IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,565,224
Granted Patent B2
US 12,565,224 · App. 18/058,286 · Granted Mar 3, 2026

Vehicular control system having a plurality of electronic control units

Inventors: Albert Huang (Sunnyvale, CA); Sertac Karaman (Cambridge, MA); Ryan C.C. Chin (Boston, MA); Jenny Larios Berlin (Chestnut Hill, MA); Ramiro Almeida (Key Biscayne, FL)
Assignee: Magna Electronics Inc.
B60W50/029B60W30/18G05D1/0055G05D1/0088B60W2556/00
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,565,224
App. No.
18/058,286
Granted
Mar 3, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

A vehicular control system includes a plurality of electronic control units (ECUs), each providing a respective quantity of computational units representative of an amount of processing power of the respective ECU. The ECUs operate a vehicle in a nominal autonomous operational mode when a sum of the quantity of computational units exceeds a threshold. The system, while the ECUs operate the vehicle in the nominal autonomous operational mode, and responsive to detecting a failure of one of the ECUs, determines whether a sum of the quantity of computational units of the remaining ECUs that do not have a failure exceeds the threshold. The ECUs, responsive to the system determining that the sum of the quantity of computational units of the remaining ECUs fails to exceed the threshold, switches from operating the vehicle in the nominal autonomous operational mode to operating the vehicle in a degraded autonomous operational mode.

Claims (24)

1 . A vehicular control system, the vehicular control system comprising:

a plurality of electronic control units (ECUs) disposed at a vehicle equipped with the vehicular control system, wherein each respective ECU of the plurality of ECUs provides a respective quantity of computational units representative of an amount of processing power of the respective ECU, and wherein the plurality of ECUs are configured to operate the equipped vehicle in a nominal autonomous operational mode that provides a first level of autonomous vehicle control;

wherein the plurality of ECUs operate the equipped vehicle in the nominal autonomous operational mode when the vehicular control system determines that a sum of the quantity of computational units exceeds a first threshold representative of an amount of processing power required to operate in the nominal autonomous operational mode;

wherein the vehicular control system, while the plurality of ECUs operate the equipped vehicle in the nominal autonomous operational mode, and responsive to detecting a failure of one ECU of the plurality of ECUs, determines whether a sum of the quantity of computational units of the remaining ECUs of the plurality of ECUs that do not have a failure exceeds the first threshold;

wherein the plurality of ECUs, responsive to the vehicular control system determining that the sum of the quantity of computational units of the remaining ECUs of the plurality of ECUs that do not have a failure fails to exceed the first threshold, determines whether the sum of the quantity of computational units of the remaining ECUs that do not have a failure exceeds a second threshold representative of an amount of processing power required to operate in a degraded autonomous operational mode; and

wherein the plurality of ECUs, responsive to the vehicular control system determining that the sum of the quantity of computational units of the remaining ECUs of the plurality of ECUs that do not have a failure exceed the second threshold,

switches from operating the equipped vehicle in the nominal autonomous operational mode to operating the equipped vehicle in the degraded autonomous operational mode that provides a second level of autonomous vehicle control that is less capable than the first level of autonomous vehicle control, and wherein (i) a maximum speed the equipped vehicle is autonomously operated at while the plurality of ECUs operate the equipped vehicle in the degraded autonomous operational mode is less than a maximum speed the equipped vehicle is autonomously operated at while the plurality of ECUs operate the equipped vehicle in the nominal autonomous operational mode and (ii) operation of trajectory planning of the equipped vehicle comprises at least one selected from the group consisting of (a) obstacle detection, (b) autonomous passing maneuvers and (c) autonomous unprotected left turns is degraded while the plurality of ECUs operate the equipped vehicle in the degraded autonomous operational mode relative to when the equipped vehicle is autonomously operated at while the plurality of ECUs operate the equipped vehicle in the nominal autonomous operational mode.

2 . The vehicular control system of claim 1 , wherein the amount of processing power required to operate in the degraded autonomous operational mode is less than the amount of processing power required to operate in the nominal autonomous operational mode.

3 . The vehicular control system of claim 1 , wherein a first ECU of the plurality of ECUs has a first quantity of computational units, and wherein a second ECU of the plurality of ECUs has a second quantity of computational units that is different than the first quantity of computational units.

4 . The vehicular control system of claim 1 , wherein the second threshold is lower than the first threshold.

5 . The vehicular control system of claim 1 , wherein the plurality of ECUs, after the vehicular control system detects the failure of the one ECU of the plurality of ECUs, and responsive to the vehicular control system determining that the sum of the quantity of computational units of the remaining ECUs of the plurality of ECUs that do not have a failure continues to exceed the first threshold, continues to operate the equipped vehicle in the nominal autonomous operational mode.

6 . The vehicular control system of claim 1 , wherein the respective quantity of computational units provided by each respective ECU of the plurality of ECUs is the same.

7 . The vehicular control system of claim 1 , wherein, while the plurality of ECUs operate the equipped vehicle in the degraded autonomous operational mode, the plurality of ECUs halt processing of sensor data captured by a sensor disposed at the equipped vehicle.

8 . The vehicular control system of claim 1 , wherein a maximum object detection range of the equipped vehicle while the plurality of ECUs operate the equipped vehicle in the degraded autonomous operational mode is less than a maximum object detection range of the equipped vehicle while the plurality of ECUs operate the equipped vehicle in the nominal autonomous operational mode.

9 . The vehicular control system of claim 1 , wherein the equipped vehicle, responsive to the plurality of ECUs switching from operating the equipped vehicle in the nominal autonomous operational mode to operating the equipped vehicle in the degraded autonomous operational mode, comes to a stop.

10 . A vehicular control system, the vehicular control system comprising:

a plurality of electronic control units (ECUs) disposed at a vehicle equipped with the vehicular control system, wherein each respective ECU of the plurality of ECUs provides a respective quantity of computational units representative of an amount of processing power of the respective ECU, wherein the respective quantity of computational units provided by a first respective ECU of the plurality of ECUs is different than the respective quantity of computational units provided by a second respective ECU of the plurality of ECUs, and wherein the plurality of ECUs are configured to operate the equipped vehicle in a nominal autonomous operational mode that provides a first level of autonomous vehicle control;

wherein the plurality of ECUs operate the equipped vehicle in the nominal autonomous operational mode when the vehicular control system determines that a sum of the quantity of computational units exceeds a first threshold representative of an amount of processing power required to operate in the nominal autonomous operational mode;

wherein the vehicular control system, while the plurality of ECUs operate the equipped vehicle in the nominal autonomous operational mode, and responsive to detecting a failure of one ECU of the plurality of ECUs, determines whether a sum of the quantity of computational units of the remaining ECUs of the plurality of ECUs that do not have a failure exceeds the first threshold;

wherein the plurality of ECUs, responsive to the vehicular control system determining that the sum of the quantity of computational units of the remaining ECUs of the plurality of ECUs that do not have a failure fails to exceed the first threshold, determines whether the sum of the quantity of computational units of the remaining ECUs of the plurality of ECUs that do not have a failure exceeds a second threshold representative of an amount of processing power required to operate in a degraded autonomous operational mode; and

wherein the plurality of ECUs, responsive to the vehicular control system determining that the sum of the quantity of computational units of the remaining ECUs of the plurality of ECUs that do not have a failure exceed the second threshold, switches from operating the equipped vehicle in the nominal autonomous operational mode to operating the equipped vehicle in the degraded autonomous operational mode that provides a second level of autonomous vehicle control that is less capable than the first level of autonomous vehicle control, and wherein (i) a maximum speed the equipped vehicle is autonomously operated at while the plurality of ECUs operate the equipped vehicle in the degraded autonomous operational mode is less than a maximum speed the equipped vehicle is autonomously operated at while the plurality of ECUs operate the equipped vehicle in the nominal autonomous operational mode and (ii) operation of trajectory planning of the equipped vehicle comprises at least one selected from the group consisting of (a) obstacle detection, (b) autonomous passing maneuvers and (c) autonomous unprotected left turns is degraded while the plurality of ECUs operate the equipped vehicle in the degraded autonomous operational mode relative to when the equipped vehicle is autonomously operated at while the plurality of ECUs operate the equipped vehicle in the nominal autonomous operational mode.

11 . The vehicular control system of claim 10 , wherein the amount of processing power required to operate in the degraded autonomous operational mode is less than the amount of processing power required to operate in the nominal autonomous operational mode.

12 . The vehicular control system of claim 10 , wherein a maximum object detection range of the equipped vehicle while the plurality of ECUs operate the equipped vehicle in the degraded autonomous operational mode is less than a maximum object detection range of the equipped vehicle while the plurality of ECUs operate the equipped vehicle in the nominal autonomous operational mode.

13 . The vehicular control system of claim 10 , wherein the equipped vehicle, responsive to the plurality of ECUs switching from operating the equipped vehicle in the nominal autonomous operational mode to operating the equipped vehicle in the degraded autonomous operational mode, comes to a stop.

Continuity (3)
Continuation 16682644 · Nov 13, 2019
Provisional Application 62760575 · Nov 13, 2018
Related Publication 20230110082A1 · Apr 13, 2023
References Cited (29)
US 7103460B1 · Breed · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 11299049B2 · Linehan et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11511762B2 · Huang et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20030089534A1 · Kanzler · 2003 [cited by examiner]
US 20080046142A1 · Jordan · 2008 [cited by examiner]
US 20080118244A1 · Nakada · 2008 [cited by examiner]
US 20110077795A1 · VanGilder · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 20110241862A1 · Debouk et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110289327A1 · Nolterieke · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 20150274027A1 · Crombez · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20160231796A1 · Wade · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160250944A1 · Christ · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20170234689A1 · Gibson et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20180229738A1 · Nilsson et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180259966A1 · Long · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20190077446A1 · Savin · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190100105A1 · Liu et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190100237A1 · Klesing · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190171205A1 · Kudanowski · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190220454A1 · Matsui et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190324450A1 · Lurie · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20200007464A1 · Lo · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20210224169A1 · Kang et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20220057798A1 · Costin et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
DE 102015003124A1 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
EP 3323687A1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
EP 3363698A1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
International Seach Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International PCT Application No. PCT/US2019/061240 mailed Jan. 27, 2020. [cited by applicant]
European Extended Search Report dated Nov. 28, 2022 for corresponding EP Patent Application No. 19885533.0. [cited by applicant]