IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,516,619
Granted Patent B2
US 12,516,619 · App. 18/596,924 · Granted Jan 6, 2026

Aftertreatment system, dual fuel system, and methods therefor

Inventors: Ankit Sakuja (Charleston, SC); Srinivas Chakravarthy Bathula (Columbus, IN)
Assignee: Cummins Power Generation Inc.
F01N3/208F01N3/2882F01N2370/02F01N2570/14F01N2610/02F01N2610/146F01N2900/0408
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,516,619
App. No.
18/596,924
Granted
Jan 6, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

Systems are provided including a selective catalytic reduction catalyst structured to receive first exhaust gas from a first fuel source of a dual fuel engine system and second exhaust gas from a second fuel source of the dual fuel engine system, a first fuel of the first fuel source differing from a second fuel of the second fuel source, an ammonia slip catalyst positioned downstream of the selective catalytic reduction catalyst to receive a flow of exhaust gases from the selective catalytic reduction catalyst without an intervening catalyst, and an oxidation catalyst positioned downstream of the ammonia slip catalyst to receive the flow of exhaust gases from the ammonia slip catalyst without an intervening catalyst.

Claims (58)

1 . An aftertreatment system, comprising:

a selective catalytic reduction catalyst structured to receive first exhaust gas from a first fuel source of a dual fuel engine system and second exhaust gas from a second fuel source of the dual fuel engine system, a first fuel of the first fuel source differing from a second fuel of the second fuel source;

a sensor configured to measure a system out emissions value;

a controller communicably coupled to the sensor, the controller configured to:

receive a signal from the sensor that is indicative of the system out emissions value;

determine a system out emissions difference based on a difference between the system out emissions value and a target system out emissions value; and

generate a control signal to iteratively adjust a substitution rate of the first fuel as compared to the second fuel that is provided to a cylinder of the dual fuel engine system for combustion within the cylinder based on the difference between the system out emissions value and the target system out emissions value.

2 . The aftertreatment system of claim 1 , wherein the system out emissions value is at least one of an amount of nitrogen oxides (NOx) or a selective catalytic reduction performance parameter indicating that the aftertreatment system is experiencing ammonia slip.

3 . The aftertreatment system of claim 2 , wherein the controller is further configured to:

determine a system out NOx difference based on a difference between the amount of NOx and a target system out NOx;

determine a length of time over which the controller has attempted to correct a difference between a target NOx conversion efficiency and an actual NOx conversion efficiency; and

generate the control signal to adjust the substitution rate based on the system out NOx difference and the length of time.

4 . The aftertreatment system of claim 1 , further comprising a dosing unit structured to deliver a diesel exhaust fluid to the selective catalytic reduction catalyst, the controller configured to control the dosing unit based on the system out emissions value.

5 . The aftertreatment system of claim 1 , further comprising:

an ammonia slip catalyst positioned downstream of the selective catalytic reduction catalyst to receive a flow of exhaust gases from the selective catalytic reduction catalyst; and

an oxidation catalyst positioned downstream of the ammonia slip catalyst to receive the flow of exhaust gases from the ammonia slip catalyst, wherein the selective catalytic reduction catalyst and the ammonia slip catalyst are co-located in a single housing.

6 . The aftertreatment system of claim 1 , wherein the control signal is configured to signal an engine system to adjust an amount of the first fuel relative to the second fuel.

7 . The aftertreatment system of claim 1 , further comprising a dosing unit structured to deliver a diesel exhaust fluid to the selective catalytic reduction catalyst, wherein the controller is further configured to control the dosing unit based on a space velocity, an ammonia to NOx ratio, an exhaust temperature, the substitution rate, and a conversion efficiency target.

8 . A dual fuel system comprising:

a dual fuel engine system including:

a first fuel source;

a second fuel source; and

a cylinder structured to combust a first fuel from the first fuel source and a second fuel from the second fuel source simultaneously;

an aftertreatment system including:

a selective catalytic reduction system structured to receive exhaust gases from the cylinder;

a sensor configured to measure a system out emissions value; and

a controller communicably coupled to the sensor, the controller configured to:

receive a signal from the sensor that is indicative of the system out emissions value;

determine a system out emissions difference based on a difference between the system out emissions value and a target system out emissions value; and

generate a control signal to control the dual fuel engine system to adjust a substitution rate of the first fuel as compared to the second fuel that is provided to the cylinder for combustion within the cylinder based on the difference between the system out emissions value and the target system out emissions value.

9 . The dual fuel system of claim 8 , wherein the system out emissions value is at least one of an amount of nitrogen oxides (NOx) or a selective catalytic reduction performance parameter indicating that the aftertreatment system is experiencing ammonia slip.

10 . The aftertreatment system of claim 9 , wherein the controller is further configured to:

determine a system out NOx difference based on a difference between the amount of NOx and a target system out NOx;

determine a length of time over which the controller has attempted to correct a difference between a target NOx conversion efficiency and an actual NOx conversion efficiency; and

generate the control signal to control the dual fuel engine system to adjust the substitution rate based on the system out NOx difference and the length of time.

11 . The dual fuel system of claim 8 , wherein the first fuel is natural gas, and the second fuel is diesel fuel.

12 . The dual fuel system of claim 8 , further comprising:

an ammonia slip catalyst positioned downstream of the selective catalytic reduction system; and

an oxidation catalyst positioned downstream of the ammonia slip catalyst, wherein the selective catalytic reduction system and the ammonia slip catalyst are co-located in a single housing.

13 . The dual fuel system of claim 8 , wherein the aftertreatment system further includes a dosing unit structured to deliver a diesel exhaust fluid to the selective catalytic reduction system.

14 . The dual fuel system of claim 13 , wherein the controller is further configured to control the dosing unit based on a space velocity, an ammonia to NOx ratio, an exhaust temperature, the substitution rate, and a conversion efficiency target.

15 . The dual fuel system of claim 8 , wherein, responsive to the control signal, the dual fuel engine system adjusts an amount of the first fuel provided to the cylinder as compared to the second fuel.

16 . An aftertreatment method, comprising:

actuating a first fuel actuator to introduce a first fuel into a cylinder;

actuating a second fuel actuator to introduce a second fuel into the cylinder;

combusting the first fuel and the second fuel within the cylinder;

receiving, from a sensor, a signal indicative of a system out emissions value;

determining a system out emissions difference based on a difference between the system out emissions value and a target system out emissions value; and

iteratively adjusting a substitution rate of the first fuel as compared to the second fuel that is provided to the cylinder for combustion within the cylinder based on the difference between the system out emissions value and the target system out emissions value.

17 . The aftertreatment method of claim 16 , further comprising treating exhaust gases received from the cylinder with a selective catalytic reduction system, by injecting diesel exhaust fluid based on a space velocity, an ammonia to NOx ratio, an exhaust temperature, the substitution rate, and a conversion efficiency target.

18 . The aftertreatment method of claim 17 , further comprising:

treating exhaust gases received from the selective catalytic reduction system with an ammonia slip catalyst; and

treating exhaust gases received from the ammonia slip catalyst with an oxidation catalyst.

19 . The aftertreatment method of claim 16 , wherein adjusting the substitution rate of the first fuel as compared to the second fuel includes adjusting an amount of the first fuel being introduced into the cylinder for combustion within the cylinder as compared to the second fuel.

20 . The aftertreatment method of claim 16 , wherein the system out emissions value is an amount of nitrogen oxides (NOx), further comprising:

determining a system out NOx difference based on a difference between the amount of NOx and a target system out NOx;

determining a length of time over which a controller has attempted to correct a difference between a target NOx conversion efficiency and an actual NOx conversion efficiency; and

adjusting the substitution rate based on the system out NOx difference and the length of time.

Continuity (2)
Continuation 17538470 · Nov 30, 2021
Related Publication 20240247603A1 · Jul 25, 2024
References Cited (51)
US 5367875A · Aboujaoude et al. · 1994 [cited by applicant]
US 5524432A · Hansel · 1996 [cited by applicant]
US 7210288B2 · Bandl-Konr et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 7490464B2 · Li et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 8161730B2 · Chi et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8230677B2 · Devarakonda et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8407987B2 · Andersson et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8468806B2 · Andersson et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8596045B2 · Tuomivaara et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8640443B2 · Andersson et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8656702B2 · Alm et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8682512B2 · Norton · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8875490B2 · Geveci et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8997465B2 · Gekas et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9038373B2 · Geveci et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9309819B2 · Norton · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9476338B2 · Geveci et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9765674B2 · Khaled · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9890678B2 · Qi · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10125660B2 · Khaled · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10287943B1 · Schiltz · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10364725B2 · Liu et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10364731B2 · Khaled · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10392991B2 · Geveci et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10557397B2 · Khaled · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10577994B2 · Mittal et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10787946B2 · Rohde et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20150377153A1 · Gallagher · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20160281619A1 · Kale et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160333761A1 · Liu et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170067387A1 · Khaled · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170356322A1 · Farid et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20180135541A1 · Hsieh et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180202341A1 · Piper et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20190345858A1 · Zielinski et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20200003137A1 · Pedder · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200025054A1 · Barve et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200116063A1 · Bleckmann et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200300190A1 · Diwakar Abraham et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2007010664 · 2007 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2012150468A1 · 2012 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2017055299 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 10,087,810 B2, 10/2018, Khaled (withdrawn) [cited by applicant]
Canada 1st Office Action dtd Apr. 22, 24 re CA Appl No. 3182558. [cited by applicant]
Final Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 17/538,470 DTD Jul. 28, 2023. [cited by applicant]
Final Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 17/538,470 DTD Oct. 3, 2022. [cited by applicant]
Foreign Action other than Search Report on CA DTD Apr. 18, 2024. [cited by applicant]
Non-Final Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 17/538,470 DTD Feb. 13, 2023. [cited by applicant]
Non-Final Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 17/538,470 DTD Jun. 7, 2022. [cited by applicant]
Notice of Allowance on U.S. Appl. No. 17/538,470 DTD Nov. 8, 2023. [cited by applicant]
Notice of Allowance on U.S. Appl. No. 17/538,505 DTD Jul. 21, 2022. [cited by applicant]