IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,565,215
Granted Patent B2
US 12,565,215 · App. 18/472,935 · Granted Mar 3, 2026

Multi-policy lane change assistance for vehicle

Inventors: Pinaki Gupta (Fremont, CA); Kshitij Tukaram Kumbar (Fremont, CA); Ajeet Ulhas Wankhede (San Jose, CA)
Assignee: Atieva, Inc.
B60W30/18163B60W50/00G08G1/167B60W2050/0012B60W2552/10B60W2554/4041B60W2554/4046B60W2554/4049
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,565,215
App. No.
18/472,935
Granted
Mar 3, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

An advanced driver-assistance system (ADAS) comprises: a sensor; a behavior planner that performs multi-policy lane change assistance for a vehicle by evaluating multiple scenarios based on an output of the sensor using a cost-based architecture, the cost-based architecture including a Markov decision process (MDP) with a discounted horizon approach applied to pre-chosen open-loop optimistic policies that are time based, wherein the behavior planner uses the MDP for choosing among the pre-chosen open-loop optimistic policies based on respective costs associated with the pre-chosen open-loop optimistic policies, the costs determined by performing a rollout for at least one gap in a fixed time horizon; a motion planner receiving an output of the behavior planner based on the MDP; and a controller receiving an output of the motion planner and determining vehicle dynamics of the vehicle for a next timestep.

Claims (23)

1 . An advanced driver-assistance system (ADAS) comprising:

a sensor;

a behavior planner that performs multi-policy lane change assistance for a vehicle by identifying multiple gaps for the multi-policy lane change assistance and evaluating multiple scenarios based on an output of the sensor using a cost-based architecture, the cost-based architecture including a Markov decision process (MDP) with a discounted horizon approach applied to pre-chosen open-loop optimistic policies that are time based, wherein the behavior planner uses the MDP for choosing among the pre-chosen open-loop optimistic policies by evaluating respective costs of each of the pre-chosen open-loop optimistic policies, the costs determined by performing a rollout for each of the gaps in a fixed time horizon such that if a lane where an actor is located can only be predicted for a certain length of time, then a behavior of the actor is predicted in the rollout only up until the certain length of time;

a motion planner receiving an output of the behavior planner based on the MDP; and

a controller receiving an output of the motion planner, determining vehicle dynamics of the vehicle for a next timestep, and controlling motion of the vehicle according to the vehicle dynamics of the vehicle for the next timestep.

2 . The ADAS of claim 1 , where the fixed time horizon is common to each of the gaps.

3 . The ADAS of claim 1 , wherein applying the discounted horizon approach comprises prioritizing events closer to the vehicle in time over events further away from the vehicle in time.

4 . The ADAS of claim 1 , wherein each of the pre-chosen open-loop optimistic policies comprises a combination of actions for the vehicle, including a fixed trajectory represented by a velocity profile.

5 . The ADAS of claim 1 , wherein the MDP comprises iterating for each of multiple gaps identified for the multi-policy lane change assistance.

6 . The ADAS of claim 5 , wherein the MDP further comprises iterating for each of the pre-chosen open-loop optimistic policies for each of the gaps.

7 . A method comprising:

receiving a sensor output from a sensor of an advanced driver-assistance system (ADAS);

performing multi-policy lane change assistance for a vehicle including:

identifying, by a processor, multiple gaps for the multi-policy lane change assistance:

applying, by the processor, in a Markov decision process (MDP), a discounted horizon approach to pre-chosen open-loop optimistic policies that are time based; and

evaluating, by the processor, multiple scenarios based on the sensor output using a cost-based architecture, including using the MDP for choosing among the pre-chosen open-loop optimistic policies by evaluating respective costs of each of the pre-chosen open-loop optimistic policies, the costs determined by performing a rollout for each of the gaps such that if a lane where an actor is located can only be predicted for a certain length of time;

generating, by the processor, a behavior planning output based on the MDP;

generating, by the processor, amotion planning output based on the behavior planning output;

determining, by the processor, vehicle dynamics of the vehicle for a next timestep based on the motion planning output; and

controlling, by the processor, motion of the vehicle according to the vehicle dynamics of the vehicle for the next timestep.

8 . The method of claim 7 , wherein applying the discounted horizon approach comprises prioritizing events closer to the vehicle.

9 . The method of claim 7 , wherein the MDP comprises iterating for each of multiple gaps identified for the multi-policy lane change assistance.

10 . The method of claim 7 , wherein the MDP comprises iterating for each of the pre-chosen open-loop optimistic policies for each of the gaps.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 18, 2023
From: GUPTA, PINAKI; KUMBAR, KSHITIJ TUKARAM; WANKHEDE, AJEET ULHAS
To: ATIEVA, INC.
Reel/Frame 065260/0956 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 63379085 · Oct 11, 2022
Related Publication 20240116511A1 · Apr 11, 2024
References Cited (42)
US 11370435B2 · Zhao · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 11814072B2 · Johnson · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 12420844B2 · Chen · 2025 [cited by examiner]
US 20150191170A1 · Johansson · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20170242435A1 · Nilsson · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20190391580A1 · Di Cairano · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20210074162A1 · Jafari Tafti · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210253128A1 · Nister · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210341941A1 · Karaman · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210370980A1 · Ramamoorthy · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20220138568A1 · Smolyanskiy · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220146997A1 · Stepanova · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220176554A1 · Thai · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220185289A1 · Arora · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220187841A1 · Ebrahimi Afrouzi · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220258764A1 · Fairley · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220269279A1 · Redford · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20230166764A1 · Johnson · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20230174084A1 · Olson · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20230256991A1 · Johnson · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20230259830A1 · Subramanian · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20230322208A1 · Rojas · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20240010196A1 · Leung · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 20240010232A1 · Karkus · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 20240013124A1 · Vandike · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 20240017743A1 · Farid · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 20240198518A1 · Bottero · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 20240239374A1 · Nister · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 20240265263A1 · Moskovitz · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 20240326792A1 · Puphal · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 20250206354A1 · Weast · 2025 [cited by examiner]
US 20250233800A1 · Alabbasi · 2025 [cited by examiner]
Zhang, Lu, et al. “Efficient uncertainty-aware decision-making for automated driving using guided branching.” 2020 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). IEEE, 2020. (Year: 2020). [cited by examiner]
Cunningham, Alexander G., et al. “MPDM: Multipolicy decision-making in dynamic, uncertain environments for autonomous driving.” 2015 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). IEEE, 2015. (Year: 20… [cited by examiner]
Hubmann, Constantin, Michael Aeberhard, and Christoph Stiller. “A generic driving strategy for urban environments.” 2016 IEEE 19th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC). IEEE, 2016. (Year… [cited by examiner]
W. Ding, L. Zhang, J. Chen and S. Shen, “EPSILON: An Efficient Planning System for Automated Vehicles in Highly Interactive Environments,” in IEEE Transactions on Robotics, vol. 38, No. 2, pp. 1118-1138, Apr. 2022, doi:… [cited by examiner]
Galceran, E., Cunningham, A.G., Eustice, R.M. et al. Multipolicy decision-making for autonomous driving via changepoint-based behavior prediction: Theory and experiment. Auton Robot 41, 1367-1382 (2017). (Year: 2017). [cited by examiner]
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Application No. PCT/US2023/074895, mailed on Feb. 21, 2024, 12 pages. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Application No. PCT/US2023/074895, mailed on Jan. 3, 2024, 12 pages. [cited by applicant]
Bubeck, Sebastien , et al., “Open Loop Optimistic Planning”, http://sbubeck.com/COLT10_BM.pdf; Jan. 1, 2010, 15 pages. [cited by applicant]
Ding, Wenchao , et al., “Epsilon: An Efficient Planning System for Automated Vehicles in Highly Interactive Environments”, arXiv:2108.07993v1; Aug. 18, 2021, 20 pages. [cited by applicant]
C. Hubmann et al.: “A Belief State Planner for Interactive Merge Maneuvers in Congested Traffic,” 2018 21st International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), IEEE, Nov. 2018, pp. 1617-1624. [cited by applicant]