IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,530,753
Granted Patent B2
US 12,530,753 · App. 18/475,568 · Granted Jan 20, 2026

Method and electronic device for estimating perceptual quality of high dynamic range (HDR) images

Inventors: Srenivas Varadarajan (Karnataka, IN); Anamika Sharma (Karnataka, IN); Kaustav Chanda (Karnataka, IN)
Assignee: SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.
G06T5/90G06T7/0002G06T7/11G06T7/13G06T7/20G06T2207/20208G06T2207/30168
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,530,753
App. No.
18/475,568
Granted
Jan 20, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method and apparatus for estimating a perceptual quality of a High Dynamic Range (HDR) image includes dividing an image into at least one static region and at least one dynamic region, weighting at least one artifact in the at least one static region and the at least one dynamic region through a visual saliency map, computing at least one edge preservation score based on a Static HDR Quality Index (SQI), a Dynamic HDR Quality Index (DQI) and the at least one weighted artifact, generating an output HDR quality metric by modulating the at least one computed edge preservation score on an input HDR quality metric, and estimating the perceptual quality of the HDR image based on the generated output HDR quality metric.

Claims (75)

1 . A method for estimating a perceptual quality of a high dynamic range (HDR) image by an electronic device, the method comprising:

dividing an image into at least one static region and at least one dynamic region;

determining at least one preserved edge in the at least one static region based on a static HDR quality index (SQI);

determining an amount of ghosting in the at least one dynamic region based on a dynamic HDR quality index (DQI);

weighting at least one artifact in the at least one static region and the at least one dynamic region through a visual saliency map;

computing at least one edge preservation score based on the SQI and the DQI;

generating an output HDR quality metric by modulating the at least one computed edge preservation score on an input HDR quality metric; and

estimating a perceptual quality of the HDR image based on the generated output HDR quality metric.

2 . The method as claimed in claim 1 , further comprising applying the generated output HDR quality metric as feedback for tuning at least one parameter to optimize the perceptual quality of the HDR image.

3 . The method as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the SQI determines an HDR blur through at least one lost LDR edge in the at least one static region of the HDR image due to at least one of an overexposure or an underexposure.

4 . The method as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the DQI determines an HDR ghosting through additional edges in the at least one dynamic region of the HDR image due to a foreground motion.

5 . The method as claimed in claim 1 ,

wherein the visual saliency map is used to weigh an edge-cost in the HDR image compared to at least one LDR image before computing the edge preservation score,

wherein the edge-cost corresponds to edge loss and a presence of extra edges in the HDR image.

6 . The method as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the SQI is generated by:

accumulating all edges present in the at least one static region of an input LDR sequence into one edge map;

detecting a blur in an output HDR image by computing a number of edge pixels in the accumulated edges that are not found in the output HDR image at a corresponding location;

computing the blur as a fraction of edge pixels in the accumulated edge map that are not present in the output HDR image; and

subtracting the computed blur ratio from a predefined value to obtain the SQI, wherein the predefined value is 1.

7 . The method as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the DQI is generated by:

counting a number of edge pixels in the at least one dynamic region for each of LDR images in the input sequence;

determining the LDR image containing a maximum number of edges;

accumulating the edges from the LDR image and the edges in the output HDR image;

detecting the at least one artifact as extra edges present in the output HDR image that are not present in the input LDR image that has the maximum number of edges; and

computing the DQI as the maximum number of edge pixels in an input sequence divided by the number of edges in the accumulated edge map, wherein the computation is always less than or equal to one, where the computation is equal to one if there are no extra edge pixels in the output HDR image.

8 . An electronic device, comprising:

a processor;

a memory; and

a perceptual quality and estimation controller, coupled with the processor and the memory,

wherein the perceptual quality and estimation controller is configured to:

divide an image into at least one static region and at least one dynamic region;

determine at least one preserved edge in the at least one static region based on a static high dynamic range (HDR) quality index (SQI);

determine an amount of ghosting in the at least one dynamic region based on a dynamic HDR quality index (DQI);

weight at least one artifact in the at least one static region and the at least one dynamic region through a visual saliency map;

compute at least one edge preservation score based on the SQI and the DQI;

generate an output HDR quality metric by modulating the at least one computed edge preservation score on an input HDR quality metric; and

estimate the perceptual quality of the HDR image based on the generated output HDR quality metric.

9 . The electronic device as claimed in claim 8 , wherein the perceptual quality and estimation controller is configured to feedback the generated output HDR quality metric for tuning at least one parameter to optimize the perceptual quality of the HDR image.

10 . The electronic device as claimed in claim 8 , wherein the SQI determines an HDR blur through at least one lost LDR edge in the at least one static region of the HDR image due to one of an overexposure or an underexposure.

11 . The electronic device as claimed in claim 8 , wherein the DQI determines a HDR ghosting through additional edges in the at least one dynamic region of the HDR image due to a foreground motion.

12 . The electronic device as claimed in claim 8 , wherein the visual saliency map is used to weigh an edge-cost in the HDR image compared to at least one the LDR image before computing the edge preservation score, wherein the edge-cost corresponds to edge loss and a presence of extra edges in the HDR image.

13 . The electronic device as claimed in claim 8 , wherein the SQI is generated by:

accumulating all edges present in the at least one static region of an input LDR sequence into one edge map;

detecting a blur in an output HDR image by computing a number of edge pixels in the accumulated edges that are not found in the output HDR image at corresponding location;

computing the blur as a fraction of edge pixels in the accumulated edge map that are not present in the output HDR image; and

subtracting the computed blur ratio from a predefined value to obtain the SQI, wherein the predefined value is 1.

14 . The electronic device as claimed in claim 8 , wherein the DQI is generated by:

counting a number of edge pixels in the at least one dynamic region for each of LDR images in the input sequence;

determining the LDR image containing a maximum number of edges;

accumulating the edges from the LDR image and the edges in the output HDR image;

detecting the at least one artifact as extra edges present in the output HDR image that are not present in the input LDR image with the maximum number of edges; and

computing the DQI as the maximum number of edge pixels in the input sequence divided by the number of edges in the accumulated edge map, wherein the computation is always less than or equal to one, where the computation is equal to one if there are no extra edge pixels in the output HDR image.

15 . A perceptual quality and estimation control circuit configured to process a plurality of low dynamic range (LDR) images of different exposures and generate a high dynamic range (HDR) image, the control circuit comprising:

a dynamic region detection circuit configured to divide an image into at least one static region and at least one dynamic region;

a static HDR quality index (SQI) circuit configured to determine at least one preserved edge in the at least one static region based on an SQI;

a dynamic HDR quality index (DQI) circuit configured to determine an amount of ghosting in the at least one dynamic region based on a DQI;

a visual saliency prediction circuit configured to weight at least one artifact in the at least one static region and the at least one dynamic region through a visual saliency map;

a combinatorial circuit configured to compute at least one edge preservation score based on the SQI and the DQI;

a convolutional circuit configured to generate an output HDR quality metric by modulating the at least one computed edge preservation score on an input HDR quality metric; and

a feedback circuit configured to estimate and compensate the perceptual quality of the HDR image based on the generated output HDR quality metric.

16 . The perceptual quality and estimation control circuit as claimed in claim 15 , wherein the feedback circuit is configured to feedback the generated output HDR quality metric for tuning at least one parameter to optimize the perceptual quality of the HDR image.

17 . The perceptual quality and estimation control circuit as claimed in claim 15 , wherein the SQI circuit determines an HDR blur through at least one lost LDR edge in the at least one static region of the HDR image due to one of an overexposure or an underexposure.

18 . The perceptual quality and estimation control circuit as claimed in claim 15 ,

wherein the DQI circuit determines an HDR ghosting through additional edges in the at least one dynamic region of the HDR image due to a foreground motion,

wherein the visual saliency prediction circuit weighs an edge-cost in the HDR image compared to at least one of the plurality of LDR images before computing the edge preservation score, wherein the edge-cost corresponds to edge loss and a presence of extra edges in the HDR image.

19 . The perceptual quality and estimation control circuit as claimed in claim 15 , wherein the SQI circuit comprises:

an accumulator configured to accumulate all edges present in the at least one static region of an input LDR sequence into one edge map;

an edge detector configured to detect a blur in an output HDR image by computing a number of edge pixels in the accumulated edges that are not found in the output HDR image at corresponding location; and

a processor configured to compute the blur as a fraction of edge pixels in the accumulated edge map that are not present in the output HDR image, and subtract the computed blur ratio from a predefined value to obtain the SQI.

20 . The perceptual quality and estimation control circuit as claimed in claim 15 , wherein the DQI circuit comprises:

a counter configured to count a number of edge pixels in the at least one dynamic regions for each of LDR images in the input sequence;

a maximizer configured to determine the LDR image containing a maximum number of edges;

an accumulator configured to accumulate the edges from the LDR image and the edges in the output HDR image;

an edge detector configured to detect the at least one artifact as extra edges present in the output HDR image that are not present in the input LDR image with the maximum number of edges; and

a processor configured to compute the DQI as the maximum number of edge pixels in the plurality of LDR images divided by the number of edges in the accumulated edge map.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 27, 2023
From: VARADARAJAN, SRENIVAS; SHARMA, ANAMIKA; CHANDA, KAUSTAV
To: SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.
Reel/Frame 065047/0446 →
Priority Claims (1)
IN 202341021249 · Mar 24, 2023 · national
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20240320809A1 · Sep 26, 2024
References Cited (47)
US 5828793A · Mann · 1998 [cited by examiner]
US 8081227B1 · Kim · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 8743291B2 · Li et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8760578B2 · Li · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 9794554B1 · Le Callet · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 9922411B2 · Aydin · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 10210433B2 · Jiang et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10771820B2 · Lee et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10860034B1 · Ziyaee · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20070242900A1 · Chen · 2007 [cited by examiner]
US 20100150473A1 · Kwon · 2010 [cited by examiner]
US 20110211732A1 · Rapaport · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 20130083838A1 · Touze · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20170193639A1 · Dai · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20170236260A1 · Budagavi · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20180089799A1 · Johnson · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20180310008A1 · Kopietz · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20210129868A1 · Nehmadi · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20220101123A1 · Kim · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220166920A1 · Sivan · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20230269487A1 · Kwong · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20240303833A1 · Boardman · 2024 [cited by examiner]
CN 104616294 · 2015 [cited by applicant]
CN 105894484B · 2017 [cited by examiner]
CN 109345525 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
CN 109345525A · 2019 [cited by examiner]
EP 3680858A1 · 2020 [cited by examiner]
JP 2020503587A · 2020 [cited by examiner]
KR 101846743 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2022133381A1 · 2022 [cited by examiner]
The State of the Art in HDR Deghosting: A Survey and Evaluation, Okan Tarhan Tursun et al., Eurographics, 2015, pp. 683-707 (Year: 2015). [cited by examiner]
Perceptual Evaluation for Multi-Exposure Image Fusion of Dynamic scenes, Yuming Fang et al., IEEE, 2020, pp. 1127-1138 (Year: 2020). [cited by examiner]
Edge-Based Objective Evaluation of Image Quality, Boban P. Bondzulic et al., IEEE, 2011, pp. 3305-3308 (Year: 2011). [cited by examiner]
An Objective to Deghosting Quality Metric for HDR Images, Okan Tarhan Tursun et al., Eurographics, 2016, pp. 1-15 (Year : 2016). [cited by examiner]
Objective Pixel-Level Image Fusion Performance Measure, C Xydeas et al., SPIE, 2000, pp. 89-98 (Year: 2000). [cited by examiner]
Blind High Dynamic Range Image Quality Assessment Using Deep Learning, Sen Jia et al., IEEE, 2017, pp. 765-769 (Year: 2017). [cited by examiner]
Lavoue, Guillaume et al., “Quality Assessment in Computer Graphics”, Visual Signal Quality Assessment, pp. 243-286, Oct. 16, 2014. [cited by applicant]
Bondulic, Boban P., et al., “Edge-Based Objective Evaluation of Image Quality 2011 18th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing”, Sep. 11-14, 2011. [cited by applicant]
Zhang et al., Non-Shift Edge Based Ratio (NSER): an Image Quality Assessment Metric Based on Early Visions Features, IEEE Signal Processing Letters, vol. 18, No. 5, May 2011. [cited by applicant]
Suthaharan et al., “A New Quality Metric Based on Just-Noticeable Difference, Perceptual Regions, Edge Extraction and Human Vision”, Can. J. Elect. Comput. Eng., vol. 30, No. 2, Spring 2005. [cited by applicant]
Fang, Yuming et al., “Perceptual Evaluation for Multi-Exposure Image Fusion of Dynamic Scenes”, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol. 29, 2020. [cited by applicant]
Tursun, et al., “An Objective Deghosting Quality Metric for HDR Images”, Eurographics 2016, vol. 35, No. 2. [cited by applicant]
Hossny, M., et al., “Comments on 'Information Measure for Performance of Image Fusion”, Electronics Letters, Aug. 28, 2008, vol. 44, No. 18. [cited by applicant]
Xydeas C., et al., “Objective Image Fusion Performace Measure”, In Sensor Fusion: Architecture, Algorithms, and Applications IV, Proceedings of SPIE, vol. 4051 (2000). [cited by applicant]
Wang, Peng-Wei, et al., “A Novel Image Fusion Metric Based on Multi-Scale Analysis”, 2008 9th International Conference on Signal Processing. [cited by applicant]
Wang et al., Performances Evaluation of Image Fusion Techniques Based on Nonlinear Correlation Measurement, IMTC 2004—Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference, Como, Italy, May 18-20, 2004. [cited by applicant]
Sen Jia et al., “Blind high dynamic range image quality assessment using deep learning”, 2017 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP). [cited by applicant]