IP Library Granted Patent US 12,540,359
Granted Patent B2
US 12,540,359 · App. 17/100,357 · Granted Feb 3, 2026

HER2 heterogeneity as a biomarker in cancer

Inventors: Adrian E. Murillo (Tucson, AZ); Hiro Nitta (Tucson, AZ); Donald G. Munroe (Tucson, AZ); Amy A. Lo (San Francisco, CA); Takeshi Kuwata (Kashiwa, JP); Akio Kaito (Kashiwa, JP); Atsushi Ochiai (Kashiwa, JP)
Assignees: GENENTECH, INC.; NATIONAL CANCER CENTER; VENTANA MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC.
C12Q1/6886C12Q1/682C12Q1/686C12Q2561/113C12Q2600/118
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,540,359
App. No.
17/100,357
Granted
Feb 3, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method for predicting responsiveness to a HER2-directed therapy by assessing HER2 heterogeneity in a tumor includes contacting a sample of the tumor with a biomarker-specific reagent that specifically binds to HER2 protein and detecting HER2 protein in the sample, contacting the sample of the tumor with a first nucleic acid probe that specifically binds HER2 genomic DNA and detecting HER2 gene amplification status in the sample, contacting the sample of the tumor with a second nucleic acid probe that specifically binds HER2 RNA and detecting HER2 RNA status in the sample scoring the HER2 protein (IHC), HER2 gene (DISH), and HER2 RNA (RNA-ISH), predicting that the tumor is responsive to the HER2-directed therapy if the tumor reveals a first foci having a first score and a second score, in which the first score and the second score are not the same.

Claims (23)

1 . A method for HER-2 directed therapy comprising

(a) assessing HER2 heterogeneity in a tumor, comprising

(i) contacting a sample of the tumor with a biomarker-specific reagent that specifically binds to HER2 protein and detecting HER2 protein in the sample,

(ii) contacting the sample of the tumor with a first nucleic acid probe that specifically binds HER2 genomic DNA, and detecting HER2 gene amplification status in the sample,

(iii) contacting the sample of the tumor with a second nucleic acid probe that specifically binds HER2 RNA, and detecting HER2 RNA status in the sample,

wherein the sample is a surgical tissue sample,

wherein the tumor is a solid tumor,

wherein the tumor is gastric cancer,

(b) scoring the HER2 protein (IHC), HER2 gene (DISH), and HER2 RNA (RNA-ISH),

wherein scoring is categorized as:

Group A for samples exhibiting IHC 3+ and DISH+, and RNA-ISH+,

Group B for samples exhibiting IHC 3+ and DISH−, and RNA-ISH−,

Group C for samples exhibiting IHC 2+ and DISH+, RNA-ISH+,

Group D for samples exhibiting IHC 2+ and DISH−, RNA-ISH−,

Group E for samples exhibiting IHC 1+ and DISH+, RNA-ISH+,

Group F for samples exhibiting IHC 1+ and DISH−, RNA-ISH−,

Group G for samples exhibiting IHC 0 and DISH+, RNA-ISH+, and

Group H for samples exhibiting IHC 0 and DISH−, RNA-ISH−,

(c) predicting that the tumor is responsive to the HER2-directed therapy if the tumor reveals a first foci having a first score selected from Group A to Group G and a second foci having a second score selected from Group A to Group G, wherein the first score and the second score are not the same, and

(d) when the first score and the second score are indicative of a tumor being responsive to HER2-directed therapy, administering HER-2 directed therapy selected from the group consisting of trastuzumab, trastuzumab emtansine, pertuzumab, neratinib, and lapatinib.

2 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the contacting a sample of the tumor with a biomarker-specific reagent and the contacting the sample of the tumor with a first nucleic acid probe are both performed on a first section of the sample and the contacting the sample of the tumor with the second nucleic acid probe is performed on a second section of the sample, wherein the second section is a serial section of the first section.

3 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the contacting a sample of the tumor with a biomarker-specific reagent is performed on a first section of the sample, the contacting the sample of the tumor with the first nucleic acid probe is performed on a second section of the sample, and the contacting the sample of the tumor with the second nucleic acid probe is performed on a third section of the sample, wherein the first, the second, and the third sections are serial sections.

4 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the contacting a sample of the tumor with a biomarker-specific reagent and the contacting the sample of the tumor with a second nucleic acid probe are performed on a same section of the sample.

Assignments (3)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 20, 2021
From: MURILLO, ADRIAN E.; NITTA, HIRO; MUNROE, DONALD G.
To: VENTANA MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC.
Reel/Frame 056920/0022 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 20, 2021
From: LO, AMY A.
To: GENENTECH, INC.
Reel/Frame 056920/0150 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 20, 2021
From: KUWATA, TAKESHI; KAITO, AKIO; OCHIAI, ATSUSHI
To: NATIONAL CANCER CENTER
Reel/Frame 056920/0343 →
Continuity (3)
Continuation PCTEP2019062972 · May 20, 2019
Provisional Application 62674566 · May 21, 2018
Related Publication 20210071270A1 · Mar 11, 2021
References Cited (48)
US 5650327A · Copeland · 1997 [cited by applicant]
US 5654200A · Copeland · 1997 [cited by applicant]
US 6296809B1 · Richards · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 6352861B1 · Copeland · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 6582962B1 · Richards · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 6649138B2 · Adams · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 6670113B2 · Hainfeld · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 6682596B2 · Zehnder · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 6815064B2 · Treadway · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 7632652B2 · Bieniarz · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 7642064B2 · Bieniarz · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 8603765B2 · Tacha · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20030211630A1 · Richards · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20040052685A1 · Richards · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20040265922A1 · Bieniarz · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20130260379A1 · Alexander · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20170082627A1 · Dennis et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
WO 2019224153A1 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
Wang et al., “Automated Quantitative RNA in Situ Hybridization for Resolution of Equivocal and Heterogeneous ERBB2 (HER2) Status in Invasive Breast Carcinoma”, The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics, March, vol. 15, No. 2… [cited by examiner]
Alba et al., “HER2 status determination using RNA-ISH—a rapid and simple technique showing high correlation with FISH and IHC in 141 cases of breast cancer,” Hisol. Histopathol., vol. 27, pp. 1021-1027. (Year: 2012). [cited by examiner]
Kurozumi et al., “HER2 intratumoral heterogeneity analyses by concurrent HER2 gene and protein assessment for the prognosis of HER2 negative invasive breast cancer patients,” Breast Cancer Res. Treat., vol. 158, pp. 99-… [cited by examiner]
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/EP2019/062972 mailed Aug. 16, 2019. [cited by applicant]
H. Nitta, et al., “Breast cancer HER2 epigenetic intratumoral heterogeneity results from lack of HER2 protein translation,” Cancer Research, (2018), vol. 78, No. 4. [cited by applicant]
Takuya Saito, et al., “Comparison of intratumoral heterogeneity of HER2 expression between primary tumor and multiple organ metastases in gastric cancer: Clinicopathological study of three autopsy cases and one resected… [cited by applicant]
J. Rüschoff, et al., “Her2-Diagnostik beim Magnekazinom: Was ist anders im Vergleich zum Mammakarzinom?” Der Pathologie, (2010), vol. 31 : 208-17. [cited by applicant]
Y. Nishida, et al., “A novel gene-protein assay for evaluating HER2 status in gastric cancer: simultaneous analyses of HER2 protein overexpression and gene amplification reveal intratumoral heterogeneity,” Gastric Cance… [cited by applicant]
Farahani et al.: “Whole slide imaging in pathology: advantages, limitations, and emerging perspectives”, Pathology and Laboratory Medicine Int'l, vol. 7, Jun. 2015 (Jun. 1, 2015), pp. 23-33. [cited by applicant]
“GenBank”, Database accession No. XM_005257140. [cited by applicant]
“GenBank”, Database accession No. XP_005257196. [cited by applicant]
“GenBank”, Database accession No. XP_005257197. [cited by applicant]
Harlow et al.: “Antibodies, A Laboratory Manual”, 1988, Cold Spring Harbor Publications (Abstract Only). [cited by applicant]
Ausubel et al.: “Current Protocols in Molecular Biology”, 1992, Greene Publ. Assoc. and Wiley-Intersciences (Cover and Foreward provided). [cited by applicant]
Ruschoff J et al.: “Her2-Diagnostik beim Magenkarzinom; Was ist anders im Vergleich zum Mammakarzinom?”, Der Pathologe ; Organ Der Deutschen Abteilung Der Internationalen Akademie Fur Pathologie, Der Deutschen, Der Oste… [cited by applicant]
Wurch et al.: “Development of Novel Protein Scaffolds as Alternatives to Whole Antibodies for Imaging and Therapy: Status on Discovery Research and Clinical Validation”, Current Pharmaceutical Biotechnology, vol. 9, 200… [cited by applicant]
SAMBROOK & GREEN: “Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual”, 1989, CSHL [Chapter of Contents]. [cited by applicant]
“GenBank”, Database accession No. NM_004448. [cited by applicant]
“GenBank”, Database accession No. 2064. [cited by applicant]
Nitta et al: “Breast cancer HER2 epigenetic intratumoral heterogeneity results from lack of HER2 protein translation”, Proceedings of The 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; Dec. 5-9, 2017, Dec. 5, 2017 (Dec. 5, 2… [cited by applicant]
Wolff et al., “American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists Guideline Recommendations for Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Testing in Breast Cancer,” J Clin Oncol, vol. 25, 2007, pp. 11… [cited by applicant]
Stack et al.: “Multiplexed immunohistochemistry, imaging, and quantitation: A review, with an assessment of Tyramide signal amplification, multispectral imaging and multiplex analysis”, Methods, vol. 70, No. 1, Nov. 201… [cited by applicant]
“GenBank”, Database accession No. NP_001005862. [cited by applicant]
“GenBank”, Database accession No. NC_000017.10. [cited by applicant]
“GenBank”, Database accession No. NP_004439. [cited by applicant]
Bartley et al., “HER2 Testing and Clinical Decision Making in Gastroesophageal Adenocarcinoma: Guideline From the College of American Pathologists, American Society for Clinical Pathology, and the American Society of Cl… [cited by applicant]
Nishida et al., “A novel gene-protein assay for evaluating HER2 status in gastric cancer: simultaneous analyses of HER2 protein overexpression and gene amplification reveal intratumoral heterogeneity,” Gastric Cancer, v… [cited by applicant]
Hammond et al., “American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline recommendations for immunohistochemical testing of estrogen and progesterone receptors in breast cancer (unabridged versi… [cited by applicant]
Saito et al.: “Comparison of intratumoral heterogeneity of HER2 expression between primary tumor and multiple organ metastases in gastric cancer: Clinicopathological study of three autopsy cases and one resected case : … [cited by applicant]
“GenBank”, Database accession No. XM_005257139. [cited by applicant]