IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,571,730
Granted Patent B2
US 12,571,730 · App. 18/455,390 · Granted Mar 10, 2026

Label-free bacterial detection

Inventors: Kevin Yehl (Dry Ridge, KY); Patrick Needham (Oxford, OH)
Assignee: Miami University
G01N21/45G01N2021/458
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,571,730
App. No.
18/455,390
Granted
Mar 10, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

Disclosed herein are systems and methods for quantifying bacteriophage virulence, measuring phage-host dynamics and parameters, including phage-host range, phage interactions with biological samples and with immune systems, and label-free bacterial detection/diagnostics, that are amenable to automation, high-throughput, and functional in complex media. In some embodiments, a label-free interferometry system transduces the light reflected by a sensor and any molecules attached thereto to a real-time signal comprising a sensorgram from which infectivity parameters such as binding kinetics and lysis time can be derived.

Claims (44)

1 . A method of measuring phage-host dynamics and parameters using bacteriophage infection of a bacteria comprising:

providing a sensor with a tip;

attaching and immobilizing to the sensor a plurality of bacteriophages having a phage-host range to obtain a functionalized sensor;

irradiating the functionalized sensor with light and detecting and obtaining in real-time an at least one wavelength of white light reflected by the tip of the functionalized sensor with the bacteriophages attached thereto and corresponding to a baseline interference pattern measurement;

contacting the functionalized sensor with a capture medium comprising a liquid mixture further comprising an at least one host;

irradiating the functionalized sensor with light, such that if the bacteriophages bind to the at least one host, the binding of the bacteriophages to the at least one host shifts the baseline interference pattern measurement;

detecting and obtaining in real-time a modified interference pattern measurement, wherein the modified interference pattern measurement comprises a measurement of the at least one wavelength of white light reflected from the tip of the functionalized sensor as shifted by the bacteriophages and the at least one host attached thereto;

comparing the modified interference pattern measurement to the baseline interference pattern measurement to produce a sensorgram;

wherein a binding signal and a lysis signal are detected, wherein the binding signal comprises an amount of the at least one host bound to the bacteriophages and the lysis signal comprises an amount of the at least one host bound to the bacteriophages while the at least one host is being lysed by the bacteriophages;

screening the phage-host range from the sensorgram.

2 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising irradiating the tip of the sensor and detecting a control measurement, wherein the control measurement is a measurement of the at least one wavelength of white light reflected by the tip of the sensor before the obtaining of the functionalized sensor.

3 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the at least one host comprises a bacteria.

4 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the at least one host comprises a biological sample.

5 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising measuring a lysis time by determining a first local maxima of the sensorgram and by taking a first derivative of the lysis signal and determining when the first derivative is equal to zero, and further comprising measuring a latency period by determining a first local maxima of the sensorgram and by taking a first derivative of the lysis signal and determining when the first derivative is equal to zero.

6 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising washing the functionalized sensor tip with a buffer after the bacteriophages bind to the at least one host.

7 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising biotinylating the bacteriophage before they are attached to the functionalized sensor, attaching streptavidin to the sensor tip, and attaching the bacteriophages to the functionalized sensor tip via biotin-streptavidin bioconjugation.

8 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising comparing the modified interference pattern measurement to a second modified interference pattern measurement produced by a second host.

9 . A system for measuring phage-host dynamics and parameters using bacteriophage infection of a bacteria comprising:

a sensor having a tip; a host attached and immobilized to the sensor tip to form a functionalized sensor;

wherein when the functionalized sensor is irradiated with light, an at least one wavelength of white light is reflected by the tip of the functionalized sensor with the host attached thereto, corresponding to a baseline interference pattern measurement;

a capture medium comprising a liquid mixture of bacteriophages provided to the functionalized sensor, the bacteriophages having a phage-host range;

wherein if the host is within the phage-host range of the bacteriophages, the bacteriophages bind to the host;

wherein the binding of the bacteriophages to the host shifts the baseline interference pattern measurement to form a modified interference pattern measurement, wherein the modified interference pattern measurement comprises a measurement of the at least one wavelength of white light reflected from the tip of the functionalized sensor with as shifted by the host and the bacteriophages attached thereto;

a comparison of the modified interference pattern measurement to the baseline interference pattern measurement, the comparison comprising a sensorgram;

wherein, if the host is within the phage-host range of the bacteriophages, a binding signal and a lysis signal are detected, wherein the binding signal comprises an amount of the at least one host bound to the bacteriophages and the lysis signal comprises an amount of the at least one host bound to the bacteriophages while the at least one host are is being lysed by the bacteriophages, and the phage-host range is screened.

10 . The system of claim 9 , wherein the host comprises a bacteria.

11 . The system of claim 9 , wherein the host comprises a biological sample.

12 . The system of claim 9 , wherein the host further comprises a monolayer on the tip of the functionalized sensor.

13 . The system of claim 9 , wherein a lysis time is measured by taking a first derivative of the lysis signal and determining a first local maxima.

14 . The system of claim 9 , wherein a latency period is measured by determining a first local maxima of the sensorgram and by taking a first derivative of the lysis signal and determining when the first derivative is equal to zero.

15 . The system of claim 9 , further comprising a control measurement, wherein the control measurement is a measurement of the at least one wavelength of white light reflected by the tip of the sensor when the sensor is irradiated with light before the obtaining of the functionalized sensor.

16 . The system of claim 9 , further comprising a second modified interference pattern measurement produced by a second host, wherein the second modified interference pattern is compared to the modified interference pattern.

17 . A method for label-free bacterial detection using bacteriophage infection of a bacteria comprising:

providing a sensor with a tip;

attaching and immobilizing to the sensor a plurality of bacteriophages having a phage-host range to obtain a functionalized sensor;

irradiating the functionalized sensor with light and detecting and obtaining in real-time an at least one wavelength of white light reflected by the tip of the functionalized sensor with the bacteriophages attached thereto and corresponding to a baseline interference pattern measurement;

contacting the functionalized sensor with a capture medium comprising a liquid mixture;

irradiating the functionalized sensor with light, such that if the capture medium comprises an at least one host within the phage-host range of the bacteriophages, the bacteriophages bind to the at least one host, and the binding of the bacteriophages to the at least one host shifts the baseline interference pattern measurement;

detecting and obtaining in real-time a modified interference pattern measurement, wherein the modified interference pattern measurement comprises a measurement of the at least one wavelength of white light reflected from the tip of the functionalized sensor as shifted by the bacteriophages and the at least one host attached thereto;

comparing the modified interference pattern measurement to the baseline interference pattern measurement to produce a sensorgram;

wherein, in the presence of at least one host within the phage-host range of the bacteriophages, a binding signal and a lysis signal are detected, wherein the binding signal comprises an amount of the at least one host bound to the bacteriophages and the lysis signal comprises an amount of the at least one host bound to the bacteriophages while the at least one host is being lysed by the bacteriophages.

18 . The method of claim 17 , further comprising studying the binding signal and the lysis signal to detect a level of bacterial contamination in the capture medium.

19 . The method of claim 17 , wherein the at least one host comprises a bacteria.

20 . The method of claim 17 , further comprising irradiating the tip of the sensor and detecting a control measurement, wherein the control measurement is a measurement of the at least one wavelength of white light reflected by the tip of the sensor before the obtaining of the functionalized sensor.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 27, 2023
From: YEHL, KEVIN; NEEDHAM, PATRICK
To: MIAMI UNIVERSITY
Reel/Frame 065051/0925 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 63400603 · Aug 24, 2022
Related Publication 20240068941A1 · Feb 29, 2024
References Cited (35)
US 4240751A · Linnecke · 1980 [cited by examiner]
US 5629214A · Crosby · 1997 [cited by examiner]
US 7070987B2 · Cunningham et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 7300803B2 · Lin et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 8111401B2 · Magnusson · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 8514391B2 · Wawro · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 8580578B2 · Cunningham et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8865078B2 · Chiou · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 9273949B2 · Bornhop · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 9482615B2 · Chiou · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 10261013B2 · Bornhop · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 10627396B2 · Bornhop · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20020012930A1 · Rothberg · 2002 [cited by examiner]
US 20030003599A1 · Wagner · 2003 [cited by examiner]
US 20030017580A1 · Cunningham · 2003 [cited by examiner]
JP 2005003561A · 2005 [cited by examiner]
WO WO2024186532A1 · 2024 [cited by examiner]
Leonard et al. “Unraveling Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Bacterial Networks on Micropillar Architectures Using Intrinsic Phase-Shift Spectroscopy”, 2017, ACSNano , 11, 6167. [cited by examiner]
Maldonao et al. “Ultrasensitive Label-Free Detection of Unamplified Multidrug-Resistance Bacteria Genes with a Bimodal Waveguide Interferometric Biosensor”, 2020, Diagonastics, 10: 845. [cited by examiner]
Murray, C.J., et al., “Global Burden of Bacterial Antimicrobial Resistance in 2019: A Systematic Analysis”, Feb. 12, 2022, pp. 629-655, vol. 399, www.thelancet.com. [cited by applicant]
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, “Antibiotic Resistance Threats in the United States”, 2019, pp. 1-14, https://www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/michael-craig-cdc-talk-thursday-am-508.pdf. [cited by applicant]
Vikesland, P. et al., “Differential Drivers of Antimicrobial Resistance across the World”, Acc. Chem. Res. 52, 916-924, DOI: 10.1021/acs.accounts.8b00643 (2019). [cited by applicant]
Zhang, Z. et al., “Assessment of Global Health Risk of Antibiotic Resistance Genes”, Nature Communications. 13, 1-11, DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-29283-8 (2022). [cited by applicant]
Cook, M.A., et al., “The past, present, and future of antibiotics” Sci. Transl. Med. 14, DOI: 10.1126/SCITRANSLMED.ABO7793 (2022). [cited by applicant]
Hutchings, M., et al., “Antibiotics: past, present and future”. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 51, 72-80, DOI: 10.1016/J.MIB.2019.10.008 (2019). [cited by applicant]
Storms, Z.J., et al., “The Virulence Index: A Metric for Quantitative Analysis of Phage Virulence”, PHAGE: Therapy, Applications, and Research. 1, 27, DOI: 10.1089/PHAGE.2019.0001 (2020). [cited by applicant]
Konopacki, M., et al., “PhageScore: A simple method for comparative evaluation of bacteriophages lytic activity”, Biochem. Eng. J. 161, 107652, DOI: 10.1016/J.BEJ.2020.107652 (2020). [cited by applicant]
Henry M., et al., “Development of a high throughput assay for indirectly measuring phage growth using the OmniLogTM system”, Bacteriophage. 2, 159, DOI: 10.4161/BACT.21440 (2012). [cited by applicant]
Egido, J.E., et al., “Monitoring phage-induced lysis of gram-negatives in real time using a fluorescent DNA dye”, Scientific Reports. 13, 1-12, DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-27734-w (2023). [cited by applicant]
Hu, B., et al., “The bacteriophage T7 virion undergoes extensive structural remodeling during infection”, Science. 339, 576-579, DOI: 10.1126/science.1231887 (2013). [cited by applicant]
Mandal, P.K., et al., “Bacteriophage infection of [cited by applicant]
Kiss, B., et al. “Imaging the Infection Cycle of T7 at the Single Virion Level”, Int. J. Mol. Sci. 23, 11252, DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms231911252 (2022). [cited by applicant]
Xiao Liu et al., “Rapid and sensitive detection of [cited by applicant]
Anneta Razatos et al., “Molecular determinants of bacterial adhesion monitored by atomic force microscopy”, Applied Biological Sciences, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, vol. 95 pp. 11059-11064 (Sep. 1998.). [cited by applicant]
N. B. Hubbs et al., “Kinetic analysis of bacteriophage Sf6 binding to outer membrane protein a using whole virions” bioRxiv (2019): 509141. [cited by applicant]