IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,554,326
Granted Patent B2
US 12,554,326 · App. 18/062,376 · Granted Feb 17, 2026

Systems and methods for controlling a device using detected changes in a neural-related signal

Inventors: Peter Eli Yoo (Fitzroy North, AU); Thomas James Oxley (Dover, DE)
Assignee: Synchron Australia Pty Limited
G06F3/015A61B5/6876
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,554,326
App. No.
18/062,376
Granted
Feb 17, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

Systems and methods of controlling a device using detected changes in a neural-related signal of a subject are disclosed. In one embodiment, a method of controlling a device or software application comprises detecting a first change in a neural-related signal of a subject, detecting a second change in the neural-related signal, and transmitting an input command to the device upon or following the detection of the second change in the neural-related signal. The neural-related signal can be detected using a neural interface implanted within a brain of the subject.

Claims (32)

1 . A method of controlling a device, comprising:

detecting an increase in an intensity of a neural-related signal of a subject beyond a baseline level measured, wherein the neural-related signal is a neural oscillation of the subject, and wherein detecting the increase in the intensity of the neural-related signal comprises detecting an increase in a power of the neural oscillation beyond a baseline oscillation power level;

detecting a reduction in the intensity of the neural-related signal below the baseline level measured following the increase; and

transmitting an input command to the device upon the detection of the reduction in the intensity of the neural-related signal following the increase in the intensity of the neural-related signal.

2 . The method of claim 1 , wherein detecting the reduction in the intensity of the neural-related signal comprises detecting a decrease in the power of the neural oscillation.

3 . The method of claim 2 , wherein the power is a power spectral density.

4 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the neural-related signal is measured or monitored using an endovascular device implanted within the subject, and wherein the steps of detecting the increase or reduction in the intensity of the neural-related signal and transmitting the input command are performed using one or more processors.

5 . The method of claim 4 , further comprising:

filtering, using one or more processors of an apparatus implanted within the subject, raw neural-related signals obtained from the endovascular device using one or more software filters; and

feeding filtered signals into a classification layer to automatically detect the reduction and increase in the intensity of the neural-related signal using a machine learning classifier.

6 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the increase in the intensity of the neural-related signal is caused by the subject mentally releasing a first thought, and wherein the reduction in the intensity of the neural-related signal is caused by the subject conjuring and holding a second thought.

7 . The method of claim 6 , wherein at least one of the first thought and the second thought is a task-relevant thought, and wherein the input command is a command to the device to accomplish at least part of a task associated with the task-relevant thought.

8 . The method of claim 6 , wherein at least one of the first thought and the second thought is a task-irrelevant thought, and wherein the input command is a command to the device to accomplish at least part of a task not associated with the task-irrelevant thought.

9 . The method of claim 8 , wherein the task-irrelevant thought is a thought related to a body function of the subject.

10 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the device is at least one of a personal computing device, an internet-of-things (IoT) device, and a mobility vehicle.

11 . A system for controlling a device, comprising:

an endovascular device configured to measure or monitor a neural-related signal of a subject, wherein the neural-related signal of the subject is a neural oscillation of the subject; and

an apparatus comprising one or more processors and wherein the one or more processors are programmed to:

detect an increase in an intensity of a neural-related signal beyond a baseline level measured, wherein detecting the increase in the intensity of the neural-related signal comprises detecting an increase in a power of the neural oscillation beyond a baseline oscillation power level,

detect a reduction in the intensity of the neural-related signal below the baseline level measured following the increase, and

transmit an input command to the device upon the detection of the reduction in the intensity of the neural-related signal following the increase in the intensity of the neural-related signal.

12 . The system of claim 11 , wherein the one or more processors are programmed to detect the reduction in the intensity of the neural-related signal by detecting a decrease in the power of the neural oscillation.

13 . The system of claim 12 , wherein the power is a power spectral density.

14 . The system of claim 11 , wherein the endovascular device is configured to be implanted within a vein or sinus of the brain of the subject.

15 . The system of claim 11 , wherein the one or more processors are further programmed to:

filter raw neural-related signals obtained from the endovascular device using one or more software filters; and

feed filtered signals into a classification layer to automatically detect the reduction and increase in the intensity of the neural-related signal using a machine learning classifier.

16 . The system of claim 11 , wherein the increase in the intensity of the neural-related signal is caused by the subject mentally releasing a first thought, and wherein the reduction in the intensity of the neural-related signal is caused by the subject conjuring and holding a second thought.

17 . The system of claim 16 , wherein at least one of the first thought and the second thought is a task-relevant thought, and wherein the input command is a command to the device to accomplish at least part of a task associated with the task-relevant thought.

18 . The system of claim 16 , wherein at least one of the first thought and the second thought is a task-irrelevant thought, and wherein the input command is a command to the device to accomplish at least part of a task not associated with the task-irrelevant thought.

19 . The system of claim 18 , wherein the task-irrelevant thought is a thought related to a body function of the subject.

20 . The system of claim 11 , wherein the device is at least one of a personal computing device, an internet-of-things (IoT) device, and a mobility vehicle.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 6, 2022
From: YOO, PETER ELI; OXLEY, THOMAS JAMES
To: SYNCHRON AUSTRALIA PTY LIMITED
Reel/Frame 061999/0140 →
Continuity (4)
Continuation 17397651 · Aug 9, 2021
Continuation PCTUS2021025440 · Apr 1, 2021
Provisional Application 63003480 · Apr 1, 2020
Related Publication 20230107850A1 · Apr 6, 2023
References Cited (94)
US 6001065A · DeVito · 1999 [cited by examiner]
US 8805494B2 · Libbus · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 9357251B2 · Dove · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 10485968B2 · Opie et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10512555B2 · John et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10575783B2 · Oxley · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 10729530B2 · Opie et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 11076794B2 · Kozhaya et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11550391B2 · Yoo et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 11559232B1 · Al-Saggaf et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 12186089B2 · Tal et al. · 2025 [cited by applicant]
US 12236013B2 · Nam · 2025 [cited by examiner]
US 20040267320A1 · Taylor · 2004 [cited by examiner]
US 20060189900A1 · Flaherty · 2006 [cited by examiner]
US 20070032738A1 · Flaherty · 2007 [cited by examiner]
US 20090318826A1 · Green · 2009 [cited by examiner]
US 20100081958A1 · She · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100130844A1 · Williams et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20110084795A1 · Fukuyori · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 20110307029A1 · Hargrove · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 20120172743A1 · Aguilar et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120296476A1 · Cale · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 20120310105A1 · Feingold · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 20130131535A1 · Sun · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20140194719A1 · Frewin et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140288667A1 · Oxley · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140309538A1 · More · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20150005660A1 · Kraus · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20150038869A1 · Simon · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20150079560A1 · Cowan · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20150272465A1 · Ishii · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20150313490A1 · Archer · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20150313496A1 · Connor · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20150317817A1 · Ryu · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20150338917A1 · Steiner · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20150351655A1 · Coleman · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20160077547A1 · Aimone · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20160235324A1 · Mershin · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20160242690A1 · Principe · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20170171441A1 · Kearns · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20180071648A1 · Chhatlani · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20180160982A1 · Laszlo · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20180178009A1 · Lee · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20180199840A1 · Loureiro · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20180292902A1 · Min · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20180303595A1 · Opie · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20190038438A1 · John et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190058703A1 · Zhu · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190104968A1 · Fedele · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190113973A1 · Coleman · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190166434A1 · Petley · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190336748A1 · Oxley · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20200016396A1 · Yoo · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200054284A1 · Imajo et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200061378A1 · Ganguly · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200078195A1 · John et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200205741A1 · Laszlo et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200329990A1 · Laszlo · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200363869A1 · Yoo · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200364539A1 · Anisimov · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20210055794A1 · Lee et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210064135A1 · Shenoy et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210124419A1 · Kang et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210361222A1 · Elbogen · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210361950A1 · Opie et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210365117A1 · Yoo et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20220137702A1 · Min et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220175555A1 · Robison et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20230001585A1 · Nam et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230107850A1 · Yoo et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230389851A1 · Tal · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20250082253A1 · Tal et al. · 2025 [cited by applicant]
JP 2009297474 · 2009 [cited by applicant]
JP 2018068886 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
JP 2018529171 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2018034113 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2018147407 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2019235458 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2021202915 · 2021 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2023240043 · 2023 [cited by applicant]
Caplan, J. et al. “Distinct Patterns of Brain Oscillations Underlie Two Basic Parameters of Human Maze Learning,” [cited by applicant]
Felsenstein, O. et al. “Decoding multimodal behavior using time differences of MEG events,” accessed at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/330617446_Decoding_multimodal_behavior_using_time_differences_of_MEG_even… [cited by applicant]
Jones, S. “When brain rhythms aren't ‘rhythmic’: implication for their mechanisms and meaning,” [cited by applicant]
Karvat, G et al. “Real-time detection of neural oscillation bursts allows behaviourally relevant neurofeedback,” [cited by applicant]
Lakatos, P. et al. “Attention and arousal related modulation of spontaneous gamma-activity in the auditory cortex of the cat,” [cited by applicant]
Lundqvist, M. et al. “Gamma and beta bursts underlie working memory,” [cited by applicant]
Neymotin, S. et al. “Detecting Spontaneous Neural Oscillation Events in Primate Auditory Cortex,” [cited by applicant]
Quinn, A. et al. “Unpacking Transient Event Dynamics in Electrophysiological Power Spectra,” [cited by applicant]
Sherman, M. et al. “Neural mechanisms of transient neocortical beta rhythms: Converging evidence from humans, computational modeling, monkeys, and mice,” [cited by applicant]
Shin, H. et al. “The rate of transient beta frequency events predicts behavior across tasks and species,” [cited by applicant]
Tal, I. et al. “Imaging the Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Cognitive Processes at High Temporal Resolution,” [cited by applicant]
Tal, I. et al. “Temporal accuracy of human cortico-cortical interactions,” [cited by applicant]
Pfurtscheller, G. et al. “‘Thought’—control of functional electrical stimulation to restore hand grasp in a patient with tetraplegia,” [cited by applicant]
Torrecillos, F. et al. “Modulation of Beta Bursts in the Subthalamic Nucleus Predicts Motor Performance,” [cited by applicant]