IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,521,051
Granted Patent B2
US 12,521,051 · App. 18/383,259 · Granted Jan 13, 2026

Multimodal investigation of speech, text, cognitive and facial video features for characterizing depression with and without medication

Inventors: Michael Neumann (Waiblingen, DE); Hardik Kothare (Burlingame, CA); William Burke (Portland, OR); Doug Habberstad (Savanna, GA); Jackson Liscombe (Mill River, MA); Oliver Roesler (Syke, DE); David Suendermann-Oeft (San Francisco, CA); David Pautler (Sarasota, FL); Andrew Cornish (Gore, NZ); Vikram Ramanarayanan (San Francisco, CA)
Assignee: Modality.AI, Inc.
A61B5/165A61B5/4088A61B5/4803G06T7/0012G06T7/10G06V20/41G06V20/49G06V20/52G06V40/171G06V40/20G10L15/02G10L15/08G10L15/30G10L25/18G10L25/63G16H20/10G16H40/67G06T2207/10016G06T2207/30004G06T2207/30201G06V2201/03
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,521,051
App. No.
18/383,259
Granted
Jan 13, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

A system for remotely determining the potential presence of depression in a user. The system includes a virtual agent that administers one or more tasks to the user. The user performs the tasks and the performance is captured by a camera. The captured audiovisual data is sent to a server that derives objective metrics which are then applied to a classifying algorithm. If certain metrics meet certain thresholds, the system determines that the user is exhibiting depression symptoms. In embodiments, the system can further determine whether a user has been taking depression medication.

Claims (37)

1 . A method for detecting a possible presence of depression, comprising:

presenting, by a computing device and via a virtual agent, at least one task for a user to perform;

capturing, by the computing device, audiovisual data of a performance of the at least one task by the user;

streaming, by the computing device, the audiovisual data to at least one remote computing device;

segmenting, by the remote computing device, the audiovisual data;

calculating, by the remote computing device, objective metrics for the user;

applying, by the remote computing device, a classifying algorithm to the objective metrics, the classifying algorithm comprising:

(a) determining, by the remote computing device, whether a metric representative of a linguistic feature of noun usage is less than a first threshold value;

(b) determining, by the remote computing device, whether a metric representative of lip and jaw kinematics is less than a second threshold;

(c) determining, by the remote computing device, whether a metric representative of cognitive executive function, attention or memory is greater than a third threshold;

(d) determining, by the remote computing device, whether a metric representative of tongue movement and speech articulation is greater than a fourth threshold;

determining, by the remote computing device, that all of the first threshold, the second threshold, the third threshold and the fourth threshold have been met; and

in response to determining that all of the first threshold, the second threshold, the third threshold and the fourth threshold have been met, determining, by the remote computing device, that the user exhibits depression symptoms; and

determining, by the remote computing device, whether the user may have depression based on an output of the classifying algorithm.

2 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the objective metrics are derived according to one or more of a speech acoustic domain, a facial domain, a linguistic domain, a motor domain, an emotional domain, and a cognitive domain.

3 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the at least one task comprises at least one of a counting task, a consonant-vowel-consonant reading task, an oral diadochokinesis task, a reading task, a picture description task, a reading sentences task, a spontaneous speech task, a forward-and-backward digit span task, a motor task, an emotion elicitation task, a word recall task, a semantic fluency task and a sequential command task.

4 . The method of claim 1 further comprising, after the step of calculating: merging, by the remote computing device, demographics information with the calculated objective metrics.

5 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising refining the objective metrics following the step of calculating, wherein the step of refining the objective metrics comprises:

removing, by the remote computing device, any objective metrics beyond a first predefined number of standard deviations; and

for remaining objective metrics, recalculating, by the remote computing device, a mean and a standard deviation and removing any remaining objective metrics with values beyond a second predefined number of standard deviations.

6 . The method of claim 5 , wherein the first predefined number of standard deviations comprises five standard deviations and the second predefined number of standard deviations comprises three standard deviations.

7 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the metric representative of linguistic feature comprises a noun-to-verb ratio.

8 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the metric representative of lip and jaw kinematics comprises at least one of an average speed of the jaw center and a maximum speed of the lower lip.

9 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the metric representative of cognitive executive function, attention or memory comprises a digit span forward score.

10 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the metric representative of tongue movement and speech articulation comprises an articulation rate in words per minute.

11 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

providing, by the remote computing device, the determination that the user exhibits depression symptoms to the computing device; and

presenting, by the computing device, the output to the user.

12 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising providing, by the remote computing device, the determination that the user exhibits depression symptoms to a healthcare provider.

13 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising determining whether the user is likely taking anti-depressant medication, where determining whether the user is likely taking anti-depressant medication further comprises:

(e) determining, by the remote computing device, whether the metric representative of lip and jaw kinematics is greater than a fifth threshold;

(f) determining, by the remote computing device, whether the metric representative of tongue movement and speech articulation is less than a sixth threshold;

(g) determining, by the remote computing device, whether a metric representative of the user's speech acoustics and spectral information is less than a seventh threshold;

(h) determining, by the remote computing device, whether the metric representative of cognitive executive function, attention or memory is greater than an eighth threshold;

determining, by the remote computing device, that all of the fifth threshold, the sixth threshold, the seventh threshold and the eighth threshold have been met; and

determining, by the remote computing device, that the user is likely taking anti-depressant medication in response to determining that all of the fifth threshold, the sixth threshold, the seventh threshold and the eighth threshold have been met.

14 . The method of claim 13 , wherein the metric representative of the user's speech acoustics and spectral information comprises a harmonics-to-noise ratio.

Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20250127445A1 · Apr 24, 2025
References Cited (71)
US 5357427A · Langen et al. · 1994 [cited by applicant]
US 9311932B2 · Carter · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 10592733B1 · Ramanarayanan · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 11504038B2 · Howard · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20070033042A1 · Marcheret et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20120144336A1 · Pinter et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20130211832A1 · Talwar et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20140278386A1 · Konchitsky · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20150051906A1 · Dickens et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150058013A1 · Pakhomov et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150126888A1 · Patel · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150356982A1 · Chesney · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20180090127A1 · Hofer et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180214061A1 · Knoth et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180310866A1 · Wrenn · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20190074028A1 · Howard · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190198043A1 · Crespi et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190325898A1 · O'Hart Kinney et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190348065A1 · Talwar et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190378537A1 · Li et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190385711A1 · Shriberg et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20200296513A1 · Littrel et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200349938A1 · Hwang et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200365275A1 · Barnett et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20210098110A1 · Periyasamy et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210118329A1 · Medan et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210121124A1 · Shenhar et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210158834A1 · Medan et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20220148570A1 · Weissberg et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220335939A1 · Liscombe · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20230018524A1 · Ramanarayanan et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230386504A1 · Lee et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
WO 2016154139 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
Neumann et al., “On the Utility of Audiovisual Dialog Technologies and Signal Analytics for Real-time Remote Monitoring of Depression Biomarkers,” Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on NLP for Medical Conversations, pp. 47… [cited by examiner]
Cohen et al., “A multimodal dialog approach to mental state characterization in clinically depressed, anxious, and suicidal populations,” Frontiers in Psychology, Sep. 11, 2023, https://doi.org/ 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.11354… [cited by examiner]
Robert et al., “Quantitative Voice Analysis in the Assessment of Bulbar Involvement in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis,” Acta Oto-Laryngologica, 2009, 119(6), 724-731. https://doi.org/10.1080/00016489950180702 (Year: 2009… [cited by examiner]
Naumann, et al. “Investigating the Utility of Multimodal Conversational Technology and Audiovisual Analytic Measures for the Assessment and Monitoring of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis at Scale,” Interspeech, 2021. 5 pag… [cited by applicant]
Getz, Lindsey. “MMSE vs. MoCA: What You Should Know,” Today's Geriatric Medicine. 2 pages. [cited by applicant]
Jia, et al. “A comparison of the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) with the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) for mild cognitive impairment screening in Chinese middle-aged and older population: a crosssectional s… [cited by applicant]
Roesler, et al. “Multimodal Dialog Based Remote Patient Monitoring of Motor Function in Parkinson's Disease and Other Movement Disorders,” Modalitiy.AI and U of CA, San Francisco. 6 pages. [cited by applicant]
Arora, et al. “Detecting and monitoring the symptoms of Parkinson's disease using smartphones: a pilot study,” 18 pages. [cited by applicant]
Kothare, et al. “Speech, Facial and Fine Motor Features for Conversation-Based Remote Assessment and Monitoring of Parkinson's Disease,” 4 pages. [cited by applicant]
Goetz, et al. “MDS-UPDRS: The MDS-sponsored Revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale,” International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society. 2018. 33 pages. [cited by applicant]
Boersma, et al. “Praat: doing phonetics by computer,”. [cited by applicant]
Mundt, et al. “Voice acoustic measures of depression severity and treatment response collected via interactive voice response (IVR) technology,” J Neurolinguistics. Jan. 2007 ; 20(1): 50-64. 17 pages. [cited by applicant]
Vasquez-Correa, et al. “Towards an automatic evaluation of the dysarthria level of patients with Parkinson's disease,” Journal of Communicaiton Orders. 76 (2018) 21-36. 16 pages. [cited by applicant]
Yunusova, Y., Green, J.R., Wang, J., Pattee, G., Zinman, L. A Protocol for Comprehensive Assessment of Bulbar Dysfunction in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS). J. Vis. Exp. (48), e2422, doi:10.3791/2422 (2011). 5 page… [cited by applicant]
Rudzicz, Frank. “Acoustic transformations to improve the intelligibility of dysarthric speech,” Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Speech and Language Processing for Assistive Technologies, pp. 11-21. 11 pages. [cited by applicant]
Cedarbaum, et al. “The ALSFRS-R: a revised ALS functional rating scale that incorporates assessments of respiratory function,” J.M. Cedarbaum et al. / Journal of the Neurological Sciences 169 (1999) 13-21. 5 pages. [cited by applicant]
Bombaci, et al. “Telemedicine for management of patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis through COVID-19 tail,” Neurological Sciences (2021) 42:9-13. 5 pages. [cited by applicant]
Morales, et al. “Modelling Errors in Automatic Speech Recognition for Dysarthric Speakers,” EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing vol. 2009, Article ID 308340, 14 pages. [cited by applicant]
Norel, et al. “Detection of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) via Acoustic Analysis,” 1Computational Biology Center, T.J. Watson IBM Research Laboratory, New York. 5 pages. [cited by applicant]
DeVault, et al. “SimSensei Kiosk: A Virtual Human Interviewer for Healthcare Decision Support,” USC Institute for Creative Technologies, 12015 Waterfront Dr., Playa Vista, CA 90094, USA http://simsensei.ict.usc.edu/. 8 … [cited by applicant]
Victoria Young MHSc & Alex Mihailidis PhD (2010) Difficulties in Automatic Speech Recognition of Dysarthric Speakers and Implications for Speech-Based Applications Used by the Elderly: A Literature Review, Assistive Tec… [cited by applicant]
Kim, et al. “Dysarthric Speech Recognition Using Dysarthria-Severity-Dependent and Speaker-Adaptive Models,” Department of Electrical Engineering Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST), Daejeon, Repu… [cited by applicant]
Stegmann, et al. “Early detection and tracking of bulbar changes in ALS via frequent and remote speech analysis,” npj Digital Medicine (2020) 3:132. 5 pages. [cited by applicant]
Borrie, et al. “Familiarisation conditions and the mechanisms that underlie improved recognition of dysarthric speech,” Familiarisation conditions and the mechanisms that underlie improved recognition of dysarthric spee… [cited by applicant]
Lisetti, et al. “Now All Together: Overview of Virtual Health Assistants Emulating Face-to-Face Health Interview Experience.” 11 pages. [cited by applicant]
Gomez, et al. “Articulation Acoustic Kinematics in ALS Speech.” 7 pages. [cited by applicant]
Kumar, et al. “Mobile Health: Revolutionizing Healthcare Through Transdisciplinary Research.” 8 pages. [cited by applicant]
Suendermann-Oeft, et al. “NEMSI: A Multimodal Dialog System for Screening of Neurological or Mental Conditions,” ACM International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents (IVA '19), Jul. 2-5, 2019. 3 pages. [cited by applicant]
Green, et al. “Algorithmic Estimation of Pauses in Extended Speech Samples of Dysarthric and Typical Speech,” J Med Speech Lang Pathol. Dec. 2004 ; 12(4): 149-154. 9 pages. [cited by applicant]
Byers, et al. “2017 Pilot Open Speech Analytic Technologies Evaluation,” NISTIR. 27 pages. [cited by applicant]
Yunusova, et al. “Profiling Speech and Pausing in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) and Frontotemporal Dementia (FTD),” PLoS ONE 11(1): e0147573. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0147573. 18 pages. [cited by applicant]
Robert, et al. “Quantitative Voice Analysis in the Assessment of Bulbar Involvement in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis,” Acta Oto-Laryngologica, 119:6, 724-731, DOI: 10.1080/00016489950180702. 9 pages. [cited by applicant]
Kodrasi, et al. “Spectro-Temporal Sparsity Characterization for Dysarthric Speech Detection,” IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing, vol. 28, 2020. 13 pages. [cited by applicant]
Janbakhshi, et al. “Subspace-Based Learning for Automatic Dysarthric Speech Detection,” IEEE Signal Processing Letters, vol. 28, 2021. 5 pages. [cited by applicant]
Kent, et al. “Toward an acoustic typology of motor speech disorders,” Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 17:6, 427-445, DOI: 10.1080/0269920031000086248. 20 pages. [cited by applicant]
Lee, et al. “Vowel-Specific Intelligibility and Acoustic Patterns in Individuals With Dysarthria Secondary to Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis,” Journal of Speech, Language, and 34 Hearing Research ⋅ vol. 62 ⋅ 34-59 ⋅ Jan.… [cited by applicant]
Neumann, et al. “On the Utility of Audiovisual Dialog Technologies and Signal Analytics for Real-time Remote Monitoring of Depression Biomarkers,” Modality.ai, Inc., 6 pages. [cited by applicant]
Ivascu, et al. “A Multi-agent Architecture for Ontology-based Diagnosis of Mental Disorders,” 17th International Symposium on Symbolic and Numeric Algorithms for Scientific Computers, IEEE Xplore, 8 pages. [cited by applicant]