IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,561,802
Granted Patent B2
US 12,561,802 · App. 18/265,016 · Granted Feb 24, 2026

Analysing ultrasound image data of the rectus abdominis muscles

Inventors: Jingping Xu (Shanghai, CN); Xiaowei Hong (Shanghai, CN); Zhouye Chen (Shanghai, CN); Yishuang Meng (Shanghai, CN)
Assignee: KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V.
G06T7/0012A61B8/0858G06T7/70G06T2207/10016G06T2207/10132G06T2207/20081G06T2207/20101G06T2207/30168
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,561,802
App. No.
18/265,016
Granted
Feb 24, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

An apparatus for use in analysing ultrasound image data of rectus abdominis muscles of a subject. The apparatus comprises a memory comprising instruction data representing a set of instructions, and a processor configured to communicate with the memory and to execute the set of instructions. The set of instructions, when executed by the processor, cause the processor to: obtain a sequence of ultrasound image data of the rectus abdominis muscles, the sequence of ultrasound image data having image data having been obtained using an ultrasound transducer tilted at different angles to the surface of the skin of the subject and thus having different angles of ingress of the ultrasound waves into the skin. The processor is further caused to select ultrasound image data from the sequence of ultrasound image data, the selected ultrasound image data comprising image data in the sequence in which a region of the rectus abdominis muscle appears clearest compared to other image data in the sequence of ultrasound image data, and make a measurement of the rectus abdominis muscles in the selected ultrasound image data.

Claims (59)

1 . An apparatus for monitoring diastasis of rectus abdominis muscles of a subject, the apparatus comprising:

a memory comprising instruction data representing a set of instructions; and

a processor configured to communicate with the memory and to execute the set of instructions, wherein the set of instructions, when executed by the processor, cause the processor to:

obtain a sequence of ultrasound images of the rectus abdominis muscles from an ultrasound system, the sequence of ultrasound images having been obtained using an ultrasound transducer of the ultrasound system tilted at different angles to a surface of skin of the subject and thus having different angles of ingress of ultrasound waves into the skin;

select an ultrasound image from the sequence of ultrasound images, the selected ultrasound image comprising an image in the sequence in which a region of the rectus abdominis muscles appears clearest compared to other images in the sequence of ultrasound images; and

make a measurement of the rectus abdominis muscles comprising locating a surface of the rectus abdominis muscles in image data automatically extracted from the selected ultrasound image.

2 . The apparatus as in claim 1 , wherein the processor being caused to select the ultrasound image from the sequence of ultrasound images comprises the processor being caused to:

select the ultrasound image in which the region of the rectus abdominis muscles appears brightest compared to other images in the sequence of ultrasound images.

3 . The apparatus as in claim 1 , wherein the processor is further caused to compare brightness of the selected ultrasound image to a threshold brightness; and

when the brightness is less than the threshold brightness, send an instruction to a user display to cause the user display to indicate that a new sequence of ultrasound images of the rectus abdominis muscles should be obtained; and

repeat selecting another ultrasound image for the new sequence of ultrasound images, making a measurement of the rectus abdominis muscles in the selected another ultrasound image.

4 . The apparatus as in claim 1 , wherein the processor being caused to select the ultrasound image from the sequence of ultrasound images comprises the processor being caused to:

select the ultrasound image in which the region of the rectus abdominis muscles appears sharpest compared to other images in the sequence of ultrasound images.

5 . The apparatus as in claim 1 , wherein the processor being caused to select the ultrasound image from the sequence of ultrasound images comprises the processor being caused to:

select the ultrasound image having a maximum average intensity.

6 . The apparatus as in claim 1 , wherein the processor being caused to select the ultrasound image from the sequence of ultrasound images comprises the processor being caused to:

determine a measure of difference in intensity between neighbouring pairs of images in the sequence of ultrasound images; and

select the ultrasound image having a largest measure of difference in intensity.

7 . The apparatus as in claim 1 , wherein the processor (being caused to the select ultrasound image from the sequence of ultrasound images comprises the processor being caused to:

determine a measure of correlation between neighbouring pairs of images in the sequence of ultrasound images; and

select the ultrasound image having a largest measure of correlation.

8 . The apparatus as in claim 1 , wherein the sequence of ultrasound images comprises images having been obtained over a midline of an anterior abdomen towards a pubic symphysis.

9 . The apparatus as in claim 1 , wherein said different angles comprise different angles spanning a range greater than about −10 degrees to about +10 degrees from a transverse plane; or spanning a range greater than about −20 degrees to about +20 degrees from the transverse plane.

10 . The apparatus as in claim 1 wherein the measurement of the rectus abdominis muscles comprises a measure of muscle thickness and/or a measure of separation of the rectus abdominis muscles.

11 . The apparatus as in claim 10 , wherein the measurement is for use in monitoring diastasis recti in the subject.

12 . An ultrasound imaging system comprising the apparatus of claim 1 and the ultrasound transducer with which to obtain the sequence of ultrasound images.

13 . A computer implemented method for use in analyzing ultrasound image data of rectus abdominis muscles of a subject, the method comprising:

obtaining a sequence of ultrasound images of the rectus abdominis muscles, the sequence of ultrasound images having been obtained using an ultrasound transducer tilted at different angles to a surface of skin of the subject and thus having different angles of ingress of ultrasound waves into the skin;

selecting an ultrasound image from the sequence of ultrasound images, the selected ultrasound image comprising an image in the sequence in which a region of the rectus abdominis muscles appears clearest compared to other images in the sequence of ultrasound images; and

making a measurement of the rectus abdominis muscles in the selected ultrasound image, wherein making the measurement of the rectus abdominis muscles comprises locating a surface of the rectus abdominis muscles in the selected image by:

segmentation;

determining an orientation of each surface in the selected image compared to the surface of the skin, and selecting a surface as the surface of the rectus abdominis muscles based on the determined orientations;

using one or more user-input locations on the surface of the rectus abdominis muscles as seed points to trace the surface of the rectus abdominis muscles in the selected image; and/or

using a model trained using a machine learning process to predict the location of the surface of the rectus abdominis muscles.

14 . An apparatus for use in analyzing ultrasound image data of rectus abdominis muscles of a subject, the apparatus comprising:

a memory comprising instruction data representing a set of instructions; and

a processor configured to communicate with the memory and to execute the set of instructions, wherein the set of instructions, when executed by the processor, cause the processor to:

obtain a sequence of ultrasound images of the rectus abdominis muscles, the sequence of ultrasound images having been obtained using an ultrasound transducer tilted at different angles to a surface of skin of the subject and thus having different angles of ingress of ultrasound waves into the skin;

select an ultrasound image from the sequence of ultrasound images, the selected ultrasound image comprising an image in the sequence in which a region of the rectus abdominis muscles appears clearest compared to other images in the sequence of ultrasound images; and

make a measurement of the rectus abdominis muscles in the selected ultrasound image wherein making the measurement of the rectus abdominis muscles comprises locating a surface of the rectus abdominis muscles in the selected image by:

segmentation;

determining an orientation of each surface in the selected image compared to the surface of the skin, and selecting a surface as the surface of the rectus abdominis muscles based on the determined orientations;

using one or more user-input locations on the surface of the rectus abdominis muscles as seed points to trace the surface of the rectus abdominis muscles in the selected image; and/or

using a model trained using a machine learning process to predict the location of the surface of the rectus abdominis muscles.

15 . The apparatus as in claim 14 , wherein the processor being caused to select the ultrasound image from the sequence of ultrasound images comprises the processor being caused to:

select the ultrasound image in which the region of the rectus abdominis muscles appears brightest compared to other images in the sequence of ultrasound images.

16 . The apparatus as in claim 14 , wherein the processor is further caused to compare brightness of the selected ultrasound image to a threshold brightness; and

when the brightness is less than the threshold brightness, send an instruction to a user display to cause the user display to indicate that a new sequence of ultrasound images of the rectus abdominis muscles should be obtained; and

repeat selecting another ultrasound image for the new sequence of ultrasound images, making a measurement of the rectus abdominis muscles in the selected another ultrasound image.

17 . The apparatus as in claim 14 , wherein the processor being caused to select the ultrasound image from the sequence of ultrasound images comprises the processor being caused to:

select the ultrasound image in which the region of the rectus abdominis muscles appears sharpest compared to other images in the sequence of ultrasound images, or

select the ultrasound image having a maximum average intensity.

18 . The apparatus as in claim 14 , wherein the processor being caused to select the ultrasound image from the sequence of ultrasound images comprises the processor being caused to:

determine a measure of difference in intensity between neighbouring pairs of images in the sequence of ultrasound images; and

select the ultrasound image having a largest measure of difference in intensity.

19 . The apparatus as in claim 14 , wherein the processor being caused to select the ultrasound image from the sequence of ultrasound images comprises the processor being caused to:

determine a measure of correlation between neighbouring pairs of images in the sequence of ultrasound images; and

select the ultrasound image having a largest measure of correlation.

20 . The apparatus as in claim 14 , wherein the sequence of ultrasound images comprises images having been obtained over a midline of an anterior abdomen towards a pubic symphysis.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 2, 2023
From: XU, JINGPING; HONG, XIAOWEI; CHEN, ZHOUYE; MENG, YISHUANG
To: KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V.
Reel/Frame 063838/0311 →
Priority Claims (2)
WO PCT/CN2020/133817 · Dec 4, 2020 · international
EP 21152871 · Jan 22, 2021 · regional
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20240029245A1 · Jan 25, 2024
References Cited (24)
US 5997479A · Savord et al. · 1999 [cited by applicant]
US 6013032A · Powers et al. · 2000 [cited by applicant]
US 6283919B1 · Roundhill et al. · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 6458083B1 · Jago et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 6530885B1 · Entrekin et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20150325036A1 · Lee · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20170319107A1 · Nguyen · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20210128117A1 · Iseri · 2021 [cited by examiner]
KR 20190016206A · 2019 [cited by applicant]
RU 2692974C1 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
WO 2020217462A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/EP2021/083822; Mailing date: Feb. 25, 2022, 9 pages. [cited by applicant]
Keshwani, N. et al., “Inter-Rectus Distance Measurement Using Ultrasound Imaging: Does the Rater Matter?”, Physiother Can., 2016, vol. 68, No. 3, pp. 223-229. [cited by applicant]
Li, Q. et al., “Continuous thickness measurement of rectus femoris muscle in ultrasound image sequences: A completely automated approach”, Biomedical Signal Processing and Control, 2013, vol. 8, Issue 6, pp. 792-798. [cited by applicant]
Wang, J. et al., “Automatic distance measurement of abdominal aorta for ultrasonographybased visceral fat estimation”, 35th Annual International Conference of the IEEE EMBS, Japan, 2013, 4 pages. [cited by applicant]
Reinpold, W. et al., Classification of rectus diastasis—A proposal by the German Hernia Society (DHG) and the International Endohernia Society (IEHS), Review, 2019, vol. 6, Article 1, 6 pages. [cited by applicant]
Barbosa, S. et al., “Diastasis of rectus abdominis in the immediate puerperium: correlation between imaging diagnosis and clinical examination”, Arch Gynecol Obstet, 2013, vol. 288, pp. 299-303. [cited by applicant]
Michalska, A. et al., “Diastasis recti abdominis—a review of treatment methods”, Ginekologia Polska, 2018, vol. 89, No. 2, pp. 97-101. [cited by applicant]
Hills, N. et al., “Influence of Ultrasound Transducer Tilt in the Cranial and Caudal Directions on Measurements of Inter-Rectus Distance in Parous Women”, Physiotherapy Canada, 2018, vol. 70, No. 1, pp. 6-10. [cited by applicant]
Kamel. D.M. et al., “Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation and Strength Recovery of Postnatal Diastasis Recti Abdominis Muscles”, Ann Rehabil Med, 2017, vol. 41, No. 3, pp. 465-474. [cited by applicant]
Liaw, L.J. et al., “The relationships Between Inter-recti Distance Measured by Ultrasound Imaging and Abdominal Muscle Function in Postpartum Women: A 6-Month Follow-up Study”, Journal of Orthopaedic & sports physical t… [cited by applicant]
Werner, L.A. et al., “Diastasis Recti Abdominis-Diagnosis, Risk Factors, Effect on Musculoskeletal Function, Framework for Treatment and Implications for the Pelvic Floor”, Current Women's Health Reviews, 2018, vol. 14,… [cited by applicant]
Salvi, M. et al., “Transverse Muscle Ultrasound Analysis (TRAMA): Robust and Accurate Segmentation of Muscle Cross-Sectional Area”, Ultrasound in Med. & Biol., 2019, vol. 45, No. 3, pp. 672-683. [cited by applicant]
Ecabert, O. et al., “Automatic model-based segmentation of the heart in CT images”, IEEE Trans Med Imaging, 2008, vol. 27, No. 9, pp. 1189-1201. [cited by applicant]