IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,542,817
Granted Patent B2
US 12,542,817 · App. 18/620,711 · Granted Feb 3, 2026

Adaptive network security using zero trust microsegmentation

Inventors: Harish Akali (Acton, MA); Satyam Tyagi (Fremont, CA); Wyn Owen (San Jose, CA); Surya Kollimarla (Santa Clara, CA); Rajesh Khazanchi (Cupertino, CA)
Assignee: ColorTokens Inc.
H04L63/20H04L63/0263H04L63/1425
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,542,817
App. No.
18/620,711
Granted
Feb 3, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

Zero trust and micro-segmentation techniques may be collectively used to enhance network security. To establish, refine, and enforce a zero-trust least-privileged policy, the network may be segmented to put each device of the network into a respective network of one, which forces all network traffic to pass through a zero-trust gatekeeper. The gatekeeper may then monitor and analyze the traffic to establish, refine, and enforce the zero-trust least-privileged policy, which reduces network access to only a limited set of network actions and/or paths. Using the gatekeeper, network traffic may be monitored to progressively establish the policy as well as to continually refine the policy. Recommended actions may be determined based on the analysis of the monitored network traffic and provided to the user to allow user feedback on the communication rules of zero-trust policy.

Claims (38)

1 . A zero-trust microsegmentation method comprising:

collecting information associated with devices of a network, each device being a respective atomic network configured to cause all device traffic to traverse a gatekeeper associated with the devices;

determining, based on the collected information, network microsegments each configured to include one or more of the devices;

determining a zero-trust security policy in which communication permissions for the devices of the network are denied by default unless otherwise allowed, the communication permissions including one or more communication dimensions; and

iteratively performing:

analyzing network traffic under the zero-trust security policy;

adapting the zero-trust security policy, based on the analysis of the network traffic, to adjust the communication permissions for the one or more communication dimensions to include one or more modifications to the one or more communication dimensions; and

implementing the zero-trust security policy, including one or more modifications to one or more communication dimensions.

2 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the one or more communication dimensions include an internet-intranet dimension defining a restrictiveness distinction between internet traffic and intranet traffic.

3 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the one or more communication dimensions include an input-output dimension defining a restrictiveness distinction between input traffic and output traffic.

4 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the one or more communication dimensions include a segment dimension defining a restrictiveness distinction between inter-segment traffic and intra-segment traffic.

5 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the one or more communication dimensions include:

a port dimension defining a port-based traffic restrictiveness distinction; and/or

a path dimension defining a communication path-based traffic restrictiveness distinction.

6 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the one or more communication dimensions include:

a user dimension defining a user-based traffic restrictiveness distinction; a user group-based traffic restrictiveness distinction;

an inter-group dimension defining an inter-group traffic restrictiveness distinction; and/or

an intra-group dimension defining an intra-group traffic restrictiveness distinction.

7 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the one or more communication dimensions include an application dimension defining an application-based traffic restrictiveness distinction.

8 . The method of claim 1 , wherein each of the respective atomic networks are networks of one.

9 . The method of claim 1 , wherein establishing each device as a respective network-of-one comprises: assigning an individualized subnet to each device, wherein the individualized subnets cause all of the device traffic to traverse the gatekeeper.

10 . The method of claim 8 , wherein the gatekeeper is configured as a default gateway for the devices.

11 . The method of claim 9 , wherein assigning the individualized subnet comprises assigning a /32 subnet or a 255.255.255.255 subnet mask to each device.

12 . A zero-trust microsegmentation method comprising:

collecting information associated with devices of a network, each device being a respective individual network configured to cause all device traffic to traverse a network device common to and associated with the devices;

determining, based on the collected information, network microsegments that each include one or more of the devices within the respective individual network;

determining a zero-trust security policy including communication permissions; and

iteratively performing:

analyzing network traffic under the communication permissions of the zero-trust security policy; and

adapting one or more of the communication permissions, based on the analysis of the network traffic, to provide the zero-trust security policy including the one or more adapted communication permissions.

13 . The method of claim 12 , wherein the zero-trust security policy is configured to deny network traffic for the devices of the network by default unless otherwise allowed.

14 . The method of claim 12 , wherein adapting the one or more of the communication permissions comprises removing the one or more of the communication permissions from the zero-trust security policy.

15 . The method of claim 12 , further comprising determining a suggested modification the one or more of the communication permissions based on the analysis of the network traffic.

16 . The method of claim 12 , wherein adapting one or more of the communication permissions comprises modifying a communication dimension of the zero-trust security policy.

17 . The method of claim 12 , wherein the network device is a gatekeeper configured as a default gateway for the devices, the method further comprising enforcing, by the gatekeeper, the zero-trust security policy on the device traffic traversing the gatekeeper.

18 . The method of claim 15 , wherein the adapting the one or more of the communication permissions is based on feedback responsive to the suggested modification.

19 . The method of claim 17 , wherein collecting information associated with the devices comprises analyzing, by the gatekeeper, the device traffic traversing the gatekeeper to collect the information associated with the devices.

20 . The method of claim 18 , wherein the feedback comprises acceptance or rejection of the suggested modification.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 1, 2024
From: AKALI, HARISH; TYAGI, SATYAM; OWEN, WYN; KHAZANCHI, RAJESH; KOLLIMARLA, SURYA
To: COLORTOKENS INC.
Reel/Frame 066961/0864 →
Continuity (3)
Continuation 18343402 · Jun 28, 2023
Provisional Application 63461476 · Apr 24, 2023
Related Publication 20240356981A1 · Oct 24, 2024
References Cited (19)
US 11405399B2 · Bhattacharya et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11916957B1 · Cheh · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 20060179472A1 · Chang et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20130167219A1 · Jung · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20140317683A1 · Mcbride et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20170078168A1 · Harris, Jr. · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20180176182A1 · Raney et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180176189A1 · Paul et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180293389A1 · Mahaffey et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20200169584A1 · Penner et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20210314250A1 · Laplante · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20220038490A1 · Thakur et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220103598A1 · Vaidya · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220337631A1 · Bhattacharya · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20230394146A1 · Dubin · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230403304A1 · Balmakhtar et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20240080323A1 · Balmakhtar · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 20240179158A1 · Kommula et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
Kim, Hyojoon, and Nick Feamster. “Improving network management with software defined networking.” IEEE Communications Magazine 51.2 (2013): 114-119. (Year: 2013). [cited by applicant]