IP Library Granted Patent US 12,541,701
Granted Patent B2
US 12,541,701 · App. 18/155,444 · Granted Feb 3, 2026

Nanophotonic parametric quantum information processor

Inventors: Alireza Marandi (Pasadena, CA); Rajveer Nehra (Pasadena, CA); Ryoto Sekine (Pasadena, CA); Luis M. Ledezma (La Crescenta, CA)
Assignee: CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
G06N10/70G06N10/40
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,541,701
App. No.
18/155,444
Granted
Feb 3, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

A photonic integrated circuit comprising one or more waveguides comprising a second order non-linearity configured to operate on optical pulses each having a pulse length shorter than 1000 optical cycles, as measured at their full width at half maximum. The circuit is configured to generate one or more quantum states carried by one or more of the optical pulses, manipulate one or more of the quantum states, and/or measure one or more of the quantum states.

Claims (68)

1 . A photonic integrated circuit, comprising:

one or more waveguides comprising a second order non-linearity configured to operate on classical and/or quantum optical pulses each having a pulse length shorter than 1000 optical cycles, as measured at their full width at half maximum of their classical field values or their quantum wave functions, so as to at least:

generate one or more quantum states carried by one or more of the optical pulses,

manipulate one or more of the quantum states, or

measure one or more of the quantum states; and

wherein the waveguides comprise at least an optical parametric amplifier (OPA) comprising a phase-matching and/or a dispersion engineering for a second order parametric amplification process involving a signal vacuum field and at least one of the optical pulses comprising a first pump pulse.

2 . The circuit of claim 1 , wherein the waveguides each have a width and height of less than 5 micrometers and/or the waveguides have the phase matching and/or the dispersion engineering for nonlinear interactions of the optical pulses having a bandwidth in a range of 0.1-100 Terahertz.

3 . The circuit of claim 2 , wherein:

the circuit comprises at least one an optical parametric oscillator (OPO) comprising one of the waveguides,

and the at least one OPAs and/or the at least one OPO generate the quantum states comprising signal and/or idler pulses in response to the first pump pulse using a second order parametric process, and

the waveguides each have dimensions including the height, the width, and the length minimizing group velocity mismatch (GVM) between the optical pulses comprising pump pulses, comprising the first pump pulse, and signal pulses and/or idler pulses so as to provide temporal overlap of the pump and signal pulses and/or idler pulses, and

the pump pulses, signal pulses, and/or idler pulses each comprise an electromagnetic wave confined in and waveguided by the waveguides.

4 . The circuit of claim 1 , wherein the quantum states comprise Gaussian states comprising one or more squeezed vacuum states having one or more modes.

5 . The circuit of claim 4 , wherein the second order parametric amplification process amplifies the signal vacuum field in a first quadrature and attenuates the signal vacuum field in a second quadrature orthogonal to the first quadrature, thereby generating one or more of the optical pulses comprising one or more signal pulses carrying a first one of the quantum states comprising the one or more a squeezed vacuum states.

6 . The circuit of claim 5 or claim 1 , wherein at least one of an intensity of the first pump pulse, the phase matching, the dispersion engineering, or a length of the optical parametric amplifier are tailored for the second order parametric amplification process comprising non-degenerate parametric amplification so that the signal pulses, carrying the one or more squeezed vacuum states, comprise at least two modes.

7 . The circuit of claim 5 , wherein the circuit further comprises a second OPA having at least one of a second phase matching, a second dispersion engineering, or a second length tailored for an additional second order nonlinear interaction involving the optical pulses comprising a second pump pulse and the signal pulses comprising the first one of the quantum states, wherein the second pump pulse can have a phase difference relative to the first pump pulse and an intensity so that the additional second order nonlinear interaction comprises the parametric amplification in a linear (non-saturated) regime amplifying one of the quadratures of the first one of the quantum states, so as to form a second quantum state in the macroscopic regime, in which the average number of photons for the second quantum state is larger than 10 but less than 10∧9, and thereby enabling a loss-tolerant (de-coherence tolerant) quantum measurement of the first one of the quantum states.

8 . The circuit of claim 1 , wherein the quantum states comprise non-Gaussian states comprising one or more cat states, one or more binomial code states, one or more Gottesnan-Kitaev-Preskill (GKP) states, or one or more photon pair states.

9 . The circuit of claim 1 , wherein the circuit comprises a modulator driven by a driving signal allowing control of a phase or an intensity of the optical pulses comprising one or more pump pulses comprising the first pump pulse or one or more quantum state pulses.

10 . The circuit of claim 1 , wherein:

the circuit comprises the optical parametric amplifier having the phase matching, the dispersion engineering, and length tailored for a second order parametric interaction involving the first pump pulse, having the pulse length, and the signal vacuum field, and

the second order nonlinear interaction comprises a parametric amplification in a saturated regime characterized by the pump energy of the first pump pulse being suppressed by more than 10% through the parametric amplification process, and

so as to form at least one of the optical pulses comprising a signal pulse carrying at least one of the quantum states comprising negativity in its Wigner function.

11 . The circuit of claim 1 , wherein the circuit comprises one or more components for manipulating the one or more quantum states, the one or more components comprising at least one of:

one or more modulators for manipulating an intensity or phase of the quantum states,

one or more couplers for combining a plurality of the quantum states, or

one or more spectral filters, one or more spectral-dependent splitters, one or more polarization rotators, one or more wavelength convertors, or one or more Mach-Zehnder interferometers.

12 . The circuit of claim 1 , wherein the circuit further comprises one or more single-photon detectors, one or more photon number resolving detectors, and/or one or more homodyne detectors configured to at least:

engineer or detect the quantum states, or

enable quantum computing tasks using the quantum states.

13 . The circuit of claim 1 , further comprising:

one or more inputs connected to the waveguides, and

one or more outputs connected to the waveguides, wherein the optical pulses comprise one or more input pulses and one or more output pulses outputted at the outputs in response to the input pulses received at the inputs, and

the waveguides are configured to at least generate, manipulate, or measure one or more of the optical pulses carrying a different one of the quantum states representing a different bit of information according to a time division multiplexing scheme wherein:

the optical pulses are distributed among different equally spaced time bins,

the different equally spaced time bins can be routed to different ones of the waveguides using one or more first modulators and one or more first couplers connected to each other via one or more first delay lines, the one or more first modulators configured to modulate the optical pulses, and

the different equally spaced time bins can be combined using one or more second couplers and one or more second delay lines so that the quantum states in the different time bins can be combined.

14 . The circuit of claim 13 , wherein the pulse lengths are in a range of 1-1000 femtoseconds so that the optical pulses can be routed into the different equally spaced time bins of longer than 1-1000 femtosecond duration and containing the different bits.

15 . The circuit of claim 1 , configured:

as a processor for performing one or more quantum computations on the one or more quantum states, or

as a quantum sensor for performing quantum sensing by a measurement of the one or more quantum states, or

to perform quantum state tomography of the quantum states that is robust against detection losses, or

to perform all-optical continuous-variable quantum error correction with Binomial and squeezed Cat codes using the quantum states, or

to perform quantum teleportation using the quantum states, or

perform boson sampling in time/frequency domain using the quantum states, or

to protect the quantum coherence of the quantum states.

16 . The circuit of claim 1 , wherein the waveguides comprise the optical parametric amplifier having the phase matching and the dispersion engineering such that parametric gain is in a non-linear saturated regime, thereby allowing at least:

all—optical linear or nonlinear quantum measurement of the quantum states, or Gaussian or non-Gaussian operations on the quantum states.

17 . The circuit of claim 1 , further comprising a wavelength converter converting a wavelength of the optical pulses, carrying the quantum states, into a different frequency range.

18 . A method of processing one or more quantum states, comprising:

inputting one or more input optical pulses to one or more waveguides; and

generating, manipulating, or measuring one or more quantum states using one or more of the waveguides comprising a second order non-linearity configured to operate on optical pulses including the input optical pulses, wherein the waveguides each have a width and height of less than 5 micrometers and/or the waveguides have a phase matching and dispersion engineering for the optical pulses having a bandwidth in a range of 0.1-100 Terahertz,

wherein the waveguides comprise at least one optical parametric amplifier (OPA) comprising a phase-matching and/or a dispersion engineering for a second order parametric amplification process involving a signal vacuum field and the optical pulses comprising a first pump pulse.

19 . The method of claim 18 , wherein the generating, manipulating, or measuring is implemented using a time division multiplexing scheme, comprising:

distributing the optical pulses among equally spaced time bins;

routing each of the time bins to different ones of the waveguides using one or more modulators and one or more first couplers connected to each other via one or more first delay lines; and

combining the different time bins using one or more second couplers and one or more second delay lines so that the quantum states in the different time bins are combined; and

wherein the waveguides comprise one or more of the optical parametric amplifiers and/or the waveguides are disposed in one or more optical parametric oscillators comprising one or more of the optical parametric amplifiers.

20 . The method of claim 18 , wherein the generating, manipulating, and/or measuring comprises at least one of:

performing one or more quantum computations on the one or more quantum states, or

quantum sensing by a measurement of the one or more quantum states, or

performing quantum state tomography of the quantum states that is robust against detection losses, or

performing all-optical continuous-variable quantum error correction with Binomial and squeezed Cat codes using the quantum states, or

performing quantum teleportation using the quantum states, or

performing boson sampling in time/frequency domain using the quantum states,

or

protecting a quantum coherence of the quantum states.

21 . The method of claim 18 , wherein at least one of an intensity of the first pump pulse, the phase matching, the dispersion engineering, or a length of the optical parametric amplifier are tailored for the second order parametric amplification process comprising non-degenerate parametric amplification.

22 . The circuit of claim 1 , wherein at least one of an intensity of the first pump pulse, the phase matching, the dispersion engineering, or a length of the optical parametric amplifier are tailored for the second order parametric amplification process comprising non-degenerate parametric amplification.

Assignments (2)
CONFIRMATORY LICENSE Recorded Feb 5, 2025
From: CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
To: NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
Reel/Frame 070114/0251 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 20, 2024
From: MARANDI, ALIREZA; NEHRA, RAJVEER; SEKINE, RYOTO; LEDEZMA, LUIS M.
To: CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
Reel/Frame 068342/0486 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 63299762 · Jan 14, 2022
Related Publication 20240005196A1 · Jan 4, 2024
References Cited (60)
US 4859876A · Dirk · 1989 [cited by examiner]
US 6344921B1 · Galvanauskas · 2002 [cited by examiner]
US 11226538B2 · Marandi et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20110032532A1 · Hirano · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 20200076149A1 · Papp et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200301244A1 · Wang · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20210272007A1 · Fatemi et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20230163737A1 · Vesterinen · 2023 [cited by examiner]
Werner et al., “Ultrashort pulsed squeezing by optical parametric amplification”. Phys. Rev. A 52, 4202-4213 (1995). Abstract. [cited by applicant]
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Nov. 6, 2023 for PCT Application No. PCT/US2023/060754. [cited by applicant]
Onodera et al., “Nonlinear Quantum Behavior of Ultrashort-Pulse Optical Parametric Oscillators”, arXiv:1811.10583v2, Feb. 2019, 14 pages. [cited by applicant]
Ladd et al., “Quantum computers”. Nature 464, 45-53 (2010). [cited by applicant]
O'Brien et al., “Photonic quantum technologies”. Nature Photonics | vol. 3 | Dec. 2009, pp. 687-695. [cited by applicant]
Yu et al., “Quantum correlations between light and the kilogram-mass mirrors of LIGO”. Nature, vol. 583, Jul. 2, 2020, pp. 43-54. [cited by applicant]
Casacio et al., “Quantum-enhanced nonlinear microscopy”. Nature 594, pp. 201-206 (2021). [cited by applicant]
Furusawa et al., “Unconditional Quantum Teleportation”. Science 282, 706-709 (1998). [cited by applicant]
Asavanant et al., “Generation of time-domain-multiplexed two-dimensional cluster state”. Science 366, 373-376 (2019). [cited by applicant]
Chen et al., “Experimentalrealizationofmultipartiteentanglementof60modesofaquantum optical frequencycomb”. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 , pp. 1-19 (2014). [cited by applicant]
Kanter et al., “Squeezing in a LiNbO3 integrated optical waveguide circuit”. Opt. Express 10, 177-182 (2002). [cited by applicant]
Roslund et al., “Wavelength-multiplexed quantum networks with ultrafast frequency combs”. Nat. Photonics 8, 109-112 (2014). [cited by applicant]
Vaidya et al., “Broadband quadrature-squeezed vacuum and nonclassical photon number correlations from a nanophotonic device”. Sci. Adv. 6, eaba9186, pp. 1-8 (2020). [cited by applicant]
Vigliar et al., Error-protected qubits in a silicon photonic chip:. Nat. Phys. 17, 1137-1143 (2021). [cited by applicant]
Arrazola et al., “Quantum circuits with many photons on a programmable nanophotonic chip”. Nature 591, 54-60 (2021). [cited by applicant]
Tasker et al., “Silicon photonics interfaced with integrated electronics for 9 GHz measurement of squeezed light”. Nat. Photonics 15, 11-15 (2021). [cited by applicant]
Javid et al., “Ultrabroadband Entangled Photons on a Nanophotonic Chip”. Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 183601 (2021). [cited by applicant]
Chen et al., “Ultra-broadband quadrature squeezing with thin-film lithium niobate nanophotonics”. Opt. Lett. 47, 1506-1509 (2022). [cited by applicant]
Peace et al., “Picosecond Pulsed Squeezing in Thin-Film Lithium Niobate Strip-Loaded Waveguides at Telecommunication Wavelengths”. arXiv:2204.05694, pp. 1-6 [quant-ph] (2022). [cited by applicant]
Caves, “Quantum limits on noise in linear amplifiers”. Phys. Rev. D 26, 1817-1839 (1982). [cited by applicant]
Shaked et al., “Lifting the bandwidth limit of optical homodyne measurement with broadband parametric amplification”. Nat. Commun. 9, 609, pp. 1-13 (2018). [cited by applicant]
Takanashi et al., “All-optical phase-sensitive detection for ultra-fast quantum computation”. Opt. Express 28, 34916-34926 (2020). [cited by applicant]
Frascella et al., “Overcoming detection loss and noise in squeezing-based optical sensing”. NPJ Quantum Inf. 7, 72 (2021), 6 pages. [cited by applicant]
Ye et al., “Overcoming the quantum limit of optical amplification in monolithic waveguides”. Sci. Adv. 7, 6 pages (2021). [cited by applicant]
Zhu et al., “Integrated photonics on thin-film lithium niobate”. Adv. Opt. Photonics 13,242 (2021), 118 pages. [cited by applicant]
Ledezma et al., “Intense optical parametric amplification in dispersion-engineered nanophotonic lithium niobate waveguides”. Optica 9, 303 (2022), 6 pages. [cited by applicant]
Jankowski et al., “Ultrabroadband nonlinear optics in nanophotonic periodically poled lithium niobate waveguides”. Optica 7, 40 (2020) pp. 053904-1-053904-5. [cited by applicant]
Hu et al., “On-chip electro-optic frequency shifters and beam splitters”. Nature 599, pp. 587-593 (2021). [cited by applicant]
Bourassa et al., “Blueprint for a Scalable Photonic Fault-Tolerant Quantum Computer”. Quantum 5, 392, pp. 1-38 (2021). [cited by applicant]
Horoshko et al., “Towards single-cycle squeezing in chirped quasi-phase-matched optical parametric down- conversion”. Phys. Rev. A 88, pp. 033806-1-033806-5 (2013). [cited by applicant]
Kizmann et al., “Subcycle squeezing of light from a time flow perspective”. Nat. Phys. 15, pp. 960-966 (2019). [cited by applicant]
Nehra et al., “Few-cycle vacuum squeezing in nanophotonics”. Figshare (2022), pp. 1-8; https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.20100140.v1. [cited by applicant]
Jankowski et al., “Temporal simultons in optical parametric oscillators”. Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, pp. 053904-1-053904-5 (2018). [cited by applicant]
Marandi et al., “Coherence properties of a broadband femtosecond mid-IR optical parametric oscillator operating at degeneracy”. Opt. Express 20, 7255-7262 (2012). [cited by applicant]
Luda et al., “Compact embedded device for lock-in measurements and experiment active control”. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 90, pp. 023106-1-023106-14 (2019). [cited by applicant]
Phillips et al., “Supercontinuum generation in quasi-phasematched waveguides”. Opt. Express 19, pp. 18754-18773 (2011). [cited by applicant]
Guo et al., “Parametric down-conversion photon-pair source on a nanophotonic chip”. Light Sci. Appl. 6, e16249 (2017), 8 pages. [cited by applicant]
Wasilewski et al., “Pulsed squeezed light: Simultaneous squeezing of multiple modes”. Phys. Rev. A 73, 063819-1 to 063819-12 (2006). [cited by applicant]
Caves et al., New formalism for two-photon quantum optics. I.Quadrature phases and squeezed states. Phys. Rev. A 31, pp. 3068-3092 (1985). [cited by applicant]
Christ et al., “Probing multimode squeezing with correlation functions”. New J. Phys. 13, 033027 (2011), 21 pages. [cited by applicant]
Van Loock et al., “Detecting genuine multipartite continuous-variable entanglement”. Phys. Rev. A 67, 052315-1 to 052315-13 (2003). [cited by applicant]
Bello et al., “Broadband complex two-mode quadratures for quantum optics”. Opt. Express 29, 41282 (2021), 21 pages. [cited by applicant]
Li et al., “All-optical ultrafast ReLU function for energy-efficient nanophotonic deep learning”. Nanophotonics 10.1515/nanoph-2022-0137 (2022). [cited by applicant]
Inoue et al., “43-GHz bandwidth real-time amplitude measurement of 5-dB squeezed light using modularized optical parametric amplifier with 5G technology”. arXiv:2205.14061 [quant-ph] (2022), 18 pages. [cited by applicant]
Guo et al., “Femtojoule femtosecond all-optical switching in lithium niobate nanophotonics”. Nat. Photonics 16, 625-631 (2022). [cited by applicant]
Dutt et al., “On-chip optical squeezing”. Phys. Rev. Appl. 3, pp. 044005-1 to 044005-7 (2015). [cited by applicant]
Zhao et al., “Near-Degenerate Quadrature-Squeezed Vacuum Generation on a Silicon-Nitride Chip”. Phys. Rev. Lett 124, 193601 (2020), pp. 193601-1 to 193601-7. [cited by applicant]
Zhang et al., “Squeezed light from a nanophotonic molecule”. Nat. Commun. 12, 2233 (2021), pp. 1-6. [cited by applicant]
Cernansky et al., “Nanophotonic source of quadrature squeezing vi self-phase modulation”. APL Photonics 5, 101303 (2020), 6 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Yang et al., “A squeezed quantum microcomb on a chip”. Nat. Commun. 12, 4781 (2021). [cited by applicant]
Ralph, “All-optical quantum teleportation”. Opt. Lett. 24, pp. 348-350 (1999). [cited by applicant]
Spirit et al., “Optical time division multiplexing: systems and networks”. Journals & Magazines >IEEE Communications Magazine >vol. 32 Issue: 12, pp. 54-62. [cited by applicant]