IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,602,037
Granted Patent B2
US 12,602,037 · App. 17/531,911 · Granted Apr 14, 2026

Methods and apparatus to generate a predictive asset health quantifier of a turbine engine

Inventors: Srikanth Akkaram (West Chester, OH); Mariusz Wiklo (Warsaw, PL); Youngwon Shin (Niskayuna, NY); Ricardo Cuevas (Queretaro, MX); William Keith Kincaid (Liberty Township, OH); Jesus Miguel Valenzuela (Queretaro, MX); Gregory Jon Chiaramonte (West Chester, OH); Vasanth Muralidharan (Bangalore, IN); Charles Larry Abernathy (West Chester, OH); Venkata Vamsi Bhagavan (Bangalore, IN); Andrew Scott Kessie (Springboro, OH)
Assignee: General Electric Company
G05B23/0254G05B23/0289G05B23/0294F05B2260/80G05B23/0267G05B2219/45071G06Q10/06375
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,602,037
App. No.
17/531,911
Granted
Apr 14, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

Methods, apparatus, systems, and articles of manufacture are disclosed to generate a predictive asset health quantifier of a turbine engine. An example apparatus includes a performance model analyzer to determine a fleet behavior parameter by generating a reference performance model using historical information for a fleet of operators using turbine engines, generate a residual performance model based on calculating a difference between the fleet behavior parameter and a plurality of operator behavior parameters, identify an operator as a candidate improvement target based on comparing the operator behavior parameters corresponding to the operator to the fleet in the residual performance model, and determine an adjusted operator behavior parameter for the candidate improvement target. The example apparatus further includes a system updater to update a computer-based model to replace the operator behavior parameter with the adjusted operator behavior parameter, and a task optimizer to determine a workscope for the turbine engine.

Claims (60)

1 . An asset workscope generation system, comprising:

one or more memory devices; and

one or processors configured to:

obtain asset monitoring information, the asset monitoring information comprising asset sensor data obtained by at least one sensor associated with a turbine engine;

calculate asset parameters associated with the turbine engine based on the asset monitoring information;

generate a reference performance model based on the asset parameters associated with the turbine engine;

calculate deviations based on a comparison of an operator behavior to the reference performance model, the operator behavior quantifying how an operator of the turbine engine has used the turbine engine in operation;

generate one or more severity models based on the asset parameters and the deviations, the one or more severity models comprising a plurality of severity models being generated based on a mapping of an asset health quantifier associated with the turbine engine to a severity factor, the severity factor comprising the operator behavior, wherein the one or more severity models are configured to estimate an effect of the operator behavior on the asset health quantifier;

identify the operator as a candidate improvement target based on the one or more severity models;

generate a report including a candidate improvement plan for the operator identified as the candidate improvement target; and

trigger generation of a workscope for the turbine engine based on the report.

2 . The asset workscope generation system of claim 1 , wherein the asset health quantifier is associated with an asset component of the turbine engine, and wherein the one or more processors are further configured to:

generate the asset health quantifier as a function of time-on-wing and the severity factor.

3 . The asset workscope generation system of claim 1 , wherein the severity factor is a takeoff temperature or a climb temperature for a region in which the turbine engine operates.

4 . The asset workscope generation system of claim 1 , wherein the asset health quantifier is associated with an asset component of the turbine engine, and wherein the one or more processors are further configured to:

determine whether the asset health quantifier satisfies a threshold based on the mapping, and

when the asset health quantifier satisfies the threshold, identify the asset component as a candidate for a maintenance operation.

5 . The asset workscope generation system of claim 1 , wherein the one or more severity models include a plurality of severity models that each correspond to an asset component of the turbine engine, and

wherein the workscope includes a recommendation to improve operator behavior for the operator identified as the candidate improvement target, and

wherein the recommendation to improve operator behavior is based on determining a sensitivity for each of the asset components to the severity factor.

6 . The asset workscope generation system of claim 1 , wherein the asset health quantifier associated with the turbine engine is a pre-workscope asset health quantifier of the turbine engine prior to performing the workscope on turbine engine, and wherein the one or more processors are further configured to:

calculate a post-workscope asset health quantifier associated with the turbine engine after completing the workscope on the turbine engine;

compare the pre-workscope asset health quantifier to the post-workscope asset health quantifier; and

determine a workscope quantifier based on comparing the pre-workscope asset health quantifier to the post-workscope asset health quantifier, the workscope quantifier representing an accuracy or efficiency of the asset workscope generation system.

7 . The asset workscope generation system of claim 6 , wherein the one or more processors are further configured to:

compare the workscope quantifier to a workscope quantifier threshold;

determine whether the workscope quantifier satisfies the workscope quantifier threshold based on comparing the workscope quantifier to the workscope quantifier threshold; and

in response to the workscope quantifier threshold satisfying the workscope quantifier threshold, modify one or more components of the asset workscope generation system.

8 . The asset workscope generation system of claim 7 , wherein in modifying the one or more components of the asset workscope generation system, the one or more processors are configured to update one or more models of the asset workscope generation system.

9 . The asset workscope generation system of claim 8 , wherein in updating the one or more models of the asset workscope generation system, the one or more processors are configured to update a digital twin associated with the turbine engine.

10 . The asset workscope generation system of claim 9 , wherein the digital twin associated with the turbine engine is updated with at least one of up-to-date historical trend information, model parameters, and model algorithms.

11 . The asset workscope generation system of claim 8 , wherein in updating the one or more models of the asset workscope generation system, the one or more processors are configured to update at least one of a historical data model, a physics-based model, a stochastic model, and a hybrid model.

12 . The asset workscope generation system of claim 1 , wherein in calculating the deviations, the one or more processors are configured to generate a residual performance model by calculating differences between actual asset parameters of operators of a fleet and the asset parameters included in the reference performance model.

13 . The asset workscope generation system of claim 1 , wherein the asset parameters used to generate the reference performance model are calculated by a historical data model using historical information associated with a fleet of operators using turbine engines.

14 . The asset workscope generation system of claim 1 , wherein the asset parameters include at least operator-level de-rate parameters and fleet-level de-rate parameters.

15 . The asset workscope generation system of claim 1 , wherein the asset parameters used to generate the reference performance model are calculated by a physics-based model executing a digital twin model associated with the turbine engine.

16 . The asset workscope generation system of claim 15 , wherein the reference performance model is generated by the one or more processors by mapping the asset parameters as a function of an engine performance characteristic output by the physics-based model.

17 . The asset workscope generation system of claim 16 , wherein the engine performance characteristic is an aircraft weight of an aircraft weight to which the turbine engine is mounted.

18 . A method, comprising:

obtaining asset monitoring information, the asset monitoring information comprising asset sensor data obtained by at least one sensor associated with a turbine engine;

calculating asset parameters associated with the turbine engine based on the asset monitoring information;

generating a reference performance model based on the asset parameters associated with the turbine engine;

calculating deviations based on a comparison of an operator behavior to the reference performance model, the operator behavior quantifying how an operator of the turbine engine has used the turbine engine in operation;

generating one or more severity models based on the asset parameters and the deviations, the one or more severity models comprising a plurality of severity models being generated based on a mapping of an asset health quantifier associated with the turbine engine to a severity factor, the severity factor comprising the operator behavior, wherein the one or more severity models are configured to estimate an effect of the operator behavior on the asset health quantifier;

identifying an operator as a candidate improvement target based on the one or more severity models;

generating a report including a candidate improvement plan for the operator identified as the candidate improvement target; and

triggering generation of a workscope for the turbine engine based on the report.

19 . A non-transitory computer readable storage medium comprising instructions, which when executed, cause a machine to at least:

obtain asset monitoring information, the asset monitoring information comprising asset sensor data obtained by at least one sensor associated with a turbine engine;

calculate asset parameters associated with the turbine engine based on the asset monitoring information;

generate a reference performance model based on the asset parameters associated with the turbine engine;

calculate deviations based on a comparison of an operator behavior to the reference performance model, the operator behavior quantifying how an operator of the turbine engine has used the turbine engine in operation;

generate one or more severity models based on the asset parameters and the deviations, the one or more severity models comprising a plurality of severity models being generated based on a mapping of an asset health quantifier associated with the turbine engine to a severity factor, the severity factor comprising the operator behavior, wherein the one or more severity models are configured to estimate an effect of the operator behavior on the asset health quantifier;

identify an operator as a candidate improvement target based on the reference performance model and the one or more severity models;

generate a report including a candidate improvement plan for the operator identified as the candidate improvement target, the candidate improvement plan comprising adjustments to the operator behavior; and

trigger generation of a workscope for the turbine engine based on the report.

20 . The asset workscope generation system of claim 1 , wherein the one or processors are further configured to:

identify one or more assets operated by the operator as candidate assets for removal from service;

generate a removal schedule to remove the one or more assets; and

performing the generated workscope on the one or more removed assets based on the removal schedule.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 22, 2021
From: AKKARAM, SRIKANTH; WIKLO, MARIUSZ; SHIN, YOUNGWON; CUEVAS, RICARDO; KINCAID, WILLIAM KEITH; VALENZUELA, JESUS MIGUEL; CHIARAMONTE, GREGORY JON; MURALIDHARAN, VASANTH; ABERNATHY, CHARLES LARRY; BHAGAVAN, VENKATA VAMSI; KESSIE, ANDREW SCOTT
To: GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY
Reel/Frame 058177/0060 →
Continuity (2)
Continuation 15809768 · Nov 10, 2017
Related Publication 20220083040A1 · Mar 17, 2022
References Cited (44)
US 6067486A · Aragones et al. · 2000 [cited by applicant]
US 6732040B2 · Sangeeta et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 6832205B1 · Aragones et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 6871160B2 · Jaw · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 7020595B1 · Adibhatla et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 7203554B2 · Fuller · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 8126574B2 · Discenzo · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 8868287B2 · Delaye et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 9477224B2 · Khan et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 11181898B2 · Akkaram et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20020123870A1 · Chan et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20040267395A1 · Discenzo et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20060010152A1 · Catalano et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20060212281A1 · Mathews, Jr. et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20080172268A1 · Wingenter · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20090037013A1 · Hendler et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090048730A1 · Akkaram et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090150131A1 · Parthasarathy et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20100023307A1 · Lee et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100262442A1 · Wingenter · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20110137575A1 · Koul · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110313726A1 · Parthasarathy et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20120029892A1 · Thulke · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120166249A1 · Jackson · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20130024179A1 · Mazzaro et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130110587A1 · Nowicki et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130179388A1 · Agarwal · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20140257526A1 · Tiwari et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140358398A1 · Brunschwig et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140372289A1 · Doom et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20150059355A1 · Feigl et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150192499A1 · Piol et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150269490A1 · Stillinger et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20160063384A1 · Green · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20160153806A1 · Ciasulli et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170323231A1 · Johnson et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20180283200A1 · Gill et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
CN 105814583A · 2016 [cited by applicant]
Ashby et al., Intelligent Maintenance Advisor for Turbine Engines, 2000 IEEE Aerospace Conference Proceedings (CAT No. 00TH8484), vol. 6, Big Sky, MT, 2000, pp. 211-219. [cited by applicant]
Donaldson et al., Economic Impact of Derated Climb on Large Commercial Engines, 2007 Performance and Flight Operations Engineering Conference, 14 Pages. [cited by applicant]
Fan et al., Asset Health Management System Design, Proceedings of the 2011 17 [cited by applicant]
James et al., Derated Climb Performance in Large Civil Aircraft, 2005 Performance and Flight Operations Engineering Conference, 14 Pages. [cited by applicant]
Leader et al., A Probabilistic, Diagnostic and Prognostic System for Engine Health and Usage Management, 2000 IEEE Aerospace Conference Proceedings (CAT No. 00TH8484), vol. 6, Big Sky, MT, 2000, pp. 185-192. [cited by applicant]
Viassolo et al., Advanced Estimation for Aircraft Engines, 2007 American Control Conference, New York, NY, 2007, pp. 2807-2821. [cited by applicant]