IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,519,665
Granted Patent B2
US 12,519,665 · App. 18/274,258 · Granted Jan 6, 2026

Methods for blockchain offline operations management

Inventors: Chonggang Wang (Princeton, NJ); Xu Li (Plainsboro, NJ); Paul Russell (Lawrence, NJ)
Assignee: INTERDIGITAL PATENT HOLDINGS, INC.
H04L9/50
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,519,665
App. No.
18/274,258
Granted
Jan 6, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

Methods and apparatus for offline management of blockchain nodes are disclosed. A method performed by a first blockchain node may comprise transmitting, to at least a second blockchain node, a first message that includes information indicating a status of the first blockchain node and a value indicating a time at which the first block chain node will go offline; receiving, from the second blockchain node, a second message that includes information indicating a blockchain proxy node being selected for the first blockchain node; and transitioning to an offline status at the time indicated by the value.

Claims (31)

1 . A method performed by a first blockchain node, the method comprising:

transmitting, to a blockchain management function (BMF), a first message including:

a value indicating a scheduled time at which the first blockchain node will transition to offline status; and

information indicating capabilities of the first blockchain node;

receiving, from the BMF, a second message indicating a blockchain proxy node selected as a proxy node for the first blockchain node; and

transitioning to the offline status at the scheduled time.

2 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the first blockchain node is a wireless transmit/receive unit (WTRU).

3 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the first blockchain nodes sends the first message to the BMF.

4 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the first message indicates a preferred proxy node of the first blockchain node.

5 . The method of claim 1 , wherein a blockchain client indicates a preferred proxy node of the first blockchain node.

6 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the BMF selects proxy nodes based on a capability of at least one node, or the time at which the first blockchain node will change status to offline.

7 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the BMF includes a Blockchain Offline Operation Management (BOOM) as a logical function to manage offline operations of blockchain nodes.

8 . A first blockchain node comprising:

a receiver;

a transmitter; and

a processor;

wherein the transmitter is configured to transmit, to a blockchain management function (BMF), a first message that includes including:

a value indicating a scheduled time at which the first block chain node will transition to offline status; and

information indicating capabilities of the first blockchain node;

wherein the receiver is configured to receive, from the BMF, a second message a blockchain proxy node selected as a proxy node for the first blockchain node; and

wherein the processor is configured transition to the offline status at the scheduled.

9 . The first blockchain node of claim 8 , wherein the first blockchain node is a wireless transmit/receive unit (WTRU).

10 . The first blockchain node of claim 8 , wherein the transmitter is further configured to send the first message to the BMF.

11 . The first blockchain node of claim 8 , wherein the first message indicates a preferred proxy node of the first blockchain node.

12 . The first blockchain node of claim 8 , wherein a blockchain client indicates a preferred proxy node of the first blockchain node.

13 . The first blockchain node of claim 8 , wherein the BMF selects proxy nodes based on a capability of at least one node, or the time at which the first blockchain node will change status to offline.

14 . The first blockchain node of claim 8 , wherein the BMF includes a Blockchain Offline Operation Management (BOOM) as a logical function to manage offline operations of blockchain nodes.

15 . A method performed by a first blockchain node, the method comprising:

transmitting, to a second blockchain node, a first message requesting a status of the second blockchain node;

receiving, from the second blockchain node, a second message a value that indicates a time at which the second blockchain node will change status to offline; and

transmitting, to a third blockchain node, a third message that includes the status of the first blockchain node, the status of the second blockchain node, and the time at which the second blockchain node will change status to offline.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 22, 2023
From: WANG, CHONGGANG; LI, XU; RUSSELL, PAUL
To: INTERDIGITAL PATENT HOLDINGS, INC.
Reel/Frame 065940/0727 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 63145285 · Feb 3, 2021
Related Publication 20240089130A1 · Mar 14, 2024
References Cited (24)
US 10642699B2 · Tang · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10742837B1 · Sankarapandian et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20180062831A1 · Zhang · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20190320014A1 · Allen · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190349733A1 · Nolan · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20200167319A1 · Fritz · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20240098072A1 · Verzun · 2024 [cited by examiner]
CN 108764868A · 2018 [cited by examiner]
JP 2009055301A · 2009 [cited by applicant]
WO 2011109424 · 2011 [cited by applicant]
WO 2015129306A1 · 2015 [cited by applicant]
European Telecommuncations Standards Institute, “PDL Operations in Offline Mode Release #,” ETSI GR PDL 010 V0.0.2 (Nov. 2020). [cited by applicant]
European Telecommuncations Standards Institute, “PDL Operations in Offline Mode Release #,” ETSI GR PDL 010 V0.0.5 (Nov. 2020). [cited by applicant]
European Telecommuncations Standards Institute, “Permissioned Distributed Ledger (PDL); Application Scenarios,” ETSI GR PDL 003 V1.1.1 (Dec. 2020). [cited by applicant]
IEEE Standard for Information technology—Telecommunications and information exchange between systems—Local and metropolitan area networks—Specific requirements; Part 11: Wireless LAN Medium Access Control (MAC) and Phys… [cited by applicant]
IEEE Standard for Information Technology—Telecommunications and information exchange between systems—Local and metropolitan area networks—Specific requirements; Part 11: Wireless LAN Medium Access Control (MAC) and Phys… [cited by applicant]
IEEE Standard for Information technology—Telecommunications and information exchange between systems—Local and metropolitan area networks—Specific requirements; Part 11: Wireless LAN Medium Access Control (MAC) and Phys… [cited by applicant]
IEEE Standard for Information technology—Telecommunications and information exchange between systems Local and metropolitan area networks—Specific requirements; Part 11: Wireless LAN Medium Access Control (MAC) and Phys… [cited by applicant]
IEEE Standard for Information technology—Telecommunications and information exchange between systems—Local and metropolitan area networks—Specific requirements; Part 11: Wireless LAN Medium Access Control (MAC) and Phys… [cited by applicant]
Third Generation Partnership Project, “Technical Specification Group Services and System Aspects; System architecture for the 5G System (5GS); Stage 2 (Release 16),” 3GPP TS 23.501 V16.4.0 (Mar. 2020). [cited by applicant]
Third Generation Partnership Project, “Technical Specification Group Services and System Aspects; System architecture for the 5G System (5GS); Stage 2 (Release 16),” 3GPP TS 23.501 V16.7.0 (Dec. 2020). [cited by applicant]
Third Generation Partnership Project, “Technical Specification Group Services and System Aspects; System architecture for the 5G System (5GS); Stage 2 (Release 16),” 3GPP TS 23.501 V16.11.0 (Dec. 2021). [cited by applicant]
Third Generation Partnership Project, “Technical Specification Group Services and System Aspects; System architecture for the 5G System (5GS); Stage 2 (Release 17),” 3GPP TS 23.501 V17.3.0 (Dec. 2021). [cited by applicant]
Tian et al., “A Coverage-Preserving Node Scheduling Scheme for Large Wireless Sensor Networks,” Proceedings of the First ACM International Workshop on Wireless Sensor Networks and Applications, pp. 32-41 (Sep. 2002). [cited by applicant]