IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,542,583
Granted Patent B2
US 12,542,583 · App. 18/745,536 · Granted Feb 3, 2026

Energy-efficient precoding with controllable power distribution

Inventors: Foad Sohrabi (Murray Hill, NJ); Jinfeng Du (Murray Hill, NJ)
Assignee: Nokia Solutions and Networks Oy
H04B7/0456
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,542,583
App. No.
18/745,536
Granted
Feb 3, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

Systems, methods, apparatuses, and computer program products for energy-efficient precoding with controllable power distribution. A method may include generating a digital precoder with controllable flatness based on at least one of a plurality of control parameters. The method may also include controlling flatness of a power distribution across a set of antennas, panels, or access points. The method may further include balancing, based on the control of the flatness of the power distribution, spectral efficiency and energy efficiency according to respective predefined values of spectral efficiency and energy efficiency. The balancing may include adjusting the at least one of the plurality of control parameters.

Claims (40)

1 . A method comprising:

generating a digital precoder with controllable flatness based on at least one of a plurality of control parameters of a number of sub-arrays, antennas, or access points to be active for transmission out of a total of N sub-arrays, N antennas, or N access points, where N is a positive integer not less than 1, wherein the control parameters include a lower-bound per-antenna power constraint and an upper-bound per-antenna power constraint, wherein the lower-bound per-antenna power constraint is based on a function of an output power of a power amplifier of the number of sub-arrays, antennas, or access points that depends on a type of the power amplifier, and wherein the upper-bound per-antenna power constraint is within a predefined threshold from a maximum allowed power at a respective one of the number of sub-arrays, antennas, or access points given an adjacent channel leakage ratio requirement;

controlling flatness of a power distribution across the number of sub-arrays, antennas, or access points based on the lower-bound per-antenna power constraint and the upper-bound per-antenna power constraint, and satisfaction of a requirement of a zero-forcing precoding, wherein the satisfaction of the requirement of the zero-forcing precoding comprises nulling out interference between a plurality of signals from a plurality of beams; and

balancing, based on the controlling of the flatness of the power distribution, spectral efficiency and energy efficiency according to respective predefined values of spectral efficiency and energy efficiency, wherein the balancing comprises adjusting the at least one of the plurality of control parameters.

2 . The method according to claim 1 , wherein the at least one of the plurality of control parameters, comprises at least one of the following:

a backoff parameter, or

the zero-forcing precoding, a weighted minimum mean-square error precoding, or a maximum ratio transmission.

3 . The method according to claim 1 , wherein the zero-forcing precoding comprises antenna-space zero-forcing and beam-space zero-forcing.

4 . The method according to claim 1 ,

wherein the generating the digital precoder with controllable flatness comprises solving a weighted sum rate maximization problem while satisfying the at least one of the plurality of control parameters, and

wherein the controlling flatness of the power distribution comprises converting a weighted sum rate maximization of the digital precoder into equivalent weighted mean-square error minimization components while satisfying the at least one of the plurality of control parameters.

5 . The method according to claim 4 , further comprising:

generating a linear-complexity algorithm for the weighted sum rate maximization comprising the lower-bound per-antenna power constraint and the upper-bound per-antenna power constraint; and

adjusting power of each row of the digital precoder to be larger than the lower-bound per-antenna power constraint and smaller than the upper-bound per-antenna power constraint.

6 . The method according to claim 5 , further comprising:

decomposing the weighted sum rate maximization into a plurality of variables comprising a combiner, a weighted matrix, and rows of the digital precoder.

7 . The method according to claim 6 , further comprising:

updating each row of the digital precoder.

8 . The method according to claim 7 , wherein each row of the digital precoder is updated in a sequential manner.

9 . An apparatus comprising:

at least one processor; and

at least one memory configured to store instructions that, when executed by the at least one processor, cause the apparatus at least to:

generate a digital precoder with controllable flatness based on at least one of a plurality of control parameters a number of sub-arrays, antennas, or access points to be active for transmission out of a total of N sub-arrays, N antennas, or N access points, where N is a positive integer not less than 1, wherein the control parameters include a lower-bound per-antenna power constraint or an upper-bound per-antenna power constraint, wherein the lower-bound per-antenna power constraint is based on a function of an output power of a power amplifier of the number of sub-arrays, antennas, or access points that depends on a type of the power amplifier, and wherein the upper-bound per-antenna power constraint is within a predefined threshold from a maximum allowed power at a respective one of the number of sub-arrays, antennas, or access points given an adjacent channel leakage ratio requirement;

control flatness of a power distribution across the number of sub-arrays, antennas, or access points based on the lower-bound per-antenna power constraint and the upper-bound per-antenna power constraint, and satisfaction of a requirement of a zero-forcing precoding, wherein the satisfaction of the requirement of the zero-forcing precoding comprises nulling out interference between a plurality of signals from a plurality of beams; and

balance, based on the control of the flatness of the power distribution, spectral efficiency and energy efficiency according to respective predefined values of spectral efficiency and energy efficiency, wherein the balance comprises adjusting the at least one of the plurality of control parameters.

10 . The apparatus according to claim 9 , wherein the at least one of the plurality of control parameters, comprises at least one of the following:

a backoff parameter, or

the zero-forcing precoding, a weighted minimum mean-square error precoding, or a maximum ratio transmission.

11 . The apparatus according to claim 9 , wherein the zero-forcing precoding comprises antenna-space zero-forcing and beam-space zero-forcing.

12 . The apparatus according to claim 9 ,

wherein the generation of the digital precoder with controllable flatness comprises solving a weighted sum rate maximization problem while satisfying the at least one of the plurality of control parameters, and

wherein the control flatness of the power distribution comprises converting a weighted sum rate maximization of the digital precoder into equivalent weighted mean-square error minimization components while satisfying the at least one of the plurality of control parameters.

13 . The apparatus according to claim 12 , wherein the at least one memory stores instructions that, when executed by the at least one processor, further causes the apparatus at least to:

generate a linear-complexity algorithm for the weighted sum rate maximization comprising the lower-bound per-antenna power constraint and the upper-bound per-antenna power constraint; and

adjust power of each row of the digital precoder to be larger than the lower-bound per-antenna power constraint and smaller than the upper-bound per-antenna power constraint.

14 . The apparatus according to claim 13 , wherein the at least one memory stores instructions that, when executed by the at least one processor, further causes the apparatus at least to:

decompose the weighted sum rate maximization into a plurality of variables comprising a combiner, a weighted matrix, and rows of the digital precoder.

15 . The apparatus according to claim 14 , wherein the at least one memory stores instructions that, when executed by the at least one processor, further causes the apparatus at least to:

update each row of the digital precoder.

16 . The apparatus according to claim 15 , wherein each row of the digital precoder is updated in a sequential manner.

Assignments (4)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 26, 2024
From: DU, JINFENG
To: NOKIA OF AMERICA CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 068089/0698 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 26, 2024
From: SOHRABI, FOAD
To: NOKIA CANADA INC.
Reel/Frame 068089/0701 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 26, 2024
From: NOKIA OF AMERICA CORPORATION
To: NOKIA SOLUTIONS AND NETWORKS OY
Reel/Frame 068089/0704 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 26, 2024
From: NOKIA CANADA INC.
To: NOKIA SOLUTIONS AND NETWORKS OY
Reel/Frame 068089/0719 →
Priority Claims (1)
EP 23182677 · Jun 30, 2023 · regional
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20250007575A1 · Jan 2, 2025
References Cited (22)
US 8442142B2 · Ojard et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 9143211B2 · Pi et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 11963111B2 · Yang et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 20130051486A1 · Pi · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20150063254A1 · Yue · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20160241316A1 · Fattouche et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
CN 111314932A · 2020 [cited by applicant]
Boccardi et al. “Zero-Forcing Precoding for the MIMO Broadcast Channel under Per-Antenna Power Constraints”, IEEE, Jul. 2006 (Year: 2006). [cited by examiner]
Wiesel et al., “Zero-Forcing Precoding and Generalized Inverses”, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 56, No. 09, Sep. 2008, pp. 4409-4418. [cited by applicant]
Zhang, “Cooperative Multi-Cell Block Diagonalization with Per-Base-Station Power Constraints”, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 28, No. 09, Dec. 2010, pp. 1435-1445. [cited by applicant]
Pham et al., “Efficient Zero-Forcing Precoder Design for Weighted Sum-Rate Maximization with Per-Antenna Power Constraint”, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 67, No. 04, Apr. 2018, pp. 3640-3645. [cited by applicant]
Shi et al., “An Iteratively Weighted MMSE Approach to Distributed Sum-Utility Maximization for a MIMO Interfering Broadcast Channel”, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 59 No. 09, Sep. 2011, pp. 4331-4340. [cited by applicant]
Zhao et al., “Rethinking WMMSE: Can its complexity scale linearly with the No. of BS antennas?”, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 71, Feb. 27, 2023, pp. 433-446. [cited by applicant]
Shi et al., “Secure Beamforming for MIMO Broadcasting With Wireless Information and Power Transfer”, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 14, No. 05, May 2015, pp. 2841-2853. [cited by applicant]
Pham et al., “On the MIMO Capacity With Joint Sum and Per-Antenna Power Constraints: A New Efficient Numerical Method”, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 71, No. 09, Sep. 2022, pp. 10179-10184. [cited by applicant]
Huang et al., “Energy and Spectral Efficient Tradeoff for Massive MIMO Enabled Heterogenous Networks with Wireless Backhaul”, IEEE 18th International Conference on Communication Technology (ICCT), Oct. 8-11, 2018, pp. 8… [cited by applicant]
Zhang et al., “Massive MIMO with Per-Antenna Power Constraint”, IEEE Global Conference on Signal and Information Processing (GlobalSIP), Dec. 3-5, 2014, pp. 642-646. [cited by applicant]
Pham, “On the MIMO Capacity with Multiple Power Constraints”, Doctoral Dissertation, Sep. 2019, 131 pages. [cited by applicant]
Extended European Search Report received for corresponding European Patent Application No. 23182677.7, dated Jan. 3, 2024, 9 pages. [cited by applicant]
Bobrov et al., “Power Allocation Algorithms for Massive MIMO Systems with Multi-Antenna Users”, arXiv, Jun. 8, 2023, pp. 1-32. [cited by applicant]
Rodriguez-Fernandez et al., “Hybrid Precoding and Combining for Frequency-Selective mmWave MIMO Systems with Per-antenna Power Constraints”, arXiv, Feb. 1, 2019, pp. 1-32. [cited by applicant]
Zhang et al., “Energy-Efficient Massive MIMO With Decentralized Precoder Design”, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 69, No. 12, Dec. 2020, pp. 15370-15384. [cited by applicant]