IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,544,712
Granted Patent B2
US 12,544,712 · App. 18/393,123 · Granted Feb 10, 2026

Systems for aggregating and processing of biogas to biomethane

Inventor: N Ross Buckenham (Dallas, TX)
Assignee: California Bioenergy, LLC
B01D53/52A01C3/00A61L11/00B01D53/04B01D53/229C02F1/5236C02F11/185G05B19/418H01M8/0668H01M8/0675H01M8/12H02J3/381H02J7/34B01D2251/304B01D2251/604B01D2253/102B01D2253/1122B01D2257/304B01D2258/05B01D2259/45G05B2219/32287H02J2300/30
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,544,712
App. No.
18/393,123
Granted
Feb 10, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

A biogas collection and purification system that includes a plurality of sources of biogas and a network of conduits configured to convey the biogas from the sources to a central processing facility for processing the biogas into methane. The central processing facility removes impurities to convert biogas to biomethane and may include an H 2 S removal stage; an activated carbon scrubber; a gas drier; and a carbon dioxide removal stage. The facility also has a biomethane gas compressor configured to deliver the biomethane for use in power plants, for CNG production. Ancillaries to the system include fuel cells for direct electricity generation from biogas/biomethane.

Claims (35)

1 . A method of managing biogas production, the method comprising:

receiving, at a central processing facility, biogas from each of a plurality of remote biogas sources, wherein each of the plurality of remote biogas sources are connected to the central processing facility by a network of biogas aggregation conduits;

processing the biogas to form processed biogas;

providing, to one or more targets, a controlled amount of the processed biogas based, at least in part, on a predicted amount of the biogas available at each of the plurality of remote biogas sources and biogas hold-up present in the network of biogas aggregation conduits.

2 . The method of claim 1 , wherein providing the controlled amount of the processed biogas further comprises:

controlling an amount of the hold-up present in the network of biogas aggregation conduits.

3 . The method of claim 2 , wherein controlling the amount of hold-up present in the network of biogas aggregation conduits further comprises controlling at least one of (a) a rate of compression of the biogas at each of the plurality of remote biogas sources and (b) a rate of compression of the processed biogas provided to the one or more targets.

4 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the one or more targets comprises one or more of a power plant, a storage tank, a tank car, a compressed natural gas processing facility, or a fuel cell.

5 . The method of claim 1 , wherein processing the biogas to form the processed biogas further comprises:

removing hydrogen sulfide with a flow of substantially pure oxygen.

6 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the target is a natural gas pipeline operated by a utility, and wherein the controlled amount of the processed biogas is a flow rate between a minimum rate and a maximum rate described in an interconnection agreement.

7 . The method of claim 6 , wherein the flow rate further comprises a duration of flow of the processed biogas.

8 . The method of claim 1 , wherein providing the controlled amount of the processed biogas further comprises:

determining the predicted amount of biogas available at each of the plurality of remote biogas sources.

9 . The method of claim 8 , wherein determining the predicted amount of biogas available at each of the plurality of remote biogas sources further comprises receiving biogas availability data from each of the plurality of remote biogas sources.

10 . The method of claim 9 , wherein the biogas availability data is based on a degree of deflection of an expandable roof over one or more of the plurality of remote biogas sources.

11 . The method of claim 10 , wherein determining the predicted amount of biogas available at each of the plurality of remote biogas sources further comprises:

detecting the degree of deflection of the expandable roof by a laser deflector measuring device.

12 . The method of claim 9 , wherein the biogas availability data is received in real time or periodically.

13 . The method of claim 8 , wherein determining the predicted amount of biogas available at each of the plurality of remote biogas sources further comprises:

detecting a threshold level of hydrogen sulfide in an atmosphere around one or more of the plurality of remote biogas sources;

determining a presence of a leak of the biogas from the one or more of the plurality of remote biogas sources or the network of biogas aggregation conduits in a nearby vicinity of the one or more of the plurality of remote biogas sources;

triggering a shutoff valve to cease flow of the biogas to prevent further leakage of the biogas; and

deducting the ceased flow of the biogas as biogas take-off that reduces the predicted amount of biogas available.

14 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the one or more targets includes a fuel cell, and wherein the method further comprises:

converting at least some of the processed biogas into electricity at the fuel cell.

15 . The method of claim 1 , wherein processing the biogas to form the processed biogas further comprises:

removing hydrogen sulfide from the biogas.

16 . The method of claim 15 , wherein removing the hydrogen sulfide further comprises contacting the hydrogen sulfide with a counter-current flow of a sodium hydroxide solution.

17 . The method of claim 1 , wherein processing the biogas to form the processed biogas further comprises:

scrubbing the biogas with an activated carbon scrubber processing, at the central processing facility, the biogas to form processed biogas.

18 . The method of claim 1 , wherein processing the biogas to form the processed biogas further comprises:

removing carbon dioxide from the biogas.

19 . The method of claim 18 , wherein removing the carbon dioxide further comprises conveying the biogas through a membrane separator.

20 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the predicted amount of the biogas available at each of the plurality of remote biogas sources provides a prediction of biogas availability 24-36 hours in advance.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 5, 2025
From: BUCKENHAM, N. ROSS
To: CALIFORNIA BIOENERGY, LLC
Reel/Frame 072176/0413 →
Continuity (3)
Continuation 16783683 · Feb 6, 2020
Provisional Application 62802502 · Feb 7, 2019
Related Publication 20240123399A1 · Apr 18, 2024
References Cited (83)
US 6852225B1 · Oswald et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 6855253B2 · Baumgartner et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 8017013B2 · Kotelko et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8211211B1 · Knaebel · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8221626B2 · Sassow · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8632024B2 · Gitschel et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8658026B2 · Foody et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8753854B2 · Foody · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8945373B2 · Foody · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9005337B2 · Grill · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9005442B2 · Reid · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9039807B2 · Mitariten et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9040271B2 · Foody · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9108894B1 · Foody et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9146547B2 · Sharma et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9181564B2 · Leonetti et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9222048B1 · Foody · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9323238B2 · Buckenham · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9447353B2 · Foody · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9464571B2 · Kremer et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9508085B2 · Foody · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9514464B2 · Foody · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9643867B2 · Brooks et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9644160B2 · Brotherton et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9690275B2 · Gan et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9969949B1 · Foody et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10093540B2 · Foody · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10202622B2 · Foody et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10266440B2 · Assadi et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20020056690A1 · Wegner · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20020114866A1 · Kartchner · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20040188356A1 · Haydock · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20050120715A1 · Labrador · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20060243648A1 · Shain et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20070254196A1 · Richards et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20080035561A1 · Gray (Gabb) et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20090090679A1 · DeWaard · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20100044279A1 · Tucker · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100105127A1 · Ginsburg · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100148585A1 · Adam et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100236253A1 · Adam · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20110023497A1 · Assmann · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110042307A1 · VanOrnum et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110126601A1 · Bottcher · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110175032A1 · Gunther · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 20110259805A1 · Standley et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20120000357A1 · Roe et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20130024014A1 · Sharma et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130073098A1 · Gan et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130122575A1 · Revankar Krishna Prasad · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130199185A1 · Wain et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130225885A1 · Foody et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130238158A1 · Gan et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130252120A1 · Robertson · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130266997A1 · Hickey et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20140015323A1 · Matthews · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140039708A1 · Curtis et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140222698A1 · Potdar et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140294719A1 · Schreiner · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140352332A1 · Mann et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20150119623A1 · Huang · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20160160239A1 · Hoff et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160241109A1 · Buckenham · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170313952A1 · Kennedy · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20230321598A1 · Buckenham et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
CN 204029930U · 2014 [cited by applicant]
CN 206916094 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
GB 2301112A · 1996 [cited by applicant]
WO 2005050768A1 · 2005 [cited by applicant]
WO 2015073963A1 · 2015 [cited by applicant]
“Appendix B: Electric Power System Basics”, MIT Study on the Future of the Electric Grid, 2011 Copyright Massachusetts Institute of Technology, pp. 243-260, 18 pages, ISBN 978-0-9828008-6-7; https://energy.mit.edu/resea… [cited by applicant]
“Chapter 3: Integration of Variable Energy Resources”, MIT Study on the Future of the Electric Grid, pp. 53-76, 24 pages; 2011 Copyright Massachusetts Institute of Technology, ISBN 978-0-9828008-6-7; https://energy.mit.… [cited by applicant]
CPS 12 Blend Absorbent Media; at least as early as Feb. 5, 2020; https://www.pureairfiltration.com/adsorbent-media/, 1 pg. [cited by applicant]
CSANR Research Report 2010-001, Zhao, Q. et al, Purification Technologies for Biogas Benerated by Anaerobic Digestion, Climate Friendly Farmng, Ch. 9, Compressed Biomethane, 2010, 24 pgs; https://csanr.wsu.edu/program-a… [cited by applicant]
DMT Clear Gas Solutions; Jan. 5, 2017; Offer California BioEnergy 750 and 2000 scfm biogas to CNG plant; 22 pages. [cited by applicant]
Economic Feasibility of Dairy Digester Clusters in California: A Case Study; Prepared by California Dairy CampaignFor the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), Rural Development Agency, Value Added Producer Gr… [cited by applicant]
Kowitt, Beth, “How A Huge Dairy Is Solving A Major Pollution Problem”, Fortune, Jan. 27, 2016, , 19 pages. [cited by applicant]
Linnane, Ciara, “FuelCells shares rocket 108% on news of expanded carbon capture deal with Exxon”, MarketWatch Published: Nov. 7, 2019, 3 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Mukhtar et al.;“Solid-Liquid Separation of Animal Manure and Wastewater”; AgriLIFE Extension, Texas A&M System, E13, 9-99; 1999, 6 pages. [cited by applicant]
Removal of Carbonyl Sulfide Using Activated Carbon Adsorption; Melanie L. Sattlet & Ranjith Samuel Rosenberk; Journal of the Air & waste Management Association; vol. 56, Feb. 2006, ISSN 1047-3289 J. Copyright 2006 Air &… [cited by applicant]
Shelford, T. et al., “Farmer's Guide to Dairy-Derived Biogas Production, Treatment and Utilization”; University of Maryland Department of Environmental Science & Technology, Oct. 1, 2018 downloaded on Mar. 24, 2020 from… [cited by applicant]
US Department of Energy, “Novel Sorbent to Clean Biogas for Fuel Cell CHP”; OSTI Identifier 1222699; Sep. 2016; entire document. [cited by applicant]
Zhao, Shunzheng, et al; “The Hydrolysis of Carbonyl Sulfide at Low Temperature: A Review”; Hindawi Publishing Corporation, The Scientific World Journal, vol. 2013, Article ID 739501, 9 pgs, http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/201… [cited by applicant]