IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,594,945
Granted Patent B2
US 12,594,945 · App. 18/456,811 · Granted Apr 7, 2026

Detection and remediation of an instability condition in a vehicle-trailer system

Inventors: Christopher James Smalley (Canton, MI); Patrick David Jordan (Austin, TX); Nicholas Earl Merkel (Canton, MI); Brian James Haugen (Plano, TX); Steven William Marion (Canton, MI)
Assignees: Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing North America, Inc.; Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha
B60W50/082B60W30/12B60W50/14B60W2300/14B60W2520/125B60W2520/14
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,594,945
App. No.
18/456,811
Filed
Aug 28, 2023
Granted
Apr 7, 2026
Kind
B2
Art Unit
3658
USPC
701/23
Abstract

A stability monitoring system for detecting an instability condition in a moving vehicle-trailer system includes a processor and a memory communicably coupled to the processor. The memory may store a stability evaluation module configured to determine if a measured value of at least one stability evaluation parameter satisfies an associated predetermined condition. The stability evaluation module may be configured to, if the measured value of the stability evaluation parameter satisfies the associated predetermined condition, determine a total amount of time within a predetermined time period that the measured value of the stability evaluation parameter satisfied the associated predetermined condition. The stability evaluation module may be configured to, if the total amount of time that the measured value of the stability evaluation parameter satisfied the associated predetermined condition exceeds a significant proportion of the predetermined time period, control operation of the vehicle to generate a stability alert.

Claims (172)

1 . A stability monitoring system for detecting an instability condition in a moving vehicle-trailer system, the stability monitoring system comprising:

a processor; and

a memory communicably coupled to the processor and storing a stability evaluation module including computer-readable instructions that when executed by the processor cause the processor to:

determine a total amount of time within a predetermined time period that a measured value of at least one stability evaluation parameter satisfied an associated predetermined condition; and

when the total amount of time that the measured value satisfied the predetermined condition exceeds a significant proportion of the time period, control operation of the vehicle to deactivate or prevent activation of a lane tracing assist system of the vehicle.

2 . The stability monitoring system of claim 1 , wherein the at least one stability evaluation parameter comprises a yaw rate of the vehicle, and wherein the associated predetermined condition comprises a condition wherein:

(ω M −ω E )/ω E >T 1 Y )

where ω M =a measured yaw rate, ω E =an expected yaw rate, T 1 Y=an associated predetermined yaw rate threshold, and wherein the expected yaw rate is determined by the relationship:

ω E =ν/R p

where ν=a velocity of the vehicle and R P =a perceived curve radius of the vehicle.

3 . The stability monitoring system of claim 1 , wherein the at least one stability evaluation parameter comprises a lateral acceleration of the vehicle, and wherein the associated predetermined condition comprises a condition wherein:

( a M −a E )/ a E >T 2 A

where a M =a measured lateral acceleration, a E =an expected lateral acceleration, T 2 A=an associated predetermined lateral acceleration threshold, and wherein the expected lateral acceleration is determined by the relationship:

a E =ν 2 /R p

where ν=a velocity of the vehicle and R P =a perceived curve radius of the vehicle.

4 . The stability monitoring system of claim 1 , wherein the at least one stability evaluation parameter comprises a lateral acceleration of the vehicle, and wherein the associated predetermined condition comprises a condition wherein a measured lateral acceleration exceeds an associated predetermined lateral acceleration threshold.

5 . The stability monitoring system of claim 1 , wherein the at least one stability evaluation parameter comprises a yaw rate of the vehicle, and wherein the associated predetermined condition comprises a condition wherein a measured yaw rate exceeds an associated predetermined yaw rate threshold.

6 . The stability monitoring system of claim 1 , wherein the at least one stability evaluation parameter comprises a yaw rate of the vehicle, and wherein the associated predetermined condition comprises a condition wherein;

(

∫

0

tM

(

ω

M

-

ω

E

)

⁢

d

⁢

ω

)

>

T

⁢

5

⁢

Y

where ω M =a measured yaw rate, and ω E =an expected yaw rate, tM=a most recent previous predetermined time period, T 5 Y=an associated predetermined threshold value, and wherein the expected yaw rate is determined by the relationship:

ω

E

=

v

R

p

where ν=a velocity of the vehicle and R P =a perceived curve radius of the vehicle.

7 . The stability monitoring system of claim 1 , wherein the at least one stability evaluation parameter comprises a lateral acceleration of the vehicle, and wherein the associated predetermined condition comprises a condition wherein:

(

∫

0

tM

(

a

M

-

a

E

)

⁢

d

⁢

ω

)

>

T

⁢

8

⁢

A

where a M =a measured lateral acceleration, a E =an expected lateral acceleration, tM=a most recent previous predetermined time period, and T 8 A=an associated predetermined threshold value, and wherein the expected lateral acceleration is determined by the relationship:

a E =ν 2 /R p

where ν=a velocity of the vehicle and R P =a perceived curve radius of the vehicle.

8 . A stability monitoring system for detecting an instability condition in a moving vehicle-trailer system, the stability monitoring system comprising:

a processor; and

a memory communicably coupled to the processor and storing a stability evaluation module including computer-readable instructions that when executed by the processor cause the processor to:

if a measured value of at least one stability evaluation parameter satisfies an associated predetermined evaluation parameter condition, determine an accumulation value of the at least one stability evaluation parameter;

if the accumulation value satisfies a first predetermined accumulation condition, set the accumulation value equal to a first limit value; and

if the accumulation value satisfies a second predetermined accumulation condition after being set to the first limit value, control operation of the vehicle to deactivate or prevent activation of a lane tracing assist system of the vehicle.

9 . The stability monitoring system of claim 8 , wherein the at least one stability evaluation parameter comprises a yaw rate of the vehicle, wherein the accumulation value of the at least one stability evaluation parameter comprises a delta yaw accumulation based on a difference between a measured yaw rate and an expected yaw rate, and wherein the second predetermined accumulation condition comprises a condition wherein the delta yaw accumulation exceeds an associated predetermined threshold value, and wherein the expected yaw rate is determined by the relationship:

ω E =ν/R p

where ν=a velocity of the vehicle and R P =a perceived curve radius of the vehicle.

10 . The stability monitoring system of claim 8 , wherein the at least one stability evaluation parameter comprises a lateral acceleration of the vehicle, wherein the accumulation value of the at least one stability evaluation parameter comprises a delta lateral acceleration accumulation based on a difference between a measured lateral acceleration and an expected lateral acceleration, and wherein the second predetermined accumulation condition comprises a condition wherein the delta lateral acceleration accumulation exceeds an associated predetermined threshold value, and wherein the expected lateral acceleration is determined by the relationship:

aΣ=ν 2 /R p

where ν=a velocity of the vehicle and R P =a perceived curve radius of the vehicle.

11 . The stability monitoring system of claim 8 , wherein the stability evaluation module includes computer-readable instructions that when executed by the processor cause the processor to:

if the accumulation value does not satisfy the first predetermined accumulation condition, determine if the accumulation value satisfies a third predetermined accumulation condition;

if the accumulation value satisfies the third predetermined accumulation condition, set the accumulation value equal to a second limit value different from the first limit value; and

if the accumulation value satisfies the second predetermined accumulation condition after being set to the second limit value, deactivate a lane tracing assist system of the vehicle.

12 . A computer-implemented method for detecting an instability condition in a moving vehicle-trailer system, the method comprising steps of:

determining a total amount of time over a predetermined time period that a measured value of at least one stability evaluation parameter satisfied an associated predetermined condition;

determining if the total amount of time exceeds a significant proportion of the predetermined time period, within a range of 10%-30% (inclusive) of the predetermined time period;

if the total amount of time exceeds the significant proportion of the predetermined time period, controlling operation of the vehicle to deactivate a lane tracing assist system of the vehicle; and

if the total amount of time does not exceed the significant proportion of the predetermined time period, controlling operation of the vehicle to activate the lane tracing assist system.

13 . The method of claim 12 , wherein the at least one stability evaluation parameter comprises a yaw rate of the vehicle, and wherein the associated predetermined condition comprises a condition wherein:

(ω M −ω E )/ω E >T 1 Y )

where ω M =a measured yaw rate, ω E =an expected yaw rate, T 1 Y=an associated predetermined yaw rate threshold, and wherein the expected yaw rate is determined by the relationship:

ω E =ν/R p

where ν=a velocity of the vehicle and R P =a perceived curve radius of the vehicle.

14 . The method of claim 12 , wherein the at least one stability evaluation parameter comprises a lateral acceleration of the vehicle, and wherein the associated predetermined condition comprises a condition wherein:

( a M −a E )/ a E >T 2 A

where a M =a measured lateral acceleration, a E =an expected lateral acceleration, T 2 A=an associated predetermined lateral acceleration threshold, and wherein the expected lateral acceleration is determined by the relationship:

a E =ν 2 /R p

where ν=a velocity of the vehicle and R P =a perceived curve radius of the vehicle.

15 . The method of claim 12 , wherein the at least one stability evaluation parameter comprises a lateral acceleration of the vehicle, and wherein the associated predetermined condition comprises a condition wherein a measured lateral acceleration exceeds an associated predetermined lateral acceleration threshold.

16 . The method of claim 12 , wherein the at least one stability evaluation parameter comprises a yaw rate of the vehicle, and wherein the associated predetermined condition comprises a condition wherein a measured yaw rate exceeds an associated predetermined yaw rate threshold.

17 . The method of claim 12 , wherein the at least one stability evaluation parameter comprises a yaw rate of the vehicle, and wherein the associated predetermined condition comprises a condition wherein:

(

∫

0

tM

(

ω

M

-

ω

E

)

⁢

d

⁢

ω

)

>

T

⁢

5

⁢

Y

where ω M =a measured yaw rate, ω E =an expected yaw rate, tM=a most recent previous predetermined time period, T 5 Y=an associated, predetermined threshold value, and wherein the expected yaw rate is determined by the relationship:

ω

E

=

v

R

p

where ν=a velocity of the vehicle and R P =a perceived curve radius of the vehicle.

18 . The method of claim 12 , wherein the at least one stability evaluation parameter comprises a lateral acceleration of the vehicle, and wherein the associated predetermined condition comprises a condition wherein:

(

∫

0

tM

(

a

M

-

a

E

)

⁢

d

⁢

ω

)

>

T

⁢

8

⁢

A

where a M =a measured lateral acceleration, a E =an expected lateral acceleration, tM=a most recent previous predetermined time period, and T 8 A=an associated predetermined threshold value, and wherein the expected lateral acceleration is determined by the relationship:

a

E

=

v

2

/

R

v

where ν=a velocity of the vehicle and R P =a perceived curve radius of the vehicle.

19 . The method of claim 12 , further comprising a step of controlling operation of the vehicle to deactivate or prevent activation of a lane tracing assist system of the vehicle if the total amount of time that the measured value of the stability evaluation parameter satisfied the predetermined condition exceeds the significant proportion of the predetermined time period.

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 21, 2026
From: TOYOTA MOTOR ENGINEERING & MANUFACTURING NORTH AMERICA, INC.
To: TOYOTA JIDOSHA KABUSHIKI KAISHA
Reel/Frame 074425/0164 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 29, 2023
From: SMALLEY, CHRISTOPHER JAMES; JORDAN, PATRICK DAVID; MERKEL, NICHOLAS EARL; HAUGEN, BRIAN JAMES; MARION, STEVEN WILLIAM
To: TOYOTA MOTOR ENGINEERING & MANUFACTURING NORTH AMERICA, INC.; TOYOTA JIDOSHA KABUSHIKI KAISHA
Reel/Frame 064738/0557 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20250074440A1 · Mar 6, 2025
References Cited (17)
US 6466863B2 · Shirai et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 7447577B2 · Hattori et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 9527528B1 · Harrison · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9849911B2 · Lee et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 11634128B2 · Zarringhalam · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 12269498B1 · Rommel · 2025 [cited by examiner]
US 20150246654A1 · Tadic · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20150291155A1 · Jonsson · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20150353096A1 · Baust · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20200156606A1 · Switkes · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20210094577A1 · Shalev-Shwartz · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210291818A1 · Barth · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210387630A1 · Sung · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20220136823A1 · Joshi · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220281448A1 · Zarringhalam · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20240167841A1 · Brun · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 20240278785A1 · Choi · 2024 [cited by examiner]