IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,526,476
Granted Patent B2
US 12,526,476 · App. 18/670,876 · Granted Jan 13, 2026

Methods and apparatus to estimate population reach from marginal ratings

Inventors: Michael Sheppard (Holland, MI); Jonathan Sullivan (Hurricane, UT); Edward Murphy (North Stonington, CT); Michael D. Morgan (Bartlett, IL); Ludo Daemen (Duffel, BE)
Assignee: The Nielsen Company (US), LLC
H04N21/44224G06Q30/0201H04N21/4756
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,526,476
App. No.
18/670,876
Granted
Jan 13, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

Methods, apparatus, systems, and articles of manufacture are disclosed to estimate population reach from marginal ratings. An example apparatus includes means for iteratively converging on an output estimate of a reach of media for a total population audience and means for outputting the estimate of the reach for the total population audience.

Claims (53)

1 . A computing system comprising a processor and a memory, the computing system configured to perform a set of acts comprising:

receiving, from a plurality of meters via a network, meter data indicative of media exposure for respective time slots of television programming across a plurality of panelist households;

determining, using the meter data, panel marginal ratings for the respective time slots and a total panel reach across the respective time slots;

receiving, from a media service provider via the network, return path data indicative of media exposure for the respective time slots across a plurality of population households;

determining, using the return path data, population marginal ratings for the respective time slots;

determining an initial estimate for a panel pseudo universe;

determining an initial estimate for a total population reach across the respective time slots;

for each of multiple iterations:

determining, for the iteration, a current estimate of a population pseudo universe using a prior estimate for the panel pseudo universe, a prior estimate for the total population reach, and the total panel reach,

determining, for the iteration, a current estimate of the total population reach using the current estimate of the population pseudo universe and the population marginal ratings, and

determining, for the iteration, whether a further iteration is necessary; and

after the multiple iterations, outputting the current estimate of the total population reach.

2 . The computing system of claim 1 , wherein determining the initial estimate for the panel pseudo universe comprises using a universe estimate for the population as the initial estimate for the panel pseudo universe.

3 . The computing system of claim 1 , wherein determining the initial estimate for the total population reach comprises determining the initial estimate for the total population reach assuming independence among the population marginal ratings.

4 . The computing system of claim 1 , wherein the initial estimate for the panel pseudo universe is the prior estimate for the panel pseudo universe for a first iteration of the multiple iterations.

5 . The computing system of claim 1 , wherein the computing system uses the initial estimate for the total population reach as the prior estimate for the total population reach for a first iteration of the multiple iterations.

6 . The computing system of claim 1 , wherein the set of acts further comprises determining a subsequent estimate for the panel pseudo universe based on determining that a further iteration is necessary.

7 . The computing system of claim 6 , wherein determining the subsequent estimate comprises determining the subsequent estimate using the total panel reach, the current estimate of the population pseudo universe, and the panel marginal ratings.

8 . The computing system of claim 1 , wherein determining whether a further iteration is necessary comprises determining that: (i) it is not a first iteration; and (ii) a difference between the current estimate of the total population reach and the prior estimate of the total population reach satisfy a threshold condition.

9 . A non-transitory computer-readable medium having stored therein instructions that upon execution by a computing system cause the computing system to perform a set of acts comprising:

receiving, from a plurality of meters via a network, meter data indicative of media exposure for respective time slots of television programming across a plurality of panelist households;

determining, using the meter data, panel marginal ratings for the respective time slots and a total panel reach across the respective time slots;

receiving, from a media service provider via the network, return path data indicative of media exposure for the respective time slots across a plurality of population households;

determining, using the return path data, population marginal ratings for the respective time slots;

determining an initial estimate for a panel pseudo universe;

determining an initial estimate for a total population reach across the respective time slots;

for each of multiple iterations:

determining, for the iteration, a current estimate of a population pseudo universe using a prior estimate for the panel pseudo universe, a prior estimate for the total population reach, and the total panel reach,

determining, for the iteration, a current estimate of the total population reach using the current estimate of the population pseudo universe and the population marginal ratings, and

determining, for the iteration, whether a further iteration is necessary; and

after the multiple iterations, outputting the current estimate of the total population reach.

10 . The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 9 , wherein determining the initial estimate for the panel pseudo universe comprises using a universe estimate for the population as the initial estimate for the panel pseudo universe.

11 . The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 9 , wherein determining the initial estimate for the total population reach comprises determining the initial estimate for the total population reach assuming independence among the population marginal ratings.

12 . The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 9 , wherein the initial estimate for the panel pseudo universe is the prior estimate for the panel pseudo universe for a first iteration of the multiple iterations.

13 . The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 9 , wherein the computing system uses the initial estimate for the total population reach as the prior estimate for the total population reach for a first iteration of the multiple iterations.

14 . The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 9 , wherein the set of acts further comprises determining a subsequent estimate for the panel pseudo universe based on determining that a further iteration is necessary.

15 . The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 14 , wherein determining the subsequent estimate comprises determining the subsequent estimate using the total panel reach, the current estimate of the population pseudo universe, and the panel marginal ratings.

16 . The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 9 , wherein determining whether a further iteration is necessary comprises determining that: (i) it is not a first iteration; and (ii) a difference between the current estimate of the total population reach and the prior estimate of the total population reach satisfy a threshold condition.

17 . A method comprising:

receiving, from a plurality of meters via a network, meter data indicative of media exposure for respective time slots of television programming across a plurality of panelist households;

determining, using the meter data, panel marginal ratings for the respective time slots and a total panel reach across the respective time slots;

receiving, from a media service provider via the network, return path data indicative of media exposure for the respective time slots across a plurality of population households;

determining, using the return path data, population marginal ratings for the respective time slots;

determining an initial estimate for a panel pseudo universe;

determining an initial estimate for a total population reach across the respective time slots;

for each of multiple iterations:

determining, for the iteration, a current estimate of a population pseudo universe using a prior estimate for the panel pseudo universe, a prior estimate for the total population reach, and the total panel reach,

determining, for the iteration, a current estimate of the total population reach using the current estimate of the population pseudo universe and the population marginal ratings, and

determining, for the iteration, whether a further iteration is necessary; and

after the multiple iterations, outputting the current estimate of the total population reach.

18 . The method of claim 17 , wherein determining the initial estimate for the panel pseudo universe comprises using a universe estimate for the population as the initial estimate for the panel pseudo universe.

19 . The method of claim 17 , wherein determining the initial estimate for the total population reach comprises determining the initial estimate for the total population reach assuming independence among the population marginal ratings.

20 . The method of claim 17 , wherein the initial estimate for the panel pseudo universe is the prior estimate for the panel pseudo universe for a first iteration of the multiple iterations.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 22, 2024
From: SULLIVAN, JONATHAN; SHEPPARD, MICHAEL; MURPHY, EDWARD; MORGAN, MICHAEL; DAEMEN, LUDO
To: THE NIELSEN COMPANY (US), LLC
Reel/Frame 067489/0746 →
Continuity (4)
Continuation 17892659 · Aug 22, 2022
Continuation 16657652 · Oct 18, 2019
Continuation 15445543 · Feb 28, 2017
Related Publication 20240397148A1 · Nov 28, 2024
References Cited (31)
US 8327396B2 · Ramaswamy et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 10045082B2 · Nagaraja Rao et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10380633B2 · Morovati et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10958956B2 · Ricci · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11012746B2 · Nagaraja Rao et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11039190B1 · Dailey et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11481802B2 · Sheppard et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20040001538A1 · Garrett · 2004 [cited by examiner]
US 20120254922A1 · Rangarajan et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20140278933A1 · McMillan · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20150186403A1 · Srivastava · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20150189378A1 · Soundararajan et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20160027037A1 · Cai et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160232538A1 · Papakostas et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170034593A1 · Ray et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170053306A1 · Sissenich et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170372359A1 · Bodzo et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20200145720A1 · Krauss et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200396502A1 · Watts · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20210084370A1 · Doe · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210248629A1 · Sullivan et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210303552A1 · Pandey et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20220036390A1 · Sheppard et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220408154A1 · Sheppard et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
WO 2020190650A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
Araujo et al. Characterizing videos, audience and advertising in Youtube channels for kids, arXiv:1707.00971v1 [cs.CY], Jul. 4, 2017, 11 pages. [cited by applicant]
Buzzard, The Definition of the Audience in the History of Television Audience Research, University Microfilms International, 1985, 483 pages. [cited by applicant]
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 18/320,958, on Apr. 23, 2024, 7 pages. [cited by applicant]
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued Oct. 8, 2021 in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 17/008,263, 19 pages. [cited by applicant]
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Final Office Action, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/843,650, mailed on Apr. 10, 2023, 40 pages. [cited by applicant]
USPTO, Final Office Action dated Nov. 5, 2024 for U.S. Appl. No. 17/961,514, 22 pages. [cited by applicant]