IP Library Granted Patent US 12,535,557
Granted Patent B2
US 12,535,557 · App. 18/174,279 · Granted Jan 27, 2026

Radar system and corresponding operating method

Inventors: Francesco Laghezza (Eindhoven, NL); Feike Guus Jansen (Eindhoven, NL)
Assignee: NXP B.V.
G01S7/354G01S13/584G01S13/931
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,535,557
App. No.
18/174,279
Granted
Jan 27, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

In accordance with a first aspect of the present disclosure, a radar system is provided, comprising: a plurality of receive channels; a first radar detector stage configured to detect, through said receive channels, at least one target using a detector threshold; a noise correlation determination unit configured to determine a noise correlation level indicative of noise correlation between the receive channels if the first radar detector stage has detected the target; a detector threshold adjustment unit configured to adjust the detector threshold in dependence on the noise correlation level determined by the noise correlation determination unit; a second radar detector stage configured to detect the target using the adjusted detector threshold. In accordance with a second aspect of the present disclosure, a corresponding method of operating a radar system is conceived.

Claims (27)

1 . A radar system, comprising:

a plurality of receive channels;

a first radar detector stage configured to detect, through said receive channels, a target using a detector threshold, wherein the target is one of a correctly detected target or a falsely detected target;

a noise correlation determination unit configured to determine a noise correlation level indicative of noise correlation between the receive channels if the first radar detector stage has detected the target, wherein the noise correlation determination unit is configured to determine the noise correlation level by averaging elements of a correlation matrix of detected range bins for Doppler components of the receive channels excluding Doppler components at which the first radar detector stage has detected the target;

a detector threshold adjustment unit configured to adjust the detector threshold in dependence on the noise correlation level determined by the noise correlation determination unit;

a second radar detector stage configured to detect the target using the adjusted detector threshold.

2 . The radar system of claim 1 , being configured to conclude that the first radar detector stage has correctly detected the target if the second radar detector stage also detects said target.

3 . The radar system of claim 2 , being configured to include said target in a radar target list upon or after concluding that the first radar detector stage has correctly detected the target.

4 . The radar system of claim 2 , further comprising a processing unit configured to perform signal decoding and direction-of-arrival estimation upon or after the radar system has concluded that the first radar detector stage has correctly detected the target.

5 . The radar system of claim 1 , being configured to discard the detection of the target by the first radar detector stage if the second radar detector stage has not detected said target.

6 . The radar system of claim 1 , further comprising a plurality of transmit channels, wherein the noise correlation level determined by the noise correlation determination unit is also indicative of the noise correlation between said transmit channels.

7 . The radar system of claim 1 , wherein the noise correlation level is indicative of a type of noise affecting the radar system.

8 . The radar system of claim 7 , wherein the type of noise is predominantly thermal noise if the noise correlation level is zero or close to zero.

9 . The radar system of claim 7 , wherein the type of noise is predominantly phase noise if the noise correlation level is significantly greater than zero.

10 . A method of operating a radar system, the radar system comprising a plurality of receive channels, a first radar detector stage, a second radar detector stage, a noise correlation determination unit and a detector threshold adjustment unit, the method comprising:

detecting, by the first radar detector stage through said receive channels, a target using a detector threshold, wherein the target is one of a correctly detected target or a falsely detected target;

determining, by the noise correlation determination unit, a noise correlation level indicative of noise correlation between the receive channels if the first radar detector stage has detected the target, wherein the determining the noise correlation level includes averaging elements of a correlation matrix of detected range bins for Doppler components of the receive channels excluding Doppler components at which the first radar detector stage has detected the target;

adjusting, by the detector threshold adjustment unit, the detector threshold in dependence on the noise correlation level determined by the noise correlation determination unit;

detecting, by the second radar detector stage, the target using the adjusted detector threshold.

11 . The method of claim 10 , wherein the radar system concludes that the first radar detector stage has correctly detected the target if the second radar detector stage also detects said target.

12 . The method of claim 11 , wherein the radar system includes said target in a radar target list upon or after concluding that the first radar detector stage has correctly detected the target.

13 . The method of claim 11 , wherein a processing unit comprised in the radar system performs signal decoding and direction-of-arrival estimation upon or after the radar system has concluded that the first radar detector stage has correctly detected the target.

14 . The method of claim 10 , wherein the radar system discards the detection of the target by the first radar detector stage if the second radar detector stage has not detected said target.

15 . The method of claim 10 , wherein the radar system further comprises a plurality of transmit channels, and wherein the determining the noise correlation level is also indicative of the noise correlation between said transmit channels.

16 . The method of claim 10 , wherein the determined noise correlation level is indicative of a type of noise affecting the radar system.

17 . The method of claim 16 , wherein the type of noise is predominantly thermal noise if the noise correlation level is zero or close to zero.

18 . The method of claim 16 , wherein the type of noise is predominantly phase noise if the noise correlation level is significantly greater than zero.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 24, 2023
From: LAGHEZZA, FRANCESCO; JANSEN, FEIKE GUUS
To: B.V., NXP, B.V.
Reel/Frame 062799/0299 →
Priority Claims (1)
EP 22160101 · Mar 3, 2022 · regional
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20230280447A1 · Sep 7, 2023
References Cited (43)
US 4401987A · Cyr · 1983 [cited by examiner]
US 4739329A · Ward · 1988 [cited by examiner]
US 5337054A · Ross · 1994 [cited by examiner]
US 5652651A · Dunne · 1997 [cited by examiner]
US 5880821A · Dunne · 1999 [cited by examiner]
US 7072618B1 · Strutt · 2006 [cited by examiner]
US 7305190B2 · Mayampurath · 2007 [cited by examiner]
US 7430254B1 · Anderson · 2008 [cited by examiner]
US 7812759B2 · Kai · 2010 [cited by examiner]
US 8102302B2 · Alon · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 8199046B2 · Nanami · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 8392149B1 · Spencer · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 9166682B2 · Renaudier · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 9553693B2 · Logan · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 9887799B2 · Logan · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 11010605B2 · Nord · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 11269042B2 · Kishigami · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 11313948B2 · Longman · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 11415682B1 · Clark · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 11644555B2 · Ding · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 11644557B2 · Cottron · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 12174312B2 · Gianelli · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 20070171122A1 · Nakano · 2007 [cited by examiner]
US 20090160708A1 · Nakano · 2009 [cited by examiner]
US 20090251355A1 · Nanami · 2009 [cited by examiner]
US 20090322592A1 · Kai · 2009 [cited by examiner]
US 20110014880A1 · Nicolson · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 20110285572A1 · Alon · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 20120269507A1 · Renaudier · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 20150139368A1 · Abrishamkar · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20160380654A1 · Logan · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20160380717A1 · Logan · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20200003887A1 · Matsumura · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200033462A1 · Ding · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200096595A1 · Kishigami · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200158847A1 · Cottron · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20210011123A1 · Longman · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210034865A1 · Nord · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20230341513A1 · Gianelli · 2023 [cited by examiner]
Jin, B., “One-Bit LFMCW Radar: Spectrum Analysis and Target Detection”, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, vol. 56, No. 4, Mar. 5, 2020. [cited by applicant]
Lefferts, R., “Adaptive False Alarm Regulation in Double Threshold Radar Detection”, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, vol. AES-10, No. 5, Sep. 1, 1981. [cited by applicant]
Liu, J., “Modified Rao Test for Multichannel Adaptive Signal Detection”, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 64, No. 3, Feb. 1, 2016. [cited by applicant]
Zhou, M., “Target Detection Based on Canonical Correlation Technique for Large Array MIMO Radar in Spatially Correlated Noise”, 2020 IEEE 11th Sensor Array and Multichannel Signal Processing Workshop (SAM), pp. 1-5, Jun… [cited by applicant]