IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,545,605
Granted Patent B2
US 12,545,605 · App. 17/549,693 · Granted Feb 10, 2026

“Super-bubble” electro-photo hybrid catalytic system for advanced treatment of organic wastewater

Inventors: Lifeng Yin (Pasadena, CA); Alan Yalun Gu (Pasadena, CA); Michael R Hoffmann (Pasadena, CA)
Assignee: California Institute of Technology
C02F1/725B01J35/39C02F1/46109C02F2001/46142
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,545,605
App. No.
17/549,693
Granted
Feb 10, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

The systems and methods for wastewater treatment comprise a porous substrate with photocatalytic material(s), and optionally electrocatalytic material(s), for generation of hydroxyl radicals that decompose contaminants in wastewater. The systems and methods intentionally facilitate the photocatalytic and/or electrocatalytic generation of oxygen bubbles, which facilitate an increase in concentration of hydroxyl radicals and shrink the liquid layer of wastewater at photocatalytic and/or electrocatalytic surfaces where hydroxyl radicals are generated in order to decrease quenching of hydroxyl radicals and simultaneously increase utilization or efficiency of the hydroxyl radicals for decomposition of contaminants. In embodiments, the systems and methods prolong hydroxyl radical lifetime and enhance water treatment performance for residential, commercial, municipal, medical, and/or industrial applications. In embodiments, oxygen bubbles generated on surfaces are compressed into pores or microchannels where they store generated hydroxyl radicals to prolong their lifetime in the gas phase and exchange hydroxyl radicals with the adjacent liquid layer.

Claims (66)

1 . A wastewater treatment system comprising:

a porous substrate having a first external surface, a second external surface opposite the first external surface, and an internal porous region between the first external surface and the second external surface; wherein

the porous substrate is an anode;

an electrocatalytic material immobilized on at least a portion of the first external surface and/or in at least a portion of the internal porous region;

wherein

the porous substrate and the electrocatalytic material are in electrical communication; and

the porous substrate is configured to be subjected to an anodic bias sufficient to electrocatalytically generate hydroxyl radicals at the electrocatalytic material;

a photocatalytic material immobilized on at least a portion of the second external surface and/or in at least a portion of the internal porous region;

a light source positioned to expose at least a portion of the photocatalytic material to a light sufficient to photocatalytically generate hydroxyl radicals at the photocatalytic material;

wherein:

the wastewater treatment system is configured to receive a flow of wastewater between the first external surface and the second external surface through the internal porous region such that the flow of wastewater is at least partially in contact with the electrocatalytic material and the photocatalytic material;

the wastewater treatment system is configured to decrease a concentration of contaminants in the flow of wastewater at least via an interaction between the contaminants and the hydroxyl radicals; and

application of the anodic bias to the porous substrate generates oxygen bubbles at the electrocatalytic material; and/or

exposure of the photocatalytic material to the light generates oxygen bubbles at the photocatalytic material.

2 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the internal porous region comprises:

a first internal region nearest to the first external surface, a second internal region nearest to the second external surface, and a middle internal region between the first and second internal regions; and

wherein the middle internal region is characterized by a different average pore size relative to an average pore size in each of the first internal region and the second internal region.

3 . The system of claim 2 , wherein the internal porous region is characterized by a non-linear pore size distribution; wherein an average pore size in the middle internal region is less than an average pore size in each of the first internal region and the second internal region.

4 . The system of claim 2 , wherein the average pore size in the first internal region is selected from the range of 20 μm to 50 μm, the average pore size in the middle internal region is selected from the range of 20 μm to 1 μm, and the average pore size in the second internal region is selected from the range of 20 μm to 50 μm.

5 . The system of claim 1 , wherein at least 80% of the total surface area of the internal porous region comprises the electrocatalytic material and/or the photocatalytic material operably immobilized thereon.

6 . The system of claim 1 , wherein at least a portion of the electrocatalytic material is subject to the anodic bias selected from the range of 1.8 V to 4.5 V vs. Ag/AgCl.

7 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the system further comprises a cathode; and wherein the system comprises an overall potential between the anode and the cathode selected from the range of 3 V to 12 V.

8 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the electrocatalytic material is characterized by an oxygen evolution potential (OEP) selected from the range of 1.6 to 2.3 V vs. SHE.

9 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the electrocatalytic material comprises Pt, PbO 2 , boron-doped diamond, or a combination of these.

10 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the photocatalytic material comprises titanium dioxide, ZnO, Bi 2 O 3 , Cu 2 O, SrTiO 3 , or any combination of these.

11 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the photocatalytic material is nanostructured.

12 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the photocatalytic material is characterized by a band gap selected from the range of 2.4 to 6.7 eV.

13 . The system of claim 1 , wherein oxygen bubbles flowing within the internal porous region are characterized by an average characteristic size selected from the range of 0.1 μm to 10 μm.

14 . The system of claim 1 , wherein a majority of oxygen bubbles that are generated within or that enter the internal porous region remain intact when within the internal porous region.

15 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the oxygen bubbles within the internal porous region comprise hydroxyl radicals within each bubble's gas-phase.

16 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the oxygen bubbles flow through pores of the internal porous region thereby confining a liquid layer adjacent to a nearest pore surface to a thickness of less than 1 μm; and wherein a liquid layer between each oxygen bubble flowing within the internal porous region and a nearest surface of the internal porous region has thickness of less than 1 μm.

17 . The system of claim 1 , wherein at least a fraction of oxygen bubbles generated outside the internal porous region are indrafted into the internal porous region.

18 . The system of claim 1 , wherein oxygen bubbles within the internal porous region compress when flowing from pores nearer to the first or second external surface to pores in a middle region of the internal porous region; and wherein oxygen bubbles within the internal porous region swell when flowing from pores in a middle region of the internal porous region to pores nearer to the first or second external surface.

19 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the flowrate of the wastewater near the first external surface, in the internal porous region, and/or near the second external surface is selected from the range of 2.6×10 −5 m/s to 1.1×10 −3 m/s.

20 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the wastewater is characterized by a fluid pressure difference between the first external surface and the second external surface selected from the range of 5.2 Pa to 83 Pa and/or wherein the wastewater is characterized by a fluid pressure at the first external surface selected from the range of 0.05 MPa to 0.3 MPa.

21 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the hydroxyl radicals are electrocatalytically and/or photocatalytically generated continuously throughout the internal porous region between the first external surface and the second external surface.

22 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the interaction between the contaminants and the hydroxyl radicals comprises oxidation, decomposition, and/or deactivation of the contaminants.

23 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the wastewater entering the system and prior to encountering generated hydroxyl radicals is an initial wastewater and wherein the wastewater exiting the system after flowing through the internal porous region is a treated water; and wherein the treated water comprises a lower concentration of one or more contaminants compared to the concentration of the same one or more contaminants in the initial wastewater; wherein the system is characterized by a COD cr selected from the range of 300,000 mg/L to 88 mg/L, and wherein the treated water is characterized by a chemical oxygen demand (COD) of less than 500 mg/L.

24 . The system of claim 1 , being characterized by a removal ratio for total organic carbon selected from the range of 50% to at least 99.9% after a retention time selected from the range of 1 to 5 hours; and wherein the system is characterized by a contaminant bond energy threshold as high as 485 KJ mol −1 , a decomposition efficiency of a refractory pollutant of as high as 99.9% depending on the energy utilization efficiency of 0.2-30 kWh/m 3 , and/or a theoretical service life of the electrode selected from the range of 1 year to 30 years.

25 . The system of claim 23 , wherein the one or more contaminants comprises ammonium ions, one or more pharmaceuticals, one or more personal care products (PPCP), pathogens, perfluorinated alkyl substances, polyfluorinated alkyl substances, trimethoprim, ciprofloxacin, metoprolol, propranolol, carbamazepine, ammonium ions, heavy oil, acrylonitrile, urea, uric acid, terephthalic acid, coke wastewater, refining wastewater, high salinity wastewater, fracturing flow-back fluid, or any combination of these; and wherein the system is capable of oxidizing, removing, decomposing, or deactivating:

perfluorinated alkyl substances, polyfluorinated alkyl substances, E. coli ., MS2 biophage, trimethoprim, ciprofloxacin, metoprolol, propranolol, carbamazepine, ammonium ions, chemical oxygen demand (COD), pharmaceuticals, personal care products (PPCP), heavy oil, acrylonitrile, urea, uric acid, terephthalic acid, coke wastewater, refining wastewater, high salinity wastewater, fracturing flow-back fluid, or any combination of these.

26 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the porous substrate comprises or is formed of particles; and wherein at least a portion of the electrocatalytic material and at least a portion of the photocatalytic material are immobilized on the particles of the porous substrate.

27 . A method for wastewater treatment, the method comprising:

flowing a wastewater having an initial concentration of one or more contaminants into a wastewater treatment system;

treating the initial wastewater in the system to produce a treated water having a final concentration of the one or more contaminants; wherein the final concentration is less than the initial concentration; and

removing the treated water from the system;

wherein the system comprises:

a porous substrate having a first external surface, a second external surface opposite the first external surface, and an internal porous region between the first external surface and the second external surface;

wherein the porous substrate is an anode;

an electrocatalytic material immobilized on at least a portion of the first external surface and/or in at least a portion of the internal porous region; wherein

the porous substrate and the electrocatalytic material are in electrical communication; and

the porous substrate is configured to be subjected to an anodic bias sufficient to electrocatalytically generate hydroxyl radicals at the electrocatalytic material;

a photocatalytic material immobilized on at least a portion of the second external surface and/or in at least a portion of the internal porous region; and

a light source positioned to expose at least a portion of the photocatalytic material to a light sufficient to photocatalytically generate hydroxyl radicals at the photocatalytic material;

wherein:

the wastewater treatment system is configured to receive a flow of wastewater between the first external surface and the second external surface through the internal porous region such that the flow of wastewater is at least partially in contact with the electrocatalytic material and the photocatalytic material;

the wastewater treatment system is configured to decrease a concentration of contaminants in the flow of wastewater at least via an interaction between the contaminants and the hydroxyl radicals; and

application of the anodic bias to the porous substrate generates oxygen bubbles at the electrocatalytic material; and/or

exposure of the photocatalytic material to the light generates oxygen bubbles at the photocatalytic material;

wherein:

the wastewater flowing in the internal porous region comprises oxygen bubbles and hydroxyl radicals;

wherein the step of treating comprises:

electrocatalytically generating at least a portion of the hydroxyl radicals in the wastewater by subjecting the electrocatalytic material to an anodic bias sufficient to electrocatalytically generate hydroxyl radicals;

photocatalytically generating at least a portion of the hydroxyl radicals in the wastewater by exposing at least a portion of the photocatalytic material a light sufficient to photocatalytically generate hydroxyl radicals;

generating at least a portion of the oxygen bubbles in the wastewater at the electrocatalytic material and/or at the photocatalytic material; and

reducing the concentration of the one or more contaminants from the initial concentration to the final concentration at least via an interaction between the one or more contaminants and the hydroxyl radicals.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 13, 2022
From: YIN, LIFENG; GU, ALAN YALUN; HOFFMANN, MICHAEL R
To: CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
Reel/Frame 059584/0206 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 63125139 · Dec 14, 2020
Related Publication 20220227645A1 · Jul 21, 2022
References Cited (88)
US 2967807A · Osborne et al. · 1961 [cited by applicant]
US 3761383A · Backhurst et al. · 1973 [cited by applicant]
US 5364509A · Dietrich · 1994 [cited by applicant]
US 6527939B1 · Hardee et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 10059607B2 · Hoffman et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10259726B2 · Fraim et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10266429B2 · Legzdins · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20010042682A1 · Weres et al. · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 20020050451A1 · Ford et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20050211553A1 · Mojana et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20050211641A1 · Butters et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20060223700A1 · Jung et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20070000774A1 · Weres · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20100044219A1 · Carlson et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20110180423A1 · Barry et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20120064435A1 · Maruyama et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120090988A1 · Li et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120279872A1 · Chen · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 20130112548A1 · Hermann et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20140209479A1 · Hoffmann et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20150354072A1 · Suchsland et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20160009574A1 · Hoffmann et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160332902A1 · Barry et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170152163A1 · Chaplin et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170334751A1 · Zhang et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20180057952A1 · Hoffman et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180222781A1 · Liu et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20190112211A1 · Cao et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190185351A1 · Huang et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190284066A1 · Mullen et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190345044A1 · Zhang et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20200407248A1 · Yang et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
CN 102596823A · 2012 [cited by examiner]
CN 102603037 · 2012 [cited by applicant]
CN 102923826 · 2013 [cited by applicant]
CN 105903358 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
CN 107930414 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
EP 0014596 · 1980 [cited by applicant]
GB 1194181A · 1970 [cited by applicant]
JP 58136790 · 1983 [cited by applicant]
WO 2009154753 · 2009 [cited by applicant]
WO 2013154623 · 2013 [cited by applicant]
WO 2016007198 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
WO 2016028231A1 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
WO 2020264112 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
WO 2022132662 · 2022 [cited by applicant]
CN-102596823-A Translation (Year: 2012). [cited by examiner]
U.S. Appl. No. 16/911,912, filed Jun. 25, 2020. [cited by applicant]
Bagheri et al. (2014) “Cobalt Doped Titanium Dioxide Nanoparticles: Synthesis, Characterization and Electrocatalytic Study,” Journal of the Chinese Chemical Society, vol. 61, Issue 6, 702-706. [cited by applicant]
Dargahi et al. (Nov. 2018) “Electrodegradation of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid herbicide from aqueous solution using three dimensional electrode reactor with G/b-PbO2 anode: Taguchi optimization and degradation mechan… [cited by applicant]
Extended European Search Report dated Mar. 23, 2020 in European application No. EP17844302, 7 pp. [cited by applicant]
Felix et al. (2012) “Synthesis, Characterization, and Evaluation of IrO2 Based Binary Metal Oxide Electrocatalysts for Oxygen Evolution Reaction”, International Journal of Electrochemical Science, 7, 12064-12077. [cited by applicant]
Furukawa et al. (2014) “Water Adsorption in Porous Metal-Organic Frameworks and Related Materials,” J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136 (11), 4369-4381. [cited by applicant]
Higley (1976) “Lead dioxide-plated titanium anode for electrowinning metals from acid solutions,” Rolla, MO: U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Mines, RI 8111, Jan. 1976:1-10. [cited by applicant]
Huang et al. (2016) “Electrochemical disinfection of toilet wastewater using wastewater electrolysis cell,” Water Research 92:164-172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2016.01.040. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion, PCT/US2015/013193, Korean Intellectual Property Office, dated May 7, 2015. [cited by applicant]
International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion, PCT/US2015/013193, The International Bureau of WIPO, dated Jan. 10, 2017. [cited by applicant]
International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion dated Feb. 26, 2019 in International application No. PCT/US2017/048066, 10 pp. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Apr. 29, 2022 in corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2021/063143, 11 pp. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed Dec. 29, 2017 in International application No. PCT/US2017/048066, 13 pp. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed Nov. 17, 2020 in corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2020/039553, 11 pp. [cited by applicant]
Jasper et al. (2016) “Electrochemical Transformation of Trace Organic Contaminants in Latrine Wastewater,” Environ. Sci. Technol. 50 (18), 10198-10208. [cited by applicant]
Jing et al. (Nov. 2018) “The roles of oxygen vacancies, electrolyte composition, lattice structure, and doping density on the electrochemical reactivity of Magnéli phase TiO [cited by applicant]
KapaŁka et al. (2009) “The importance of electrode material in environmental electrochemistry: Formation and reactivity of free hydroxyl radicals on boron- doped diamond electrodes,” Electrochimica Acta 54, 2018-2023. [cited by applicant]
Li et al. (2016) “Electrochemical degradation of pyridine by Ti/SnO [cited by applicant]
Lin et al. (1996) “The properties of antimony-doped tin oxide thin films from the sol-gel process”, Surface and Coatings Technology, vol. 88, issues 1-3, 239-247. [cited by applicant]
Lin et al. (Dec. 2018) “Development of macroporous Magnéli phase Ti [cited by applicant]
Martínez-Huitle et al. (2011) “Electrocatalysis in wastewater treatment: recent mechanism advances,” Quím. Nova vol. 34 No. 5, 850-858. [cited by applicant]
McDowell et al. (2005) “Ozonation of Carbamazepine in Drinking Water: Identification and Kinetic Study of Major Oxidation Products,” Environ. Sci. Technol. 39 (20), 8014-8022. [cited by applicant]
Menzel et al. (2013) “Dimensionally Stable Ru/Ir/TiO [cited by applicant]
Moradi et al. (2014) “Addition of IrO [cited by applicant]
Moreno-Hernandez et al. (Mar. 2019) Crystalline nickel, cobalt, and manganese antimonates as electrocatalysts for the chlorine evolution reaction. Energy Environ. Sci. 12:1241-1248. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8EE03676D. [cited by applicant]
Niu et al. (2012) “Electrochemical Mineralization of Perfluorocarboxylic Acids (PFCAs) by Ce-Doped Modified Porous Nanocrystalline PbO2 Film Electrode,” Environ. Sci. Technol. 46, (18), 10191-10198. [cited by applicant]
Oh et al. (2015) “Long-term stability of hydrogen nanobubble fuel,” Fuel 158, 399-404. 10.1016/j.fuel.2015.05.072. [cited by applicant]
Samarghandi et al. (Sep. 2018) “Electrochemical process for 2,4-D herbicide removal from aqueous solutions using stainless steel 316 and graphite Anodes: optimization using response surface methodology,” Sep. Sci. Techn… [cited by applicant]
Trellu et al. (Oct. 2018) “Electro-oxidation of organic pollutants by reactive electrochemical membranes,” Chemosphere 208:159-175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.05.026. [cited by applicant]
Wang et al. (2009) “SnO2 Nanostructures-TiO2 Nanofibers Heterostructures: Controlled Fabrication and High Photocatalytic Properties”, Inorganic Chemistry, 48, 15, 7261-7268. [cited by applicant]
Wang et al. (2016) “Applications of Water Stable Metal-Organic Frameworks,” Chemical Society Reviews 45 (18), 5107-5134. [cited by applicant]
Xu et al. (2003) “A Study on the Deactivation of an IrO [cited by applicant]
Xu et al. (Feb. 2020) “Antimony Doped Tin Oxide Nanoparticles Deposited onto Nb—TiO2 Nanotubes for Electrochemical Degradation of Bio-refractory Pollutions,” Electroanalysis 32, 1370-1378. [cited by applicant]
Yang et al. (2014) “Shift of the Reactive Species in the Sb—SnO [cited by applicant]
Yang et al. (2016) “Multilayer Heterojunction Anodes for Saline Wastewater treatment: Design Strategies and Reactive Species Generation Mechanisms,” Environ. Sci. Technol. 50:8780-8787. [cited by applicant]
Yang et al. (Apr. 2018) “A reactive electrochemical filter system with an excellent penetration flux porous Ti/SnO [cited by applicant]
Yi et al. (2007) “Effect of IrO [cited by applicant]
Yu et al. (Apr. 2020) “Reactive Oxygen Species and Catalytic Active Sites in Heterogeneous Catalytic Ozonation for Water Purification,” Environ. Sci. Technol. 54(10):5931-5946. [cited by applicant]
Zaky et al. (2013) “Porous Substoichiometric TiO [cited by applicant]
Zaky et al. (2014) “Mechanism of p-Substituted Phenol Oxidation at a Ti [cited by applicant]
Zhou et al. (Mar. 2019) “High-efficiency electrochemical degradation of antiviral drug abacavir using a penetration flux porous Ti/SnO [cited by applicant]