IP Library Granted Patent US 12,573,218
Granted Patent B2
US 12,573,218 · App. 18/161,688 · Granted Mar 10, 2026

Systems and methods for processing electronic images for ranking loss and grading

Inventors: Hamed Aghdam (New York, NY); Christopher Kanan (Pittsford, NY)
Assignee: Paige.AI, Inc.
G06V20/698G06T7/0012G06T7/11G16H50/30G06T2207/20021G06T2207/20081G06T2207/30024
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,573,218
App. No.
18/161,688
Granted
Mar 10, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

A computer-implemented method for processing medical images, the method comprising receiving a plurality of medical images of at least one pathology specimen, the pathology specimen being associated with a patient. The method may further comprise dividing the one or more medical images into a plurality of tiles and predicting, using a machine learning system, proportions of each type of cancer sub-category for the plurality of tiles, the machine learning system having been trained by ranking loss. The method may further include determining an overall grade of cancer for the one or more medical images.

Claims (59)

1 . A computer-implemented method for processing electronic medical images, comprising:

receiving one or more medical images of at least one pathology specimen associated with a patient;

dividing the one or more medical images into a plurality of tiles;

predicting, using a machine learning system, proportions of each type of cancer sub-category for the plurality of tiles, the machine learning system having been trained by ranking loss, the machine learning system having been trained by:

dividing a plurality of electronic images into tiles; and

for each of the plurality of electronic images:

predicting proportions of any of a plurality of cancer sub-categories;

determining a loss for each less than relation based on ground-truth proportions;

determining a total loss based on the loss for each less than relation;

determining a backward pass; and

updating the machine learning system using the total loss and backward pass; and

determining an overall grade of cancer for the one or more medical images.

2 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the overall grade of cancer is output as a Gleason score prediction.

3 . The method of claim 1 , wherein predicting proportions of each type of cancer includes predicting proportions of each cancer sub-category.

4 . The method of claim 3 , wherein during training, the ranking loss is determined for each cancer sub category.

5 . The method of claim 4 , wherein the total ranking loss of the machine learning system is calculated using a ranking loss formula Lrank=x+1 if x>0 & Lrank=ex if x<0.

6 . The method of claim 5 , wherein the machine learning system is trained using weak labels to learn more granular labels using the rank loss formula.

7 . The method of claim 3 , further comprising:

outputting the proportion of each cancer sub-category.

8 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

outputting a segmentation map displaying a location of each cancer sub-category.

9 . A system for processing electronic medical images, the system comprising:

at least one memory storing instructions; and

at least one processor configured to execute the instructions to perform operations comprising:

receiving one or more medical images of at least one pathology specimen associated with a patient;

dividing the one or more medical images into a plurality of tiles;

predicting, using a machine learning system, proportions of each type of cancer sub-category for the plurality of tiles, the machine learning system having been trained by ranking loss, the machine learning system having been trained by:

dividing a plurality of electronic images into tiles; and

for each of the plurality of electronic images:

predicting proportions of any of a plurality of cancer sub-categories;

determining a loss for each less than relation based on ground-truth proportions;

determining a total loss based on the loss for each less than relation;

determining a backward pass; and

updating the machine learning system using the total loss and backward pass; and

determining an overall grade of cancer for the one or more medical images.

10 . The system of claim 9 , wherein the overall grade of cancer is output as a Gleason score prediction.

11 . The system of claim 9 , wherein predicting proportions of each type of cancer includes predicting proportions of each cancer sub-category.

12 . The system of claim 11 , wherein during training, the ranking loss is determined for each cancer sub category.

13 . The system of claim 12 , wherein the total ranking loss of the machine learning system is calculated using a ranking loss formula Lrank=x+1 if x>0 & Lrank=ex if x<0.

14 . The system of claim 13 , wherein the machine learning system is trained using weak labels to learn more granular labels using the rank loss formula.

15 . The system of claim 11 , further comprising:

outputting the proportion of each cancer sub-category.

16 . The system of claim 9 , further comprising:

outputting a segmentation map displaying a location of each cancer sub-category.

17 . A non-transitory computer-readable medium storing instructions that, when executed by a processor, perform operations processing electronic digital medical images, the operations comprising:

receiving one or more medical images of at least one pathology specimen associated with a patient;

dividing the one or more medical images into a plurality of tiles;

predicting, using a machine learning system, proportions of each type of cancer sub-category for the plurality of tiles, the machine learning system having been trained by ranking loss, the machine learning system having been trained by:

dividing a plurality of electronic images into tiles; and

for each of the plurality of electronic images:

predicting proportions of any of a plurality of cancer sub-categories;

determining a loss for each less than relation based on ground-truth proportions;

determining a total loss based on the loss for each less than relation;

determining a backward pass; and

updating the machine learning system using the total loss and backward pass; and

determining an overall grade of cancer for the one or more medical images.

18 . The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 17 , wherein the overall grade of cancer is output as a Gleason score prediction.

19 . The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 17 , wherein predicting proportions of each type of cancer includes predicting proportions of each cancer sub-category.

20 . The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 17 , wherein during training, the ranking loss is determined for each cancer sub category.

Assignments (3)
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded May 14, 2026
From: ARES CAPITAL CORPORATION, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
To: PAIGE.AI, INC.
Reel/Frame 075589/0752 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Oct 21, 2025
From: PAIGE.AI, INC.
To: ARES CAPITAL CORPORATION, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 073216/0876 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 28, 2023
From: AGHDAM, HAMED; KANAN, CHRISTOPHER
To: PAIGE.AI, INC.
Reel/Frame 062823/0660 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 63305150 · Jan 31, 2022
Related Publication 20230245480A1 · Aug 3, 2023
References Cited (6)
US 20210209753A1 · Dogdas · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20220005201A1 · Rothrock et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
WO 2020243090A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
Li et al., “An attention-based multi-resolution model for prostate whole slide image classification and localization”, CVPR, 2019, pp. 1-8 (Year: 2019). [cited by examiner]
Kalapahar, et al., “Gleason Grading of Histology Prostate Images Through Semantic Segmentation Via Residual U-Net”, IEEE, 2020, pp. 2501-2505 (Year: 2020). [cited by examiner]
Le Vuong, T.T., Kim, K., Song, B., Kwak, J.T. (2021). “Ranking Loss: A Ranking-Based Deep Neural Network for Colorectal Cancer Grading in Pathology Images,” Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention—MIC… [cited by applicant]