IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,541,799
Granted Patent B2
US 12,541,799 · App. 18/533,118 · Granted Feb 3, 2026

Enhanced unmanned aerial vehicles for damage inspection

Inventors: Clint J. Marlow (Barrington Hills, IL); Bryan Keith Corder (Gurnee, IL)
Assignee: Allstate Insurance Company
G06Q40/08B64U20/40B64U50/30B64U2101/26B64U2101/30B64U2101/55B64U2201/10B64U2201/104
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,541,799
App. No.
18/533,118
Filed
Dec 7, 2023
Granted
Feb 3, 2026
Kind
B2
Art Unit
3694
USPC
705/4
Abstract

Systems and methods for performing insurance damage inspection by an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) are provided. A computing device may receive a request to inspect a vehicle, the request comprising a location of the vehicle. The computing device may identify a UAV from a plurality of UAVs that is located closest to the location of the vehicle from other UAVs in the plurality of UAVs. The computing device may instruct the UAV to travel to the location of the vehicle. The computing device may instruct the UAV to collect damage information on the vehicle using one or more onboard sensors of the UAV. The computing device may determine an amount of insurance payout to approve for repairs to the vehicle based on the damage information collected by the UAV.

Claims (49)

1 . A provider computing system communicatively coupled to an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV), the provider computing system comprising:

at least one processor; and

memory storing instructions that, when executed by the at least one processor, cause the provider computing system to:

cause, at a first time, the UAV to autonomously fly over an area proximate to an insured property;

instruct the UAV to use a first set of one or more UAV sensors to collect first information about a condition of the area;

after identifying, based on the first information, a potential risk to the insured property, determine a second set of one or more UAV sensors capable of providing detailed damage information about the insured property;

instruct, at a second time, the UAV to autonomously fly over the insured property and to use the second set of one or more UAV sensors to collect the detailed damage information related to the condition of the insured property;

after receiving the detailed damage information, prepare, based on the detailed damage information, a claim relating to the potential risk; and

communicate the prepared claim to a policyholder related to the insured property.

2 . The provider computing system of claim 1 , wherein the provider computing system is communicatively coupled to a plurality of UAVs; and

wherein causing the UAV to autonomously fly over the insured property is responsive to determining that the UAV is geographically closer to the insured property relative to at least one other UAV of the plurality of UAVs.

3 . The provider computing system of claim 1 , wherein the insured property comprises a vehicle or a real estate property.

4 . The provider computing system of claim 1 , wherein causing the UAV to autonomously fly over the area containing the insured property comprises:

generating a flight trajectory for the UAV from a current location to the location of the area containing the insured property; and

transmitting the generated flight trajectory to the UAV.

5 . The provider computing system of claim 4 , wherein causing the UAV to autonomously fly over the area containing the insured property further comprises causing the UAV to perform a routine inspection of at least one other insured property that is along the flight trajectory.

6 . The provider computing system of claim 1 , wherein the potential risk comprises an aspect of the insured property that is not in compliance with an insurance coverage policy associated with the policyholder.

7 . The provider computing system of claim 1 , wherein the potential risk comprises one or more of: an adjacent structure, a potential hazard related to the area containing the insured property, a location of an object, physical conditions, dangerous chemicals, and a temperature of a component of the insured property that is outside a normal temperate range of such components.

8 . The provider computing system of claim 1 , wherein preparing the claim relating to the potential risk comprises identifying whether the policyholder had been previously notified of the potential risk.

9 . The provider computing system of claim 8 , wherein the instructions that cause the provider computing system to prepare the claim relating to the potential risk cause the provider computing system to:

after determining that the policyholder had been notified of the potential risk and not taken steps to mitigate the potential risk, prepare a claim relating to the potential risk that does not include a damage recuperation payment.

10 . A method comprising:

causing, at a first time and by a provider computing system communicatively coupled to an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV), the UAV to autonomously fly over an area proximate to an insured property;

instructing, by the provider computing system, the UAV to use a first set of one or more UAV sensors to collect first information about a condition of the area;

after identifying, by the provider computing system and based on the first information, a potential risk to the insured property, determine a second set of one or more UAV sensors capable of providing detailed damage information about the insured property;

instructing, at a second time, the UAV to autonomously fly over the insured property and to use the second set of one or more UAV sensors to collect the detailed damage information related to the condition of the insured property;

after receiving the detailed damage information, preparing, by the provider computing system and based on the detailed damage information, a claim relating to the potential risk; and

communicating the prepared claim to a policyholder related to the insured property.

11 . The method of claim 10 , wherein the insured property comprises a vehicle or a real estate property.

12 . The method of claim 10 , wherein causing the UAV to autonomously fly over the area containing the insured property comprises:

generating a flight trajectory for the UAV from a current location to the location of the area containing the insured property; and

transmitting the generated flight trajectory to the UAV.

13 . The method of claim 12 , wherein causing the UAV to autonomously fly over the area containing the insured property further comprises causing the UAV to perform a routine inspection of at least one other insured property that is along the flight trajectory.

14 . The method of claim 10 , wherein the potential risk comprises an aspect of the insured property that is not in compliance with an insurance coverage policy associated with the policyholder.

15 . The method of claim 10 , wherein the potential risk comprises one or more of: an adjacent structure, a potential hazard related to the area containing the insured property, a location of an object, physical conditions, dangerous chemicals, and a temperature of a component of the insured property that is outside a normal temperate range of such components.

16 . Non-transitory computer readable media having computer executable instructions embodied therein that, when executed by at least one processor of a computing system, cause the computing system to perform operations for an inspection, the operations comprising:

communicatively coupling to an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV), the UAV having one or more sensors;

causing, at a first time, the UAV to autonomously fly over an area proximate to an insured property;

instructing the UAV to use a first set of one or more UAV sensors to collect first information about a condition of the area;

after identifying, based on the first information, a potential risk to the insured property, determine a second set of one or more UAV sensors capable of providing detailed damage information about the insured property;

instructing, at a second time, the UAV to autonomously fly over the insured property and to use the second set of one or more UAV sensors to collect the detailed damage information related to the condition of the insured property;

after receiving the detailed damage information, preparing, by the computing system and based on the detailed damage information, a claim relating to the potential risk; and

communicating the prepared claim to a policyholder related to the insured property.

17 . The non-transitory computer readable media of claim 16 , wherein the insured property comprises a vehicle or a real estate property.

18 . The non-transitory computer readable media of claim 16 , wherein causing the UAV to autonomously fly over the area containing the insured property comprises:

generating a flight trajectory for the UAV from a current location to the location of the insured property; and

transmitting the generated flight trajectory to the UAV.

19 . The non-transitory computer readable media of claim 18 , wherein causing the UAV to autonomously fly over the area containing the insured property further comprises causing the UAV to perform a routine inspection of at least one other insured property that is along the flight trajectory.

20 . The non-transitory computer readable media of claim 16 , wherein the potential risk comprises an aspect of the insured property that is not in compliance with an insurance coverage policy associated with the policyholder.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 18, 2025
From: MARLOW, CLINT J.; CORDER, BRYAN KEITH
To: ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY
Reel/Frame 073264/0391 →
Continuity (4)
Continuation 17321758 · May 17, 2021
Continuation 16121851 · Sep 5, 2018
Continuation 14700440 · Apr 30, 2015
Related Publication 20240112275A1 · Apr 4, 2024
References Cited (74)
US 6798357B1 · Khan · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 6868314B1 · Frink · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 8078436B2 · Pershing et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8081795B2 · Brown · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8229768B1 · Hopkins, III · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8346578B1 · Hopkins, III · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 8630820B2 · Amis · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8650106B1 · Hopkins, III · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8818572B1 · Tofte et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 9218626B1 · Haller et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9454157B1 · Hafeez · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 9892463B1 · Hakimi-Boushehri · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 9894327B1 · Jacob · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 9939810B1 · Matheson et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10102589B1 · Tofte · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 10102590B1 · Farnsworth · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 10134092B1 · Harvey et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10365646B1 · Farnsworth et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10685402B1 · Bryant · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 10713726B1 · Allen et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20090265193A1 · Collins et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20100106395A1 · Gadler · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100174564A1 · Stender et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20120200601A1 · Osterhout et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20130226624A1 · Blessman et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130287261A1 · Lee et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130317865A1 · Tofte et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20140118140A1 · Amis · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140140575A1 · Wolf · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140166817A1 · Levien et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140202800A1 · Breed · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140245210A1 · Battcher et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140279707A1 · Joshua et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20150106010A1 · Martin et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150363717A1 · Lim · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20160063642A1 · Luciani et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160236638A1 · Lavie et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160307449A1 · Gordon et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170083979A1 · Winn · 2017 [cited by examiner]
CN 201217502Y · 2009 [cited by applicant]
CN 101508344A · 2009 [cited by applicant]
CN 101833870A · 2010 [cited by applicant]
CN 103413444A · 2013 [cited by applicant]
CN 103809599A · 2014 [cited by applicant]
CN 103812052A · 2014 [cited by applicant]
EP 1496484A1 · 2005 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2014080388A2 · 2014 [cited by applicant]
Final Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 14/700,440 dated Apr. 7, 2020, 20 pages. [cited by applicant]
Final Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 14/700,440 dated Feb. 12, 2018, 29 pages. [cited by applicant]
Final Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 15/282,237 dated Jun. 8, 2018, 11 pages. [cited by applicant]
Final Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 17/321,758 Dtd Feb. 10, 2023. [cited by applicant]
Francis, et al., “Drones: The Insurance Industry's Next Game-Changer?,” Cognizant, 18 pages (2014). [cited by applicant]
G&C Tire and Auto Service, “Drones Over Washington DC!,” video located at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K3vXBbv9ySA, 3 pages (2014). [cited by applicant]
Issue Lab, “Drones for Disaster Response and Relief Operations,” retrieved from https://www.issuelab.org/resources/21683/21683.pdf, 52 pages (2015). [cited by applicant]
Johnson, “FAA has insurers hovering over the use of drones,” Small Insurance Blog, 13 pages (2014). [cited by applicant]
Johnson, “The Future of Drone Use in the Insurance Industry,” Claims Journal, retrieved from https://www.claimsjournal.com/news/national/2014/03/03/245393.htm, 4 pages (2014). [cited by applicant]
McGrath, “Technology Creates Insurance Challenges,” McGrath Insurance Group, Inc., retrieved from http://mcgrathinsurance.com/technology-creates-insurance-challenges, 2 pages (2014). [cited by applicant]
Miami Aerial, “Property damage litigation, Insurance claims and Inspection,” retrieved from http://www.miamiaerial.com/aerial-media-applications/accidents-ligitation-inspection-373.html, 3 pages (2012). [cited by applicant]
Moore, “Drones Drones May Be Coming To a Fender-Bender or a Storm Near You,” KyForward, retrieved from http://www.kyforward.com/keven-moore-on-insurance-drones-may-be-coming-to-a-fender-bender-or-storm-near-you/, 4 page… [cited by applicant]
Non-Final Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 17/321,758 Dtd Aug. 22, 2022. [cited by applicant]
Notice of Allowance on U.S. Appl. No. 14/700,440 dated Jan. 22, 2021, 10 pages. [cited by applicant]
Notice of Allowance on U.S. Appl. No. 14/700,440 dated Jun. 7, 2018, 8 pages. [cited by applicant]
Notice of Allowance on U.S. Appl. No. 14/700,469 dated Jul. 20, 2016, 7 pages. [cited by applicant]
Notice of Allowance on U.S. Appl. No. 15/282,237 dated Mar. 28, 2018, 28 pages. [cited by applicant]
Notice of Allowance on U.S. Appl. No. 16/241,205 dated Dec. 19, 2019, 5 pages. [cited by applicant]
Notice of Allowance on U.S. Appl. No. 17/321,758 Dtd Jul. 11, 2023. [cited by applicant]
Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 14/700,440 dated Aug. 11, 2017, 35 pages. [cited by applicant]
Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 14/700,440 dated Oct. 11, 2019, 25 pages. [cited by applicant]
Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 14/700,440 dated Oct. 28, 2020, 10 pages. [cited by applicant]
Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 14/700,469 dated Mar. 28, 2018, 28 pages. [cited by applicant]
Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 15/282,237 dated Jun. 19, 2017, 19 pages. [cited by applicant]
Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 16/241,205 dated Aug. 20, 2019, 8 pages. [cited by applicant]
Stone, “Rise of the Drones,” Risk & Insurance, retrieved from https://riskandinsurance.com/rise-drones/, 5 pages (2014). [cited by applicant]
Transport Risk, “UAS UAV Drone Insurance,” retrieved from http://www.transportrisk.com/uavrcfilm.html, 6 pages (2014). [cited by applicant]