IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,573,143
Granted Patent B2
US 12,573,143 · App. 18/327,742 · Granted Mar 10, 2026

Systems and methods for identifying suitability of stormwater management measures using spatial analysis

Inventors: Nicole Beck (Santa Cruz, CA); Tyler Nodine (Santa Cruz, CA); Catherine Riihimaki (Annandale, NJ); Gary Conley (Santa Cruz, CA); Margaret Mathias (Santa Cruz, CA); Nathaniel Evatt (Oceanside, CA); Patrick Smyth (Santa Fe, NM)
Assignee: 2ndNature Software Inc.
G06T17/05G06Q50/26
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,573,143
App. No.
18/327,742
Granted
Mar 10, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

Methods and systems for identifying stormwater management opportunities in accordance with embodiments of the invention are disclosed. In one embodiment of the invention, a method for identifying stormwater management opportunities comprises gathering spatial data for a region; rasterizing the spatial data into a set of raster data layers; forming a plurality of benefit maps using subsets of the set of raster data layers, wherein the plurality of benefit maps corresponds to a plurality of benefit categories; generating an opportunity map by combining a subset of the plurality of benefit maps using weights corresponding to the plurality of benefit categories; and displaying the opportunity map on a user interface.

Claims (40)

1 . A method for identifying stormwater management opportunities, comprising:

gathering spatial data for a region;

rasterizing the spatial data into a set of raster data layers;

forming a plurality of benefit maps of the region using subsets of the set of raster data layers, wherein the plurality of benefit maps corresponds to a plurality of benefit categories, wherein each benefit map indicates an opportunity for improvement in the corresponding plurality of benefit categories for the region;

generating an opportunity map by combining a subset of the plurality of benefit maps using a set of weights where each of the set of weights assigns a relative importance to one of the subset of the plurality of benefit maps, wherein the opportunity map includes an opportunity score for a portion of the region that indicates an estimated potential for achieving the benefits of the subset of benefit maps if stormwater management projects are implemented; and

displaying the opportunity map on a user interface.

2 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

normalizing the set of raster data layers.

3 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the spatial data includes data of at least one data type selected from the group consisting of vector data and raster data.

4 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the spatial data relates to at least one data category selected from the group consisting of stormwater pollution, drainage distance to impaired waterbody, water pollution risk, trash priority land use area, stormwater runoff, drought risk, groundwater basin, soil infiltration capacity, hydrologic soil type, area of imperviousness, local flooding frequency, historical precipitation, projected change in precipitation, biodiversity, urban heat island condition, current greenness level, community socioeconomic status, park proximity, and public exposure.

5 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the plurality of benefit categories includes at least one benefit category selected from the group consisting of runoff reductions, water quality improvements, urban greening, community enhancement, natural habitat protection, water supply resilience, flood risk protection, urban temperature reductions, and climate change mitigation.

6 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the weights are specified by a user.

7 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

synthesizing multiple raster data layers from the set of raster data layers to form a synthesized raster data layer; and

adding the synthesized raster data layer to the set of raster data layers.

8 . The method of claim 1 , wherein generating the opportunity map is further performed by combining the subset of the plurality of benefit maps using a model structure.

9 . The method of claim 8 , wherein the model structure is specified by a user.

10 . The method of claim 1 , wherein generating the opportunity map is further performed by joining the combined subset of the plurality of benefit maps with at least one supplemental data layer selected from the group consisting of a parcel data layer and a road data layer.

11 . A system for identifying stormwater management opportunities, comprising:

a processor; and

a memory containing an application for identifying stormwater management opportunities, wherein execution of the application directs the processor to:

gather spatial data for a region;

rasterize the spatial data into a set of raster data layers;

form a plurality of benefit maps of the region using subsets of the set of raster data layers, wherein the plurality of benefit maps corresponds to a plurality of benefit categories, wherein each benefit map indicates an opportunity for improvement in the corresponding plurality of benefit categories for the region;

generate an opportunity map by combining a subset of the plurality of benefit maps using a set of weights where each of the set of weights assigns a relative importance to one of the subset of the plurality of benefit maps, wherein the opportunity map includes an opportunity score for a portion of the region that indicates an estimated potential for achieving the benefits of the subset of benefit maps if stormwater management projects are implemented; and

display the opportunity map on a user interface.

12 . The system of claim 11 , wherein execution of the application further directs the processor to:

normalize the set of raster data layers.

13 . The system of claim 11 , wherein the spatial data includes data of at least one data type selected from the group consisting of vector data and raster data.

14 . The system of claim 11 , wherein the spatial data relates to at least one data category selected from the group consisting of stormwater pollution, drainage distance to impaired waterbody, water pollution risk, trash priority land use area, stormwater runoff, drought risk, groundwater basin, soil infiltration capacity, hydrologic soil type, area of imperviousness, local flooding frequency, historical precipitation, projected change in precipitation, biodiversity, urban heat island condition, current greenness level, community socioeconomic status, park proximity, and public exposure.

15 . The system of claim 11 , wherein the plurality of benefit categories includes at least one benefit category selected from the group consisting of runoff reductions, water quality improvements, urban greening, community enhancement, natural habitat protection, water supply resilience, flood risk protection, urban temperature reductions, and climate change mitigation.

16 . The system of claim 11 , wherein the weights are specified by a user.

17 . The system of claim 11 , wherein execution of the application further directs the processor to:

synthesize multiple raster data layers from the set of raster data layers to form a synthesized raster data layer; and

add the synthesized raster data layer to the set of raster data layers.

18 . The system of claim 11 , wherein generating the opportunity map is further performed by combining the subset of the plurality of benefit maps using a model structure.

19 . The system of claim 18 , wherein the model structure is specified by a user.

20 . The system of claim 11 , wherein generating the opportunity map is further performed by joining the combined subset of the plurality of benefit maps with at least one supplemental data layer selected from the group consisting of a parcel data layer and a road data layer.

21 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the opportunity map provides a ranking of portions of the region based on the opportunity score for each portion of the region.

22 . The system of claim 11 , wherein the opportunity map provides a ranking of portions of the region based on the opportunity score for each portion of the region.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 27, 2024
From: BECK, NICOLE; NODINE, TYLER; RIIHIMAKI, CATHERINE; CONLEY, GARY; MATHIAS, MARGARET; EVATT, NATHANIEL; SMYTH, PATRICK
To: 2NDNATURE SOFTWARE INC.
Reel/Frame 067864/0352 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 63365767 · Jun 2, 2022
Related Publication 20230394761A1 · Dec 7, 2023
References Cited (95)
US 10482848B2 · He · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 10754061B2 · Beck et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20050273300A1 · Patwardhan et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20140375678A1 · Kjeldergaard · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20150019262A1 · Du et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20180017710A1 · Beck et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180127286A1 · Chung et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20190324170A1 · Beck et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20210294932A1 · Venu · 2021 [cited by examiner]
Diringer SE, Shimabuku M, Cooley H. Economic evaluation of stormwater capture and its multiple benefits in California. PLoS One. Mar. 24, 2020;15(3):e0230549. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230549. PMID: 32208442; PMCID: PM… [cited by examiner]
Martijn Kuller, Peter M. Bach, Simon Roberts, Dale Browne, Ana Deletic, A planning-support tool for spatial suitability assessment of green urban stormwater infrastructure, Science of The Total Environment, vol. 686, 20… [cited by examiner]
“BMP RAM: Field Protocols v3.1”, 2NDNATURE LLC, Aug. 2016, Retrieved from: http://www.2ndnaturellc.com/wpcontent/uploads/2016/09/BMPRAMFieldProtocols3.1.pdf, 42pgs. [cited by applicant]
“BMP RAM: Technical Document v3.1”, 2NDNATURE LLC, Nov. 2016, Retrieved from: http://www.2ndnaturellc.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/BMPRAMv3-1_TechnicalDoc_Nov2016.pdf, 52 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“BMP RAM: User Guidance v3.2”, 2NDNATURE LLC, Mar. 30, 2017, Retrieved from: http://www.2ndnaturellc.com/wpcontent/uploads/2016/09/BMPRAMUserGuidance3.1.pdf, 68 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“Delineate Urban Catchments: Guidance for Creating Catchment Boundaries and Attributes v3.1”, 2NDNATURE LLC, Jul. 2017, Retrieved from: http://www.2ndnaturellc.com/documents/MS4_Mapping_Guidance.pdf, 54 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“Focused Stormwater Monitoring to Validate Water Quality Source Control and Treatment Assumptions”, 2NDNATURE, LLC, Final Technical Report, Mar. 2010, 118 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“Focused Stormwater Quality Monitoring”, 2NDNATURE, LLC, Final Technical Report, Jun. 2012, 149 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“HEC 19-Hydrology”, Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), Design Manual, Report No. FHWA 1P-84-15, 303 pgs. (Presented in 2 Parts). [cited by applicant]
“Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) Main Page”, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Retrieved from: http://water.epa.gov/polwaste/npdes/stormwater/Municipal-Separate-Storm-Sewer-System-MS4-Main-Page.… [cited by applicant]
“Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System Discharge Permit”, Maryland Department of the Environment, National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System, Permit No. 11-DP-2215 MD0068292, Dec. 27, 2013, 37.pgs. [cited by applicant]
“Nutrient and Siltation TMDL Development for Wissahickon Creek, Pennsylvania”, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Final Report, Oct. 2003, 233 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“Our Built and Natural Environments: A Technical Review of the Interactions Among Land Use, Transportation, and Environmental Quality”, United States Environmental Protection Agency, EPA 231K13001, Second Edition, Jun. … [cited by applicant]
“ParcelRAM: Technical and User Guidance Document v1”, 2NDNATURE LLC, Aug. 2016, Retrieved from: https://2ntelr.com/parcelram/dist/prod/data/ParcelRAMTechDoc_Web.pdf, 42 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“Phase I Municipal Stormwater Permit”, National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System and State Waste Discharge General Permit for Discharges from Large and Medium Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems, State of Washi… [cited by applicant]
“Pollutant Load Reduction Model (PLRM)”, Northwest Hydraulic Consultants, Inc. Geosyntec Consultants, Inc. 2NDNATURE, LLC, Model Development Document, Oct. 2009, 163 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“Pollutant Load Reduction Model Quick Start Guide”, Northwest Hydraulic Consultants, Inc. Geosyntec Consultants, Inc. 2NDNATURE, LLC, Version 2.1, Feb. 2015, 21 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“Stormwater Tool to Estimate Load Reductions: Final Technical Document v1.1”, 2NDNATURE LLC, Mar. 2017, Retrieved from: http://www.2ndnaturellc.com/documents/swTELR_TechDoc.pdf, 141 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“Time of Concentration”, United States Department of Agriculture, Part 630 Hydrology National Engineering Handbook, 210-VI-NEH, Chapter 15, May 2010, 29 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“Urban Catchment Monitoring to Evaluate Tahoe TMDL Tools”, 2NDNATURE, LLC, Final Technical Report, Jun. 2014, 127 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds”, United States Department of Agriculture, Technical Release 55, Jun. 1986, 81 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“User's Guide Spreadsheet Tool for the Estimation of Pollutant Load (STEPL)”, Version 4.1, Tetra Tech, Inc. Mar. 2011, Available at: http://it.tetratech-ffx.com/steplweb, 90 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“Waste Discharge Requirements (WDRs) For Storm Water Discharges from Small Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems (Ms4s) (General Permit)”, California State Water Resources Control Board, Water Quality Order No. 2013-00… [cited by applicant]
Ahiablame et al., “Effectiveness of Low Impact Development Practices: Literature Review and Suggestions for Future Research”, Water, Air, & Soil Pollution, vol. 223, No. 7, 2012, pp. 4253-4273, doi: 10.1007/s11270-012-1… [cited by applicant]
Arnold Jr. et al., “Impervious Surface Coverage: The Emergence of a Key Environmental Indicator”, Journal of the American Planning Association, vol. 62, No. 2, Spring 1996, pp. 243-258, 10.1080/01944369608975688. [cited by applicant]
Atchison et al., “Recarga User's Manual Version 2.3”, Retrieved from: http://https://dnr.wisconsin.gov/topic/Stormwater/standards/recarga.html (Accessed in Apr. 2016), 19 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Beck et al., “An urban runoff model designed to inform stormwater management decisions”, Journal of Environmental Management, vol. 193, May 15, 2017, pp. 257-269, doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.02.007. [cited by applicant]
Bedan et al., “Stormwater Runoff Quality and Quantity From Traditional and Low Impact Development Watersheds”, Journal of the American Water Resources Association, vol. 45, No. 4, Aug. 2009, pp. 998-1008, doi: 10.1111/j… [cited by applicant]
Beven, “Changing Ideas in Hydrology—The Case of Physically-Based Models”, Journal of Hydrology, vol. 105, No. 1-2, Jan. 1989, pp. 157-172, doi: 10.1016/0022-1694(89)90101-7. [cited by applicant]
Beven, “Rainfall-Runoff Modelling: The Primer”, Wiley, First Edition, Apr. 16, 2001, 360 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Beven et al., “A guide to good practice in modeling semantics for authors and referees”, Water Resources Research, vol. 49, No. 8, Aug. 2013, pp. 5092-5098, doi: 10.1002/wrcr.20393. [cited by applicant]
Bhaduri et al., “Assessing Watershed-Scale, Long-Term Hydrologic Impacts of Land-Use Change Using a GIS-NPS Model”, Environmental Management, vol. 26, No. 6, 2000, pp. 643-658, doi: 10.1007/s002670010122. [cited by applicant]
Bicknell et al., “Hydrological Simulation Program—Fortran User's Manual for Version 11”, United States Environmental Protection Agency, National Exposure Research Laboratory, EPA/600/SR-97/080, Aug. 1997, 2 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Bormann et al., “Possibilities and limitations of regional hydrological models applied within an environmental change study in Benin (West Africa)”, Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, vol. 28, No. 33-36, 2003, pp. 1323… [cited by applicant]
Brander et al., “Modeled Impacts of Development Type on Runoff Volume and Infiltration Performance”, Journal of the American Water Resources Association, vol. 40, No. 4, Aug. 2004, pp. 961-970, doi: 10.1111/j.1752-1688.… [cited by applicant]
Brezonik et al., “Analysis and predictive models of stormwater runoff volumes, loads, and pollutant concentrations from watersheds in the Twin Cities metropolitan area, Minnesota, USA”, Water Research, vol. 36, No. 7, A… [cited by applicant]
Chandler et al., “Estimating Annual Urban Nonpoint Pollutant Loads”, Journal of Management in Engineering, vol. 10, No. 6, Nov. 1, 1994, pp. 50-59, doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)9742-597X(1994)10:6(50). [cited by applicant]
Dotto et al., “Comparison of different uncertainty techniques in urban stormwater quantity and quality modelling”, Water Research, vol. 46, No. 8, May 15, 2012, pp. 2545-2558, doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2012.02.009. [cited by applicant]
Dotto et al., “Impacts of measured data uncertainty on urban stormwater models”, Journal of Hydrology, vol. 508, Jan. 16, 2014, pp. 28-42, doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.10.025. [cited by applicant]
Elliott et al., “A review of models for low impact urban stormwater drainage”, Environmental Modelling & Software, vol. 22, No. 3, Mar. 3, 2006, pp. 394-405, doi: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2005.12.005. [cited by applicant]
Freni et al., “Assessment of the integrated urban water quality model complexity through identifiability analysis”, Water Research, vol. 45, No. 1, Jan. 2011, pp. 37-50, doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2010.08.004. [cited by applicant]
Fry et al., “Identifying streamgage networks for maximizing the effectiveness of regional water balance modeling”, Water Resources Research, vol. 49, No. 5, May 2013, pp. 2689-2700, doi: 10.1002/wrcr.20233. [cited by applicant]
Gaume et al., “Uncertainty assessment and analysis of the calibrated parameter values of an urban storm water quality model”, Journal of Hydrology, vol. 210, No. 1-4, Sep. 1998, pp. 38-50, doi: 10.1016/S0022-1694(98)001… [cited by applicant]
Gilroy et al., “Spatio-temporal effects of low impact development practices”, Journal of Hydrology, vol. 367, No. 3-4, Apr. 15, 2009, pp. 228-236, doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.01.008. [cited by applicant]
Gove et al., “Effects of Scale on Land Use and Water Quality Relationships: A Longitudinal Basin-Wide Perspective”, Journal of the American Water Resources Association, vol. 37, No. 6, Dec. 2001, pp. 1721-1734, doi: 10.… [cited by applicant]
Harbor, “A Practical Method for Estimating the Impact of Land-Use Change on Surface Runoff, Groundwater Recharge and Wetland Hydrology”, Journal of the American Planning Association, vol. 60, No. 1, 1994, pp. 95-108, do… [cited by applicant]
Harmel et al., “Cumulative Uncertainty in Measured Streamflow and Water Quality Data for Small Watersheds”, Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, vol. 49, No. 3, 2006, pp. 689-70… [cited by applicant]
Hawkins et al., “Runoff Curve Number Method: Examination of the Initial Abstraction Ratio”, Proceedings of the Second Federal Interagency Hydrologic Modeling Conference, Las Vegas, Nevada. U.S. Geological Survey, Lakewo… [cited by applicant]
Heaney et al., “Storm Water Management Model: Level 1—Preliminary Screening Procedures”, Environmental Protection Technology Series, EPA-600/2-76-275, Project No. R-802411, Oct. 1976, 94 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Holman-Dodds et al., “Evaluation of Hydrologic Benefits of Infiltration Based Urban Storm Water Management”, Journal of the American Water Resources Association, vol. 39, No. 1, Feb. 2003, pp. 205-215, doi: 10.1111/j.17… [cited by applicant]
Hossain et al., “Advances in Landscape Runoff Water Quality Modelling: A Review”, Landscape Dynamics, Soils and Hydrological Processes in Varied Climates, Chapter 12, Jul. 22, 2015, pp. 225-257, doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-1… [cited by applicant]
Jakeman et al., “How Much Complexity is Warranted in a Rainfall-Runoff Model?”, Water Resources Research, vol. 29, No. 8, Aug. 1993, pp. 2637-2649, doi: 10.1029/93wr00877. [cited by applicant]
Jiang, “Investigation of Runoff Curve Number Initial Abstraction Ratio”, University of Arizona, Thesis, 2001, 120 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Karr, “Defining and measuring river health”, Freshwater Biology, vol. 41, No. 2, Mar. 1999, pp. 221-234, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2427.1999.00427.x. [cited by applicant]
Kokkonen et al., “A comparison of metric and conceptual approaches in rainfall-runoff modeling and its implications”, Water Resources Research, vol. 37, No. 9, Sep. 2001, pp. 2345-2352, doi: 10.1029/2001WR000299. [cited by applicant]
Leavesley et al., “A modular approach to addressing model design, scale, and parameter estimation issues in distributed hydrological modelling”, Hydrological Processes, vol. 16, Feb. 15, 2002, pp. 173-187, doi: 10.1002/… [cited by applicant]
Lee et al., “A watershed-scale design optimization model for stormwater best management practices”, Environmental Modelling & Software, vol. 37, Nov. 2012, pp. 6-18, doi: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2012.04.011. [cited by applicant]
Lee et al., “Characterization of urban stormwater runoff”, Water Research, vol. 34, No. 6, Apr. 1, 2000, pp. 1773-1780, doi: 10.1016/s0043-1354(99)00325-5. [cited by applicant]
Li et al., “Sensitivity Analysis for Urban Drainage Modeling Using Mutual Information”, Entropy, vol. 16, No. 11, Nov. 3, 2014, pp. 5738-5752, doi: 10.3390/e16115738. [cited by applicant]
Lim et al., “Effects of Initial Abstraction and Urbanization on Estimated Runoff Using CN Technology”, Journal of the American Water Resources Association, vol. 42, No. 3, Jun. 2006, pp. 629-643, doi: 10.1111/j.1752-168… [cited by applicant]
Lindenschmidt, “The effect of complexity on parameter sensitivity and model uncertainty in river water quality modelling”, Ecological Modelling, vol. 190, No. 1-2, Jan. 10, 2006, pp. 72-86, doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005… [cited by applicant]
Maheepala et al., “Hydrological data monitoring for urban stormwater drainage systems”, Journal of Hydrology, vol. 245, No. 1-4, May 1, 2001, pp. 32-47, doi: 10.1016/S0022-1694(01)00342-0. [cited by applicant]
Mathevet et al., “A bounded version of the Nash-Sutcliffe criterion for better model assessment on large sets of basins”, Large Sample Basin Experiments for Hydrological Model Parameterization: Results of the Hydrologic… [cited by applicant]
Meals et al., “Lag Time in Water Quality Response to Best Management Practices: A Review”, Journal of Environmental Quality Abstract, vol. 39, No. 1, Jan. 2010, pp. 85-96, doi: 10.2134/jeq2009.0108. [cited by applicant]
Michel et al., “Soil Conservation Service Curve Number method: How to mend a wrong soil moisture accounting procedure?”, Water Resources Research, vol. 41, No. W02011, Feb. 12, 2005, 6 pgs. doi:10.1029/2004WR003191. [cited by applicant]
Nandakumar et al., “Uncertainty in rainfall—runoff model simulations and the implications for predicting the hydrologic effects of land-use change”, Journal of Hydrology, vol. 192, No. 1-4, May 1997, pp. 211-232, doi: 1… [cited by applicant]
Nash et al., “River Flow Forecasting Through Conceptual Models Part I—A Discussion of Principles”, Journal of Hydrology, vol. 10, No. 3, Apr. 1970, pp. 282-290, doi: 10.1016/0022-1694(70)90255-6. [cited by applicant]
National Research Council, “Urban Stormwater Management in the United States”, National Academies Press, Mar. 17, 2009, Available at: http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=12465, 611 pgs. (Presented in 2 Parts). [cited by applicant]
Perrin et al., “Does a large number of parameters enhance model performance? Comparative assessment of common catchment model structures on 429 catchments”, Journal of Hydrology, vol. 242, No. 3-4, Feb. 28, 2001, pp. 27… [cited by applicant]
Petrucci et al., “The dilemma of spatial representation for urban hydrology semi-distributed modelling: trade-offs among complexity, calibration and geographical data”, Journal of Hydrology, vol. 517, Sep. 19, 2014, pp.… [cited by applicant]
Rauch et al., “Deterministic modelling of integrated urban drainage systems”, Water Science and Technology, vol. 45, No. 3, 2002, pp. 81-94, doi: 10.2166/wst.2002.0059. [cited by applicant]
Reed et al., “Overall distributed model intercomparison project results”, Journal of Hydrology, vol. 298, No. 1-4, Oct. 1, 2004, pp. 27-60, doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.03.031. [cited by applicant]
Rode et al., “Uncertainties in selected river water quality data”, Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, vol. 11, No. 2, Feb. 13, 2007, pp. 863-874, doi: 10.5194/hess-11-863-2007. [cited by applicant]
Rossman, “National Stormwater Calculator User's Guide”, Environmental Protection Agency, EPA/600/R-13/085, Jul. 2013, 60 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Rossman, “Storm Water Management Model—User's Manual Version 5.0”, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA/600/R-05/040, 2008, Revised: Jul. 2010, 295 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Schaefli et al., “Do Nash values have value?”, Hydrological Processes, vol. 21, No. 15, Jul. 15, 2007, pp. 2075-2080, doi: 10.1002/hyp.6825. [cited by applicant]
Schueler, “Controlling Urban Runoff: A Practical Manual for Planning and Designing Urban BMPs”, Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments, Department of Environmental Programs, Jul. 1987, 227 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Schuster et al., “Evaluation of Water Quality Projects in the Lake Tahoe Basin”, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, vol. 90, No. 1-3, Jan. 2004, pp. 225-242, doi: 10.1023/b:emas.0000003591.52435.8d. [cited by applicant]
Shi et al., “Research on the SCS-CN initial abstraction ratio using rainfall-runoff event analysis in the Three Gorges Area, China”, Catena, vol. 77, No. 1, Apr. 15, 2009, pp. 1-7, doi: 10.1016/j.catena.2008.11.006. [cited by applicant]
Snowling et al., “Evaluating modelling uncertainty for model selection”, Ecological Modelling, vol. 138, No. 1-3, Mar. 15, 2001, pp. 17-30, doi: 10.1016/S0304-3800(00)00390-2. [cited by applicant]
Tang et al., “Forecasting land use change and its environmental impact at a watershed scale”, Journal of Environmental Management, vol. 76, No. 1, Jul. 2005, pp. 35-45, doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2005.01.006. [cited by applicant]
Tomer et al., “The challenge of documenting water quality benefits of conservation practices: a review of USDA-ARS's conservation effects assessment project watershed studies”, Water Science & Technology, vol. 64, No. 1… [cited by applicant]
Voskamp et al., “Planning support system for climate adaptation: Composing effective sets of blue-green measures to reduce urban vulnerability to extreme weather events”, Building and Environment, vol. 83, Jan. 2015, pp… [cited by applicant]
Walsh et al., “Principles for urban stormwater management to protect stream ecosystems”, Freshwater Science, vol. 35, No. 1, Mar. 2016, 14 pgs. doi: 10.1086/685284. [cited by applicant]
Xian et al., “Change of Impervious Surface Area between 2001 and 2006 in the Conterminous United States”, Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, vol. 77, No. 8, 2011, pp. 758-762. [cited by applicant]
Zoppou, “Review of urban storm water models”, Environmental Modelling & Software, vol. 16, No. 3, Apr. 2001, pp. 195-231, doi: 10.1016/S1364-8152(00)00084-0. [cited by applicant]