IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,542,591
Granted Patent B2
US 12,542,591 · App. 18/799,163 · Granted Feb 3, 2026

Unified feedback for OFDMA WLAN

Inventors: Oghenekome Oteri (San Diego, CA); Hanqing Lou (Syosset, NY); Rui Yang (Greenlawn, NY); Robert L. Olesen (Huntington, NY); Alphan Sahin (Westbury, NY); Li-Hsiang Sun (San Diego, CA)
Assignee: InterDigital Patent Holdings, Inc.
H04B7/0632H04B7/0417H04W24/10H04W88/08
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,542,591
App. No.
18/799,163
Granted
Feb 3, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

An access point (AP) may transmit a null data packet announcement (NDPA) with an indication of a resource unit of a bandwidth that feedback is requested. The AP may transmit a null data packet (NDP) for measurement of a channel quality for a resource unit of a bandwidth. The AP may transmit, based on a response, another feedback request for resource units of the bandwidth.

Claims (66)

1 . A first station (STA) comprising a transceiver and a processor, the transceiver and the processor configured to:

receive a null data packet announcement (NDPA), the NDPA comprising a first STA information field and a second STA information field, wherein the first STA information field comprises:

a first subcarrier grouping,

a first AID subfield configured to include a first STA identifier (ID) identifying the first STA, and

at least a first subfield comprising a first resource unit (RU) start index for the first STA and a second subfield comprising a first RU end index for the first STA, wherein the first RU start index indicated in the first subfield and the first RU end index indicated in the second subfield indicates a first group of RUs comprising a first group of subcarriers associated with channel state feedback, wherein the first group of RUs for the first STA is less than a 20 megahertz (MHz) channel bandwidth;

and wherein the second STA information field comprises:

a second subcarrier grouping,

a second AID subfield configured to include a second STA ID identifying a second STA, and

at least a third subfield comprising a second RU start index for the second STA and a fourth subfield comprising a second RU end index for the second STA, wherein the second RU start index indicated in the third subfield and the second RU end index indicated in the fourth subfield indicates a second group of RUs comprising a second group of subcarriers associated with channel state feedback, wherein the second group of RUs for the second STA is less than a 20 MHz channel bandwidth;

receive a null data packet (NDP) for measurement of a channel quality;

receive, subsequent to the NDP, a trigger frame that specifies a resource allocation for feedback responses from each of the first STA and the second STA, wherein the resource allocation for the feedback responses from each of first STA and the second STA is different;

determine the channel state feedback based on an identifier in the trigger frame corresponding to the first STA ID; and

transmit the feedback response utilizing the resource allocation for the first STA in response to the trigger frame short a interframe spacing (SIFS) after the trigger frame, wherein the feedback response comprises signal to noise ratio (SNR) information.

2 . The STA of claim 1 , wherein the feedback response comprises per-RU feedback that is associated with a subset range of the first group of RUs comprising the first group of subcarriers.

3 . The STA of claim 1 , wherein the feedback response is provided in terms of a signal to noise ratio (SNR).

4 . The STA of claim 1 , wherein the feedback response comprises a per-RU average signal to noise ratio (SNR) of each space time stream associated with the first group of RUs.

5 . The STA of claim 1 , wherein the second group of subcarriers is different than the first group of subcarriers.

6 . A method performed by a first station (STA), the method comprising:

receiving a null data packet announcement (NDPA), the NDPA comprising a first STA information field and a second STA information field, wherein the first STA information field comprises:

a first subcarrier grouping,

a first AID subfield configured to include a first STA identifier (ID) identifying the first STA, and

at least a first subfield comprising a first resource unit (RU) start index for the first STA and a second subfield comprising a first RU end index for the first STA, wherein the first RU start index indicated in the first subfield and the first RU end index indicated in the second subfield indicates a first group of RUs comprising a first group of subcarriers associated with channel state feedback, wherein the first group of RUs for the first STA is less than a 20 megahertz (MHz) channel bandwidth;

and wherein the second STA information field comprises:

a second subcarrier grouping,

a second AID subfield configured to include a second STA ID identifying a second STA, and

at least a third subfield comprising a second RU start index for the second STA and a fourth subfield comprising a second RU end index for the second STA, wherein the second RU start index indicated in the third subfield and the second RU end index indicated in the fourth subfield indicates a second group of RUs comprising a second group of subcarriers associated with channel state feedback, wherein the second group of RUs for the second STA is less than a 20 MHz channel bandwidth;

receiving a null data packet (NDP) for measurement of a channel quality;

receiving, subsequent to the NDP, a trigger frame that specifies a resource allocation for feedback responses from each of the first STA and the second STA, wherein the resource allocation for the feedback responses from each of first STA and the second STA is different;

determining the channel state feedback based on an identifier in the trigger frame corresponding to the first STA ID; and

transmitting the feedback response utilizing the resource allocation for the first STA in response to the trigger frame a short interframe spacing (SIFS) after the trigger frame, wherein the feedback response comprises signal to noise ratio (SNR) information.

7 . The method of claim 6 , wherein the feedback responses comprises per-RU feedback that is associated with a subset range of the first group of RUs comprising the first group of subcarriers.

8 . The method of claim 6 , wherein the feedback response is provided in terms of a signal to noise ratio (SNR).

9 . The method of claim 6 , wherein the feedback response comprises a per-RU average signal to noise ratio (SNR) of each space time stream associated with the first group of RUs.

10 . The method of claim 6 , wherein the second group of subcarriers is different than the first group of subcarriers.

11 . An access point (AP) comprising a transceiver and a processor, the transceiver and the processor configured to:

send a null data packet announcement (NDPA), the NDPA comprising a first STA information field and a second STA information field, wherein the first STA information field comprises:

a first subcarrier grouping,

a first AID subfield configured to include a first STA identifier (ID) identifying the first STA, and

at least a first subfield comprising a first resource unit (RU) start index for the first STA and a second subfield comprising a first RU end index for the first STA, wherein the first RU start index indicated in the first subfield and the first RU end index indicated in the second subfield indicates a first group of RUs comprising a first group of subcarriers associated with channel state feedback, wherein the first group of RUs for the first STA is less than a 20 megahertz (MHz) channel bandwidth;

and wherein the second STA information field comprises:

a second subcarrier grouping,

a second AID subfield configured to include a second STA ID identifying a second STA, and

at least a third subfield comprising a second RU start index for the second STA and a fourth subfield comprising a second RU end index for the second STA, wherein the second RU start index indicated in the third subfield and the second RU end index indicated in the fourth subfield indicates a second group of RUs comprising a second group of subcarriers associated with channel state feedback, wherein the second group of RUs for the second STA is less than a 20 MHz channel bandwidth;

send a null data packet (NDP) for measurement of a channel quality;

send, subsequent to the NDP, a trigger frame that specifies a resource allocation for feedback responses from each of the first STA and the second STA, wherein the resource allocation for the feedback responses from each of first STA and the second STA is different; and

receive the feedback response utilizing the resource allocation for the first STA in response to the trigger frame a short interframe spacing (SIFS) after the trigger frame, wherein the feedback response comprises signal to noise ratio (SNR) information.

12 . The AP of claim 11 , wherein the feedback response comprises per-RU feedback that is associated with a subset range of the first group of RUs comprising the first group of subcarriers.

13 . The AP of claim 11 , wherein the feedback response is provided in terms of a signal to noise ratio (SNR).

14 . The AP of claim 11 , wherein the feedback response comprises a per-RU average signal to noise ratio (SNR) of each space time stream associated with the first group of RUs.

15 . The AP of claim 11 , wherein the second group of subcarriers is different than the first group of subcarriers.

16 . A method performed by an access point (AP), the method comprising:

sending a null data packet announcement (NDPA), the NDPA comprising a first STA information field and a second STA information field, wherein the first STA information field comprises:

a first subcarrier grouping,

a first AID subfield configured to include a first STA identifier (ID) identifying the first STA, and

at least a first subfield comprising a first resource unit (RU) start index for the first STA and a second subfield comprising a first RU end index for the first STA, wherein the first RU start index indicated in the first subfield and the first RU end index indicated in the second subfield indicates a first group of RUs comprising a first group of subcarriers associated with channel state feedback, wherein the first group of RUs for the first STA is less than a 20 megahertz (MHz) channel;

and wherein the second STA information field comprises:

a second subcarrier grouping,

a second AID subfield configured to include a second STA ID identifying a second STA, and

at least a third subfield comprising a second RU start index for the second STA and a fourth subfield comprising a second RU end index for the second STA, wherein the second RU start index indicated in the third subfield and the second RU end index indicated in the fourth subfield indicates a second group of RUs comprising a second group of subcarriers associated with channel state feedback, wherein the second group of RUs for the second STA is less than a 20 MHz channel bandwidth;

sending a null data packet (NDP) for measurement of a channel quality;

sending, subsequent to the NDP, a trigger frame that specifies a resource allocation for feedback responses from each of the first STA and the second STA, wherein the resource allocation for the feedback responses from each of first STA and the second STA is different; and

receiving the feedback response utilizing the resource allocation for the first STA in response to the trigger frame a short interframe spacing (SIFS) after the trigger frame, wherein the feedback response comprises signal to noise ratio (SNR) information.

17 . The method of claim 16 , wherein the feedback response comprises per-RU feedback that is associated with a subset range of the first group of RUs comprising the first group of subcarriers.

18 . The method of claim 16 , wherein the feedback response is provided in terms of a signal to noise ratio (SNR).

19 . The method of claim 16 , wherein the feedback response comprises a per-RU average signal to noise ratio (SNR) of each space time stream associated with the first group of RUs.

20 . The method of claim 16 , wherein the second group of subcarriers is different than the first group of subcarriers.

Continuity (5)
Continuation 15743408
Provisional Application 62251482 · Nov 5, 2015
Provisional Application 62217559 · Sep 11, 2015
Provisional Application 62191100 · Jul 10, 2015
Related Publication 20240405829A1 · Dec 5, 2024
References Cited (114)
US 8787841B2 · Ketchum et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8908600B2 · Sampath et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8923219B2 · Breit et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 9019983B2 · Maeda et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9088393B2 · Seok · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 9107242B2 · Sohn et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9326190B2 · Haghighat et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9584165B2 · Seok · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9585165B2 · Seok et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9680538B2 · Xia et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9887821B2 · Seok · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10375682B2 · Cheong et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10826588B2 · Chun · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20070149249A1 · Chen et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070298742A1 · Ketchum et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20080219219A1 · Sartori et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20100046451A1 · Tada et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100202372A1 · Chun et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20110170631A1 · Kim et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110299480A1 · Breit et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20120051246A1 · Zhang et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120063439A1 · Seok · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120250543A1 · Abraham et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120307757A1 · Edler Von Elbwart et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20130034003A1 · Shapira · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20130107916A1 · Liu et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130223427A1 · Sohn et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130235836A1 · Roh et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130294397A1 · Lee et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130294533A1 · Kim et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20140003269A1 · Edler Von Elbwart et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140044069A1 · Bao et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140301240A1 · Park et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20150063128A1 · Garikipati et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150085777A1 · Seok · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150215022A1 · Nagata et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150296493A1 · Wengerter et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150341933A1 · Aboul-Magd et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20160020888A1 · Kwon et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160165607A1 · Hedayat · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160204960A1 · Yu · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160254884A1 · Hedayat et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160261327A1 · Merlin et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160278081A1 · Chun et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160295513A1 · Moon · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20160295581A1 · Ghosh et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160301452A1 · Kwon et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160380730A1 · Ghosh et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170033898A1 · Chun et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170238286A1 · Chun · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20170310424A1 · Chun et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20180042029A1 · Ghosh et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20200195315A1 · Wang · 2020 [cited by examiner]
CA 2772468A1 · 2012 [cited by applicant]
CN 101479958A · 2009 [cited by applicant]
CN 101640656A · 2010 [cited by applicant]
CN 102036394A · 2011 [cited by applicant]
CN 102549992A · 2012 [cited by applicant]
CN 102783105A · 2012 [cited by applicant]
CN 102804637A · 2012 [cited by applicant]
CN 102812766A · 2012 [cited by applicant]
CN 103201963A · 2013 [cited by applicant]
CN 103202085A · 2013 [cited by applicant]
CN 103380586A · 2013 [cited by applicant]
CN 104320228A · 2015 [cited by applicant]
CN 104350799A · 2015 [cited by applicant]
CN 104380787A · 2015 [cited by applicant]
CN 104429148A · 2015 [cited by applicant]
CN 101352089B · 2015 [cited by applicant]
JP 4698734B2 · 2011 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2011035204A2 · 2011 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2012011658A2 · 2012 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2012067393A1 · 2012 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2014182137A1 · 2014 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2015195050A1 · 2015 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2016053024A1 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP), 36.211, “3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Radio Access Network; Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access (E-UTRA); Physical channels and modu… [cited by applicant]
3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP), R1-101683, “Way Forward for Rel-10 Feedback Framework”, Ericsson, Huawei, Alcatel-Lucent, Alcatel-Lucent Shanghai Bell, LG Electronics, Marvell, Nokia, Nokia Siemens Networks, … [cited by applicant]
3rd Generation Partnership Project, “COMP Feedback based on Multiple CSI-RS Resources”, Alcatel-Lucent Shanghai Bell, Alcatel-Lucent, R1-114048, Nov. 14-18, 2011, 6 pages. [cited by applicant]
3rd Generation Partnership Project, “Technical Specification Group Radio Access Network; Evolved 11 Universal Terrestrial Radio Access (E-UTRA); Physical channels and modulation (Release 12),” 3GPP TS 36.211 V12.6.0 (Ju… [cited by applicant]
3rd Generation Partnership Project, “Technical Specification Group Radio Access Network; Evolved 12 Wniversal Terrestrial Radio Access (E-UTRA); Physical channels and modulation (Release 12),” 3GPP TS 36.211 V12.8.0 (De… [cited by applicant]
3rd Generation Partnership Project, “Technical Specification Group Radio Access Network; Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access (E-UTRA); Physical channels and modulation (Release 13),” 3GPP TS 36.211 V13.2.0 (Jun. … [cited by applicant]
Aboul-Magd, “802.11 HEW SG Proposed PAR,” IEEE 802.11-14/0165r0 (Jan. 22, 2014). [cited by applicant]
Aboul-Magd, “IEEE 802.11 HEW SG Proposed CSD,” IEEE 802.11-14/0169r0 (Jan. 22, 2014). [cited by applicant]
Aboul-Magd, Osama, “802.11 HEWSG Proposed PAR”, IEEE 802.11-14/0165r1, IEEE P802.11 Wireless LANs, Mar. 2014, 6 pages. [cited by applicant]
Aboul-Magd, Osama, “IEEE 802.11 HEWSG Proposed CSD”, IEEE 802.11-14/0169r1, IEEE P802.11 Wireless LANs, Mar. 2014, 6 pages. [cited by applicant]
Andrews et al., “Fundamentals of WiMAX, Understanding Broadband Wireless Networking”, Pearson Education, Inc., Feb. 2007, 61 pages. [cited by applicant]
Azizi et al., “OFDMA Numerology and Structure”, IEEE 802.11-15/0330r5, May 13, 2015, 50 pages. [cited by applicant]
Chen et al., MAC and PHY Proposal for 802.11 af, IEEE 802.11-10/0258r0, Mar. 2010, 23 pages. [cited by applicant]
Draft Standard for Information technology—Telecommunications and information exchange between systems Local and metropolitan area networks—Specific requirements; Part 11: Wireless LAN Medium Access Control (MAC) and Phy… [cited by applicant]
Fano, Robert M., “The Transmission of Information”, Technical Report No. 65, Research Laboratory of Electronics at MIT, Mar. 17, 1949, 37 pages. [cited by applicant]
Ghosh et al., “DL Sounding Sequence with UL MU Feedback,” IEEE 802.11-15/1103r0 (Sep. 14, 2015). [cited by applicant]
Halasz, “Sub 1 GHz license-exempt PAR and SC,” IEEE P802.11 Wireless LANs, IEEE 802.11-10/0001r13 (Jul. 2010). [cited by applicant]
Halasz, Dave, “Sub 1 GHz license-exempt PAR and SC”, IEEE 802.11-10/0001 r7, IEEE P802.11 Wireless LANs, Jul. 2010, 8 pages. [cited by applicant]
Huffman, David A., “A Method for the Construction of Minimum-Redundancy Codes”, Proceedings of the IRE, vol. 40, No. 9, Sep. 1952, pp. 1098-1101. [cited by applicant]
IEEE P802.11ah/D5.0, Draft Standard for Information technology—Telecommunications and information exchange between systems Local and metropolitan area networks—Specific requirements; Part 11: Wireless LAN Medium Access … [cited by applicant]
IEEE Standard for Information Technology—Telecommunications and information exchange between systems—Local and metropolitan area networks—Specific requirements; Part 11: Wireless LAN Medium Access Control (MAC) and Phys… [cited by applicant]
IEEE Standard for Information technology—Telecommunications and information exchange between systems—Local and metropolitan area networks—Specific requirements; Part 11: Wireless LAN Medium Access Control (MAC) and Phys… [cited by applicant]
IEEE Standard for Information technology—Telecommunications and information exchange between systems—Local and metropolitan area networks—Specific requirements; Part 11: Wireless LAN Medium Access Control (MAC) and Phys… [cited by applicant]
IEEE, “Part 11: Wireless LAN Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) Specifications”, IEEE Std 802.11 ™-2012, Mar. 29, 2012, 2793 pages. [cited by applicant]
IEEE, “Part 11: Wireless LAN Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY)Specifications—Amendment 5: Enhancements for Very High Throughput for Operation in Bands below 6 GHz”, IEEE P802.11ac™/D1 .0, May 2011, 26… [cited by applicant]
Josiam et al., “Analysis on Multiplexing Schemes Exploiting Frequency Selectivity”, IEEE 11-10/0858r1, Jul. 2014, 18 pages. [cited by applicant]
Madhavan et al., “Reducing Channel Sounding Protocol Overhead for 11ax,” IEEE 802.11-15/1097r1 (Sep. 14. 2015). [cited by applicant]
Oteri et al., “Frequency Selective Scheduling (FSS) for TGax OFDMA”, IEEE 802.11-15/568r2, May 11, 2015, 21 pages. [cited by applicant]
Oteri et al., “Further Analysis of Feedback and Frequency Selective Scheduling (FSS) for TGax OFDMA,” IEEE B02_11-15/0818r1 (Jul. 12, 2015). [cited by applicant]
Park, Minyoung, “Proposed Specification Framework for TGah”, IEEE 802.11-11/1137r6, IEEE P802.11 Wireless LANs, Mar. 2012, 13 pages. [cited by applicant]
Perahia et al., “HEW Usage Scenarios and Applications”, IEEE 802.11-13/0514r0, May 2013, 23 pages. [cited by applicant]
Porat et al., “Improved MU-MIMO Performance for Future 802.11 Systems Using Differential Feedback”, Broadcom Corp., Information Theory and Applications Workshop (ITA), Feb. 2013, 5 pages. [cited by applicant]
Shannon, C., E., “A Mathematical Theory of Communication”, The Bell System Technical Journal, vol. 27, No. 3, Jul. 1948, 55 pages. [cited by applicant]
Sharetechnote, “LTE Quick Reference”, CQI/PMI Feedback Type—Details of Aperiodic Report, Available at http://www.sharetechnote.com/html/Handbook_LTE_CQI_PMI_FeedbackType.html, retrieved on Jan. 19, 2018, 4 pages. [cited by applicant]
Stacey, Robert, “Specification Framework for TGax”, IEEE 802.11-15/0132r2, IEEE P802.11 Wireless LANs, Jan. 2015, 3 pages. [cited by applicant]
Tayamon et al., “Impact of Number of Sub-Channels in OFDMA”, IEEE 802.11-15/0383r0, Mar. 2015, 21 pages. [cited by applicant]
Wong et al., “Proposed TGah Draft Amendment”, IEEE 802.11-13/0500r1, IEEE P802.11 Wireless LANs, May 2013, 330 pages. [cited by applicant]
Wu et al., “OFDMA Performance Analysis”, IEEE 802.11-14/1227r2, Sep. 2014, 11 pages. [cited by applicant]