IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,511,754
Granted Patent B2
US 12,511,754 · App. 18/162,852 · Granted Dec 30, 2025

Computer-implemented method for determining scar segmentation

Inventors: Marc Vornehm (Erlangen, DE); Daniel Giese (Erlangen, DE); Jens Wetzl (Erlangen, DE); Elisabeth Preuhs (Erlangen, DE)
Assignee: SIEMENS HEALTHINEERS AG
G06T7/11A61B5/055G06T2207/20084
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,511,754
App. No.
18/162,852
Filed
Feb 1, 2023
Granted
Dec 30, 2025
Kind
B2
Art Unit
2665
USPC
382/131
Abstract

A computer-implemented method for determining scar segmentation includes receiving a medical image of an object to be segmented acquired after an application of a low-dose of contrast agent and determining a scar segmentation mask by applying a trained artificial neural network to the medical image. The low-dose of the contrast agent includes less contrast-agent than a standard full-dose of the contrast agent.

Claims (43)

1 . A method for training an artificial neural network for determining scar segmentation on contrast agent enhanced medical images with a reduced contrast agent dose, the method comprising:

acquiring a first set of medical images after a low-dose of a contrast agent has been applied;

receiving input training data, the input training data including the first set of medical images of objects to be segmented acquired after the application of the low-dose of the contrast agent, the low-dose of the contrast agent including less of the contrast agent than a full-dose of the contrast agent;

acquiring a second set of medical images after an additional dose of the contrast agent has been applied such that the low-dose and the additional dose equal the full-dose;

receiving output training data, the output training data including reference scar segmentation masks determined from the second set of medical images of the objects acquired after the application of the full-dose of the contrast agent; and

training the artificial neural network using the input training data and the output training data to determine the scar segmentation on the contrast agent enhanced medical images with the reduced contrast agent dose.

2 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

determining the reference scar segmentation masks via a full width at half maximum method on the second set of medical images.

3 . A non-transitory computer-readable medium including instructions which, when executed by a processing unit of a medical imaging device, cause the medical imaging device to perform the method of claim 2 .

4 . The method of claim 1 , wherein

at least one of the input training data or the output training data comprise real medical images and simulated medical images.

5 . The method of claim 4 , wherein a number of the real medical images is increased by at least one of oversampling or augmentation.

6 . The method of claim 5 , further comprising:

performing an image registration of the first set of medical images and the second set of medical images to transform the first set of medical images and the second set of medical images into a common coordinate system.

7 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

performing an image registration of the first set of medical images and the second set of medical images to transform the first set of medical images and the second set of medical images into a common coordinate system.

8 . An imaging method for determining a scar area of an object, the method comprising:

acquiring a medical image of the object after a low-dose of a contrast agent has been applied to the object, the low-dose of contrast agent includes less of the contrast agent than a full-dose of the contrast agent; and

determining a scar segmentation mask by applying a trained artificial neural network to the medical image, the trained artificial neural network being trained according to the method of claim 1 .

9 . A non-transitory computer-readable medium including instructions which, when executed by a processing unit of a medical imaging device, cause the medical imaging device to perform the method of claim 1 .

10 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the scar segmentation is a segmentation of a myocardial scar.

11 . A computer-implemented method for determining scar segmentation, the method comprising:

receiving a medical image of an object to be segmented acquired after an application of a low-dose of a contrast agent, the low-dose of the contrast agent including less of the contrast agent than a full-dose of the contrast agent;

determining borders of the object to be segmented on the medical image; and

determining a scar segmentation mask by applying a trained artificial neural network to the medical image after the determining the borders of the object to be segmented on the medical image, the determining the scar segmentation by the trained artificial neural network being restricted to the borders.

12 . The method of claim 11 , wherein the trained artificial neural network is trained for scar segmentation on contrast agent enhanced medical images with a reduced contrast agent dose.

13 . The method of claim 11 , wherein

the contrast agent is a gadolinium-based contrast agent, and

the medical image is acquired via MR imaging with late gadolinium enhancement.

14 . The method of claim 11 , wherein the low-dose comprises 20% to 90% of an amount of the contrast agent of the full-dose.

15 . The method of claim 11 , wherein a U-Net based artificial neural network is used.

16 . A system for determining a scar area of an object, the system comprising:

a first interface configured to receive a medical image of the object to be segmented acquired after an application of a low-dose of a contrast agent, the low-dose of the contrast agent including less of the contrast agent than a full-dose of the contrast agent;

a processing unit configured to determine a scar segmentation mask by applying a trained artificial neural network, the trained artificial neural network being trained by

receiving input training data, the input training data including a first set of medical images of objects to be segmented acquired after an application of the low-dose of the contrast agent,

receiving output training data, the output training data including reference scar segmentation masks determined from a second set of medical images of the objects acquired after an application of the full-dose of the contrast agent, and

training an artificial neural network using the input training data and the output training data to obtain the trained artificial neural network to determine scar segmentation on contrast agent enhanced medical images with a reduced contrast agent dose; and

a second interface configured to output the scar segmentation mask.

17 . A computer-implemented method for determining scar segmentation, the method comprising:

receiving a medical image of an object to be segmented acquired after an application of a low-dose of a contrast agent, the low-dose of the contrast agent including less of the contrast agent than a full-dose of the contrast agent; and

determining a scar segmentation mask by applying a trained artificial neural network to the medical image,

wherein the low-dose of the contrast agent comprises 50% to 75% of an amount of the contrast agent of the full-dose.

18 . The method of claim 17 , wherein the low-dose comprises 60% to 70% of the amount of the contrast agent of the full-dose.

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 5, 2025
From: VORNEHM, MARC; GIESE, DANIEL; WETZL, JENS; PREUHS, ELISABETH
To: SIEMENS HEALTHINEERS AG
Reel/Frame 071935/0523 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 20, 2023
From: SIEMENS HEALTHCARE GMBH
To: SIEMENS HEALTHINEERS AG
Reel/Frame 066267/0346 →
Priority Claims (1)
EP 22155242 · Feb 4, 2022 · regional
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20230252640A1 · Aug 10, 2023
References Cited (43)
US 9311570B2 · Mohr · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 9968257B1 · Burt · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 10600184B2 · Golden · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 10997716B2 · Zaharchuk et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20040127799A1 · Sorensen · 2004 [cited by examiner]
US 20150003706A1 · Eftestol · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20160025835A1 · Gulani · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20180218497A1 · Golden · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20180253844A1 · Forman · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20180286037A1 · Zaharchuk · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20190108634A1 · Zaharchuk · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20200138521A1 · Aben · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200179722A1 · Packer · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200311932A1 · Hooper · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20210121715A1 · Falco · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210137384A1 · Robinson · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210249142A1 · Lau · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20220107378A1 · Dey · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220208355A1 · Li · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220287671A1 · Huang · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220334208A1 · Tamir · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20230033442A1 · Xiang · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20230118094A1 · Morgas · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20230394670A1 · Trayanova · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20240212143A1 · Buckler · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 20240273362A1 · Valbusa · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 20250131562A1 · Golden · 2025 [cited by examiner]
US 20250147136A1 · Chitiboi · 2025 [cited by examiner]
EP 3576049A2 · 2019 [cited by examiner]
WO WO2010023618A1 · 2010 [cited by examiner]
WO WO2019155306A1 · 2019 [cited by examiner]
Yang, G. “Fully automatic segmentation and objective assessment of atrial scars for long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation patients using late gadolinium-enhanced MRI” Medical Physics, vol. 45, Issue 4, Apr. 2018,… [cited by examiner]
Fahmy AS. et al.:“Automated cardiac MR scar quantification in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy using deep convolutional neural networks”. JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging. 2018; 11:1917-1918. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.04.030. [cited by applicant]
M. Vornehm et al., Myocardial Scar Segmentation on LGE Images with Reduced GBCA-Dose Using Deep Learning; Magnetic resonance, 2021. [cited by applicant]
Rosendahl Lene et al: “Late gadolinium uptake demonstrated with magnetic resonance in patients where automated PERFIT analysis of myocardial SPECT suggests irreversible perfusion defect”; BMC Medical Imaging; Biomed Cen… [cited by applicant]
SubtleGAD™, AI-powered for safer MRI; https://subtlemedical.com/subtlegad/. [cited by applicant]
Gong et al., “Deep Learning Enables Reduced Gadolinium Dose for Contrast-Enhanced Brain MRI”, Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2018, pp. 1-11 .; 2018. [cited by applicant]
Ronneberger, Olaf et al. “U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation” Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention (MICCAI), Springer, LNCS, vol. 9351, pp. 234-241, 2015 // arXiv:1505.… [cited by applicant]
Moccia S. et al.:“Development and testing of a deep learning-based strategy for scar segmentation on CMR-LGE images”. Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine. 2019; 32:187-195. doi: 10.1007/s10334-… [cited by applicant]
Yinzhe Wu et al: “Recent Advances in Fibrosis and Scar Segmentation from Cardiac MRI: A State-of-the-Art Review and Future Perspectives”; arxiv.org; Cornell University Library Ithaca, NY 14853; 2021. [cited by applicant]
Xu Chenchu et al: “Direct Detection of Pixel-Level Myocardial Infarction Areas via a Deep-Learning Algorithm”; SAT 2015 18th International Conference; Austin, TX, USA; Sep. 24-27, 2015; [Lecture Notes in Computer Scienc… [cited by applicant]
Segars, W. P. et al., “4D XCAT phantom for multimodality imaging research,” Med Phys. Sep. 2010; 37(9):4902-4915; 2010. [cited by applicant]
Galea Nicola et al: “Ultra low-dose of gadobenate dimeglumine for late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) imaging in acute myocardial infarction: A feasibility study”; European Journal of Radiology; Elsevier Science; vol. 83,… [cited by applicant]