state or a dark quantum state.

17 . The QIP system according to claim 12 , wherein the optical source is a red-detuned near-resonant laser that Doppler cools the plurality of atomic ions and fluoresces the at least one atomic ion.

18 . The QIP system according to claim 13 , wherein the imaging system is further configured to determine the qubit value by adaptively correcting the plurality of atomic ions in response to the best fit linear combination indicating that there is a slow movement of at least a subset of the plurality of atomic ions, there are dropouts from losing trapped atomic ions, or drifts affecting crosstalk.

19 . The QIP system according to claim 13 , wherein the imaging system is further configured to determine the peak intensity in the fluorescing image by identifying a region-of-interest (ROI) for the at least one atomic ion based on one or more of the centroid and the width of the respective individual peak intensity.

20 . The QIP system according to claim 19 , wherein the imaging system is further configured to label the ROI with one or more of a text identifier or a geometric shape encircling the respective individual peak intensity.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 21, 2024
From: MONROE, CHRISTOPHER; WONG-CAMPOS, DAVID; KYPRIANIDIS, ANTONIOS; BECKER, PATRICK MICHAEL
To: UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK
Reel/Frame 066513/0408 →
Continuity (4)
Continuation 17513496 · Oct 28, 2021
Division 16239084 · Jan 3, 2019
Provisional Application 62614108 · Jan 5, 2018
Related Publication 20240219951A1 · Jul 4, 2024
References Cited (24)
US 11262785B2 · Monroe · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20070269852A1 · Muys · 2007 [cited by applicant]
Blatt, Rainer, et al., Entangled States of Trapped Atomic Ions, Nature, vol. 453, Jun. 19, 2008, 8 pages. [cited by applicant]
Brown, Kenneth et al., Co-designing a scalable quantum computer with trapped atomic ions, Nature Quantum Information 2, 2016, 10 pages. [cited by applicant]
Burrell, A., et al., Scalable simultaneous muliti-qubit readout with 99.99% single-shot fidelity, Physical Review A 81, 2010, 4 pages. [cited by applicant]
Dehmelt, H., Experiments with an Isolated Subatomic Particle at Rest, Nobel Lecture, Dec. 8, 1989, 13 pages. [cited by applicant]
Deslauriers, L., et al., Efficient photolonization loading of trapped ions with ultrafast pulses, Physical Review A 74 063421 (2006). [cited by applicant]
Hume,. D., et al., High-Fidelity, Adaptive Qubit Measurements through Repetitive Information transfer, Physical Review Letters, vol. 99, 2007, 4 pages. [cited by applicant]
James, D.F.V., Quantum dynamics of cold trapped ions with application to quantum computation, Applied Physics B: Lasers and Optics 66, 1998, 10 pages. [cited by applicant]
Kielpinski, D. et al., Architecture for a large-scale ion-trap quantum computer, Nature, vol. 417, Jun. 15, 2002, 3 pages. [cited by applicant]
Ladd, T.D., et al., Quantum Computing, Nature 464, 45 (2010), 26 pages. [cited by applicant]
Leibfried, D., et al., Quantum dynamics of single trapped ions, Review of Modern Physics, vol. 75, Jan. 2003, 44 pages. [cited by applicant]
Maiwald, Robert, et al., Stylus ion trap for enhanced access and sensing, Nature Physics, vol. 5, Aug. 2009, 4 pages. [cited by applicant]
Monroe, C., et al., Scaling the Ion Trap Quantum Processor, Science 339, 2013, 7 pages. [cited by applicant]
Monroe, Christopher R., et al., Quantum Computing with Ions, Scientific American, Aug. 2008, 9 pages. [cited by applicant]
Myerson, A., et al., High-fidelity readout of trapped-ion quibits, Physical Review Letters 100, 2008, 4 pages. [cited by applicant]
Nielsen, M.A., et al., Quantum Computation and Quantum Information (Cambridge University Press, Address, 2000, 17 pages. [cited by applicant]
Olmschenk, S., et al., Manipulation and detection of a trapped Yb+ hyperfine qubit, Physical Review A, vol. 76, 2007, 9 pages. [cited by applicant]
Paul, Wolfgang, Electromagnetic traps for charged and neutral particles, Rev. Mod. Phys. vol. 62, (1990), 12 pages. [cited by applicant]
Quantum Simulation, Nature Physics, Insight Issue, vol. 8, Apr. 2012, 1 page. [cited by applicant]
Rosenband, T. et al., Frequency Ratio of Al+ and Hg+ Single-Ion Optical Clocks; Metrology at the 17th Decimal Place, Science 319, 2008, 6 pages. [cited by applicant]
Schiffer, J.P., Phase Transitions in Anisotropically Confined Ionic Crystals, Physical Review Letters, vol. 70, No. 6, Feb. 8, 1993, 5 pages. [cited by applicant]
Shen, C., et al., Correcting detection errors in quantum state engineering through data processing, New Journal of Physics 14, 2002, 10 pages. [cited by applicant]
Wineland, D.J., et al., Laser Cooling of Atoms, Physical Review A, vol. 20, No. 4, Oct. 1979, 20 pages. [cited by applicant]