IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,556,630
Granted Patent B2
US 12,556,630 · App. 18/464,256 · Granted Feb 17, 2026

System and method for food safety audit and sampling

Inventors: Seth Oren (Edgerton, WI); Eric Engman (Cedarburg, WI)
Assignee: Crop Search LLC
H04M1/72457G06Q50/02
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,556,630
App. No.
18/464,256
Granted
Feb 17, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

Disclosed herein are embodiments of a system, method, and non-transitory computer-readable storage media for generating sampling plans for a selected agriculture area and providing a user interface configured to display sampling plan information to a user to allow for validation and traceability of sample collection in the agriculture area. One or more embodiments allow for sample plan information to be based in part on food safety audit information, some or all of which may have been collected using the system.

Claims (33)

1 . A mobile device for sampling an agricultural area comprising:

at least one processor;

a non-transitory computer readable storage medium;

a display; and

a geolocation subsystem,

wherein the non-transitory computer readable storage medium stores instructions that, when executed by the at least one processor, perform a method comprising:

displaying, on the display of the mobile device, map information of an agriculture area overlaid with a plurality of sampling plan visual elements and a geolocator visual element; and

determining, using the geolocation subsystem, the current location of the mobile device,

wherein each sampling plan visual element provides an indication of the geographic location of a sampling location according to a sampling plan for the agriculture area, and

wherein the geolocator visual element provides an indication of the current location of the mobile device, and

wherein the sampling plan is based in part on food safety audit information.

2 . The mobile device of claim 1 , wherein the sampling plan consists essentially of a set of a set of sampling locations.

3 . The mobile device of claim 1 , wherein the method further comprises changing the visual appearance of any of the plurality of sampling plan visual elements if the current location of the mobile device is within a predetermined area centered on the geographic location of the sampling location indicated by the sampling plan visual element.

4 . The mobile device of claim 1 , wherein the method further comprises changing the visual appearance of any of the plurality of sampling plan visual elements if the current location of the mobile device is within a predetermined distance from the geographic location of the sampling location indicated by the sampling plan visual element.

5 . The mobile device of claim 1 , wherein the geolocation subsystem comprises one or more GNSS receivers.

6 . The mobile device of claim 1 , wherein the method further comprises displaying, on the display of the mobile device, a compliance interface element that is configured to accept a user interaction only when one or more preconfigured sample collection compliance criteria have been satisfied, wherein the user interaction causes the mobile device to store a log entry recording information indicative of the user interaction.

7 . The mobile device of claim 6 , wherein the log entry is stored in memory of the mobile device.

8 . The mobile device of claim 6 , wherein the compliance interface element is a button and wherein preconfigured sample collection compliance criteria includes a proximity requirement comprising the current location of the mobile device being within a predetermined distance from the geographic location of a sampling location.

9 . The mobile device of claim 8 , wherein the preconfigured sample collection compliance criteria further includes a dwell time requirement comprising the current location of the mobile device being within the predetermined distance for at least a predetermined amount of time.

10 . The mobile device of claim 8 , wherein the preconfigured sample collection compliance criteria further includes a dwell time requirement comprising the current location of the mobile device being within the predetermined distance for at least a predetermined amount of time.

11 . The mobile device of claim 1 , wherein the sampling plan comprises a list of sampling locations determined using a random sampling model, a stratified random sampling model, or a geometric-pattern sampling model.

12 . The mobile device of claim 1 , wherein the sampling plan comprises a list of sampling locations determined using a weighted strata random sampling model in which the strata are weighted based in part on food safety audit information.

13 . A mobile device for performing a food safety audit of an agriculture area comprising:

at least one processor;

a non-transitory computer readable storage medium;

a display; and

a geolocation subsystem,

wherein the non-transitory computer readable storage medium stores instructions that, when executed by the at least one processor, perform a method comprising:

displaying, on the display of the mobile device, a user interface (UI) comprising a map of an agriculture area and at least one food safety control element, wherein the at least one food safety control element is configured to provide a plurality of food safety map marker elements for selection by a user; and

marking, by a user, at least one food safety risk existing in relation to the agriculture area using a food safety marker element,

wherein the step of marking comprises selecting on the UI an appropriate food safety marker element from the plurality of food safety map marker elements and geolocating the food safety marker element on the map to be proximate the at least one food safety risk.

14 . The mobile device of claim 13 , wherein the at least one food safety risk is selected from the group consisting essentially of static-type food safety risks and variable-type food safety risks.

15 . The mobile device of claim 14 , wherein the plurality of food safety map marker elements is selected from the group consisting essentially of text, pins, circles, rectangles, polygons, lines, segmented lines, and curved lines.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 19, 2026
From: OREN, SETH; ENGMAN, ERIC
To: CROP SEARCH LLC
Reel/Frame 073505/0096 →
Continuity (2)
Continuation In Part 18051067 · Oct 31, 2022
Related Publication 20240146838A1 · May 2, 2024
References Cited (50)
US 6299934B1 · Manning · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 7194965B2 · Hickey · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 7256711B2 · Sheha · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 7411518B2 · Ratnakar · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 7860517B1 · Patoskie · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 8070629B2 · Balardeta · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8358201B1 · Haddy · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8442763B2 · Tuck · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8554243B2 · Klassen · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8682575B2 · Sakashita · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8694240B1 · Lookingbill · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8793101B2 · Yuen · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 9131642B2 · Groeneveld · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9258676B2 · Beckett · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9756844B2 · Groeneveld · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9843895B2 · Huang · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9851451B2 · Anghelescu · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 10007391B2 · Sabtelli · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10042862B2 · Gorman · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10096073B2 · Groeneveld · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10115158B2 · Lindores · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10117617B2 · Cantu · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10352718B2 · Wu · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10408623B2 · Brush · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10506373B2 · Warren · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10685303B2 · Christie · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10809072B1 · Timmons · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10842144B2 · Groeneveld · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10890452B2 · Gum · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11005801B1 · Thom · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11035687B2 · Chang · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20020160817A1 · Salmimaa · 2002 [cited by examiner]
US 20060134726A1 · Samadpour · 2006 [cited by examiner]
US 20140188658A1 · Li · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20160132196A1 · Anghelescu · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170042081A1 · Zumbach · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20180188225A1 · Viscarra Rossel · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20190043142A1 · Groeneveld · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20200104377A1 · Eamesty, Jr. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20210103728A1 · Young · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210133196A1 · Gladwin · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210144987A1 · Groeneveld · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210201025A1 · Ogawa · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20220297148A1 · Wilcox · 2022 [cited by examiner]
Jasson et al, “Alternative microbial methods: An overview and selection criteria” (Food Microbiology 27) p. 710-730. [cited by applicant]
Jongenburger et al, “Statistical Aspects of Food Safety Sampling” (Annu. Rev. Food Sci. Technol. (2015) 6:479-503. [cited by applicant]
Jongenburger et al., “Random or systematic sampling to detect a localised microbial contamination within a batch of food” (Food Control 22 (2011)) 1448-1455. [cited by applicant]
Loyola et al., “Smart sampling and incremental function learning for very large high dimensional data” Neural Networks 78 (2016) 75-87. [cited by applicant]
Schaffner, “Microbial Criteria and Testing—Probability, Sampling and Sampling Plans” United Fresh. [cited by applicant]
Xu et al, “Evaluation of sampling methods for the detection of pathogenic bacteria on pre-harvest leafy greens” (Food Microbiology 77), p. 137-145. [cited by applicant]