IP Library Granted Patent US 12,604,903
Granted Patent B2
US 12,604,903 · App. 17/309,920 · Granted Apr 21, 2026

Antimicrobial NCR peptides

Inventors: Dilip M. Shah (St. Louis, MO); Siva L. S. Velivelli (St. Louis, MO)
A01N63/50A01P3/00A61K38/168C07K14/415C12N15/8281C12N15/8282
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,604,903
App. No.
17/309,920
Granted
Apr 21, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

Antimicrobial nodule specific cysteine rich (NCR) peptides and proteins are disclosed along with compositions comprising the NCR peptides or NCR proteins and transgenic or genetically edited plants or microorganisms that express the NCR peptides or proteins to inhibit growth of pathogenic microbes. Such NCR peptides, proteins, compositions, plants, and microorganisms can provide for inhibition of fungal and oomycete growth.

Claims (6)

1 . A method for preventing or reducing crop damage by Phytophthora capsici comprising: applying a Phytophthora capsici inhibitory amount of a composition comprising an antimicrobial peptide dimer, the antimicrobial peptide dimer comprising two antimicrobial peptides, wherein each antimicrobial peptide comprises an amino acid sequence that is at least 90% identical to the amino acid sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO: 3 to the locus of a crop susceptible to infection by Phytophthora capsici , wherein the amino acid sequence of each antimicrobial peptide monomer comprises, within the corresponding region of SEQ ID NO: 3, the six cysteine residues of SEQ ID NO: 3 in the same relative positions as in SEQ ID NO: 3, wherein the peptide dimer comprises synergistic antifungal activity against Phytophthora capsici when compared to the antifungal activity of the peptide monomer against Phytophthora capsici , and wherein the two antimicrobial peptides are linked in tandem by a linker peptide.

2 . A method for treating, preventing, or inhibiting Phytophthora capsici comprising topically applying a Phytophthora capsici effective amount of a composition comprising an antimicrobial peptide dimer, the antimicrobial peptide dimer comprising two antimicrobial peptide monomers, wherein each antimicrobial peptide monomer comprises an amino acid sequence that is at least 90% identical to the amino acid sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO: 3, to the surface of the plant or to the locus of Phytophthora capsici at the surface of the plant, wherein the amino acid sequence comprises, within the corresponding region of SEQ ID NO: 3, the six cysteine residues of SEQ ID NO: 3 in the same relative positions as in SEQ ID NO: 3, wherein the peptide dimer comprises synergistic antifungal activity against Phytophthora capsici when compared to the antifungal activity of the peptide monomer against Phytophthora capsici , and wherein the two antimicrobial peptides are linked in tandem by a linker peptide.

3 . The method of claim 1 , wherein each antimicrobial peptide comprises an amino acid sequence having at least 95% sequence identity to SEQ ID NO: 3.

4 . The method of claim 3 , wherein each antimicrobial peptide comprises the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 3.

5 . The method of claim 2 , wherein each antimicrobial peptide comprises an amino acid sequence having at least 95% sequence identity to SEQ ID NO: 3.

6 . The method of claim 2 , wherein each antimicrobial peptide comprises the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 3, and wherein the linker peptide comprises the amino acid sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO: 9 and wherein the plant fungal pathogen is Phytophthora capsici.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 9, 2021
From: SHAH, DILIP M.; VELIVELLI, SIVA L. S.
To: DONALD DANFORTH PLANT SCIENCE CENTER
Reel/Frame 057124/0932 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 62789037 · Jan 7, 2019
Related Publication 20220061333A1 · Mar 3, 2022
References Cited (38)
US 6696559B1 · Selsted · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 7825297B2 · Shah et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 8592367B2 · Kondorosi-Kuzsel et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 10253328B2 · Shah · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20020162135A1 · Daniell · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20150045287A1 · Chen et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20190185877A1 · Boyle · 2019 [cited by examiner]
WO 2006080032A2 · 2006 [cited by applicant]
WO 2010146067A1 · 2010 [cited by applicant]
WO 2017127558A1 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
WO 2017156457A1 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2018140518A1 · 2018 [cited by examiner]
UniProt Accession: A0A0U8SNQ0, 2016, https://www.uniprot.org/uniprotkb/A0A0U8SNQ0/entry (Year: 2016). [cited by examiner]
Montiel et al., 2016, Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions 29: 210-219 (Year: 2016). [cited by examiner]
Velivelli et al., 2020 PNAS 117: 16043-16054 (Year: 2020). [cited by examiner]
Haag et al., 2012, Journal of Biological Chemistry, 287: 10791-10798 (Year: 2012). [cited by examiner]
Shabab et al.2016, PNAS 113: 10157-10162 (Year: 2016). [cited by examiner]
Isozumi et al.2021, Scientific Reports 11:9923 (Year: 2021). [cited by examiner]
Guo et al., 2004, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101: 9205-9210 (Year: 2004). [cited by examiner]
Balogh et al.2014, Acta Microbiol. Immunol. Hung. 61(2): 231-2431; in IDS Filed May 24, 2022 (Year: 2014). [cited by examiner]
Maroti et al 2015, Current Opinion in Plant Biology 26: 57-63 (Year: 2015). [cited by examiner]
Ordogh et al., 2014, BioMed Research International 320796: 1-9; in IDS Filed May 24, 2022 (Year: 2014). [cited by examiner]
Balogh et al., “Anti-chlamydial effect of plant peptides,” Acta Microbiol Immunol Hung., 2014, pp. 1-19. [cited by applicant]
Farkas et al., “Antimicrobial Activity of NCR Plant Peptides Strongly Depends on the Test Assays,” Frontiers in Microbiology, Oct. 30, 2018, vol. 9, Article 2600, pp. 1-9. [cited by applicant]
Guefrachi et al., “Extreme specificity of NCR gene expression in Medicago trucatula,” BMC Genomics, 2014, vol. 15, No. 712, pp. 1-16. [cited by applicant]
Haag et al., “Role of Cysteine Residues and Disulfide Bonds in the Activity of a Legume Root Nodule-specific, Cysteine-rich Peptide,” J. of Bio. Chem., Mar. 30, 2012, vol. 287, pp. 10791-10798. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion of PCT/US2020/12550, mailed Jun. 5, 2020, 15 pages. [cited by applicant]
Sozumi et al., “Structure and antimicrobial activity of NCR169, a nodule-specific cysteine-rich peptide of Medicago runcatula,” Scientific Reports, May 10, 2021, vol. 11, Article No. 9923, pp. 1-13. [cited by applicant]
Kereszt et al., “Impact of Plant Peptides on Symbiotic Nodule Development and Functioning,” Frontiers in Plant Science, Jul. 17, 2018, vol. 9, Article 1026, pp. 1-16. [cited by applicant]
Montiel et al., “Terminal Bacteroid Differentiation Is Associated with Variable Morphological Changes in Legume Species Belonging to the Inverted Repeat-Lacking Clade,” MPMI, Dec. 3, 2015, vol. 29, No. 3, pp. 210-219. [cited by applicant]
Montiel et al., “Morphotype of bacteroids in different legumes correlates with the number and type of symbiotic NCR peptides,” PNAS, Apr. 24, 2017, vol. 114, No. 19, pp. 5041-5046. [cited by applicant]
Ordogh et al., “Symbiotic Plant Peptides Eliminate Candida albicans Both In Vitro and in an Epithelial Infection Model and Inhibit the Proliferation of Immortalized Human Cells,” BioMed Research Int., Aug. 28, 2014, vol… [cited by applicant]
Sagaram et al., “Structural and Functional Studies of a Phosphatidic Acid-Binding Antifungal Plant Defensin MtDef4: Identification of an RGFRRR Motif Governing Fungal Cell Entry,” PLOS One, Dec. 4, 2013, vol. 8, Issue 1… [cited by applicant]
Sagaram et al., “Structure-Activity Determinants in Antifungal Plant Defensins MsDef1 and MtDef4 with Different Modes of Action against Fusarium graminearum,” PLOS One, Apr. 13, 2011, vol. 6, Issue 4, pp. 1-13. [cited by applicant]
Shabab et al., “Disulfide cross-linking influences symbiotic activities of nodule peptide NCR247,” PNAS, Sep. 6, 2016, vol. 113, No. 36, pp. 10157-10162. [cited by applicant]
Szerencses et al. “Symbiotic NCR Peptide Fragments Affect the Viability, Morphology and Biofilm Formation of [cited by applicant]
UniProtKB—A0A0U8TEW4 (A0A0USTEW4_CICAR), “Nodule cysteine-rich protein 7” Mar. 2016, 1 page. [cited by applicant]
Lima, R., et al., “Legume Plant Peptides as Sources of Novel Antimicrobial Molecules Against Human Pathogens,” Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences, Jun. 9, 2022, vol. 9, pp. 1-12. [cited by applicant]