IP Library Granted Patent US 12,560,150
Granted Patent B2
US 12,560,150 · App. 18/699,019 · Granted Feb 24, 2026

Systems and methods for controlling a wind turbine

Inventors: Fernando Javier D'Amato (Niskayuna, NY); Hema Kumari Achanta (Schenectady, NY); Masoud Abbaszadeh (Clifton Park, NY); Kalpesh Singal (Ballston Spa, NY); Mustafa Tekin Dokucu (Latham, NY); Xu Fu (Clifton Park, NY)
Assignee: GE Vernova Renovables Espana, S.L.
F03D7/045F03D7/046F05B2260/821F05B2260/84F05B2270/404
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,560,150
App. No.
18/699,019
Granted
Feb 24, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

Systems and methods are provided for the control of a wind turbine. Accordingly, a wind classification module of a controller determines a current aerodynamic state of the wind resource based, at least in part, on a current operational data set of the wind turbine. The current operational data set is indicative of a current operation of the wind turbine. A configuration intelligence module of the controller then generates an estimated configuration for a turbine estimator module and a predictive control configuration for a predictive control module based, at least in part, on the current aerodynamic state. An operation of the wind turbine is emulated via the turbine estimator module to generate a control initial state for the predictive control module. The predictive control module then determines a predicted performance of the wind turbine over a predictive interval based on the control initial state and the predictive control configuration. The predictive control module generates a set point for at least one actuator of the wind turbine based on the predicted performance, and an operating state of the wind turbine is affected via the at least one actuator in accordance with the setpoint.

Claims (64)

1 . A method for controlling a wind turbine, the wind turbine including a controller, the method comprising:

determining, via a wind classification module of the controller, a current aerodynamic state of a wind resource based, at least in part, on a current operational data set of the wind turbine indicative of a current operation of the wind turbine;

generating, via a configuration intelligence module of the controller, an estimator configuration for a turbine estimator module based, at least in part on the current aerodynamic state;

emulating, via the turbine estimator module of the controller, an operation of the wind turbine so as to generate a control initial state for a predictive control module, wherein the control initial state comprises a modeled current operating state of a plurality of components of the wind turbine;

generating, via the configuration intelligence module, a predictive control configuration for the predictive control module based, at least in part, on the current aerodynamic state, wherein generating the estimator configuration and the predictive control configuration further comprises selecting, via the configuration intelligence module, a gain tuning of a plurality of gain tunings based on the current aerodynamic state, wherein each gain tuning is configured to modify at least one of the estimator configuration and the predictive control configuration;

determining, via the predictive control module of the controller, a predicted performance of the wind turbine over a predictive interval based on the control initial state and the predictive control configuration;

generating, via the predictive control module, a setpoint for at least one actuator of the wind turbine based on the predicted performance; and

affecting an operating state of the wind turbine via the at least one actuator in accordance with the setpoint.

2 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the wind classification module comprises a first plurality of aeroelastic estimators, wherein each aeroelastic estimator is tuned to a different presumptive wind condition, and wherein determining the current aerodynamic state further comprises:

generating, via the wind classification module, a plurality of wind descriptive parameters from each aeroelastic estimator based, at least in part, on the current operational data set; and

determining, via the wind classification module, the current aerodynamic state based on a designated portion of the pluralities of wind descriptive parameters.

3 . The method of claim 2 , further comprising determining the designated portion of the pluralities of wind descriptive parameters by:

a) modelling, via the controller, a projected operational response of the wind turbine to one potential aerodynamic state of a plurality of potential aerodynamic states of the wind resource to generate a projected operational data set;

b) generating, via the each aeroelastic estimator of the first plurality of aeroelastic estimators, a plurality of projected wind descriptive parameters based on the projected operational data set;

c) determining a portion of the pluralities of projected wind descriptive parameters that replicates the one potential aerodynamic state;

d) correlating the portion of the pluralities of projected wind descriptive parameters to the projected operational data set corresponding to the potential aerodynamic state;

e) repeating steps a)-d) for a remainder of the plurality of potential aerodynamic states, wherein the plurality of potential aerodynamic states corresponds to an environmental operating envelope of the wind turbine;

f) generating, via the controller, an operational-response signature data set comprising the projected operational data set at each potential aerodynamic state of the plurality of potential aerodynamic states and the portion of the pluralities of projected wind descriptive parameters that corresponds; and

determining, via the wind classification module, the designated portion of the pluralities of wind descriptive parameters based on the operational-response signature data set, the pluralities of wind descriptive parameters, and the current operational data set.

4 . The method of claim 3 , wherein determining the designated portion of the pluralities of wind descriptive parameters further comprises:

implementing at least one machine learning algorithm within the wind classification module to generate the operational-response signature data set;

implementing the at least one machine learning algorithm to determine the designated portion of the pluralities of wind descriptive parameters corresponding to the current operational data set; and

implementing the at least one machine learning algorithm to determine the current aerodynamic state based on the designated portion of the pluralities of wind descriptive parameters.

5 . The method of claim 2 , wherein each aeroelastic estimator of the first plurality of aeroelastic estimators comprises at least one aeroelastic model and at least one filtering algorithm, wherein the at least one aeroelastic model of each aeroelastic estimator is configured to model a behavior of the wind turbine as a multibody system of flexible structures, and wherein generating the pluralities of wind descriptive parameters further comprises:

deriving, via the at least one aeroelastic model, a resultant aerodynamic state of the wind resource that develops the current operational data set in the presence of the presumptive wind condition corresponding to the tuning of the at least one aerodynamic model; and

determining the plurality of wind descriptive parameters corresponding to the resultant aerodynamic state derived by the at least one aeroelastic model of each aeroelastic estimator of the first plurality of aeroelastic estimators.

6 . The method of claim 1 , wherein generating the estimator configuration and the predictive control configuration further comprises:

determining, via an operating condition module of the controller, a current operating condition of the wind turbine based, at least in part, on the current operational data set, wherein the operational data set further comprises a plurality of output signals from a sensor system of the wind turbine and at least one control signal from the controller;

generating, via the configuration intelligence module of the controller, the estimator configuration for the turbine estimator module based, at least in part, on the current aerodynamic state and the current operating condition; and

generating, via the configuration intelligence module, the predictive control configuration for the predictive control module based, at least in part, on the current aerodynamic state and the current operating condition.

7 . The method of claim 6 , wherein the operating condition module comprises a second plurality of aeroelastic estimators, wherein each aeroelastic estimator is tuned to a different presumptive fault condition of the wind turbine, and wherein determining the current operating condition further comprises:

generating, via the operating condition module, a plurality of descriptive operating parameters from the second plurality of aeroelastic estimators based, at least in part, on the current operational data set; and

determining, via the operating condition module, the current operating condition of the wind turbine based on a designated portion of the plurality of descriptive operating parameters.

8 . The method of claim 7 , wherein determining the designated portion of the plurality of descriptive operating parameters comprises:

a) modelling, via the controller, a projected plurality of sensor outputs from the sensor system under one potential fault condition of a plurality of potential fault conditions for a projected operating condition;

b) generating, via the second plurality of aeroelastic estimators, a plurality of projected descriptive operating parameters based on a projected operational data set corresponding to the projected operating condition;

c) determining a portion of the plurality of projected descriptive operating parameters that replicates the projected plurality of sensor outputs;

d) correlating the portion of the plurality of projected descriptive operating parameters to the projected plurality of sensor outputs to the one potential fault condition that corresponds;

e) repeating steps a)-d) for a remainder of the plurality of potential fault conditions; implementing at least one machine learning algorithm within the operating condition module to generate a fault signature data set comprising the projected plurality of sensor outputs at each potential fault condition and the corresponding portion of the plurality of projected descriptive operating parameters;

implementing the at least one machine learning algorithm to determine the designated portion of the plurality of descriptive operating parameters based on the fault signature data set and the current operational data set; and

implementing the at least one machine learning algorithm to determine the current operating condition based on the designated portion of the plurality of descriptive operating parameters.

9 . The method of claim 7 , wherein each aeroelastic estimator of the second plurality of aeroelastic estimators comprises at least one aeroelastic model and at least one filtering algorithm, wherein the at least one aeroelastic model of each aeroelastic estimator is configured to model a behavior of the wind turbine as a multibody system of flexible structures.

10 . The method of claim 7 , wherein selecting the gain tuning of the plurality of gain tunings further comprises:

selecting, via the configuration intelligence module, the gain tuning based on the current aerodynamic state and the current operating condition, wherein each gain tuning is configured to modify at least one of the estimator configuration and the predictive control configuration based on the current aerodynamic state of the wind resource and the current operating condition of the wind turbine.

11 . The method of claim 10 , wherein selecting the gain tuning of the plurality of gain tunings further comprises:

determining a prioritization schedule for the plurality of gain tunings; and

selecting, via the configuration intelligence module, the gain tuning in accordance with the prioritization schedule based on the current aerodynamic state and the current operating condition.

12 . The method of claim 11 , wherein selecting the gain tuning of the plurality of gain tunings further comprises:

receiving, via a feedback assessment module of the controller, at least one feedback signal from the turbine estimator module, wherein the at least one feedback signal is indicative of an emulated operation of the wind turbine in response to the aerodynamic state and the current operating condition; and

modifying, via the controller, at least one gain tuning of the plurality of gain tunings of the configuration intelligence module based on the at least one feedback signal.

13 . The method of claim 7 , further comprising:

receiving, via the wind classification module and the operating condition module, at least one feedback signal from the turbine estimator module, wherein the at least one feedback signal is indicative of an emulated operation of the wind turbine in response to the aerodynamic state and the current operating condition; and

modifying, via the controller, at least one of the plurality of descriptive operating parameters, the designated portion of the plurality of descriptive operating parameters, the pluralities of wind descriptive parameters, or the designated portion of the pluralities of wind descriptive parameters based on the at least one feedback signal.

14 . The method of claim 7 , wherein emulating the operation of the wind turbine further comprises:

computing, via the turbine estimator module, a continuous data stream indicative of a structural state of the wind turbine.

15 . The method of claim 1 , generating the estimator configuration and the predictive control configuration further comprises:

detecting, via the configuration intelligence module, a difference between the current aerodynamic state and an immediate-past aerodynamic state necessitating a gain transition; and

implementing, via the configuration intelligence module, a transition algorithm corresponding to the current aerodynamic state to smoothly transition between an immediate-past gain tuning and the selected gain tuning corresponding to the current aerodynamic state.

16 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the estimator configuration comprises at least a process-noise gain and a sensor-noise gain.

17 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the predictive control configuration comprises at least gains corresponding to tracking weights, slack weights, and constraint limits.

18 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

implementing, via the controller, a plurality of parallel calculations to determine or generate the estimator configuration, the predictive control configuration, the control initial state, the predicted performance of the wind turbine, and the setpoint.

19 . The method of claim 18 , wherein implementing the plurality of parallel calculations further comprises:

executing a plurality of advanced vector extension instructions in parallel.

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 22, 2026
From: GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY
To: GENERAL ELECTRIC RENOVABLES ESPAÑA S.L.
Reel/Frame 073541/0395 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 5, 2024
From: D'AMATO, FERNANDO JAVIER; ACHANTA, HEMA KUMARI; ABBASZADEH, MASOUD; SINGAL, KALPESH; DOKUCU, MUSTAFA TEKIN; FU, XU
To: GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY
Reel/Frame 067018/0679 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20240401565A1 · Dec 5, 2024
References Cited (213)
US 4455614A · Martz et al. · 1984 [cited by applicant]
US 7062370B2 · Vhora et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 7225343B1 · Honig et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 7805205B2 · Santos · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7818276B2 · Veillette et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 8191136B2 · Dudfield et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8219356B2 · Mihok et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8468244B2 · Redlich et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8756047B2 · Patel · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8849737B1 · Engler · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8973123B2 · Bjones et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 8973124B2 · Chong et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9046886B2 · Chong et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9130983B2 · Heo et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9245116B2 · Evans et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9379951B2 · Mihnev · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9384885B2 · Karalis et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9397997B2 · Chong et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9405900B2 · Dixit et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9483049B2 · Maeda et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9541065B2 · Chauvin et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9645574B2 · Frankenstein et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9712553B2 · Nguyen et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9719494B2 · Prats Mustaros et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9752561B2 · Egedal et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9784241B2 · Blom · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 9822762B2 · Kooijman · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 9983555B2 · Bengston · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 9998487B2 · Mestha et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10267291B2 · Hammerum et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10302067B2 · Herbsleb et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10303954B2 · Xiao et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10337497B2 · Hammerum et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10344740B2 · Caponetti et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10387728B2 · Arya et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10417415B2 · Abbaszadeh et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10465659B2 · Hammerum et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10594712B2 · Mestha et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10678912B2 · Mestha et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10691087B2 · D'Amato et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10728282B2 · Mestha et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10749890B1 · Aloisio et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10954919B1 · Evans et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 10975845B2 · Grunnet et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11053918B2 · Hovgaard et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11125209B2 · Kjaer et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11293404B2 · Hovgaard et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11384730B2 · Dalsgaard et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11421652B2 · Thomsen et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11429713B1 · Donovan et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11519386B2 · Grunnet et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11525432B2 · Von Aswege · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11629694B2 · D'Amato · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20020032717A1 · Malan et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20060010493A1 · Piesco et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20070289013A1 · Lim · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20080010225A1 · Gonsalves et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080288330A1 · Hildebrand et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20110020122A1 · Parthasarathy et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110148112A1 · Ormel et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110272161A1 · Kumaran et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20120049516A1 · Viassolo · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120209539A1 · Kim · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20130104236A1 · Ray et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130110414A1 · Caponetti et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130132149A1 · Wei et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130174664A1 · Olesen · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130204664A1 · Romagnolo et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130214535A1 · Brath · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130291115A1 · Chong et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130318022A1 · Yadav et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20140003939A1 · Adams et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140103652A1 · Ubben et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140107521A1 · Galan · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140201780A1 · Wong et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140244192A1 · Craig et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140283047A1 · Dixit et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140297635A1 · Orduna et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140298399A1 · Heo et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140337973A1 · Foster et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140359708A1 · Schwartz · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20150033341A1 · Schmidtler et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150095003A1 · Horowitz et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150118047A1 · Yoon et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150149174A1 · Gollan et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150249864A1 · Tang et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150346706A1 · Gendelman · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150347902A1 · Butler, Jr. et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20160033941A1 · T et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160127931A1 · Baxley et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160212100A1 · Banerjee · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160222816A1 · Chen et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160252075A1 · Kruger et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160328654A1 · Bauer et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160333855A1 · Lund et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160341636A1 · Rajaram et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160369777A1 · Chiang et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170034205A1 · Canedo et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170052960A1 · Alizadeh-Shabdiz et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170054751A1 · Schneider et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170142133A1 · Kallos · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170244726A1 · Finkel et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170284896A1 · Harpale et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170310690A1 · Mestha et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170346840A1 · Barkan · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170350369A1 · Evans et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170352245A1 · Maher et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20180100488A1 · Miranda et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180115561A1 · Sun et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180137277A1 · Mestha et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180142674A1 · Hammerum et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180157831A1 · Abbaszadeh et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180266392A1 · Hovgaard et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180268264A1 · Marwah et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180276375A1 · Arov et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180335018A1 · Cao et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180367550A1 · Musuvathi et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20190128242A1 · Grunnet et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190154000A1 · Hammerum et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190190938A1 · Oba et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190230119A1 · Mestha et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190362070A1 · Abbaszadeh · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20200056588A1 · Nielsen · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200244677A1 · Abbaszadeh et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200271093A1 · Grunnet et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200291922A1 · Hovgaard et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200318614A1 · Hovgaard et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200340450A1 · Grunnet et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20210081270A1 · Abbaszadeh et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210295439A1 · Konrardy et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210372371A1 · Nielsen et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20220046047A1 · Lewis · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220213870A1 · De Bot · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220334540A1 · D'Amato et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220345468A1 · Yan et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20230077025A1 · Fu et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
CN 102175449B · 2012 [cited by applicant]
CN 109460621A · 2019 [cited by applicant]
CN 112261042A · 2021 [cited by applicant]
DE 102013208084B3 · 2014 [cited by applicant]
EP 3239884A1 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
EP 3436694A1 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
EP 3452877A1 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
EP 3465360A1 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
EP 3734063A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
JP 2018178900A · 2018 [cited by applicant]
KR 20140109132A · 2014 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2014144857A2 · 2014 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2015092817A1 · 2015 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2016020660A1 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2016139097A1 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2016172514A1 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2016176682A1 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2019052617A1 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2019110063A1 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2019114896A1 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2019120419A1 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2019214786A1 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2020078518A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2021066867A1 · 2021 [cited by applicant]
PCT International Search Report Corresponding to PCT/US2021/053915 on Jul. 4, 2022. [cited by applicant]
PCT International Search Report Corresponding to PCT/US2021/053915 on Apr. 18, 2024. [cited by applicant]
Almalawi et al., An Unsupervised Anomaly-Based Detection Approach for Integrity Attacks on SCADA Systems, ScienceDirect, Computers & Security, vol. 46, Oct. 2014, pp. 94-110. (Abstract Only) https://doi.org/10.1016/1.co… [cited by applicant]
Badihi et al., A Review on Application of Monitoring, Diagnosis, and Fault-tolerant Control to Wind Turbines, 2013 Conference on Control and Fault-Tolerant Systems (SysTol), Nice, France, Oct. 9-11, 2013, pp. 365-370. [cited by applicant]
Badihi et al., Model-Based Fault-Tolerant Pitch Control of an Offshore Wind Turbine, IFAC—Papersonline, vol. 51, Issue 18, 2018, pp. 221-226. (Abstract Only). [cited by applicant]
Cho et al., Model-based Fault Detection, Fault Isolation and Fault-tolerant Control of a Blade Pitch System in Floating Wind Turbines, Renewable Energy, vol. 120, May 2018, pp. 306-321. [cited by applicant]
Datta et al, Cyber Threat Analysis Framework for the Wind Energy Based Power System, CPS '17: Proceedings of the 2017 Workshop on Cyber-Physical Systems Security and Privacy, Nov. 2017, pp. 81-92. https://doi.org/10.114… [cited by applicant]
El-Baklish et al., Nonlinear Model Predictive Pitch Control of Aero-Elastic Wind Turbine Blades, Renewable Energy, vol. 161, 2020, 777-791. [cited by applicant]
Feng et al., A Model-Based Predictive Control for FTC for Wind Turbine Speed Sensor Fault, 2013 Conference on Control and Fault-Tolerant Systems (SYSTOL), IEEE, XP032545765, Oct. 9, 2013, pp. 504-509. (Abstract Only). [cited by applicant]
Frison et al., BLASFEO: Basic Linear Algebra Subroutines for Embedded Optimization, ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software, vol. 44, No. 4, , 2017, 30 Pages. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3210754. [cited by applicant]
Frison et al., HPIPM: A High-Performance Quadratic Programming Framework for Model Predictive Control, IFAC—PapersOnLine, vol. 53, Issue 2, 2020, 6563-6569. [cited by applicant]
Frison et al., HPMPC—A New Software Package with Efficient Solvers for Model Predictive Control, 2015, 19 Pages. http://smart-cities-centre.org/wp-content/uploads/06-Frison-cities.pdf. [cited by applicant]
Frison et al., The BLAS API of BLASFEO Optimizing Performance for Small Matrices, ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software, vol. 46, Issue 2, Article No. 15, 1-36. (Abstract Only) https://doi.org/10.1145/3378671. [cited by applicant]
Gambier et al., Modeling the Aerodynamics of Wind Turbines for Real-Time Simulation and Control Purposes, IEEE 2017 11th Asian Control Conference (ASCC), 2017, 1432-1437. [cited by applicant]
Gao et al., On Cyber Attacks and Signature Based Intrusion Detection for Modbus Based Industrial Control Systems, Journal of Digital Forensics, Security and Law, vol. 9, No. 1, 2014, 20 Pages. [cited by applicant]
Jiang et al., Wind Turbine Fault Detection Using a Denoising Autoencoder with Temporal Information, IEEE, Journals & Magazines, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, vol. 23, Issue 1, Feb. 2018, pp. 89-100. (Abstract … [cited by applicant]
Kanev et al., Wind Turbine Extreme Gust Control, Wind Energy, vol. 13, 2010, 18-35. [cited by applicant]
Karimipour et al., Relaxation-based Anomaly Detection in Cyber-Physical Systems Using Ensemble KalmanFilter, ResearchGate, IET Cyber-Physical Systems Theory & Applications, vol. 5, Issue 1, 2020, p. 49-58. https://www.r… [cited by applicant]
Kavaz et al., Fault Detection of Wind Turbine Sensors Using Artificial Neural Networks, Journal of Sensors, Dec. 19, 2018, 12 Pages. [cited by applicant]
Kerres et al., Economic Evaluation of Maintenance Strategies for Wind Turbines: A Stochastic Analysis, The Institution of Engineering and Technology (IET), Journals & Magazines, IET Renewable Power Generation, vol. 9, I… [cited by applicant]
Knowles et al., A Survey of Cyber Security Management in Industrial Control Systems, International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, vol. 9, 2015, pp. 52-80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcip.2015.02.002. [cited by applicant]
Knudsen et al., A Nonlinear Model Predictive Control Scheme for Sensor Fault Tolerance in Observation Processes, International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control, vol. 30, Issue 14, 2020, 5657-5677. https://doi.org… [cited by applicant]
Kosek et al., Ensemble Regression Model-based Anomaly Detection for Cyber-Physical Intrusion Detection in Smart Grids, 2016 IEEE Electrical Power and Energy Conference (EPEC), 2016, Ottawa, ON Canada. (Abstract Only) ht… [cited by applicant]
Li et al., Data Driven Condition Monitoring of Wind Power Plants Using Cluster Analysis, IEEE, 2015 International Conference on Cyber-Enabled Distributed Computing and Knowledge Discovery, 2015, Xi'an China. (Abstract O… [cited by applicant]
Li et al., Asset-Based Dynamic Impact Assessment of Cyberattacks for Risk Analysis in Industrial Control Systems, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, IEEE Service Center, vol. 14, No. 2, 2018, 608-618. [cited by applicant]
Lio et al., Kalman-Based Interacting Multiple-Model Wind Speed Estimator for Wind Turbines, Department of Wind Energy—Technical University of Denmark, 2021, 6 pages. [cited by applicant]
Lio et al., A Review on Applications of Model Predictive Control to Wind Turbines, In: Control (Control), 2014 UKACC International Conference on Control, 2014, 7 Pages. [cited by applicant]
Mahmoud et al., Adaptive and Predictive Control Strategies for Wind Turbine Systems: A Survey, IEEE CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica, vol. 6, No. 2, 2019, 364-378. [cited by applicant]
Mantere et al., Challenges of Machine Learning Based Monitoring for Industrial Control System Networks, Advanced Information Networking and Applications Workshops (WAINA), 2012 26th International Conference, Fukuoka, Ma… [cited by applicant]
Mohammadpourfard et al., Identification of False Data Injection Attacks with Considering the Impact of Wind Generation and Topology Reconfigurations, IEEE, Journals & Magazines, IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy, … [cited by applicant]
Mulders et al., Preventing Wind Turbine Tower Natural Frequency Excitation with a Quasi-LPV Model Predictive Control Scheme, Wind Energy, vol. 23, Issue 3, 2019, 627-644. https://doi.org/10.1002/we.2447. [cited by applicant]
Nalavade et al., Finding Frequent Itemsets using Apriori Algorihm to Detect Intrusions in Large Dataset, International Journal of Computer Applications & Information Technology, vol. 6, Issue 1, Jun.-Jul. 2014, pp. 84-9… [cited by applicant]
Nath, Low Latency Anomaly Detection with Imperfect Models, Dissertation University of Arkansas, May 2020, 24 pages. [cited by applicant]
Odgaard et al., A Benchmark Evaluation of Fault Tolerant Wind Turbine Control Concepts, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, vol. 23, Issue 3, 2015, 1221-1228. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCST.2014.2361291. [cited by applicant]
Odgaard et al., On Using Pareto Optimality to Tune a Linear Model Predictive Controller for Wind Turbines, Renewable Energy, vol. 87, 2016, 884-891. [cited by applicant]
Petrovic et al., MPC Framework for Constrained Wind Turbine Individual Pitch Control, Wind Energy, 2020, 1-15. [cited by applicant]
Qian et al., A Novel Wind Turbine Condition Monitoring Method Based on Cloud Computing, Science Direct, Renewable Energy, vol. 135, May 2019, pp. 390-398. (Abstract Only) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2018.12.045. [cited by applicant]
Qiao et al., A Survey on Wind Turbine Condition Monitoring and Fault Diagnosis—Part II: Signals and Signal Processing Methods, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 62, Issue 10, Oct. 2015, 6546-6557. https:… [cited by applicant]
Rasmussen et al., Application of Functional Modeling for Monitoring of WTG in a Cyber-Physical Environment, ResearchGate, IET Cyber-Physical Systems Theory & Applications, vol. 4, Jul. 2018, 9 Pages. https://www.researc… [cited by applicant]
Recalde et al., Gusts Detection in a Horizontal Wind Turbine by Monitoring of Innovations Error of an Extended Kalman Filter, Journal of Physics: Conference Series 753, 2016, 11 Pages. [cited by applicant]
Rezamand et al., A New Hybrid Fault Detection Method for Wind Turbine Blades Using Recursive PCA and Wavelet-Based PDF, IEEE, Journals & Magazines, Sensors Journal, vol. 20, Issue 4, Feb. 15, 2020, pp. 2023-2033. (Abstr… [cited by applicant]
Skormin et al., The Behavioral Approach to Diagnostics of Cyber-Physical Systems, AUTOTESTCON, 2014 IEEE, St. Louis, MO, Sep. 15-18, 2014, pp. 26-30. [cited by applicant]
Soliman et al., Multiple Model Multiple-Input Multiple-Output Predictive Control for Variable Speed Variable Pitch Wind Energy Conversion Systems, IET Renewable Power Generation, vol. 4, No. 2, 2011, 124-136. [cited by applicant]
Vanini et al., Fault Detection and Isolation of a Dual Spool Gas Turbine Engine Using Dynamic Neural Networks and Multiple Model Approach, ScienceDirect, vol. 259, Feb. 20, 2014, pp. 234-251. (Abstract Only) https://doi… [cited by applicant]
Vencore Labs, Vencore Labs to Assist DARPA in Protecting The Nation's Electrical Grid, PR Newswire a Cision Company, Chantilly, VA, Sep. 13, 2016, 2 Pages. http://www.econline.com/doc/yencore-labs-to-assist-darpa-in-pro… [cited by applicant]
Wang, Unified Estimator for Offshore Wind Turbines—Prepare WTLin DataIn from Bladed Simulations, 2019, 12 pages. [cited by applicant]
Xu et al., Adaptive Fault Detection in Wind Turbine via RF and CUSUM, The Institution of Engineering and Technology (IET), Journals & Magazines, IET Renewable Power Generation, vol. 14, Issue 10, Jul. 27, 2020, pp. 1789… [cited by applicant]
Yampikulsakul et al., Condition Monitoring of Wind Power System with Nonparametric Regression Analysis, IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, vol. 29, Issue 2, Jun. 2014, pp. 288-299. [cited by applicant]
Yan et al., On Accurate and Reliable Anomaly Detection for Gas Turbine Combustors: A Deep Learning Approach, Annual Conference of the Prognostics and Health Management Society, 2015, pp. 1-8. [cited by applicant]
Yi et al., Discriminative Feature Learning for Blade Icing Fault Detection of Wind Turbine, IOP Science, Measurement Science and Technology, 115102, vol. 31, No. 11, Aug. 25, 2020. (Abstract Only) https://doi.org/10.108… [cited by applicant]
Yu, Unsupervised Machine Learning Anomaly Detection for Multivariate Time-Series Data in Wind Turbine Converters, Theseus, May 2020, 63 Pages. [cited by applicant]
Zhang et al., A Data-Driven Design for Fault Detection of Wind Turbines Using Random Forests and XGboost, IEEE, Journals & Magazines, vol. 6, 2018, pp. 21020-21031. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2818678. [cited by applicant]
Zhang et al., Fault Diagnosis Strategy for Wind Turbine Generator Based on the Gaussian Process Metamodel, Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2020, Article ID 4295093, 2020, 10 Pages. https://www.hindawi.com/jou… [cited by applicant]