IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,553,754
Granted Patent B2
US 12,553,754 · App. 18/367,015 · Granted Feb 17, 2026

Omnidirectional flow sensor

Inventors: Nathaniel Simon (Princeton, NJ); Alexander Piqué (Princeton, NJ); David Snyder (Princeton, NJ); Kyle Ikuma (Norwood, NJ); Anirudha Majumdar (Hillsborough, NJ); Marcus Hultmark (Princeton, NJ)
Assignee: The Trustees of Princeton University
G01F1/6845G01F1/69G01P5/10G01P5/12
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,553,754
App. No.
18/367,015
Granted
Feb 17, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

Disclosed is a fast-response sensor system to measure a fluid vector in a plurality of dimensions. This system, known as ‘MAST’ (for MEMS Anemometry Sensing Tower), utilizes microelectromechanical (MEMS) hot-wire devices to produce a solid-state, lightweight, and robust flow sensor system suitable for, e.g., real-time wind estimation onboard a UAV. The MAST uses three through eighteen polygonally-arranged microscale flow sensors to determine the fluid's vector's direction and magnitude.

Claims (48)

1 . An omnidirectional flow sensor, comprising:

a plurality of microelectromechanical system (MEMS) flow sensors, each MEMS flow sensor comprising:

a substrate having a first surface and a second surface opposite the first surface, and a window extending through a portion of the first surface to the second surface; and

at least one wire array disposed on the first surface, each wire array comprising an odd number of wires aligned in parallel directions and connected in series, one wire array of the at least one wire array disposed at least partially over the window;

a chassis substrate, upon which an additional MEMS flow sensor is placed;

a plurality of support substrates;

wherein each MEMS flow sensor of the plurality of MEMS flow sensors is coupled to a respective support substrate of the plurality of support substrates at a fixed distance from the chassis substrate; and

wherein each MEMS flow sensor faces a different direction.

2 . The omnidirectional flow sensor of claim 1 , further comprising at least one spacer configured to be coupled between the chassis substrate and the plurality of support substrates.

3 . The omnidirectional flow sensor of claim 2 , the plurality of support substrates are arranged in a three-dimensional geometric shape, the three-dimensional geometric shape being disposed at an end of the at least one spacer.

4 . The omnidirectional flow sensor of claim 1 , further comprising an instrument amplifier on each support substrate of the plurality of support substrates configured to amplify a signal from each MEMS flow sensor for greater resolution.

5 . The omnidirectional flow sensor of claim 1 , wherein each support substrate of the plurality of support substrates is coupled orthogonal to the chassis substrate, and each support substrate has one of the plurality of MEMS flow sensors placed on the support substrate at a fixed distance from the chassis substrate facing away from other support substrates.

6 . The omnidirectional flow sensor of claim 1 , wherein there are at least 5 support substrates of the plurality of support substrates.

7 . The omnidirectional flow sensor of claim 1 , wherein each of the plurality of MEMS flow sensors operates as a hotwire anemometer.

8 . The omnidirectional flow sensor of claim 1 , wherein the at least one wire array is part of a Wheatstone bridge.

9 . The omnidirectional flow sensor of claim 1 , wherein the at least one wire array includes four wire arrays configured as legs of a Wheatstone bridge, the four wire arrays including:

a first wire array on the first surface couples a first contact and a second contact;

a second wire array on the first surface couples the second contact and a third contact;

a third wire array on the first surface couples the third contact and a fourth contact; and

a fourth wire array configured to extend over the window couples the fourth contact and the first contact.

10 . The omnidirectional flow sensor of claim 9 , wherein the substrate is a silicon substrate electrically insulated with a layer of silicon nitride or silicon oxide.

11 . The omnidirectional flow sensor of claim 10 , wherein each contact comprises platinum.

12 . The omnidirectional flow sensor of claim 11 , wherein each wire array comprises platinum.

13 . The omnidirectional flow sensor of claim 12 , wherein the chassis substrate and each support substrate of the plurality of support substrates comprises a printed circuit board (PCB).

14 . The omnidirectional flow sensor of claim 1 , further comprising an instrument amplifier on each support substrate of the plurality of support substrates configured to amplify a signal from each MEMS flow sensor for greater resolution.

15 . The omnidirectional flow sensor of claim 1 , further comprising a constant voltage source on the chassis substrate that is operably coupled to each MEMS flow sensor.

16 . The omnidirectional flow sensor of claim 1 , wherein each support substrate of the plurality of support substrates has one MEMS flow sensor bonded to the support substrate with a conductive epoxy.

17 . The omnidirectional flow sensor of claim 1 , wherein each support substrate of the plurality of support substrates has one MEMS flow sensor bonded to the support substrate with solder.

18 . The omnidirectional flow sensor of claim 1 , wherein each support substrate of the plurality of support substrates has one MEMS flow sensor bonded to the support substrate with gold.

19 . A system, comprising:

at least one processor; and

an omnidirectional flow sensor operably coupled to the at least one processor, the omnidirectional flow sensor comprising:

a plurality of microelectromechanical system (MEMS) flow sensors, each MEMS flow sensor comprising:

a substrate having a first surface and a second surface opposite the first surface, and a window extending through a portion of the first surface to the second surface; and

at least one wire array disposed on the first surface, each wire array comprising an odd number of wires aligned in parallel directions and connected in series, one wire array of the at least one wire array disposed at least partially over the window;

a chassis substrate, upon which an additional MEMS flow sensor is placed; and

a plurality of support substrates;

wherein each MEMS flow sensor of the plurality of MEMS flow sensors is coupled to a respective support substrate of the plurality of supports substrates at a fixed distance from the chassis substrate; and

wherein each MEMS flow sensor faces a different direction.

20 . The system of claim 19 , further comprising a vehicle, wherein the omnidirectional flow sensor is operably coupled to the vehicle.

21 . The system of claim 20 , wherein the vehicle is an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV).

22 . The system of claim 19 , wherein the at least one processor is coupled to a non-transitory computer-readable storage device containing instructions that, when executed by the at least one processor, causes the at least one processor to, collectively:

cause a constant voltage to be applied across a Wheatstone bridge of the omnidirectional flow sensor;

receive signals from each MEMS flow sensor in the omnidirectional flow sensor;

determine a wind angle by passing the received signals to a first trained machine learning algorithm and/or determining a wind magnitude by passing the received signals to a second trained machine learning algorithm; and

output the determined wind angle and/or wind magnitude.

23 . The system of claim 22 , wherein the first trained machine learning algorithm comprises an input layer and two hidden layers, the two hidden layers including a first hidden layer and a second hidden layer, the input layer having a width of n, where n is a number of MEMS flow sensor in the system, the first hidden layer being of width 8n, and the second hidden layer being of width 4n+5.

24 . The system of claim 23 , wherein the second trained machine learning algorithm comprises an input layer, a hidden layer, and an output layer, the input layer having a width of 3, the hidden layer having a width of 6, and the output layer having a width of 1.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 10, 2023
From: SIMON, NATHANIEL; PIQUE, ALEXANDER; SNYDER, DAVID; IKUMA, KYLE; MAJUMDAR, ANIRUDHA; HULTMARK, MARCUS
To: THE TRUSTEES OF PRINCETON UNIVERSITY
Reel/Frame 065171/0849 →
Continuity (3)
Provisional Application 63408284 · Sep 20, 2022
Provisional Application 63405731 · Sep 12, 2022
Related Publication 20240200997A1 · Jun 20, 2024
References Cited (17)
US 5880366A · Yamaguchi · 1999 [cited by examiner]
US 10877060B2 · Remboski · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 11592838B2 · Arwatz · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20080034861A1 · Bognar · 2008 [cited by examiner]
Craig, William et al., “Geometric Attitude and Position Control of a Quadrotor in Wind,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, vol. 43, No. 5, pp. 870-883, May 2020. [cited by applicant]
Bailey, Sean C.C. et al., “Turbulence measurements using a nanoscale thermal anemometry probe,” Journal of Fluid Mechanics, vol. 663, pp. 160-179, Sep. 1, 2010. [cited by applicant]
Fan, Y. et al., “Nanoscale sensing devices for turbulence measurements,” Experiments in Fluids, vol. 56, No. 138, 13 pages, Jun. 20, 2015. [cited by applicant]
Huang, K.Y. et al., “Investigation of the atmospheric surface layer using a novel high-resolution sensor array,” Experiments in Fluids, vol. 62, No. 76, 13 pages, Mar. 23, 2021. [cited by applicant]
Sundin, Johan et al., “A Soft Material Flow Sensor for Micro Air Vehicles,” Soft Robotics, vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 119-127, 2021. [cited by applicant]
Zahran, Shady et al., “A New Velocity Meter Based on Hall Effect Sensors for UAV Indoor Navigation,” IEEE Sensors Journal, vol. 19, No. 8, pp. 3067-3076, Apr. 15, 2019. [cited by applicant]
Tagliabue, Andrea et al., “Touch the Wind: Simultaneous Airflow, Drag and Interaction Sensing on a Multirotor,” 2020 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), pp. 1645-1652, Oct. 2020. [cited by applicant]
Yeo, Derrick W. et al., “Onboard Flow Sensing For Downwash Detection and Avoidance On Small Quadrotor Helicopters,” Proceedings AIAA Guidance, Navigation and Control Conference, vol. AIAA 2015-1769, pp. 1-11, 2015. [cited by applicant]
Bruschi, P. et al., “Wind speed and direction detection by means of solid-state anemometers embedded on small quadcopters,” Procedia Engineering, vol. 168, pp. 802-805, 2016. [cited by applicant]
Prudden, S. et al., “Measuring Wind with Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems,” Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, vol. 176, pp. 197-210, 2018. [cited by applicant]
Prudden, S. et al., “An Anemometer for UAS-based Atmospheric Wind Measurements,” Proceedings of the 17th Australian International Aerospace Congress: AIAC, 7 pages, Feb. 2017. [cited by applicant]
Fu, M.K. et al., “Elastic filament velocimetry (EFV),” Measurement Science and Technology, vol. 28, No. 025301, 12 pages, Dec. 20, 2016. [cited by applicant]
Panerati, Jacopo et al., “Learning to Fly—a Gym Environment with PyBullet Physics for Reinforcement Learning of Multi-agent Quadcopter Control,” 2021 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (… [cited by applicant]