IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,494,224
Granted Patent B2
US 12,494,224 · App. 18/328,738 · Granted Dec 9, 2025

Analyzing speech using speech-sample alignment and segmentation based on acoustic features

Inventors: Raziel Haimi-Cohen (Springfield, NJ); Itai Katsir (Shaar Efraim, IL); Ilan D. Shallom (Gedera, IL)
Assignee: Cordio Medical Ltd.
G10L25/66G10L15/22G10L15/30
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,494,224
App. No.
18/328,738
Filed
Jun 4, 2023
Granted
Dec 9, 2025
Kind
B2
Art Unit
2657
USPC
704/206
Abstract

A method includes mapping, by a processor, a test speech sample, which was produced by a subject while a physiological state of the subject was unknown, to a reference speech sample, which was produced in a known physiological state. The method further includes, based on the mapping, computing a distance between the test speech sample and the reference speech sample, and in response to the distance, communicating an output indicating the physiological state of the subject while the test speech sample was produced. Other embodiments are also described.

Claims (89)

1 . A system, comprising:

an output interface; and

one or more processors, configured to cooperatively carry out a process that includes:

mapping a test speech sample, which was produced by a subject while a physiological state of the subject was unknown, to a reference speech sample, which was produced in a known physiological state,

based on the mapping, computing a distance between the test speech sample and the reference speech sample, and

in response to the distance, communicating, via the output interface, an output indicating the physiological state of the subject while the test speech sample was produced,

wherein the reference speech sample was divided into multiple reference-sample segments based on differences in acoustic properties between each pair of successive ones of the reference-sample segments,

wherein mapping the test speech sample to the reference speech sample includes:

dividing the test speech sample into multiple test-sample segments based on differences in the acoustic properties between each pair of successive ones of the test-sample segments, and

mapping at least some of the test-sample segments to corresponding ones of the reference-sample segments, and

wherein computing the distance includes computing the distance based on respective local distances between the mapped test-sample segments and the corresponding ones of the reference-sample segments.

2 . A method, comprising:

mapping, by a processor, a test speech sample, which was produced by a subject while a physiological state of the subject was unknown, to a reference speech sample, which was produced in a known physiological state;

based on the mapping, computing a distance between the test speech sample and the reference speech sample; and

in response to the distance, communicating an output indicating the physiological state of the subject while the test speech sample was produced,

wherein the reference speech sample was divided into multiple reference-sample segments based on differences in acoustic properties between each pair of successive ones of the reference-sample segments,

wherein mapping the test speech sample to the reference speech sample comprises:

dividing the test speech sample into multiple test-sample segments based on differences in the acoustic properties between each pair of successive ones of the test-sample segments; and

mapping at least some of the test-sample segments to corresponding ones of the reference-sample segments, and

wherein computing the distance comprises computing the distance based on respective local distances between the mapped test-sample segments and the corresponding ones of the reference-sample segments.

3 . The method according to claim 2 , further comprising, prior to the mapping, verifying that the test speech sample and reference speech sample include the same verbal content.

4 . The system according to claim 1 ,

wherein the reference-sample segments were labeled as corresponding to respective reference-sample speech units, and

wherein dividing the test-speech sample includes dividing the test-speech sample such that the test-sample segments are labeled as corresponding to respective test-sample speech units.

5 . The system according to claim 1 , wherein the process further includes:

computing respective test-sample feature vectors quantifying acoustic features of the mapped test-sample segments,

computing respective reference-sample feature vectors quantifying the acoustic features of the corresponding ones of the reference-sample segments, and

computing the local distances by computing the local distances between the test-sample feature vectors and the reference-sample feature vectors, respectively.

6 . The method according to claim 2 , wherein the reference speech sample was produced by the subject.

7 . The method according to claim 2 ,

wherein the reference speech sample was divided into N reference-sample segments,

wherein dividing the test speech sample comprises dividing the test speech sample into N test-sample segments, and

wherein mapping the at least some of the test-sample segments to the corresponding ones of the reference-sample segments comprises mapping an i th one of the test-sample segments to an i th one of the reference-sample segments for i=1 . . . N.

8 . The method according to claim 2 ,

wherein the reference-sample segments were labeled as corresponding to respective reference-sample speech units, and

wherein dividing the test-speech sample comprises dividing the test-speech sample such that the test-sample segments are labeled as corresponding to respective test-sample speech units.

9 . The method according to claim 8 , wherein mapping the at least some of the test-sample segments to the corresponding ones of the reference-sample segments comprises mapping the at least some of the test-sample segments to the corresponding ones of the reference-sample segments by finding the correspondence that minimizes, under one or more predefined constraints, a function of respective measures of dissimilarity between the test-sample speech units of the mapped test-sample segments and the reference-sample speech units of the corresponding ones of the reference-sample segments.

10 . The method according to claim 8 , wherein dividing the test speech sample comprises dividing the test speech sample while constraining the test-sample speech units responsively to the reference-sample speech units.

11 . The method according to claim 2 , further comprising:

computing respective test-sample feature vectors quantifying acoustic features of the test-sample segments; and

computing respective reference-sample feature vectors quantifying the acoustic features of the reference-sample segments,

wherein mapping the at least some of the test-sample segments to the corresponding ones of the reference-sample segments comprises mapping the at least some of the test-sample segments to the corresponding ones of the reference-sample segments by finding the correspondence that minimizes, under one or more predefined constraints, a function of respective measures of dissimilarity between the test-sample feature vectors of the mapped test-sample segments and the reference-sample feature vectors of the corresponding ones of the reference-sample segments.

12 . The method according to claim 2 , further comprising:

computing respective test-sample feature vectors quantifying acoustic features of the mapped test-sample segments;

computing respective reference-sample feature vectors quantifying the acoustic features of the corresponding ones of the reference-sample segments; and

computing the local distances by computing the local distances between the test-sample feature vectors and the reference-sample feature vectors, respectively.

13 . The method according to claim 12 , wherein computing the test-sample feature vectors comprises:

dividing the test speech sample into multiple frames, such that each of the test-sample segments includes a different respective subset of the frames; and

for each of the mapped test-sample segments:

computing multiple test-frame feature vectors quantifying the acoustic features of the subset of the frames included in the test-sample segment, and

computing the test-sample feature vector for the test-sample segment based on the test-frame feature vectors.

14 . The method according to claim 13 , wherein computing the test-sample feature vector for the test-sample segment comprises computing the test-sample feature vector for the test-sample segment based on a statistic of the test-frame feature vectors.

15 . The method according to claim 13 , wherein computing the test-sample feature vector for the test-sample segment comprises:

fitting respective functions to one or more components of the test-frame feature vectors; and

computing the test-sample feature vector for the test-sample segment based on parameters of the functions.

16 . A computer software product comprising a tangible non-transitory computer-readable medium in which program instructions are stored, which instructions, when read by a processor, cause the processor to:

map a test speech sample, which was produced by a subject while a physiological state of the subject was unknown, to a reference speech sample, which was produced in a known physiological state,

based on the mapping, compute a distance between the test speech sample and the reference speech sample, and

in response to the distance, communicate an output indicating the physiological state of the subject while the test speech sample was produced,

wherein the reference speech sample was divided into multiple reference-sample segments based on differences in acoustic properties between each pair of successive ones of the reference-sample segments,

wherein the instructions cause the processor to map the test speech sample to the reference speech sample by:

dividing the test speech sample into multiple test-sample segments based on differences in the acoustic properties between each pair of successive ones of the test-sample segments, and

mapping at least some of the test-sample segments to corresponding ones of the reference-sample segments, and

wherein the instructions cause the processor to compute the distance based on respective local distances between the mapped test-sample segments and the corresponding ones of the reference-sample segments.

17 . The computer software product according to claim 16 , wherein the reference speech sample was produced by the subject.

18 . The computer software product according to claim 16 , wherein the instructions further cause the processor to verify, prior to the mapping, that the test speech sample and reference speech sample include the same verbal content.

19 . The computer software product according to claim 16 ,

wherein the reference speech sample was divided into N reference-sample segments,

wherein the instructions cause the processor to divide the test speech sample into N test-sample segments, and

wherein the instructions cause the processor to map the at least some of the test-sample segments to the corresponding ones of the reference-sample segments by mapping an i th one of the test-sample segments to an i th one of the reference-sample segments for i=1 . . . N.

20 . The computer software product according to claim 16 ,

wherein the reference-sample segments were labeled as corresponding to respective reference-sample speech units, and

wherein the instructions cause the processor to divide the test-speech sample such that the test-sample segments are labeled as corresponding to respective test-sample speech units.

21 . The computer software product according to claim 20 , wherein the instructions cause the processor to map the at least some of the test-sample segments to the corresponding ones of the reference-sample segments by finding the correspondence that minimizes, under one or more predefined constraints, a function of respective measures of dissimilarity between the test-sample speech units of the mapped test-sample segments and the reference-sample speech units of the corresponding ones of the reference-sample segments.

22 . The computer software product according to claim 20 , wherein the instructions cause the processor to divide the test speech sample while constraining the test-sample speech units responsively to the reference-sample speech units.

23 . The computer software product according to claim 16 ,

wherein the instructions further cause the processor to:

compute respective test-sample feature vectors quantifying acoustic features of the test-sample segments, and

compute respective reference-sample feature vectors quantifying the acoustic features of the reference-sample segments, and

wherein the instructions cause the processor to map the at least some of the test-sample segments to the corresponding ones of the reference-sample segments by finding the correspondence that minimizes, under one or more predefined constraints, a function of respective measures of dissimilarity between the test-sample feature vectors of the mapped test-sample segments and the reference-sample feature vectors of the corresponding ones of the reference-sample segments.

24 . The computer software product according to claim 16 , wherein the instructions further cause the processor to:

compute respective test-sample feature vectors quantifying acoustic features of the mapped test-sample segments,

compute respective reference-sample feature vectors quantifying the acoustic features of the corresponding ones of the reference-sample segments, and

compute the local distances by computing the local distances between the test-sample feature vectors and the reference-sample feature vectors, respectively.

25 . The computer software product according to claim 24 , wherein the instructions cause the processor to compute the test-sample feature vectors by:

dividing the test speech sample into multiple frames, such that each of the test-sample segments includes a different respective subset of the frames, and

for each of the mapped test-sample segments:

computing multiple test-frame feature vectors quantifying the acoustic features of the subset of the frames included in the test-sample segment, and

computing the test-sample feature vector for the test-sample segment based on the test-frame feature vectors.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 5, 2023
From: HAIMI-COHEN, RAZIEL; KATSIR, ITAI; SHALLOM, ILAN D.
To: CORDIO MEDICAL LTD.
Reel/Frame 063850/0537 →
Continuity (3)
Continuation In Part 17233487 · Apr 18, 2021
Continuation 16299178 · Mar 12, 2019
Related Publication 20230317099A1 · Oct 5, 2023
References Cited (279)
US 4292471A · Kuhn et al. · 1981 [cited by applicant]
US 4838275A · Lee · 1989 [cited by applicant]
US 5853005A · Scanlon · 1998 [cited by applicant]
US 5864810A · Digalakis et al. · 1999 [cited by applicant]
US 6006188A · Bogdashevsky · 1999 [cited by examiner]
US 6168568B1 · Gavriely · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 6241683B1 · Macklem et al. · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 6289313B1 · Heinonen et al. · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 6389393B1 · Gong · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 6396416B1 · Kuusela et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 6527729B1 · Turcott · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 6600949B1 · Turcott · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 7092874B2 · Clavbo · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 7225013B2 · Geva et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 7226422B2 · Hatlestsad et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 7267652B2 · Coyle et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 7283962B2 · Meyerhoif et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 7363226B2 · Shiomi et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 7398213B1 · Levanon et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 7457753B2 · Moran et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 7529670B1 · Michaelis · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 7762264B1 · Raming et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 8478596B2 · Schultz · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8591430B2 · Amurthur et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8684900B2 · Tran · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8689606B2 · Schellekens et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8784311B2 · Shrivastav et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8903725B2 · Pilz · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 9070357B1 · Kennedy · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 9138167B1 · Leydon · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9153231B1 · Salvador et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9445763B2 · Davis et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9492096B2 · Brockway et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9579056B2 · Rosenbek et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9685174B2 · Karam et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9922641B1 · Chun · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10311980B2 · Kim et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10796205B2 · Shi et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10796805B2 · Lotan et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10847177B2 · Shallom · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10896765B2 · Kim et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 10991384B2 · Eyben et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11011188B2 · Shallom · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11024327B2 · Shallom · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11417342B2 · Shallom · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11484211B2 · Shallom · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11538490B2 · Shallom · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11610600B2 · Shallom · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 12046238B2 · Khaleghi · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 20020059029A1 · Todder et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20030115054A1 · Iso-Sipila · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20030220790A1 · Kepuska · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20040097822A1 · Muz et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20050038635A1 · Klefenz et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20050060153A1 · Gable et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20060058697A1 · Mochizuki et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20060116878A1 · Nagamine · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20060167385A1 · Guion · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20060293609A1 · Stahmann et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20070005357A1 · Moran et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070100623A1 · Hentschel et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070225975A1 · Imoto · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070288183A1 · Bulkes et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20080013747A1 · Tran · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080275349A1 · Halperin et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20090036777A1 · Zhang et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090043586A1 · MacAuslan · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090099848A1 · Lerner et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090227888A1 · Salmi et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090326937A1 · Chitsaz et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20100201807A1 · Mcpherson · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20110021940A1 · Chu et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110092779A1 · Chang et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110125044A1 · Rhee · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110184250A1 · Schmidt et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20120041279A1 · Freeman et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120116186A1 · Shrivastav et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120220899A1 · Oh et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120265024A1 · Shrivastav et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120283598A1 · Horii et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20130018274A1 · O'Neill · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130158434A1 · Shen et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130166279A1 · Dines et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130218582A1 · Lalonde · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20140005564A1 · Ivanovic et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140073993A1 · Poellabauer et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140153794A1 · Varaklis et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140249424A1 · Fan et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140294188A1 · Rini et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140302472A1 · Fletcher · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140314212A1 · Bentley et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20150073306A1 · Abeyratne et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150126888A1 · Patel et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150127350A1 · Agiomyrgiannakis · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150216448A1 · Lotan et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150265205A1 · Rosenbek et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20160015289A1 · Simon et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160045161A1 · Alshaer et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160081611A1 · Hampton et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160095545A1 · Levanon · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160113618A1 · Su et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160249842A1 · Ohana Lubelchick · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160302003A1 · Rahman et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170069312A1 · Sundararajan et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170084295A1 · Tsiartas et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170262606A1 · Abdullah et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170280239A1 · Sekiya et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170325779A1 · Spina et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170354363A1 · Quatieri et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20180004913A1 · Ghasemzadeh et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180108440A1 · Stevens et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180125444A1 · Kahlman et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180214061A1 · Knoth · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20180296092A1 · Hassan et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20190130910A1 · Kariya · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190221317A1 · Kempanna et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190311815A1 · Kim et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190385711A1 · Shriberg et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20200077940A1 · Srivastava et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200098384A1 · Nematihosseinabadi et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200152226A1 · Anushiravani et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200168230A1 · Roh et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20210065676A1 · Abrami et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210110894A1 · Shriberg et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210193169A1 · Faizakof et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210256992A1 · Shallom · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20220130415A1 · Garrison et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220165295A1 · Shallom · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220257466A1 · Nitzan · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220328064A1 · Shriberg et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220409063A1 · Shallom · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220415308A1 · Berisha et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20230072242A1 · Kim et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230080870A1 · Shallom · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230190177A1 · Shor et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230352013A1 · Khaleghi · 2023 [cited by examiner]
CN 102125427A · 2011 [cited by applicant]
CN 102423262A · 2012 [cited by applicant]
CN 202261466U · 2012 [cited by applicant]
CN 102497472A · 2012 [cited by applicant]
CN 107622797A · 2018 [cited by applicant]
DE 102015218948A1 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
EP 1091689A1 · 2001 [cited by applicant]
EP 1855594A1 · 2007 [cited by applicant]
EP 2124223A1 · 2009 [cited by applicant]
EP 2438863A1 · 2012 [cited by applicant]
EP 3365057A1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
FR 2672793A1 · 1992 [cited by applicant]
GB 1219618A · 1971 [cited by applicant]
GB 2493458A · 2013 [cited by applicant]
JP 04082538A · 1992 [cited by applicant]
JP 09173320A · 1997 [cited by applicant]
JP 2003044078A · 2003 [cited by applicant]
JP 2004302786A · 2004 [cited by applicant]
JP 2006230548A · 2006 [cited by applicant]
JP 2016006504A · 2016 [cited by applicant]
JP 2017191166A · 2017 [cited by applicant]
JP 6263308B1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
SE 508439C2 · 1998 [cited by applicant]
WO 03068062A1 · 2003 [cited by applicant]
WO 2005074799A1 · 2005 [cited by applicant]
WO 2006033044A3 · 2006 [cited by applicant]
WO 2006079062A1 · 2006 [cited by applicant]
WO 2010004025A1 · 2010 [cited by applicant]
WO 2010015865A1 · 2010 [cited by applicant]
WO 2010123483A2 · 2010 [cited by applicant]
WO 2012038903A2 · 2012 [cited by applicant]
WO 2012104743A2 · 2012 [cited by applicant]
WO 2013043847A1 · 2013 [cited by applicant]
WO 2013170131A1 · 2013 [cited by applicant]
WO 2014037843A1 · 2014 [cited by applicant]
WO 2014045257A1 · 2014 [cited by applicant]
WO 2014188408A1 · 2014 [cited by applicant]
WO 2016028495A1 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
WO 2017060828A1 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
WO 2017068582A1 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
WO 2017147221A1 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
WO 2018021920A1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
WO 2019089830A1 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
WO 2019210261A1 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
CN Application # 2020800180012 Office Action dated Jan. 30, 2024. [cited by applicant]
IN Application # 202347030550 Office Action dated Dec. 13, 2023. [cited by applicant]
CN Application # 2019800670875 Office Action dated Dec. 20, 2023. [cited by applicant]
JP Application # 2021549583 Office Action dated Dec. 25, 2023. [cited by applicant]
JP Application # 2021551893 Office Action dated Dec. 25, 2023. [cited by applicant]
CN Application # 202080017839X Office Action dated Jan. 27, 2024. [cited by applicant]
Hickey., “App lets you monitor lung health using only a smartphone”, pp. 1-5, Sep. 18, 2012. [cited by applicant]
Gandler et al., “Mobile FEV: Evaluation of iPhone Spirometer”, pp. 1-1, Feb. 14, 2013. [cited by applicant]
Abushakra et al., “Lung capacity estimation through acoustic signal of breath”, 13th IEEE International Conference on BioInformatics and BioEngineering, pp. 386-391, Nov. 11-Nov. 13, 2012. [cited by applicant]
G.P. Imports, Inc., “Spirometer Pro”, pp. 1-3, Jan. 8, 2010. [cited by applicant]
Murton et al., “Acoustic speech analysis of patients with decompensated heart failure: A pilot study”, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 142, Issue 4, pp. 1-28, Oct. 24, 2017. [cited by applicant]
Gillespie et al., “The Effects of Hyper- and Hypocapnia on Phonatory Laryngeal Airway Resistance in Women”, Research Article, Journal of Speech, Language, and 638 Hearing Research, vol. 58, pp. 638-652, Jun. 2015. [cited by applicant]
Wang et al., “Accuracy of perceptual and acoustic methods for the detection of inspiratory loci in spontaneous speech”, Behavior Research Methods, vol. 44, Issue 4, pp. 1121-1128, Dec. 2012. [cited by applicant]
Larson et al., “SpiroSmart: using a microphone to measure lung function on a mobile phone”, Proceedings of the 2012 ACM Conference on Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp '12), pp. 280-289, Sep. 5-8, 2012. [cited by applicant]
Abushakra et al., “An Automated Approach Towards Estimating Lung Capacity from Respiration Sounds”, IEEE Healthcare Innovations Conference (HIC'12), pp. 1-5, Jan. 2012. [cited by applicant]
Williammson et al., “Vocal and Facial Biomarkers of Depression Based on Motor Incoordination and Timing”, 4th International Audio/Visual Emotion Challenge and Workshop: Depression Challenge, Orlando, Florida, USA , pp. … [cited by applicant]
Ciccarelli et al., “Neurophysiological Vocal Source Modeling for Biomarkers of Disease”, Interspeech 2016: Understanding Speech Processing in Humans and Machines, Technical Program, San Francisco, USA, pp. 1-7, Sep. 8-1… [cited by applicant]
Helfer et al., “Classification of depression state based on articulatory precision”, Proceedings of the 14th Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association (Interspeech), pp. 2172-2176, year 201… [cited by applicant]
Horwitz., “Vocal Modulation Features in the Prediction of Major Depressive Disorder Severity”, Master Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, pp. 1-115, Sep. 2014. [cited by applicant]
Hillel., “Using phonation time to estimate vital capacity in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis”, Arch Phys Med Rehabil, vol. 70, pp. 618-620, Aug. 1989. [cited by applicant]
Yanagihara., “Phonation and Respiration”, Folia Phoniat, vol. 18, pp. 323-340, year 1966. [cited by applicant]
Dewar et al., “Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: diagnostic considerations.”, American Academy of Family Physicians, vol. 73, pp. 669-676, Feb. 2006. [cited by applicant]
Solomon et al., “Respiratory and laryngeal contributions to maximum phonation duration”, Journal of voice, vol. 14, No. 3, pp. 331-340, Sep. 2000. [cited by applicant]
Dogan et al., “Subjective and objective evaluation of voice quality in patients with asthma”, Journal of voice, vol. 21, No. 2, pp. 224-230, Mar. 2007. [cited by applicant]
Orenstein et al., “Measuring ease of breathing in young patients with cystic fibrosis”, Pediatric Pulmonology, vol. 34, No. 6, pp. 473-477, Aug. 8, 2002. [cited by applicant]
Lee et al., “Speech Segment Durations Produced by Healthy and Asthmatic Subjects”, Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, vol. 653, pp. 186-193, May 31, 1988. [cited by applicant]
JP Application # 2022548568 Office Action dated Oct. 29, 2024. [cited by applicant]
US Application # 17531828 Office Action dated Jan. 15, 2025. [cited by applicant]
US Application # 18105848 Office Action dated Jan. 21, 2025. [cited by applicant]
Rabiner, L., “A tutorial on hidden Markov models and selected applications in speech recognition,” Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 77, issue 2, pp. 257-286, Feb. 1989. [cited by applicant]
Rabiner et al., “Fundamentals of Speech Recognition”, Prentice Hall, pp. 1-18 (related section 6.4.3.), year 1993. [cited by applicant]
Sakoe et al., “Dynamic Programming Algorithm Optimization for Spoken Word Recognition”, IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, vol. ASSP-26, No. 1, pp. 43-49, Feb. 1978. [cited by applicant]
Lee et al., “Consistency of acoustic and aerodynamic measures of voice production over 28 days under various testing conditions”, Journal of Voice, vol. 13, issue 4, pp. 477-483, Dec. 1, 1999. [cited by applicant]
Walia et al., “Level of Asthma: A Numerical Approach based on Voice Profiling”, IJEDR(International Journal of Engineering Development and Research), vol. 4, Issue 4, pp. 717-722, year 2016. [cited by applicant]
Mulligan et al., “Detecting regional lung properties using audio transfer functions of the respiratory system”, 31st Annual International Conference of the IEEE EMBS, pp. 5697-5700, Sep. 2-6, 2009. [cited by applicant]
Christina et al., “HMM-based speech recognition system for the dysarthric speech evaluation of articulatory subsystem”, International Conference on Recent Trends in Information Technology, pp. 54-59, Apr. 1, 2012. [cited by applicant]
Wang et al., “Vocal folds disorder detection using pattern recognition methods”, 29th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, pp. 3253-3256, Aug. 22-26, 2007. [cited by applicant]
Masada et al., “Feature Extraction by ICA and Clustering for Lung Sound Classification”, IPSJ Symposium Series, vol. 2007, pp. 1-9, year 2007. [cited by applicant]
De La Torre et al., “Discriminative feature weighting for HMM-based continuous speech recognizers”, Speech Communication, vol. 38, pp. 267-286, year 2001. [cited by applicant]
Mswanathan et al., “Complexity Measures of Voice Recordings as a Discriminative Tool for Parkinson's Disease”, MDPI Journal Biosensors 2020, vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 1-16, Dec. 20, 2019. [cited by applicant]
Williamson et al., “Segment-dependent dynamics in predicting Parkinson's disease”, ISCA Conference Interspeech 2015, pp. 518-522, Dresden, Germany, Sep. 6-10, 2015. [cited by applicant]
Valente et al., “Maximum Entropy Discrimination (MED) Feature subset Selection for Speech Recognition”, IEEE Workshop on Automatic Speech Recognition and Understanding (ASRU), ResearchGate publication, pp. 327-332, Nov.… [cited by applicant]
Ramirez et al., “Voice activity detection. Fundamentals and speech recognition system robustness”, Robust Speech Recognition and Understanding, I-Tech, Vienna, Austria, pp. 1-24, Jun. 2007. [cited by applicant]
Bachu et al., “Separation of Voiced and Unvoiced Speech Signals using Energy and Zero Crossing Rate”, ASEE Regional Conference, pp. 1-7, year 2008. [cited by applicant]
Eden et al., “Measuring phonological distance between languages”, Doctor Thesis, UCL Department of Linguistics, pp. 1-254, year 2018. [cited by applicant]
Falkhausen et al., “Calculation of Distance Measures Between Hidden Markov Models”, 4th European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology, pp. 1487-1490, Sep. 18-21, 1995. [cited by applicant]
Kempton et al., “Cross-language phone recognition when the target language phoneme inventory is not known”, 12th Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association, pp. 3165-3168, Aug. 27-31, 2011. [cited by applicant]
Kienappel et al., “Cross-Language Transfer of Multilingual Phoneme Models”, ASR2000-Automatic Speech Recognition Challenges for the New Millennium, pp. 1-5, Sep. 18-20, 2000. [cited by applicant]
Gupta et al., “Characterizing Exhaled Airflow from Breathing and Talking,” Indoor Air, vol. 20, pp. 31-39, year 2010. [cited by applicant]
Mirza et al., “Analytical Modeling and Simulation of a CMOS-MEMS Cantilever Based CO2 Sensor for Medical Applications,” Proceedings IEEE Regional Symposium on Micro and Nanoelectronics, pp. 70-73, Sep. 27, 2013. [cited by applicant]
Bhagya et al., “Speed of Sound-Based Capnographic Sensor with Second-Generation CNN for Automated Classification of Cardiorespiratory Abnormalities,” IEEE Sensors Journal, vol. 19, issue 19, pp. 8887-8894, Oct. 1, 2019. [cited by applicant]
Kohler, “Multi-Lingual Phoneme Recognition Exploiting Acoustic-Phonetic Similarities of Sounds”, 4th International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (ICSLP 96), pp. 1-4, Oct. 3-6, 1996. [cited by applicant]
Pitts et al., “Using Voluntary Cough To Detect Penetration and Aspiration During Oropharyngeal Swallowing in Patients With Parkinson Disease”, CHEST, vol. 138, issue 6, pp. 1426-1431, Dec. 2010. [cited by applicant]
Sooful et al., “An acoustic distance measure for automatic cross-language phoneme mapping”, PRASA proceedings, pp. 1-4, year 2001. [cited by applicant]
Sooful et al., “Comparison of acoustic distance measures for automatic cross-language phoneme mapping”, 7th International Conference on Spoken Language Processing, pp. 1-4, Sep. 16-20, 2002. [cited by applicant]
Sterling et al., “Automated Cough Assessment on a Mobile Platform”, Journal of Medical Engineering, pp. 1-10, year 2014. [cited by applicant]
Vaswani et al., “Attention is all you need”, 31st Conference on Neural Information Processing systems, pp. 1-11, year 2017. [cited by applicant]
Zeng et al., “A new distance measure for hidden Markov models”, Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 37, pp. 1550-1555, year 2010. [cited by applicant]
Rabiner et al., “Fundamentals of Speech Recognition”, Prentice Hall, chapters 7-8, pp. 390-481, year 1993. [cited by applicant]
Wikipedia, “Breathing,” pp. 1-13, last edited Oct. 17, 2021, as downloaded from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Breathing. [cited by applicant]
“Sound Speed in Gases,” Sound and Hearing, HyperPhysics, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Georgia State University, USA, pp. 1-3, year 2017, as downloaded from http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/Sound/souspe… [cited by applicant]
“Echo Devices,” Amazon.com, Inc, Interest-Based Ads, pp. 1-6, year 2021, as downloaded from https://www.amazon.com/echo-devices/s?k=echo+devices. [cited by applicant]
“The Best Google Home Speakers in 2021,” Tom's Guide, Future US Inc., pp. 1-21, year 2021, as downloaded from https://www.tomsguide.com/best-picks/best-google-home-speakers. [cited by applicant]
West et al., “Measurements of Pulmonary Gas Exchange Efficiency using Expired Gas and Oximetry: Results in Normal Subjects,” American Journal of Physiology—Lung Cellular and Molecular Physiology, vol. 314, No. 4, pp. L6… [cited by applicant]
West et al., “A New Method for Noninvasive Measurement of Pulmonary Gas Exchange Using Expired Gas,” Respiratory Physiology & Neurobiology, vol. 247, pp. 112-115, year 2018. [cited by applicant]
Huang et al., “An Accurate Air Temperature Measurement System Based on an Envelope Pulsed Ultrasonic Time-of-Flight Technique,” Review of Scientific Instruments, vol. 78, pp. 115102-1-115102-9, year 2007. [cited by applicant]
Jedrusyna, “An Ultrasonic Air Temperature Meter”, Book “Recent Advances in Mechatronics”, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 85-89, year 2010. [cited by applicant]
Cramer, “The Variation of the Specific Heat Ratio and the Speed of Sound in Air with Temperature, Pressure, Humidity, and CO2 Concentration,” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 93, No. 5, pp. 2510-2516, … [cited by applicant]
Rao et al., “Acoustic Methods for Pulmonary Diagnosis,” HHS Public Access, Author manuscript, pp. 1-39, year 2020 (final version published in IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering, vol. 12, pp. 221-239, year 2019). [cited by applicant]
Cohen, “Signal processing methods for upper airway and pulmonary dysfunction diagnosis,” IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine, vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 72-75, Mar. 1, 1990. [cited by applicant]
Ney, “The Use of a One-Stage Dynamic Programming Algorithm for Connected Word Recognition,” IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, vol. ASSP-32, No. 2, pp. 263-271, Apr. 1984. [cited by applicant]
Haimi-Cohen et al., U.S. Appl. No. 18/105,847, filed Feb. 5, 2023. [cited by applicant]
Sakran et al., “A Review: Automatic Speech Segmentation”, International Journal of Computer Science and Mobile Computing (IJCSMC), vol. 6, issue 4, pp. 308-315, Apr. 2017. [cited by applicant]
Nicora et al., “Evaluating pointwise reliability of machine learning prediction”, Journal of Biomedical Informatics, vol. 127, pp. 1-15, Mar. 2022. [cited by applicant]
JP Application # 2021-517971 Office Action dated May 16, 2023. [cited by applicant]
EP Application # 21209891.7 Office Action dated May 19, 2023. [cited by applicant]
Indian Application # 202247066856 Office Action dated Mar. 29, 2023. [cited by applicant]
EP Application # 19201720.0 Office Action dated Mar. 30, 2023. [cited by applicant]
EP Application # 20158058.6 Summons to Oral Proceedings dated Apr. 19, 2023. [cited by applicant]
Haimi-Cohen et al., U.S. Appl. No. 18/105,848, filed Feb. 5, 2023. [cited by applicant]
Katsir et al., U.S. Appl. No. 18/319,518, filed May 18, 2023. [cited by applicant]
Haimi-Cohen et al., U.S. Appl. No. 18/328,739, filed Jun. 4, 2023. [cited by applicant]
International Application # PCT/IB2024/050483 Search Report dated May 7, 2024. [cited by applicant]
EP Application # 21832054.7 Search Report dated Mar. 11, 2024. [cited by applicant]
International Application # PCT/IB2024/054360 Search Report dated Jun. 28, 2024. [cited by applicant]
JP Application # 2022576351 Office Action dated Jul. 2, 2024. [cited by applicant]
US Application # U.S. Appl. No. 17/902,836 Office Action Jul. 8, 2024. [cited by applicant]
International Application # PCT/IB2024/054359 Search Report dated Jul. 9, 2024. [cited by applicant]
AU Application # 2021384028 Office Action Aug. 15, 2024. [cited by applicant]
EP Application # 24181539.8 Search Report dated Sep. 4, 2024. [cited by applicant]
US Office Action U.S. Appl. No. 18/319,518 dated Jun. 6, 2025. [cited by applicant]
CN Application # 202180045274.0 Office Action dated Feb. 28, 2025. [cited by applicant]
Voleti et al., “A Review of Automated Speech and Language Features for Assessment of Cognitive and Thought Disorders,” IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing, vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 282-298, Feb. 2020. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 18/328,739 Office Action dated Apr. 25, 2025. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 18/105,847 Office Action dated May 6, 2025. [cited by applicant]
CN Application # 202180017631.2 Office Action dated Mar. 31, 2025. [cited by applicant]
Canadian Examination report, application # 3,114,864, dated Oct. 16, 2025. [cited by applicant]
Korean Office Action, application # 10-2021-7032027, dated Oct. 24, 2025. [cited by applicant]
Korean Office Action, application # 10-2021-7032025, dated Sep. 26, 2025. [cited by applicant]