IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,517,229
Granted Patent B2
US 12,517,229 · App. 18/217,366 · Granted Jan 6, 2026

Method of providing interference reduction and a dynamic region of interest in a LIDAR system

Inventors: Ronald A. Kapusta (Carlisle, MA); Andrew William Sparks (Arlington, MA); Harvey Weinberg (Sharon, MA)
Assignee: Analog Devices, Inc.
G01S7/4817G01S7/4808G01S7/483G01S17/58G01S17/89G01S17/931
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,517,229
App. No.
18/217,366
Granted
Jan 6, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

A system and method for providing a dynamic region of interest in a lidar system can include scanning a light beam over a field of view to capture a first lidar image, identifying a first object within the captured first lidar image, selecting a first region of interest within the field of view that contains at least a portion of the identified first object, and capturing a second lidar image, where capturing the second lidar image includes scanning the light beam over the first region of interest at a first spatial sampling resolution, and scanning the light beam over the field of view outside of the first region of interest at a second spatial sampling resolution, wherein the second sampling resolution is different the first spatial sampling resolution.

Claims (43)

1 . A method for providing a dynamic region of interest in a lidar system, the method comprising:

capturing a first lidar image corresponding to a field of view (FOV), the capturing comprising:

selecting a first subregion of interest in the FOV that is smaller than the FOV;

performing a first scanning of a light beam emitted by a single laser across the first subregion of interest sequentially across a first collection of regularly spaced pixels corresponding to the first subregion of interest;

performing a second scanning of the light beam emitted by the single laser within the FOV but outside the first subregion of interest using a first random or pseudo-random spatial scanning pattern across a second collection of regularly spaced pixels, wherein the spatial scanning pattern represents an order in which the pixels are scanned by the light beam, wherein the first random or pseudo-random spatial scanning pattern represents an identity of the lidar system performing the second scanning; and

in response to detecting an object in the first lidar image corresponding to the FOV, performing a third scanning of the light beam emitted by the single laser to capture a second lidar image, the third scanning being over a selected second subregion of interest, the second subregion of interest being different than the first subregion of interest.

2 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

performing a fourth scanning of the light beam emitted by the single laser within the FOV, outside the second subregion of interest in a second random or pseudo-random spatial scanning pattern and wherein the fourth scanning of the light beam is also outside the first subregion of interest and uses a second random or pseudo-random spatial scanning pattern that is different than the first random or pseudo-random spatial scanning pattern.

3 . The method of claim 2 , wherein at least one of the first or second random or pseudo-random spatial scanning pattern further comprises a random time delay between successive transmissions of the light beam emitted by the single laser over the FOV.

4 . The method of claim 1 , wherein a spatial sampling resolution in the first lidar image is different from the spatial sampling resolution of the second lidar image.

5 . The method of claim 4 , comprising, using the identity, rejecting received light pulses from a target within the FOV that were not issued by the same lidar system.

6 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

using the identity, verifying that received light pulses from a target within the FOV were issued by the same lidar system; and

determining a distance from the lidar system to a target within the FOV based on the verified light pulses.

7 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

using an inertial sensor to provide an indication of an acceleration or a rotation of the lidar system, and using control circuitry to adjust the FOV of the lidar system or the first subregion of interest within the FOV in response to the indication of the acceleration or rotation of the lidar system.

8 . The method of claim 7 comprising using the inertial sensor to provide an indication of a change in orientation of the lidar system and using the control circuitry to adjust the FOV of the lidar system or the first subregion of interest within the FOV in response to the indication of the change in orientation of the lidar system.

9 . The method of claim 7 comprising using the inertial sensor to provide an indication of static misalignment of the lidar system with a host vehicle and using the control circuitry to adjust the FOV of the lidar system or the first subregion of interest within the FOV in response to the indication of the static misalignment of the lidar system.

10 . The method of claim 7 comprising using the inertial sensor to provide an indication of dynamic vehicle motion and using the control circuitry to adjust the FOV of the lidar system or the first subregion of interest within the FOV in response to the indication of the dynamic vehicle motion.

11 . The method of claim 1 , wherein capturing the second lidar image is at a second angular resolution different than a first angular resolution that the first lidar image is captured at and a second region of interest that corresponds to a different location in the FOV than the first lidar image.

12 . A lidar system for providing a dynamic region of interest and reduce interference in a lidar system, the system comprising:

a scanning element configured to capture a first lidar image corresponding to a field of view (FOV); and

control circuitry configured to:

select a first subregion of interest in the FOV that is smaller than the FOV;

perform a first scanning of a light beam emitted by a single laser across the first subregion of interest sequentially across a collection of regularly spaced pixels corresponding to the first subregion of interest;

perform a second scanning of the light beam emitted by the single laser within the FOV but outside the first subregion of interest using a first random or pseudo-random spatial scanning pattern across a second collection of regularly spaced pixels, wherein the first random or pseudo-random spatial scanning pattern represents an identity of the lidar system performing the second scanning; and

in response to detecting an object in the first lidar image corresponding to the FOV, perform a third scanning of the light beam emitted by the single laser to capture a second lidar image, the third scanning being over a selected second subregion of interest, the second subregion of interest being different than the first subregion of interest.

13 . The system of claim 12 , further configured to:

perform a fourth scanning of the light beam emitted by the single laser within the FOV, outside the second subregion of interest in a second random or pseudo-random spatial scanning pattern and wherein the fourth scanning of the light beam is also outside the first subregion of interest and uses a second random or pseudo-random spatial scanning pattern that is different than the first random or pseudo-random spatial scanning pattern.

14 . The system of claim 13 , wherein at least one of the first or second random or pseudo-random spatial scanning pattern further comprises a random time delay between successive transmissions of the light beam emitted by the single laser over the FOV.

15 . The system of claim 12 , wherein a spatial sampling resolution in the first lidar image is different from the spatial sampling resolution of the second lidar image.

16 . The system of claim 15 , comprising, using the identity, rejecting received light pulses from a target within the FOV that were not issued by the same lidar system.

17 . The system of claim 12 , further comprising:

using the identity, verifying that received light pulses from a target within the FOV were issued by the same lidar system; and

determining a distance from the lidar system to a target within the FOV based on the verified light pulses.

18 . A lidar system for providing a dynamic region of interest and reduce interference in a lidar system, the system comprising:

a means for capturing a first lidar image corresponding to a field of view (FOV), the capturing comprising:

a means for selecting a first subregion of interest in the FOV that is smaller than the FOV;

a means for performing a first scanning of a light beam emitted by a single laser across the first subregion of interest sequentially across a collection of regularly spaced pixels corresponding to the first subregion of interest;

a means for performing a second scanning of the light beam emitted by the single laser within the FOV but outside the first subregion of interest using a first random or pseudo-random spatial scanning pattern across a second collection of regularly spaced pixels, wherein the first random or pseudo-random spatial scanning pattern represents an identity of the lidar system performing the second scanning; and

a means for performing a third scanning, in response to detecting an object in the first lidar image corresponding to the FOV, of the light beam emitted by the single laser to capture a second lidar image, the third scanning being over a selected second subregion of interest, the second subregion of interest being different than the first subregion of interest.

19 . The system of claim 18 , wherein a spatial sampling resolution in the first lidar image is different from the spatial sampling resolution of the second lidar image.

20 . The system of claim 18 , wherein the first random or pseudo-random spatial scanning pattern further comprises a random time delay between successive transmissions of the light beam emitted by the single laser over the FOV.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 20, 2023
From: KAPUSTA, RONALD A.; SPARKS, ANDREW WILLIAM; WEINBERG, HARVEY
To: ANALOG DEVICES, INC.
Reel/Frame 065619/0054 →
Continuity (3)
Continuation 16606721
Continuation 15492771 · Apr 20, 2017
Related Publication 20240069172A1 · Feb 29, 2024
References Cited (44)
US 5621514A · Paranto et al. · 1997 [cited by applicant]
US 5638164A · Landau · 1997 [cited by applicant]
US 9383753B1 · Templeton · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 10295660B1 · McMichael · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20060227317A1 · Henderson et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20100045965A1 · Meneely · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20130050676A1 · D'aligny · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20140240691A1 · Mheen et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20160282468A1 · Gruver · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20170082735A1 · Slobodyanyuk · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20170219695A1 · Hall et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170329010A1 · Warke · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20180062345A1 · Bills · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20180306905A1 · Kapusta et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20200150228A1 · Kapusta et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
CN 102338872A · 2012 [cited by applicant]
CN 106461785A · 2017 [cited by applicant]
CN 110537108 · 2023 [cited by applicant]
EP 2626722A1 · 2013 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2018194721A1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 15/492,771, filed Apr. 20, 2017, Method of Providing a Dynamic Region of Interest in a LIDAR System. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 16/606,721, filed Oct. 18, 2019, Method of Providing Interference Reduction and a Dynamic Region of Interest in a LIDAR System. [cited by applicant]
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/492,771, Non Final Office Action mailed Aug. 16, 2019”, 9 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“U.S. Appl. No. 16/606,721, Advisory Action mailed Jun. 2, 2023”, 5 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“U.S. Appl. No. 16/606,721, Final Office Action mailed Feb. 1, 2023”, 21 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“U.S. Appl. No. 16/606,721, Non Final Office Action mailed Aug. 30, 2022”, 19 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“U.S. Appl. No. 16/606,721, Response filed May 1, 2023 to Final Office Action mailed Feb. 1, 2023”, 10 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“U.S. Appl. No. 16/606,721, Response filed Jul. 20, 2022 to Restriction Requirement mailed May 24, 2022”, 8 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“U.S. Appl. No. 16/606,721, Response filed Dec. 22, 2022 to Non Final Office Action mailed Aug. 30, 2022”, 11 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“U.S. Appl. No. 16/606,721, Restriction Requirement mailed May 24, 2022”, 6 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201780089765.9, Office Action mailed Dec. 1, 2022”, 15 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“German Application Serial No. 112017007467.3, Office Action mailed Jan. 10, 2023”, w/English Machine Translation, 17 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“How modern camera and framegrabber features are changing Machine Vision”, Teledyne Dalsa, (Aug. 2015), 30 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2017/065392, International Search Report mailed May 4, 2018”, 7 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2017/065392, Invitation to Pay Additional Fees and Partial Search Report mailed Mar. 8, 2018”, 11 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2017/065392, Written Opinion mailed May 4, 2018”, 8 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“Multiple Region of Interest (MROI) Imaging”, (2017), 3 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“RobotEye RE08 3D LIDAR: 3D Laser Scanning System”, Ocular Robotics, (2015), 6 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Anderton, Donald C, “Synchronized Line=Scan LIDAR/EO Imager for Creating 3D Images of Dynamic Scenes: Prototype II”, All Graduate Plann B and other Reports. Paper 1., (2005), 148 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Britt, Jordan H, et al., “Lane Detection, Calibration, and Attitude Determination with a Multi-Layer Lidar for Vehical Safety Systems”, Thesis submitted to Auburn University, (Dec. 13, 2010), 103 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Tian, Yi, “Self-Powered Intelligent Traffic Monitoring Using IR Lidar and Camera”, Thesis Submitted to Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, (Dec. 6, 2016), 106 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201780089765.9, Response filed Mar. 8, 2023 to Office Action mailed Dec. 1, 2022”, w/English Claims, 14 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201780089765.9, Office Action mailed May 19, 2023”, 12 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“German Application Serial No. 112017007467.3, Response filed May 26, 2023 to Office Action mailed Jan. 10, 2023”, 50 pgs. [cited by applicant]