IP Library Granted Patent US 12,584,970
Granted Patent B2
US 12,584,970 · App. 18/408,132 · Granted Mar 24, 2026

Electrical methods for structural defect detection in battery cells

Inventors: Brian Clifford MacCleery (Austin, TX); Martin Weiss (Austin, TX)
Assignee: NATIONAL INSTRUMENTS CORPORATION
G01R31/389G01R31/3648G01R31/367G01R31/3865
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,584,970
App. No.
18/408,132
Granted
Mar 24, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

Systems, methods, and devices for characterizing a defect of a device-under-test (DUT). A first measurement is performed of a first quantity on the DUT prior to performing a first operation on the DUT, producing a first result. The first operation is performed on the DUT, and subsequently a second measurement of the first quantity is performed on the DUT, producing a second result. A defect class is characterized for the DUT from a plurality of defect classes based on a difference between the first and second results.

Claims (95)

1 . A method for characterizing a defect of a device-under-test (DUT), the method comprising:

performing a first measurement of a first quantity on the DUT prior to performing a first operation on the DUT, wherein performing the first measurement produces a first result;

performing the first operation on the DUT;

after performing the first operation on the DUT, performing a second measurement of the first quantity on the DUT, wherein performing the second measurement produces a second result;

characterizing a first defect class for the DUT from a plurality of defect classes based at least in part on a difference between the first and second results, wherein the plurality of defect classes comprise defects in different regions of the DUT.

2 . The method of claim 1 ,

wherein the first defect class indicates a defect in a first region of the DUT, and

wherein the first and second measurements are not specific to the first region of the DUT.

3 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

characterizing a magnitude of the first defect based at least in part on the difference between the first and second results.

4 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

heating or cooling a first region of the DUT prior to performing the first measurement, the first operation, and the second measurement;

wherein characterizing the defect class is performed further based in part on the heating or cooling of the first region.

5 . The method of claim 1 ,

wherein characterizing the first defect class for the DUT utilizes a machine learning algorithm to map the difference between the first and second results to different ones of the plurality of defect classes.

6 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

determining the first and second measurements based at least in part on a structure of the DUT.

7 . The method of claim 1 ,

wherein the DUT comprises a battery comprising a plurality of conductive plates,

wherein the first and second measurements comprise applying an alternating current (AC) voltage with a frequency sweep to the DUT and measuring a first and second reactive impedance of the DUT, respectively, wherein the difference between the first and second results comprises a difference in the first and second reactive impedances of the DUT as a function of frequency;

wherein characterizing the first defect class for the DUT comprises:

identifying a first frequency that causes a dip in difference in the first and second reactive impedances of the DUT;

determining a thickness of the conductive plates based at least in part on the first frequency; and

determining the first defect class based at least in part on the thickness of the conductive plates.

8 . The method of claim 1 ,

wherein the DUT comprises a battery,

wherein the first and second measurements comprise applying an alternating current (AC) voltage with a frequency sweep to the DUT and measuring a first and second reactive impedance of the DUT, respectively, wherein the difference between the first and second results comprises a difference in the first and second reactive impedances of the DUT as a function of frequency;

wherein characterizing the first defect class for the DUT comprises:

identifying a first slope of the difference in the first and second reactive impedances of the DUT as the function of frequency; and

determining the first defect class to be a torn tab of the battery based at least in part on the first slope.

9 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

wherein characterizing the first defect class for the DUT comprises:

determining that a signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) for reactive impedance of the DUT increases with excitation frequency; and

determining that a bad tab weld occurred on the DUT based on the determination that the SNR for reactive impedance increases with excitation frequency.

10 . The method of claim 1 ,

wherein the first operation comprises one or more of:

a manufacturing step of the DUT;

controlled regional heating of the DUT;

a physical actuation of the DUT; or

an electrical actuation of the DUT.

11 . The method of claim 1 ,

wherein the plurality of defect classes comprises two or more of:

a weld defect;

a bad tab weld;

a torn tab;

a folded separator;

a dendrite;

an internal short;

internal contamination; and

wetting.

12 . A controller, comprising:

a non-transitory computer-readable memory medium; and

a processor coupled to memory medium, wherein the processor is configured to execute program instructions stored on the memory medium to cause the controller to:

perform a first measurement of a first quantity on a device-under-test (DUT) prior to performing a first operation on the DUT, wherein performing the first measurement produces a first result;

perform the first operation on the DUT;

after performing the first operation on the DUT, perform a second measurement of the first quantity on the DUT, wherein performing the second measurement produces a second result; and

characterize a first defect class for the DUT from a plurality of defect classes based at least in part on a difference between the first and second results, wherein the plurality of defect classes comprise defects in different regions of the DUT.

13 . The controller of claim 12 ,

wherein the first defect class indicates a defect in a first region of the DUT, and

wherein the first and second measurements are not specific to the first region of the DUT.

14 . The controller of claim 12 , wherein the program instructions are further executable to cause the controller to:

heat or cool a first region of the DUT prior to performing the first measurement, the first operation, and the second measurement;

wherein characterizing the defect class is performed further based in part on the heating or cooling of the first region.

15 . The controller of claim 12 ,

wherein the DUT comprises a battery comprising a plurality of conductive plates,

wherein the first and second measurements comprise applying an alternating current (AC) voltage with a frequency sweep to the DUT and measuring a first and second reactive impedance of the DUT, respectively, wherein the difference between the first and second results comprises a difference in the first and second reactive impedances of the DUT as a function of frequency;

wherein, in characterizing the first defect class for the DUT, the program instructions are further executable to cause the controller to:

identify a first frequency that causes a dip in difference in the first and second reactive impedances of the DUT;

determine a thickness of the conductive plates based at least in part on the first frequency; and

determine the first defect class based at least in part on the thickness of the conductive plates.

16 . The controller of claim 12 ,

wherein the DUT comprises a battery,

wherein the first and second measurements comprise applying an alternating current (AC) voltage with a frequency sweep to the DUT and measuring a first and second reactive impedance of the DUT, respectively, wherein the difference between the first and second results comprises a difference in the first and second reactive impedances of the DUT as a function of frequency;

wherein, in characterizing the first defect class for the DUT, the program instructions are further executable to cause the controller to:

identify a first slope of the difference in the first and second reactive impedances of the DUT as the function of frequency; and

determine the first defect class to be a torn tab of the battery based at least in part on the first slope.

17 . The controller of claim 12 ,

wherein the processor comprises one of:

a parallel multi-processor system;

a field programmable gate array (FPGA); or

an application specific integrated circuit (ASIC).

18 . A non-transitory computer-readable memory medium storing program instructions which, when executed by at least one processor, cause the at least one processor to:

perform a first measurement of a first quantity on a device-under-test (DUT) prior to performing a first operation on the DUT, wherein performing the first measurement produces a first result;

perform the first operation on the DUT;

after performing the first operation on the DUT, perform a second measurement of the first quantity on the DUT, wherein performing the second measurement produces a second result; and

characterize a first defect class for the DUT from a plurality of defect classes based at least in part on a difference between the first and second results, wherein the plurality of defect classes comprise defects in different regions of the DUT.

19 . The non-transitory computer-readable memory medium of claim 18 ,

wherein the first defect class indicates a defect in a first region of the DUT, and

wherein the first and second measurements are not specific to the first region of the DUT.

20 . The non-transitory computer-readable memory medium of claim 18 ,

wherein the DUT comprises a battery,

wherein the first and second measurements comprise applying an alternating current (AC) voltage with a frequency sweep to the DUT and measuring a first and second reactive impedance of the DUT, respectively, wherein the difference between the first and second results comprises a difference in the first and second reactive impedances of the DUT as a function of frequency;

wherein, in characterizing the first defect class for the DUT, the program instructions are further executable to cause the at least one processor to:

identify a first slope of the difference in the first and second reactive impedances of the DUT as the function of frequency; and

determine the first defect class to be a torn tab of the battery based at least in part on the first slope.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 23, 2025
From: MACCLEERY, BRIAN; WEISS, MARTIN
To: NATIONAL INSTRUMENTS CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 069975/0157 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 63479172 · Jan 9, 2023
Related Publication 20240230779A1 · Jul 11, 2024
References Cited (20)
US 5493199A · Koenck et al. · 1996 [cited by applicant]
US 5856737A · Miller et al. · 1999 [cited by applicant]
US 6271643B1 · Becker et al. · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 9465077B2 · Love et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 11623526B2 · Stefanopoulou et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20120133521A1 · Rothkopf · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 20120176140A1 · Kitsuani et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120186071A1 · Yamashita et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20190036373A1 · Shimura · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20200358147A1 · Dou et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20210190874A1 · Kim · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20220404430A1 · Salvador et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20230038456A1 · Lee et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20240060934A1 · Park · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 20240142535A1 · Jeong · 2024 [cited by examiner]
CN 110687465A · 2020 [cited by applicant]
CN 111856284A · 2020 [cited by applicant]
CN 109856549B · 2021 [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion; International Application No. PCT/US2024/010896; mailed Apr. 19, 2024; 9 pgs. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion; International Application No. PCT/US2023/077195; mailed Jun. 28, 2024; 12 pgs. [cited by applicant]