IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,535,515
Granted Patent B2
US 12,535,515 · App. 18/383,921 · Granted Jan 27, 2026

Methods of removing intrinsic noise from signal under test (SUT)

Inventors: Marlin E. Viss (Santa Rosa, CA); David Leyba (Santa Rosa, CA)
Assignee: KEYSIGHT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
G01R29/26G01R13/0218
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,535,515
App. No.
18/383,921
Granted
Jan 27, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

A test system implemented method removes intrinsic noise from a waveform representation of a repeating signal under test (SUT). The method includes obtaining an oversampled equivalent-time waveform representation of the repeating SUT. The method further includes obtaining a time-domain representation of a combined noise of the equivalent-time waveform above the deterministic maximum frequency by applying the equivalent-time waveform to a high-pass filter. The method further includes determining a standard deviation of the time-domain representation of the combined noise, and determining a correction factor α in accordance with the standard deviation of the digitizer noise, and the standard deviation of the time-domain representation of the combined noise. The method further includes applying the equivalent-time waveform representation to a low-pass filter having a unity magnitude response at frequencies below the cutoff frequency and a correction factor magnitude response at frequencies above the cutoff frequency.

Claims (92)

1 . A test system implemented method of removing intrinsic noise from a waveform representation of a repeating signal under test (SUT), comprising:

determining an intrinsic noise of a digitizer channel of the test system;

applying the repeating SUT to the digitizer channel of the test system;

obtaining an equivalent-time waveform representation of the repeating SUT, wherein the waveform representation is oversampled such that a Nyquist frequency of the waveform representation is greater than deterministic maximum frequency of the repeating SUT;

obtaining a time-domain representation of a combined noise of the equivalent-time waveform above the deterministic maximum frequency by applying the equivalent-time waveform to a high-pass filter having a cutoff frequency greater than the deterministic maximum frequency;

determining a standard deviation of the time-domain representation of the combined noise;

determining a correction factor α in accordance with the following equation,

α

=

sqrt

⁡

(

σ

d

·

σ

d

-

σ

i

·

σ

i

)

/

σ

d

where σ i is a standard deviation of the digitizer noise, and σ d is the standard deviation of the time-domain representation of the combined noise, and

applying the equivalent-time waveform representation to a low-pass filter having the cutoff frequency to obtain an output waveform representation in which the intrinsic noise has been removed, wherein the low pass filter has a unity magnitude response at frequencies below the cutoff frequency and a α magnitude response at frequencies above the cutoff frequency.

2 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the repeating SUT is an optical signal.

3 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the test system is an oscilloscope.

4 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the high pass filter has a unity magnitude response at frequencies above the cutoff frequency and a zero-magnitude response at frequencies below the cutoff frequency.

5 . A test system implemented method of removing intrinsic noise from a waveform representation of a repeating signal under test (SUT), comprising:

determining a digitizer noise of a digitizer channel of the test system;

applying the repeating SUT to the digitizer channel of the test system;

obtaining an equivalent-time waveform representation of the repeating SUT, wherein the waveform representation is oversampled such that a Nyquist frequency of the waveform representation is greater than deterministic maximum frequency of the repeating SUT;

obtaining a frequency power spectrum of the equivalent-time waveform representation and integrating the power above a cutoff frequency to obtain a standard deviation of a combined noise of the equivalent-time waveform above the deterministic maximum frequency, wherein the cutoff frequency is greater than the deterministic maximum frequency;

determining a correction factor α in accordance with the following equation,

α

=

sqrt

⁡

(

σ

d

·

σ

d

-

σ

i

·

σ

i

)

/

σ

d

where σ i is a standard deviation of the digitizer noise, and σ d is the standard deviation of the time-domain representation of the combined noise, and

applying the equivalent-time waveform representation to a low-pass filter having the cutoff frequency to obtain an output waveform representation in which the digitizer noise has been removed, wherein the low pass filter has a unity magnitude response at frequencies below the cutoff frequency and a α magnitude response at frequencies above the cutoff frequency.

6 . The method of claim 5 , wherein the repeating SUT is an optical signal.

7 . The method of claim 5 , wherein the test system is an oscilloscope.

8 . A non-transitory tangible computer readable medium having stored thereon executable instructions embodied in the computer readable medium that when executed by at least one processor of a test system cause the test system to execute a method of removing intrinsic noise from a waveform representation of a repeating signal under test (SUT), the method including:

obtaining an equivalent-time waveform representation of the repeating SUT from sampling data received from a digitizer channel of the test system, wherein the waveform representation is oversampled such that a Nyquist frequency of the waveform representation is greater than deterministic maximum frequency of the repeating SUT;

obtaining a time-domain representation of a combined noise of the equivalent-time waveform above the deterministic maximum frequency by applying the equivalent-time waveform to a high-pass filter having a cutoff frequency greater than the deterministic maximum frequency;

determining a standard deviation of the time-domain representation of the combined noise;

determining a correction factor α in accordance with the following equation,

α

=

sqrt

⁡

(

σ

d

·

σ

d

-

σ

i

·

σ

i

)

/

σ

d

where σ i is a standard deviation of the digitizer noise, and σ d is the standard deviation of the time-domain representation of the combined noise, and

applying the equivalent-time waveform representation to a low-pass filter having the cutoff frequency to obtain an output waveform representation in which the intrinsic noise has been removed, wherein the low pass filter has a unity magnitude response at frequencies below the cutoff frequency and a α magnitude response at frequencies above the cutoff frequency.

9 . The non-transitory tangible computer readable medium of claim 8 , wherein the test system is an oscilloscope.

10 . The non-transitory tangible computer readable medium of claim 8 , wherein the non-transitory tangible computer readable medium is a memory of the oscilloscope.

11 . The non-transitory tangible computer readable medium of claim 8 , wherein the high pass filter has a unity magnitude response at frequencies above the cutoff frequency and a zero magnitude response at frequencies below the cutoff frequency.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 26, 2023
From: VISS, MARLIN E.; LEYBA, DAVID
To: KEYSIGHT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Reel/Frame 065356/0283 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20250138073A1 · May 1, 2025
References Cited (28)
US 7339509B2 · Woodward et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 8332172B2 · Agoston et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 9208805B1 · Ow · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 9608721B2 · Dawe · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9985812B1 · Hollender · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 11255893B2 · Draving · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11604213B1 · Draving et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 11821920B1 · Viss · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20050238094A1 · Bessho et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20140100822A1 · Hiltner · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20170292977A1 · Pickerd et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20190227109A1 · Guenther · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20200064386A1 · Draving · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20210270877A1 · Owen · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20220082603A1 · Draving · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220082604A1 · Draving · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20240125837A1 · Tan · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 20240410941A1 · Ramian · 2024 [cited by examiner]
CN 105102992A · 2015 [cited by applicant]
CN 105657434B · 2019 [cited by applicant]
English translation of CN105657434B, 13 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Restriction Requirement dated Jul. 21, 2022, for U.S. Appl. No. 17/178,691, 8 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Non-Final Office Action dated Oct. 26, 2022, for U.S. Appl. No. 17/178,691, 23 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Jason Breitbarth, “Cross Correlation in Phase noise analysis,” Microwave Journal, Feb. 2011, pp. 178-185. [cited by applicant]
Non-Final Office Action dated Jul. 6, 2022, for U.S. Appl. No. 17/084,232, 20 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Notice of Allowance dated Dec. 19, 2022, U.S. Appl. No. 17/084,232, 20 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Supplemental Notice of Allowability dated Feb. 15, 2023, U.S. Appl. No. 17/084,232, 4 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“PAM4 Signaling in High-Speed Serial Technology: Test, Analysis, and Debug,” Tektronix, 2016, www.tek.com, pp. 1-36. [cited by applicant]