IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,496,907
Granted Patent B2
US 12,496,907 · App. 17/924,493 · Granted Dec 16, 2025

Failure sign determination device, onboard device, and failure sign determination method

Inventor: Toru Hirata (Tokyo, JP)
Assignee: MITSUBISHI ELECTRIC CORPORATION
B60L3/003B61C3/00G01M13/04G01R23/16G07C5/0808
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,496,907
App. No.
17/924,493
Granted
Dec 16, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

A failure sign determining device includes an acquirer to acquire pieces of sensor data based on respective values measured by multiple sensors, an FFT processor to execute fast Fourier transform on each of the pieces of sensor data and thereby generate a piece of frequency spectrum data, and a determiner to determine the existence of a failure sign on the basis of comparison between the piece of frequency spectrum data and a spectrum range defined for the sensor. The determiner, only when determining that a failure sign exists, transmits at least either of the piece of frequency spectrum data and the piece of sensor data to an analysis apparatus.

Claims (35)

1 . A failure sign determining device that determines existence of a failure sign in a component of an apparatus installed in a railway vehicle, the apparatus being a power conversion apparatus that comprises power converting circuitry configured to convert electric power fed from a power source into electric power to be fed to a load and is configured to feed the electric power converted by the power converting circuitry to a motor to generate a force to drive the railway vehicle, the failure sign determining device comprising:

processing circuitry configured:

to acquire pieces of sensor data on a plurality of sensors including a plurality of electrical sensors provided to the apparatus installed in the railway vehicle for measuring mutually different electrical physical quantities of the component, the pieces of sensor data being pieces of digital data based on respective values measured by the plurality of sensors,

to execute fast Fourier transform on each of the acquired pieces of sensor data and generate, for each of the electrical sensors, a piece of frequency spectrum data indicating a spectrum intensity at each frequency,

to determine the existence of a failure sign based on a comparison between the piece of frequency spectrum data and a spectrum range defined for the sensor corresponding to the piece of sensor data used in the generation of the piece of frequency spectrum data, and

to transmit, only when determining that a failure sign exists, at least either of the piece of frequency spectrum data applied to the determination of the existence of a failure sign and the piece of sensor data used in the generation of the piece of frequency spectrum data applied to the determination of the existence of a failure sign, to an analysis apparatus installed in the railway vehicle or outside the railway vehicle,

wherein

the spectrum range is defined for each of the plurality of sensors in accordance with an operating frequency of the power converting circuitry depending on an operation instruction indicating an acceleration or deceleration of the railway vehicle and a speed of the railway vehicle, and a modulation factor and a carrier wave frequency of a switching control signal for controlling switching elements including in the power converting circuitry.

2 . The failure sign determining device according to claim 1 , wherein the processing circuitry is configured to determine, at each frequency, whether the spectrum intensity indicated by the piece of frequency spectrum data is within the spectrum range.

3 . The failure sign determining device according to claim 1 , wherein

the processing circuitry is further configured to:

select one of the acquired pieces of sensor data on the respective plurality of sensors, and

execute the fast Fourier transform on the selected piece of sensor data and generate the piece of frequency spectrum data.

4 . The failure sign determining device according to claim 1 , wherein

the processing circuitry is further configured to acquire the operation mode of the railway vehicle, and

when the acquired operation mode accords with a predetermined operation mode, the processing circuitry determines the existence of a failure sign based on comparison with the spectrum range, the spectrum range being defined, in accordance with the operation mode, for the sensor corresponding to the piece of sensor data used in the generation of the piece of frequency spectrum data.

5 . The failure sign determining device according to claim 1 , wherein the plurality of sensors include a first voltage sensor to measure a value of voltage input to the power converting circuitry.

6 . The failure sign determining device according to claim 1 , wherein the plurality of sensors include a first current sensor to measure a value of current output from the power converting circuitry.

7 . The failure sign determining device according to claim 1 , wherein the plurality of sensors include a second current sensor to measure a value of current input to the power converting circuitry.

8 . The failure sign determining device according to claim 1 , wherein the plurality of sensors include a second voltage sensor to measure a value of voltage of the power source that feeds the electric power to the power converting circuitry.

9 . The failure sign determining device according to claim 1 , wherein

the processing circuitry is further configured to retain a value of the spectrum range at each frequency.

10 . The failure sign determining device according to claim 1 , wherein

the spectrum range varies stepwise depending on a frequency,

the processing circuitry is further configured to: retain a value of the frequency at which the spectrum range varies and the varied spectrum range, and

specify a spectrum range defined for the sensor corresponding to the piece of sensor data used in the generation of the piece of frequency spectrum data based on the frequency corresponding to the piece of frequency spectrum data and the retained value of the frequency at which the spectrum range varies, and then determine the existence of a failure sign based on comparison between the piece of frequency spectrum data and the specified spectrum range.

11 . An in-vehicle apparatus to be installed in a vehicle, the in-vehicle apparatus comprising:

the failure sign determining device according to claim 1 , wherein

the failure sign determining device determines existence of a failure sign in a component of the in-vehicle apparatus.

12 . A method of determining a failure sign, the method comprising:

acquiring pieces of sensor data on a plurality of sensors including a plurality of electrical sensors for measuring mutually different electrical physical quantities, the pieces of sensor data being pieces of digital data based on respective values measured by the respective plurality of sensors provided to an apparatus installed in a railway vehicle, the apparatus being a power conversion apparatus that comprises power concerting circuitry configured to convert electric power fed from a power source into electric power to be fed to a load and is configured to feed the electric power converted by the power converting circuitry to a motor to generate a force to drive the railway vehicle;

executing fast Fourier transform on each of the acquired pieces of sensor data and generating, for each of the electrical sensors, a piece of frequency spectrum data indicating a spectrum intensity at each frequency;

determining existence of a failure sign in a component of an apparatus based on comparison between the piece of frequency spectrum data and a spectrum range defined for the sensor corresponding to the piece of sensor data used in the generation of the piece of frequency spectrum data; and

transmitting, in only response to determination of existence of a failure, at least either of the piece of frequency spectrum data applied to the determining of the existence of a failure sign and the piece of sensor data used in the generation of the piece of frequency spectrum data applied to the determination of the existence of a failure sign, to an analysis apparatus installed in the railway vehicle or outside the railway vehicle, wherein

the spectrum range is defined for each of the plurality of sensors in accordance with an operating frequency of the power converting circuitry depending on an operation instruction indicating an acceleration or deceleration of the railway vehicle and a speed of the railway vehicle, and a modulation factor and a carrier wave frequency of a switching control signal for controlling switching elements included in the power converting circuitry.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 10, 2022
From: HIRATA, TORU
To: MITSUBISHI ELECTRIC CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 061720/0313 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20230173922A1 · Jun 8, 2023
References Cited (43)
US 7224807B2 · Welsh · 2007 [cited by examiner]
US 7487679B2 · Sirrine · 2009 [cited by examiner]
US 7930111B2 · Luo · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 8442778B2 · Bechhoefer · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 8930166B1 · Das · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 8991254B2 · Raguenet · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 10643405B2 · Hale · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 11847531B1 · Ozturk · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20030088346A1 · Calkins · 2003 [cited by examiner]
US 20060167659A1 · Miyasaka · 2006 [cited by examiner]
US 20090024268A1 · Eagan · 2009 [cited by examiner]
US 20120072070A1 · Eagan · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 20130013231A1 · Banerjee · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20130116937A1 · Calhoun · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20160033580A1 · Qiao · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20170006401A1 · Kropp · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20170336430A1 · Winslow · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20190025813A1 · Cella · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20200090425A1 · Senft-Grupp · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200130437A1 · Root · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200134939A1 · Schell · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200134942A1 · Root · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200363296A1 · Westlund · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20210125428A1 · Tedesco · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210335061A1 · Claessens · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210335062A1 · Claessens · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20220038913A1 · Sun · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220180672A1 · Madrid · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20240192090A1 · Yi · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 20240192091A1 · Yi · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 20240194000A1 · Conklin · 2024 [cited by examiner]
JP 2004116571A · 2004 [cited by applicant]
JP 2007252134A · 2007 [cited by applicant]
JP 2010252443A · 2010 [cited by applicant]
JP 2010284032A · 2010 [cited by applicant]
JP 2012008030A · 2012 [cited by applicant]
JP 2015053767A · 2015 [cited by applicant]
JP 2016083759A · 2016 [cited by applicant]
WO 2018225067A1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
Office Action issued in corresponding India Patent Application No. 202227065207, mailed Mar. 7, 2023, 6 pages. [cited by applicant]
Office Action issued in corresponding Japan Patent Application No. 2022-531227, mailed Jan. 31, 2023, 14 pages Including 7 pages of English translation. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report (PCT/ISA/210) with translation and Written Opinion (PCT/ISA/237) mailed on Jul. 14, 2020, by the Japan Patent Office as the International Searching Authority for International Application No.… [cited by applicant]
Notice of Reasons for Refusal dated May 16, 2023, issued in the corresponding Japanese Patent Application No. 2022-531227, 10 pages including 5 pages of English Translation. [cited by applicant]