IP Library Granted Patent US 12,548,121
Granted Patent B2
US 12,548,121 · App. 17/647,527 · Granted Feb 10, 2026

Image quality improvement methods for optical coherence tomography

Inventors: Zaixing Mao (Edgewater, NJ); Zhenguo Wang (Ridgewood, NJ); Kinpui Chan (Ridgewood, NJ)
Assignee: TOPCON CORPORATION
G06T5/70G06T5/50G06T5/75G06T2207/10101G06T2207/20081G06T2207/20216G06T2207/30041
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,548,121
App. No.
17/647,527
Granted
Feb 10, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

Ophthalmological images generated by coherent imaging modalities have multiple types of noise, including random noise caused by the imaging system and speckle noise caused by turbid objects such as living tissues. These noises can occur at different levels in different locations. A noise-reduction method and system of the present disclosure thus relates to applying different filters for different types of noise and/or different locations of images, sequentially or in parallel and combined, to produce a final noise-reduced image.

Claims (35)

1 . An image processing method comprising:

inputting an input image to a machine learning system; and

generating a first noise-reduced image based on an output of the machine learning system,

wherein the machine learning system is trained to suppress from the input image either a first type of noise or a second type of noise, but not both of the first and second types of noise,

wherein the machine learning system is trained with images taken from the same or substantially the same location as the input image to suppress the first type of noise, or is trained with images taken from locations that are adjacent to or nearby a location of the input image to suppress the second type of noise,

wherein training images for the machine learning system comprise at least one image taken from a different subject than the input image,

wherein the input image is obtained by an optical coherence tomography imaging system configured to operate at least at a 400 kHz A-line rate,

wherein the first type of noise is random noise or noise caused by an imaging system that captured the input image,

wherein the second type of noise is speckle noise.

2 . The image processing method of claim 1 , further comprising:

combining the first noise-reduced image with a second noise-reduced image, thereby generating a final noise-reduced image,

wherein the first type of noise and the second type of noise are suppressed in the final noise-reduced image.

3 . The method of claim 2 , wherein the first noise-reduced image and the second noise-reduced images are combined by weighted averaging, the first noise-reduced image being weighted according to a level of the first type of noise in the input image and the second noise-reduced image being weighted according to a level of the second type of noise in the input image.

4 . The method of claim 2 , further comprising:

displaying the final noise-reduced image in real-time with a capturing of the input image.

5 . The method of claim 1 , wherein an intensity of at least one pixel of the first noise-reduced image is set by the machine learning system to correspond to a maximum intensity of a probability distribution of intensities of pixels at a corresponding location of an object in the image.

6 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the input image is an optical coherence tomography (OCT) or OCT-angiography B-scan image.

7 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the input image is an en face optical coherence tomography (OCT) or OCT-angiography image.

8 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the input image is an image of a retina.

9 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

segmenting the input image based on the output of the machine learning system.

10 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

displaying the first noise-reduced image in real-time with a capturing of the input image.

11 . An image processing method comprising:

filtering a first input image;

filtering a second input image; and

combining the filtered first input image and the filtered second input image, thereby generating a final noise-reduced volume,

wherein the first input image and the second input image are different 2D images of a 3D volume,

wherein the first input image and the second input image are from different planes of, and/or are en face images of different reference layers of the 3D volume,

wherein the first input image and second input image are obtained by an optical coherence tomography imaging system configured to operate at least at a 400 kHz A-line rate,

wherein filtering the first input image comprises:

applying a first filter to the first input image, thereby generating a first noise-reduced image;

applying a second filter to the first input image, thereby generating a second noise-reduced image; and

combining the first noise-reduced image and the second noise-reduced image, thereby generating a final noise-reduced image, and

wherein the first filter is configured to suppress a first type of noise from the first input image and the second filter is configured to suppress a second type of noise from the first input image, the first and second types of noise being different.

Continuity (3)
Continuation 16797848 · Feb 21, 2020
Provisional Application 62812728 · Mar 1, 2019
Related Publication 20220130021A1 · Apr 28, 2022
References Cited (33)
US 9591240B1 · Barbu · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 9704224B2 · Lee · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 9984459B2 · Reisman · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20050157796A1 · Suzuki · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20060245506A1 · Lin et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20080247620A1 · Lewis · 2008 [cited by examiner]
US 20130243318A1 · Honda · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20140044375A1 · Xu · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20160206190A1 · Reisman · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20160307314A1 · Reisman · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20170319059A1 · Cheng · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20180012359A1 · Prentasic · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20180137605A1 · Otsuka · 2018 [cited by examiner]
CN 105359185A · 2016 [cited by examiner]
EP 2099224A1 · 2009 [cited by applicant]
EP 3404611A1 · 2018 [cited by examiner]
JP 2013201724A · 2013 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2018159689A1 · 2018 [cited by examiner]
WO WO2018210978A1 · 2018 [cited by examiner]
Dong et al., Compression Artifacts Reduction by a Deep Convolution Network, 2015, IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 1-9. (Year: 2015). [cited by examiner]
Wei et al, Clustering-Oriented Multiple Convolutional Neural Networks for Optical Coherence Tomography Image Denoising, 2018, 11th International Congress on Image and Signal Processing, BioMedical Engineering and Infoma… [cited by examiner]
Abbasi A et al, 3D OCT Image Denoising through Multi-input Fully Convolutional Networks, 2019, Computers in Biology and Medicine, 108, pp. 1-8. (Year: 2019). [cited by examiner]
Avanaki et al, Denoising based on noise parameter estimation in speckled OCT images using neural network, 2008, Proceedings of SPIE, 71390E-1, pp. 1-10. (Year: 2008). [cited by examiner]
Ma et al, Speckle noise reduction in optical coherence tomography images based on edge-sensitive cGAN, 2018, Biomed Optics Express, 9(11): 5129-5146. (Year: 2018). [cited by examiner]
Devalla, et al., “A Deep Learning Approach to Denoise Optical Coherence Tomography Images of the Optic Nerve Head”, Scientific Reports, www.nature.com/scientifcreports; Oct. 8, 2019, pp. 1-13. [cited by applicant]
Halupka, et al., “Retinal optical coherence tomography image enhancement via deep learning”, Biomedical Optics Express, vol. 9, No. 12, Dec. 1, 2018, pp. 6205-6221. [cited by applicant]
Li, et al., “Statistical model for OCT image denoising”, Biomedical Optics Express, vol. 8, No. 9, Sep. 1, 2017, pp. 3903-3917. [cited by applicant]
Ma, et al., “Speckle noise reduction in optical coherence tomography images based on edge-sensitive cGAN”, Biomedical Optics Express, vol. 9, No. 11, Nov. 1, 2018, pp. 5129-5146. [cited by applicant]
Esmaeili, et al., “Speckle Noise in Optical Coherence Tomography Using Two-dimensional Curvelet-based Dictionary Learning”, Journal of Medical Signals and Sensors, vol. 7, No. 2, Apr.-Jun. 2017, pp. 86-91. [cited by applicant]
Liu et al., “Connecting Image Denoising and High-Level Vision Tasks via Deep Learning”, IEEE Transations on Image Processing, Sep. 6, 2018 , pp. 3695-3706, XP55698602. [cited by applicant]
Partial European Search Report for European Application No. 20159835.6 dated May 26, 2020. [cited by applicant]
Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 20159835.6 dated Sep. 10, 2020. [cited by applicant]
Agostinelli, et al., “Adaptive Multi-Column Deep Neural Networks with Application to Robust Image Denoising”, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, Jan. 1, 2013, XP055568209, ISSN: 2162-237X, vol. 2… [cited by applicant]