IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,487,676
Granted Patent B2
US 12,487,676 · App. 18/671,678 · Granted Dec 2, 2025

Closed-loop extended reality stimulus presentation and perception feedback using multi-channel physiological signals

Inventors: Pascal Fortin (Montreal, CA); Jeremy Cooperstock (Westmount, CA); Sanghoon Kim (Chadds Ford, PA)
Assignee: InterDigital VC Holdings, Inc.
G06F3/015G06F3/013G06Q30/0255
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,487,676
App. No.
18/671,678
Granted
Dec 2, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

In example embodiments, a method includes obtaining a first measurement of at least a first physiological parameter of a user from a time before presentation of an information item to the user. The information item may be, for example, a notification, an advertisement, or an emergency alert, among other possibilities. A second measurement of the first physiological parameter is obtained from a time after a beginning of the presentation of the information item to the user (e.g. during the presentation). Based at least on a comparison between the first and second measurements, a determination is made of whether the user has perceived the information item. The determination may also be based on a corruption coefficient indicating an amount by which an activity of the user is likely to interfere with the first physiological parameter.

Claims (26)

1 . A method comprising:

using a microphone to detect an audible alert;

obtaining at least a first signal representing a difference between (i) a first value representing a first physiological parameter of a user during a time before the audible alert and (ii) a second value representing the first physiological parameter of the user during a time after the audible alert;

based at least on the first signal, determining whether the user perceived the audible alert.

2 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising providing a communication indicating whether the user perceived the audible alert.

3 . The method of claim 2 , wherein the communication indicating whether the user perceived the audible alert is provided to a vehicle.

4 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising providing a supplemental alert in response to a determination that the user did not perceive the audible alert.

5 . The method of claim 4 , wherein the supplemental alert is a light.

6 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising obtaining a second signal representing a difference between (i) a third value representing a second physiological parameter of the user during a time before the audible alert and (ii) a fourth value representing the second physiological parameter of the user during a time after the audible alert, wherein the determination is further based on the second signal.

7 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the first value is an average value of the first physiological parameter during the time before the audible alert, and the second value is an average value of the first physical parameter during the time after the audible alert.

8 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the first value is a maximum value of the first physiological parameter during the time before the audible alert, and the second value is a maximum value of the first physical parameter during the time after the audible alert.

9 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the first value is a frequency of the first physiological parameter during the time before the audible alert, and the second value is a frequency of the first physical parameter during the time after the audible alert.

10 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the first value is a variability of the first physiological parameter during the time before the audible alert, and the second value is a variability of the first physical parameter during the time after the audible alert.

11 . An apparatus comprising one or more processors configured to perform at least:

using a microphone to detect an audible alert;

obtaining at least a first signal representing a difference between (i) a first value representing a first physiological parameter of a user during a time before the audible alert and (ii) a second value representing the first physiological parameter of the user during a time after the audible alert;

based at least on the first signal, determining whether the user perceived the audible alert.

12 . The apparatus of claim 11 , further configured to provide a communication indicating whether the user perceived the audible alert.

13 . The apparatus of claim 12 , wherein the communication indicating whether the user perceived the audible alert is provided to a vehicle.

14 . The apparatus of claim 13 , wherein the vehicle is configured to provide a supplemental alert in response to a determination that the user did not perceive the audible alert.

15 . The apparatus of claim 14 , wherein the supplemental alert is a light.

16 . The apparatus of claim 11 , further configured to obtain a second signal representing a difference between (i) a third value representing a second physiological parameter of the user during a time before the audible alert and (ii) a fourth value representing the second physiological parameter of the user during a time after the audible alert, wherein the determination is further based on the second signal.

17 . The apparatus of claim 11 , wherein the first value is an average value of the first physiological parameter during the time before the audible alert, and the second value is an average value of the first physical parameter during the time after the audible alert.

18 . The apparatus of claim 11 , wherein the first value is a maximum value of the first physiological parameter during the time before the audible alert, and the second value is a maximum value of the first physical parameter during the time after the audible alert.

19 . The apparatus of claim 11 , wherein the first value is a frequency of the first physiological parameter during the time before the audible alert, and the second value is a frequency of the first physical parameter during the time after the audible alert.

20 . The apparatus of claim 11 , wherein the first value is a variability of the first physiological parameter during the time before the audible alert, and the second value is a variability of the first physical parameter during the time after the audible alert.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 17, 2024
From: FORTIN, PASCAL; COOPERSTOCK, JEREMY; KIM, SANGHOON
To: INTERDIGITAL VC HOLDINGS, INC.
Reel/Frame 069614/0537 →
Continuity (3)
Continuation 18016179
Provisional Application 63052313 · Jul 15, 2020
Related Publication 20240310914A1 · Sep 19, 2024
References Cited (22)
US 20040234044A1 · MacNamara · 2004 [cited by examiner]
US 20070236488A1 · Mathan · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070263978A1 · Yang · 2007 [cited by examiner]
US 20090082071A1 · Hicks, III · 2009 [cited by examiner]
US 20100250554A1 · Shu · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20110295142A1 · Chakravarthy · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20150269009A1 · Faaborg · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20160093207A1 · Di Censo · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20170116839A1 · Friedman · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20180114444A1 · Maytal · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180164588A1 · Leppanen · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20190354879A1 · Van Rensburg · 2019 [cited by applicant]
CN 108304074A · 2018 [cited by applicant]
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/US2021/41316 issued Jan. 17, 2023 (8pages). [cited by applicant]
Pielot, M. et al., “Didn't you see my message? Predicting Attentiveness to Mobile Instant Messages.” In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, pp. 3319-3328. 2014 (11 pages). [cited by applicant]
Chang, Y.-J. et al., “Investigating mobile users' ringer mode usage and attentiveness and responsiveness to communication.” In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile D… [cited by applicant]
Sahami S et al., “Large-scale assessment of mobile notifications.” In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, 2014 (10 pages). [cited by applicant]
Andersen, H. et al., “Modeling vibrotactile detection by logistic regression.” In Proceedings of the 7th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Making Sense Through Design, 2012 (5 pages). [cited by applicant]
Blum, J. et al., “Improving haptic feedback on wearable devices through accelerometer measurements.” In Proceedings of the 28th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software & Technology, pp. 31-36. 2015, (6 pages). [cited by applicant]
Fortin, P. et al., “Detecting perception of smartphone notifications using skin conductance responses.” In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1-9. May 2019 (9 pages). [cited by applicant]
Jerritta, S., et al., “Physiological signals based human emotion recognition: a review.” In 2011 IEEE 7th international colloquium on signal processing and its applications, pp. 410-415. IEEE, 2011 (6 pages). [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2021/041316 dated Nov. 10, 2021 (11 pages). [cited by applicant]