IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,548,639
Granted Patent B2
US 12,548,639 · App. 18/610,635 · Granted Feb 10, 2026

Determining the intrinsic reaction coordinate of a chemical reaction by nested path integrals

Inventors: Robert Michael Parrish (Woodside, CA); Edward Grafton Hohenstein (Gainesville, GA); Bryan Scott Fales (Midland, MI); Andrew Craig Simmonett (Arlington, VA)
Assignee: QC Ware Corp.
G16C20/30G16C10/00
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,548,639
App. No.
18/610,635
Granted
Feb 10, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

A computer system can perform a computational methods of determining intrinsic reaction coordinates (IRCs) for chemical transformations (e.g., chemical reactions) via dual nested integration.

Claims (170)

1 . A method of determining an intrinsic reaction coordinate (IRC) path from a reactant molecular geometry to a product molecular geometry of a chemical reaction on a potential energy surface, the method comprising:

accessing, by a computer system, data indicating a potential energy surface function and molecular coordinates;

performing, by the computer system, a dual nested integration of two polynomial splines, wherein performing the dual nested integration comprises:

parameterizing a first polynomial spline according to a set of control points corresponding to locations on the potential energy surface of the chemical reaction, the first polynomial spline describing molecular coordinates as a function of a parameter coordinate describing progress along a candidate IRC path from the reactant molecular geometry to the product molecular geometry;

computing the integral of the first polynomial spline, the integrated first polynomial spline describing length along the candidate IRC path as a function of the parameter coordinate;

generating a second polynomial spline by inverting the length and parameter coordinates of the integrated first polynomial spline;

parameterizing the second polynomial spline according to interpolated sampling points along the integral of the first polynomial spline, the second polynomial spline describing the gradient of the potential energy surface of the chemical reaction along the candidate IRC path from the reactant molecular geometry to the product molecular geometry; and

computing an action integral, the action integral being the integral of the second polynomial spline, wherein the integral of the first polynomial spline is the integrand of the second polynomial spline integral;

determining, by the computer system, the IRC path from the reactant molecular geometry to the product molecular geometry based on the action integral, the IRC path indicating a feasibility of the chemical reaction; and

based on the IRC path indicating the chemical reaction is feasible, selecting to perform the chemical reaction to generate the product molecular geometry from the reactant molecular geometry.

2 . The method of claim 1 , wherein determining the IRC path from the reactant molecular geometry to the product molecular geometry of a chemical reaction on a potential energy surface does not include determining the Hessian of an objective function at or between any control point or sampling point, wherein the objective function is the action integral.

3 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the parameter coordinate describing progress along the candidate IRC path is an arbitrary time coordinate t, wherein the first polynomial spline is constrained at t=0 and t=1.

4 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the integral of the first polynomial spline is:

∫

0

t

⁢

dt

′

⁢

∑

A

⁢

(

dz

A

dt

⁢

′

)

2

,

wherein z A represents continuous molecular coordinates.

5 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the integral of the second polynomial spline is:

∫

0

l

⁢

dl

′

⁢

∑

A

⁢

(

g

A

(

l

′

)

)

2

,

wherein g A is the second polynomial spline approximating the gradient of the potential energy surface with respect to the molecular coordinates as a function of the length coordinate l′.

6 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the integral of the second polynomial spline is:

∫

0

l

⁢

dl

′

⁢

∑

B

⁢

(

g

B

(

z

B

(

l

′

)

)

)

2

,

wherein l′ is the length coordinate, z B represents continuous molecular coordinates, and g B is the gradient of the potential energy surface.

7 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the method is applied iteratively to candidate IRCs defined by more than one transition state.

8 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the set of control points are uniformly spaced along the first polynomial spline.

9 . The method of claim 1 , wherein determining the IRC path based on the action integral comprises determining the gradient of the action integral along the IRC path.

10 . The method of claim 9 , wherein determining the IRC path based on the action integral further comprises determining the IRC path by reducing the value of the action integral.

11 . The method of claim 10 , wherein the value of the action integral is reduced using gradient-based optimization.

12 . A non-transitory computer-readable storage medium storing instructions for determining an intrinsic reaction coordinate (IRC) path from a reactant molecular geometry to a product molecular geometry of a chemical reaction on a potential energy surface, wherein the instructions, when executed by a computer, cause the computer to perform operations comprising:

accessing, by the computer, data indicating a potential energy surface function and molecular coordinates;

performing, by the computer, a dual nested integration of two polynomial splines, wherein performing the dual nested integration comprises:

parameterizing a first polynomial spline according to a set of control points corresponding to locations on the potential energy surface of the chemical reaction, the first polynomial spline describing molecular coordinates as a function of a parameter coordinate describing progress along a candidate IRC path from the reactant molecular geometry to the product molecular geometry;

computing the integral of the first polynomial spline, the integrated first polynomial spline describing length along the candidate IRC path as a function of the parameter coordinate;

generating a second polynomial spline by inverting the length and parameter coordinates of the integrated first polynomial spline;

parameterizing the second polynomial spline according to interpolated sampling points along the integral of the first polynomial spline, the second polynomial spline describing the gradient of the potential energy surface of the chemical reaction along the candidate IRC path from the reactant molecular geometry to the product molecular geometry; and

computing an action integral, the action integral being the integral of the second polynomial spline, wherein the integral of the first polynomial spline is the integrand of the second polynomial spline integral;

determining, by the computer, the IRC path from the reactant molecular geometry to the product molecular geometry based on the action integral, the IRC path indicating a feasibility of the chemical reaction; and

based on the IRC path indicating the chemical reaction is feasible, selecting to perform the chemical reaction to generate the product molecular geometry from the reactant molecular geometry.

13 . The computer-readable storage medium of claim 12 , wherein determining the IRC path from the reactant molecular geometry to the product molecular geometry of a chemical reaction on a potential energy surface does not include determining the Hessian of an objective function at or between any control point or sampling point, wherein the objective function is the action integral.

14 . The computer-readable storage medium of claim 12 , wherein the parameter coordinate describing progress along the candidate IRC path is an arbitrary time coordinate t, wherein the first polynomial spline is constrained at t=0 and t=1.

15 . The computer-readable storage medium of claim 12 , wherein the integral of the first polynomial spline is:

∫

0

t

⁢

dt

′

⁢

∑

A

⁢

(

dz

A

dt

⁢

′

)

2

,

wherein z A represents continuous molecular coordinates.

16 . The computer-readable storage medium of claim 12 , wherein the integral of the second polynomial spline is:

∫

0

l

⁢

dt

′

⁢

∑

A

⁢

(

g

A

(

l

′

)

)

2

,

wherein g A is the second polynomial spline approximating the gradient of the potential energy surface with respect to the molecular coordinates as a function of the length coordinate l′.

17 . The computer-readable storage medium of claim 12 , wherein the integral of the second polynomial spline is:

∫

0

l

⁢

dl

′

⁢

∑

B

⁢

(

g

B

(

z

B

(

l

′

)

)

)

2

,

wherein l is the length coordinate, z B represents continuous molecular coordinates, and g B is the gradient of the potential energy surface.

18 . The computer-readable storage medium of claim 12 , wherein the operations are applied iteratively to candidate IRCs defined by more than one transition state.

19 . The computer-readable storage medium of claim 12 , wherein the set of control points are uniformly spaced along the first polynomial spline.

20 . The computer-readable storage medium of claim 19 , wherein determining the IRC path based on the action integral comprises determining the gradient of the action integral along the IRC path.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 22, 2024
From: PARRISH, ROBERT MICHAEL; HOHENSTEIN, EDWARD GRAFTON; FALES, BRYAN SCOTT; SIMMONETT, ANDREW CRAIG
To: QC WARE CORP.
Reel/Frame 066866/0108 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 63453585 · Mar 21, 2023
Related Publication 20240321408A1 · Sep 26, 2024
References Cited (29)
US 7844431B2 · Paxson et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 10622098B2 · Coley et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 11309063B2 · Dey et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20020111761A1 · Edgecombe · 2002 [cited by examiner]
US 20210065851A1 · Madrid et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion, PCT Application No. PCT/US2024/020800, Jul. 8, 2024, nine pages. [cited by applicant]
Shiga, M. et al., “A quantum generalization of intrinsic reaction coordinate using path integral centroid coordinates,” The Journal of Chemical Physicals, vol. 136, May 9, 2012, pp. 184103-1-184103-11. [cited by applicant]
Aguilar-Mogas, A. et al. “Applications of analytic and geometry concepts of the theory of calculus of variations to the intrinsic reaction coordinate model,” Molecular Physics, vol. 105, No. 19-22, Oct. 10, 2007, pp. 24… [cited by applicant]
Baker, J. “An algorithm for the location of transition states,” Journal of Computational Chemistry, vol. 7, No. 4, Aug. 1986, pp. 385-395. [cited by applicant]
Banerjee, A. et al. “Search for stationary points on surfaces,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry, vol. 89, No. 1, Jan. 1985, pp. 52-57. [cited by applicant]
Birkholz, A. et al. “Path optimization by a variational reaction coordinate method. I. Development of formalism and algorithms,” The Journal of Chemical Physics, vol. 143, No. 24, Dec. 28, 2015, 12 pages. [cited by applicant]
Birkholz, A. et al. “Path optimization by a variational reaction coordinate method. II. Improved computational efficiency through internal coordinates and surface interpolation,” The Journal of Chemical Physics, vol. 14… [cited by applicant]
Cerjan, C. et al. “On finding transition states,” The Journal of Chemical Physics, vol. 75, No. 6, Sep. 15, 1981, pp. 2800-2806. [cited by applicant]
Crehuet, R. et al. “The reaction path intrinsic reaction coordinate method and the Hamilton-Jacobi theory,” The Journal of Chemical Physics, vol. 122, No. 23, Jun. 15, 2005, 17 pages. [cited by applicant]
Fukui, K. “Formulation of the reaction coordinate,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry, Nov. 1970, vol. 74, No. 23, pp. 4161-4163. [cited by applicant]
Fukui, K. “The path of chemical reactions—the IRC approach,” Accounts of Chemical Research, Dec. 1, 1981, vol. 14, No. 12, pp. 363-368. [cited by applicant]
Govind, N. et al. “A generalized synchronous transit method for transition state location,” Computational Materials Science, vol. 28, No. 2, Oct. 1, 2003, 250-258. [cited by applicant]
Halgren, T.A. et al. “The synchronous-transit method for determining reaction pathways and locating molecular transition states,” Chemical Physics Letters, Jul. 15, 1977, vol. 49, No. 2, pp. 225-232. [cited by applicant]
Henkelman, G. et al. “A climbing image nudged elastic band method for finding saddle points and minimum energy paths,” The Journal of Chemical Physics, vol. 113, No. 22, Dec. 8, 2000, pp. 9901-9904. [cited by applicant]
Henkelman, G. et al. “A dimer method for finding saddle points on high dimensional potential surfaces using only first derivatives,” The Journal of Chemical Physics, vol. 111, No. 15, Oct. 15, 1999, pp. 7010-7022. [cited by applicant]
Henkelman, G. et al. “Improved tangent estimate in the nudged elastic band method for finding minimum energy paths and saddle points,” The Journal of Chemical Physics, vol. 113, No. 22, Dec. 8, 2000, pp. 9978-9985. [cited by applicant]
Jónsson, H. et al. “Nudged elastic band method for finding minimum energy paths of transitions,” Classical and quantum dynamics in condensed phase simulations, 1998, pp. 385-404. [cited by applicant]
Peng, C. et al. “Combining Synchronous Transit and Quasi-Newton Methods to Find Transition States,” Israel Journal of Chemistry, Jul. 8, 1993, vol. 33, No. 4, 449-454. [cited by applicant]
Peters, B. et al. “A growing string method for determining transition states: Comparison to the nudged elastic band and string methods,” The Journal of Chemical Physics, vol. 120, No. 17, May 1, 2004, pp. 7877-7886. [cited by applicant]
Quapp, W. “Chemical reaction paths and calculus of variations,” Theoretical Chemistry Accounts, vol. 121, Dec. 2008, 10 pages. [cited by applicant]
Simons, J. et al. “Walking on potential energy surfaces,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry, vol. 87, No. 15, Jul. 1983, pp. 2745-2753. [cited by applicant]
Weinan, E. et al. “String method for the study of rare events,” Physical Review B, vol. 66, No. 5, Aug. 12, 2002, 4 pages. [cited by applicant]
Heuer, M. A. et al., “Integrated Reaction Path Processing from Sampled Structure Sequences,” Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation, vol. 14/Issue 4, Mar. 8, 2018, pp. 2052-2062. [cited by applicant]
Heuer, M. A. et al., “Integrated Reaction Path Processing from Sampled Structure Sequences,” arXiv:1801.02100v1, Jan. 6, 2018, pp. 1-19. [cited by applicant]