IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,493,004
Granted Patent B2
US 12,493,004 · App. 18/374,289 · Granted Dec 9, 2025

Method for determining parameters of three dimensional nanostructure and apparatus applying the same

Inventors: Chun-Ting Liu (Taichung, TW); Po-Ching He (Hsinchu, TW); Wei-En Fu (Taoyuan, TW); Chun-Yu Liu (Taipei, TW)
Assignee: INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH INSTITUTE
G01N23/201G01B15/04G01N23/2273H01L22/12G01N2223/052G01N2223/1016
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,493,004
App. No.
18/374,289
Granted
Dec 9, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method for determining parameters of nanostructures, wherein the method includes steps as follows: Firstly, an X-ray reflection intensity measurement curve of a nanostructure to be tested is obtained by radiating the nanostructure to be tested with X-ray. The X-ray reflection intensity measurement curve is compared with an X-ray reflection intensity standard curve to obtain a comparison result. Subsequently, at least one parameter existing in the nanostructure to be tested is determined according to the comparison result.

Claims (54)

1 . A method for determining parameters of nanostructures, comprising:

obtaining an X-ray reflection intensity measurement curve of a nanostructure to be tested by radiating the nanostructure to be tested with an X-ray;

comparing the X-ray reflection intensity measurement curve with an X-ray reflection intensity standard curve to obtain a comparison result; and

determining at least one parameter existing in the nanostructure to be tested according to the comparison result.

2 . The method according to claim 1 , wherein the step of obtaining an X-ray reflection intensity measurement curve comprises:

focusing the X-rays on a surface of the nanostructure to be tested, wherein an incident angle of the X-ray is adjusted within a preset angle range, and an optical wavelength of the X-ray is less than 0.154 nm;

using an x-ray detector to collect and measure a total reflection intensity of x-ray reflection lines reflected by the surface;

calculating a plurality of non-specular reflection components of the X-ray reflection lines corresponding to different ranges of the incident angle; and removing the non-specular reflection components from the total reflection intensity; and integrating a remained portion of the total reflection intensity to obtain a specular reflection component; and

adjust the incident angle with in the preset angle range, repeat above steps, and obtain a relationship curve between the incident angle and the specular reflection component as the X-ray reflection intensity measurement curve.

3 . The method according to claim 2 , wherein the comparison result comprises a difference curve of reflection intensity obtained by subtracting the X-ray reflection intensity standard curve from the X-ray reflection intensity measurement curve.

4 . The method according to claim 3 , wherein the difference curve of reflection intensity comprises a maximum reflection intensity difference at a critical angle of the X-ray reflection intensity measurement curve.

5 . The method according to claim 4 , wherein the step of determining at least one parameter comprises determining a critical dimension deviation in the nanostructure to be tested by referring the maximum reflection intensity difference and an equivalent density function of the X-ray reflection intensity measurement curve.

6 . The method according to claim 5 , wherein the equivalent density function is:

ρ

E

⁢

M

⁢

A

=

∑

i

⁢

A

i

⁢

ρ

i

∑

i

⁢

A

i

wherein, ρEMA is a total equivalent density of the nanostructure to be tested ρ i is an electron density of at least one material constituting the nanostructure to be tested; A i is a surface area of the at least one material on the surface.

7 . The method according to claim 6 , wherein the ρEMA is proportional to the maximum reflection intensity difference.

8 . The method according to claim 6 , further comprising:

obtaining a plurality of reflection intensity simulation curves respectively corresponding to a plurality of structural features, each of which corresponds to at least one parameter of known position, type and/or size;

performing a curve fitting on the reflection intensity measurement curve and the plurality of reflection intensity simulation curves, so as to obtain a fitting result; and

deducing a position, a type and/or a size of the at least one parameter existing in the nanostructure to be tested by referencing the fitting result.

9 . The method according to claim 1 , wherein the X-ray reflection intensity standard curve is obtained by using the X-rays to irradiate a standard nanostructure which has the same specifications as the nanostructure to be tested, and actually measuring its reflection intensity.

10 . The method according to claim 1 , wherein the X-ray reflection intensity standard curve is obtained by a computer simulation.

11 . An apparatus for determining parameters of nanostructures, comprising:

an X-ray light source, used for emitting an X-ray

an X-ray reflector, used to focus the X-ray on a surface of a nanostructure to be tested by adjusting an incident angle of the X-ray within a preset angle range;

an X-ray detector, used to collect X-ray reflection lines reflected from surfaces; and

a parameters determining module used for:

obtaining an X-ray reflection intensity measurement curve according to a reflection intensity of the X-ray reflection lines;

comparing the X-ray reflection intensity measurement curve with an X-ray reflection intensity standard curve to obtain a comparison result; and

determining at least one parameter existing in the nanostructure to be tested according to the comparison result.

12 . The apparatus according to claim 11 , further comprising an incident slit disposed between the X-ray reflector and the surface; wherein a divergence angle of the X-ray is adjusted by a width of the incident slit.

13 . The apparatus according to claim 11 , further comprising a three-axis moving device used to control a three-axis movement of the X-ray detector in at least one of the X-axis, Y-axis and Z-axis to collect and measure the X-ray reflection lines.

14 . The apparatus according to claim 11 , wherein the X-ray has an optical wavelength less than 0.154 nm.

15 . The apparatus according to claim 11 , wherein the X-ray reflection intensity standard curve is obtained by using the X-rays to irradiate a standard nanostructure which has the same specifications as the nanostructure to be tested, and actually measuring its reflection intensity.

16 . The apparatus according to claim 11 , wherein the X-ray reflection intensity standard curve is obtained by a computer simulation.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 28, 2023
From: LIU, CHUN-TING; HE, PO-CHING; FU, WEI-EN; LIU, CHUN-YU
To: INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH INSTITUTE
Reel/Frame 065065/0204 →
Priority Claims (1)
TW 112119892 · May 29, 2023 · national
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 63410667 · Sep 28, 2022
Related Publication 20240102950A1 · Mar 28, 2024
References Cited (58)
US 6771735B2 · Janik et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 6987832B2 · Koppel et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 7139365B1 · Janik · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 7558371B2 · Park et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 8731138B2 · Yokhin et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 9588066B2 · Pois et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9823203B2 · Yun et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 10119925B2 · Pois et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10151713B2 · Wu et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 11036898B2 · Chouaib et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11181489B2 · Thompson et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11333621B2 · Wack et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11460418B2 · Kuznetsov et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11519719B2 · Shchegrov et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11579099B2 · Liu et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20050195941A1 · Lischka et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20120140889A1 · Wall et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20160077025A1 · Zhang et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160341674A1 · Wu et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170167862A1 · Dziura et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170307548A1 · Bykanov et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170315055A1 · Tinnemans et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20180106735A1 · Gellineau et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180188192A1 · Artemiev et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180299259A1 · Shchegrov et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180350699A1 · Gellineau et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20200225151A1 · Wang et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20210063329A1 · Kuznetsov et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210239629A1 · Chuang et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210310968A1 · Kuznetsov et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20220120561A1 · Liu et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220252395A1 · Hench et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
CN 104081193B · 2017 [cited by applicant]
CN 110036284A · 2019 [cited by applicant]
EP 2443651B1 · 2015 [cited by applicant]
FR 2180847A1 · 1973 [cited by applicant]
JP 201213659A · 2012 [cited by applicant]
JP 5504502B2 · 2014 [cited by applicant]
TW 201011278A · 2010 [cited by applicant]
TW I444589B · 2014 [cited by applicant]
TW 201602514A · 2016 [cited by applicant]
TW I689702B · 2020 [cited by applicant]
TW 202124941A · 2021 [cited by applicant]
TW 202203281A · 2022 [cited by applicant]
TW I753490B · 2022 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2017203406A1 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
Taiwanese Office Action and Search Report for Taiwanese Application No. 112119892, dated Oct. 23, 2023. [cited by applicant]
Freychet et al., “Estimation of Line Cross Sections Using Critical-Dimension Grazing-Incidence Small-Angle X-Ray Scattering”, Physical Review Applied 12, 044026, 2019, pp. 044026-1-044026-8. [cited by applicant]
Gin et al., “Inline metrology of high aspect ratio hole tilt using small-angle x-ray scattering”, Proc. of SPIE, 2022, vol. 12053, pp. 1205312-1 to 1205312-10. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International Application PCT/US22/80122, dated Feb. 14, 2023. [cited by applicant]
Lee et al., “Nanoimprint pattern transfer quality from specular x-ray reflectivity”, Applied Physics Letters 87, 263111, 2005, pp. 263111-1-263111-3. [cited by applicant]
Lee et al., “X-ray Reflectivity Measurements of Nanoscale Structures: Limits of the Effective Medium Approximation”, AIP Conference Proceedings 931, 209, 2007, pp. 209-215. [cited by applicant]
Leng et al., “Rapid X-Ray Reflectivity (XRR) characterization and Process Monitoring of Multilayer Ta/Al [cited by applicant]
Taiwanese Office Action and Search Report for Taiwanese Application No. 109123688, dated Apr. 7, 2021. [cited by applicant]
Taiwanese Office Action and Search Report for Taiwanese Application No. 111134541, dated Feb. 16, 2023. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 17/037,115, dated Jul. 14, 2022. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 17/532,767, dated May 18, 2023. [cited by applicant]
Voegeli et al., “A quick convergent-beam laboratory X-ray reflectometer using a simultaneous multiple-angle dispersive geometry,” Journal of Applied Crystallography, vol. 50, 2017, pp. 570-575. [cited by applicant]